Retrospective analysis of the impact of respiratory motion in treatment margins for frameless lung SBRT based on respiratory‐correlated CBCT data‐sets

Purpose To investigate the impact of respiratory motion in the treatment margins for lung SBRT frameless treatments and to validate our treatment margins using 4D CBCT data analysis. Methods Two hundred and twenty nine fractions with early stage NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2020-10, Vol.21 (10), p.170-178
Hauptverfasser: Thengumpallil, Sheeba, Racine, Damien, Germond, Jean‐François, Péguret, Nicolas, Bourhis, Jean, Bochud, François, Moeckli, Raphaël
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To investigate the impact of respiratory motion in the treatment margins for lung SBRT frameless treatments and to validate our treatment margins using 4D CBCT data analysis. Methods Two hundred and twenty nine fractions with early stage NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated in frameless and free breathing conditions. The treatment margins were calculated according to van Herk equation in Mid‐Ventilation. For each fraction, three 4D CBCT scans, pre‐ and postcorrection, and posttreatment, were acquired to assess target baseline shift, target localization accuracy and intra‐fraction motion errors. A bootstrap analysis was performed to assess the minimum number of patients required to define treatment margins. Results The retrospectively calculated target‐baseline shift, target localization accuracy and intra‐fraction motion errors agreed with the literature. The best tailored margins to our cohort of patients were retrospectively computed and resulted in agreement with already published data. The bootstrap analysis showed that fifteen patients were enough to assess treatment margins. Conclusions The treatment margins applied to our patient’s cohort resulted in good agreement with the retrospectively calculated margins based on 4D CBCT data. Moreover, the bootstrap analysis revealed to be a promising method to verify the reliability of the applied treatment margins for safe lung SBRT delivery.
ISSN:1526-9914
1526-9914
DOI:10.1002/acm2.13034