Pros and Cons of the Exoscope for Otologic Surgery

Introduction. There are a few discussions regarding usefulness of an exoscope in otologic surgery compared to a traditional microscope. Objective. The pros and cons of using a newly developed exoscope (ORBEYE™) during microotologic surgery were evaluated. Methods. The usefulness of the ORBEYE™ exosc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical innovation 2021-06, Vol.28 (3), p.360-365
Hauptverfasser: Kanzaki, Sho, Takahashi, Satoshi, Toda, Masahiro, Yoshida, Kazanari, Ogawa, Kaoru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 365
container_issue 3
container_start_page 360
container_title Surgical innovation
container_volume 28
creator Kanzaki, Sho
Takahashi, Satoshi
Toda, Masahiro
Yoshida, Kazanari
Ogawa, Kaoru
description Introduction. There are a few discussions regarding usefulness of an exoscope in otologic surgery compared to a traditional microscope. Objective. The pros and cons of using a newly developed exoscope (ORBEYE™) during microotologic surgery were evaluated. Methods. The usefulness of the ORBEYE™ exoscope was retrospectively assessed in 6 otologic surgeries by 8 surgeons postoperatively. A questionnaire comprising 20 questions was designed and used for evaluation. Results. All the otologic surgeons agreed that the exoscope is useful as an educational tool; the exoscope had the highest score in the questionnaire (average: 4.75). The question “Will the ORBEYETM exoscope replace the conventional tympanoplasty or stapes surgery?” had the lowest score (average: 3.13). Conclusions. The quality of the images and movies in the exoscope was considered to be high and improved; therefore, the exoscope was considered as a useful educational tool in otologic surgery. Similar to otologic endoscopic surgery, all the members such as the operator and assistants could head up and share 1 image.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1553350620964151
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2447310446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1553350620964151</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2447310446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6d62a7be9a435718486aa3842ef9f7a9ab41e2f7605a94277219e87a687158ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEUxIMoWKt3jzl6Wc3L9x5lqR9QqKCew-s2qS3bTU12wf73blnxIHiax_CbBzOEXAO7BTDmDpQSQjHNWaklKDghk6NVCAXy9Pdm-pxc5LxlTCpgakL4S4qZYruiVWwzjYF2H57OvmKu497TEBNddLGJ601NX_u09ulwSc4CNtlf_eiUvD_M3qqnYr54fK7u50UtLOsKvdIczdKXKIUyYKXViMJK7kMZDJa4lOB5MJopLCU3hkPprUFtDShbo5iSm_HvPsXP3ufO7Ta59k2DrY99dlxKI4BJqQeUjWg9tMnJB7dPmx2mgwPmjvO4v_MMkWKMZFx7t419aocy__Pfthphzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447310446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pros and Cons of the Exoscope for Otologic Surgery</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kanzaki, Sho ; Takahashi, Satoshi ; Toda, Masahiro ; Yoshida, Kazanari ; Ogawa, Kaoru</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanzaki, Sho ; Takahashi, Satoshi ; Toda, Masahiro ; Yoshida, Kazanari ; Ogawa, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction. There are a few discussions regarding usefulness of an exoscope in otologic surgery compared to a traditional microscope. Objective. The pros and cons of using a newly developed exoscope (ORBEYE™) during microotologic surgery were evaluated. Methods. The usefulness of the ORBEYE™ exoscope was retrospectively assessed in 6 otologic surgeries by 8 surgeons postoperatively. A questionnaire comprising 20 questions was designed and used for evaluation. Results. All the otologic surgeons agreed that the exoscope is useful as an educational tool; the exoscope had the highest score in the questionnaire (average: 4.75). The question “Will the ORBEYETM exoscope replace the conventional tympanoplasty or stapes surgery?” had the lowest score (average: 3.13). Conclusions. The quality of the images and movies in the exoscope was considered to be high and improved; therefore, the exoscope was considered as a useful educational tool in otologic surgery. Similar to otologic endoscopic surgery, all the members such as the operator and assistants could head up and share 1 image.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-3506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1553350620964151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Surgical innovation, 2021-06, Vol.28 (3), p.360-365</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6d62a7be9a435718486aa3842ef9f7a9ab41e2f7605a94277219e87a687158ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6d62a7be9a435718486aa3842ef9f7a9ab41e2f7605a94277219e87a687158ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9056-0850</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1553350620964151$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1553350620964151$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanzaki, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toda, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Kazanari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><title>Pros and Cons of the Exoscope for Otologic Surgery</title><title>Surgical innovation</title><addtitle>Surg Innov</addtitle><description>Introduction. There are a few discussions regarding usefulness of an exoscope in otologic surgery compared to a traditional microscope. Objective. The pros and cons of using a newly developed exoscope (ORBEYE™) during microotologic surgery were evaluated. Methods. The usefulness of the ORBEYE™ exoscope was retrospectively assessed in 6 otologic surgeries by 8 surgeons postoperatively. A questionnaire comprising 20 questions was designed and used for evaluation. Results. All the otologic surgeons agreed that the exoscope is useful as an educational tool; the exoscope had the highest score in the questionnaire (average: 4.75). The question “Will the ORBEYETM exoscope replace the conventional tympanoplasty or stapes surgery?” had the lowest score (average: 3.13). Conclusions. The quality of the images and movies in the exoscope was considered to be high and improved; therefore, the exoscope was considered as a useful educational tool in otologic surgery. Similar to otologic endoscopic surgery, all the members such as the operator and assistants could head up and share 1 image.</description><issn>1553-3506</issn><issn>1553-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEUxIMoWKt3jzl6Wc3L9x5lqR9QqKCew-s2qS3bTU12wf73blnxIHiax_CbBzOEXAO7BTDmDpQSQjHNWaklKDghk6NVCAXy9Pdm-pxc5LxlTCpgakL4S4qZYruiVWwzjYF2H57OvmKu497TEBNddLGJ601NX_u09ulwSc4CNtlf_eiUvD_M3qqnYr54fK7u50UtLOsKvdIczdKXKIUyYKXViMJK7kMZDJa4lOB5MJopLCU3hkPprUFtDShbo5iSm_HvPsXP3ufO7Ta59k2DrY99dlxKI4BJqQeUjWg9tMnJB7dPmx2mgwPmjvO4v_MMkWKMZFx7t419aocy__Pfthphzw</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Kanzaki, Sho</creator><creator>Takahashi, Satoshi</creator><creator>Toda, Masahiro</creator><creator>Yoshida, Kazanari</creator><creator>Ogawa, Kaoru</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9056-0850</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Pros and Cons of the Exoscope for Otologic Surgery</title><author>Kanzaki, Sho ; Takahashi, Satoshi ; Toda, Masahiro ; Yoshida, Kazanari ; Ogawa, Kaoru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-6d62a7be9a435718486aa3842ef9f7a9ab41e2f7605a94277219e87a687158ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanzaki, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toda, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Kazanari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical innovation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanzaki, Sho</au><au>Takahashi, Satoshi</au><au>Toda, Masahiro</au><au>Yoshida, Kazanari</au><au>Ogawa, Kaoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pros and Cons of the Exoscope for Otologic Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Surgical innovation</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Innov</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>360</spage><epage>365</epage><pages>360-365</pages><issn>1553-3506</issn><eissn>1553-3514</eissn><abstract>Introduction. There are a few discussions regarding usefulness of an exoscope in otologic surgery compared to a traditional microscope. Objective. The pros and cons of using a newly developed exoscope (ORBEYE™) during microotologic surgery were evaluated. Methods. The usefulness of the ORBEYE™ exoscope was retrospectively assessed in 6 otologic surgeries by 8 surgeons postoperatively. A questionnaire comprising 20 questions was designed and used for evaluation. Results. All the otologic surgeons agreed that the exoscope is useful as an educational tool; the exoscope had the highest score in the questionnaire (average: 4.75). The question “Will the ORBEYETM exoscope replace the conventional tympanoplasty or stapes surgery?” had the lowest score (average: 3.13). Conclusions. The quality of the images and movies in the exoscope was considered to be high and improved; therefore, the exoscope was considered as a useful educational tool in otologic surgery. Similar to otologic endoscopic surgery, all the members such as the operator and assistants could head up and share 1 image.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1553350620964151</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9056-0850</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-3506
ispartof Surgical innovation, 2021-06, Vol.28 (3), p.360-365
issn 1553-3506
1553-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2447310446
source Access via SAGE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Pros and Cons of the Exoscope for Otologic Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A00%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pros%20and%20Cons%20of%20the%20Exoscope%20for%20Otologic%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20innovation&rft.au=Kanzaki,%20Sho&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=360&rft.epage=365&rft.pages=360-365&rft.issn=1553-3506&rft.eissn=1553-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1553350620964151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2447310446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447310446&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1553350620964151&rfr_iscdi=true