The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas

One of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2020-12, Vol.276, p.111291-111291, Article 111291
Hauptverfasser: Dairel, Mariana, Fidelis, Alessandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111291
container_issue
container_start_page 111291
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 276
creator Dairel, Mariana
Fidelis, Alessandra
description One of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence of invasive propagules in the soil seed bank. This study analyzed the dynamics of the soil seed bank in invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas elucidating the potential of grass regeneration from the seed bank. Soil samples were collected in areas with different invasive grasses: Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D.Webster – synonym Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora Beauv. and areas with native vegetation. Soil seed bank was assessed using two techniques: seed counting and seedling emergence. Dominant species in each area influenced the seed bank composition, showing the highest densities from April to September. In invaded areas, the seed bank was composed mainly of invasive grasses that contributed to 98% (670 ± 382 seeds.m−2) of total seeds. In non-invaded areas, the soil seed bank presented the highest density (65%, 135 ± 38 seeds.m−2) of native species. However, the presence of invasive grasses was significant, with 35% of the total seeds belonging to U. brizantha. Although non-invaded areas have a higher potential for regeneration by native grasses, the presence of invasive grasses in the seed bank is an indication that the invasive species is already in the system and changes in the aboveground cover could accelerate the invasion process. Early management efforts towards establishing and/or established invasive species before seed dispersal could help reduce the soil seed bank load and should be carried out to control and avoid the establishment of African grasses, since they can dominate the seed bank in non-invaded areas if they are present in neighboring areas, affecting the dynamics of plant communities. •The soil seed bank in invaded areas is dominated mainly by invasive species.•Invasive species impeded on the establishment of native species.•Seed density of native species was higher than 50% only in non-invaded areas.•Invasive species' propagules were present in areas with native vegetation.•Management of seed bank should be targeted to avoid invasive species from re-seeding.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2448407585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479720312159</els_id><sourcerecordid>2448407585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-ca32dbbda9c2a6d564acf4026c2e08a186399ee5ac9a03dd6d29d931e310f323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouH78BCFHL13z0XY3JxHxCxa87D3MJlPNuk1qphb8Df5pW1e8ehpm5pkX5mHsQoq5FLK-2s63GIcW4lwJNc6kVEYesJkUpiqWtRaHbCa0kEW5MItjdkK0FUJoJRcz9rV-Rd5lJIwOeWp4iANQGJC_ZCBC4tA06Hri_QhSCjtOiJ5vIL5xl9ouUehDihyi5_4zQhscTTmb1L_-hPmRnpYxxeKvzwg_VOowcoIBYgQ6Y0cN7AjPf-spW9_frW8fi9Xzw9PtzapwulR94UArv9l4ME5B7au6BNeUQtVOoViCHD82BrECZ0Bo72uvjDdaopai0Uqfsst9bJfT-wdSb9tADnc7iJg-yKqyXJZiUS2rEa32qMuJKGNjuxxayJ9WCju5t1v7695O7u3e_Xh3vb_D8Y0hYLbkwmTYhzzKtD6FfxK-AeB7kpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448407585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Dairel, Mariana ; Fidelis, Alessandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Dairel, Mariana ; Fidelis, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><description>One of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence of invasive propagules in the soil seed bank. This study analyzed the dynamics of the soil seed bank in invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas elucidating the potential of grass regeneration from the seed bank. Soil samples were collected in areas with different invasive grasses: Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D.Webster – synonym Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora Beauv. and areas with native vegetation. Soil seed bank was assessed using two techniques: seed counting and seedling emergence. Dominant species in each area influenced the seed bank composition, showing the highest densities from April to September. In invaded areas, the seed bank was composed mainly of invasive grasses that contributed to 98% (670 ± 382 seeds.m−2) of total seeds. In non-invaded areas, the soil seed bank presented the highest density (65%, 135 ± 38 seeds.m−2) of native species. However, the presence of invasive grasses was significant, with 35% of the total seeds belonging to U. brizantha. Although non-invaded areas have a higher potential for regeneration by native grasses, the presence of invasive grasses in the seed bank is an indication that the invasive species is already in the system and changes in the aboveground cover could accelerate the invasion process. Early management efforts towards establishing and/or established invasive species before seed dispersal could help reduce the soil seed bank load and should be carried out to control and avoid the establishment of African grasses, since they can dominate the seed bank in non-invaded areas if they are present in neighboring areas, affecting the dynamics of plant communities. •The soil seed bank in invaded areas is dominated mainly by invasive species.•Invasive species impeded on the establishment of native species.•Seed density of native species was higher than 50% only in non-invaded areas.•Invasive species' propagules were present in areas with native vegetation.•Management of seed bank should be targeted to avoid invasive species from re-seeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>African invasive species ; Germination ; Grasses ; Natural regeneration ; Regeneration niche</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2020-12, Vol.276, p.111291-111291, Article 111291</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-ca32dbbda9c2a6d564acf4026c2e08a186399ee5ac9a03dd6d29d931e310f323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-ca32dbbda9c2a6d564acf4026c2e08a186399ee5ac9a03dd6d29d931e310f323</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9545-2285 ; 0000-0002-2008-0170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dairel, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidelis, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><title>The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><description>One of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence of invasive propagules in the soil seed bank. This study analyzed the dynamics of the soil seed bank in invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas elucidating the potential of grass regeneration from the seed bank. Soil samples were collected in areas with different invasive grasses: Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D.Webster – synonym Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora Beauv. and areas with native vegetation. Soil seed bank was assessed using two techniques: seed counting and seedling emergence. Dominant species in each area influenced the seed bank composition, showing the highest densities from April to September. In invaded areas, the seed bank was composed mainly of invasive grasses that contributed to 98% (670 ± 382 seeds.m−2) of total seeds. In non-invaded areas, the soil seed bank presented the highest density (65%, 135 ± 38 seeds.m−2) of native species. However, the presence of invasive grasses was significant, with 35% of the total seeds belonging to U. brizantha. Although non-invaded areas have a higher potential for regeneration by native grasses, the presence of invasive grasses in the seed bank is an indication that the invasive species is already in the system and changes in the aboveground cover could accelerate the invasion process. Early management efforts towards establishing and/or established invasive species before seed dispersal could help reduce the soil seed bank load and should be carried out to control and avoid the establishment of African grasses, since they can dominate the seed bank in non-invaded areas if they are present in neighboring areas, affecting the dynamics of plant communities. •The soil seed bank in invaded areas is dominated mainly by invasive species.•Invasive species impeded on the establishment of native species.•Seed density of native species was higher than 50% only in non-invaded areas.•Invasive species' propagules were present in areas with native vegetation.•Management of seed bank should be targeted to avoid invasive species from re-seeding.</description><subject>African invasive species</subject><subject>Germination</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Natural regeneration</subject><subject>Regeneration niche</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouH78BCFHL13z0XY3JxHxCxa87D3MJlPNuk1qphb8Df5pW1e8ehpm5pkX5mHsQoq5FLK-2s63GIcW4lwJNc6kVEYesJkUpiqWtRaHbCa0kEW5MItjdkK0FUJoJRcz9rV-Rd5lJIwOeWp4iANQGJC_ZCBC4tA06Hri_QhSCjtOiJ5vIL5xl9ouUehDihyi5_4zQhscTTmb1L_-hPmRnpYxxeKvzwg_VOowcoIBYgQ6Y0cN7AjPf-spW9_frW8fi9Xzw9PtzapwulR94UArv9l4ME5B7au6BNeUQtVOoViCHD82BrECZ0Bo72uvjDdaopai0Uqfsst9bJfT-wdSb9tADnc7iJg-yKqyXJZiUS2rEa32qMuJKGNjuxxayJ9WCju5t1v7695O7u3e_Xh3vb_D8Y0hYLbkwmTYhzzKtD6FfxK-AeB7kpA</recordid><startdate>20201215</startdate><enddate>20201215</enddate><creator>Dairel, Mariana</creator><creator>Fidelis, Alessandra</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-2285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-0170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201215</creationdate><title>The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas</title><author>Dairel, Mariana ; Fidelis, Alessandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-ca32dbbda9c2a6d564acf4026c2e08a186399ee5ac9a03dd6d29d931e310f323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>African invasive species</topic><topic>Germination</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Natural regeneration</topic><topic>Regeneration niche</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dairel, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidelis, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dairel, Mariana</au><au>Fidelis, Alessandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><date>2020-12-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>276</volume><spage>111291</spage><epage>111291</epage><pages>111291-111291</pages><artnum>111291</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>One of the major threats to tropical savannas globally is the invasion by alien grasses. In systems frequently disturbed, individuals can be recruited from the seed bank, and areas under natural regeneration can be more easily invaded when exotic newcomers are in the system, including the presence of invasive propagules in the soil seed bank. This study analyzed the dynamics of the soil seed bank in invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas elucidating the potential of grass regeneration from the seed bank. Soil samples were collected in areas with different invasive grasses: Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D.Webster – synonym Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf, Melinis minutiflora Beauv. and areas with native vegetation. Soil seed bank was assessed using two techniques: seed counting and seedling emergence. Dominant species in each area influenced the seed bank composition, showing the highest densities from April to September. In invaded areas, the seed bank was composed mainly of invasive grasses that contributed to 98% (670 ± 382 seeds.m−2) of total seeds. In non-invaded areas, the soil seed bank presented the highest density (65%, 135 ± 38 seeds.m−2) of native species. However, the presence of invasive grasses was significant, with 35% of the total seeds belonging to U. brizantha. Although non-invaded areas have a higher potential for regeneration by native grasses, the presence of invasive grasses in the seed bank is an indication that the invasive species is already in the system and changes in the aboveground cover could accelerate the invasion process. Early management efforts towards establishing and/or established invasive species before seed dispersal could help reduce the soil seed bank load and should be carried out to control and avoid the establishment of African grasses, since they can dominate the seed bank in non-invaded areas if they are present in neighboring areas, affecting the dynamics of plant communities. •The soil seed bank in invaded areas is dominated mainly by invasive species.•Invasive species impeded on the establishment of native species.•Seed density of native species was higher than 50% only in non-invaded areas.•Invasive species' propagules were present in areas with native vegetation.•Management of seed bank should be targeted to avoid invasive species from re-seeding.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9545-2285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-0170</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2020-12, Vol.276, p.111291-111291, Article 111291
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2448407585
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects African invasive species
Germination
Grasses
Natural regeneration
Regeneration niche
title The presence of invasive grasses affects the soil seed bank composition and dynamics of both invaded and non-invaded areas of open savannas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T23%3A16%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20presence%20of%20invasive%20grasses%20affects%20the%20soil%20seed%20bank%20composition%20and%20dynamics%20of%20both%20invaded%20and%20non-invaded%20areas%20of%20open%20savannas&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Dairel,%20Mariana&rft.date=2020-12-15&rft.volume=276&rft.spage=111291&rft.epage=111291&rft.pages=111291-111291&rft.artnum=111291&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111291&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2448407585%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448407585&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301479720312159&rfr_iscdi=true