Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience

Summary Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplant international 2020-12, Vol.33 (12), p.1788-1798
Hauptverfasser: Sef, Davorin, Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra, Mohite, Prashant, Stock, Ulrich, Trkulja, Vladimir, Raj, Binu, Garcia Saez, Diana, Mahesh, Balakrishnan, De Robertis, Fabio, Simon, Andre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1798
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1788
container_title Transplant international
container_volume 33
creator Sef, Davorin
Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra
Mohite, Prashant
Stock, Ulrich
Trkulja, Vladimir
Raj, Binu
Garcia Saez, Diana
Mahesh, Balakrishnan
De Robertis, Fabio
Simon, Andre
description Summary Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). All consecutive LTxs performed between April 2017 and March 2019 at our tertiary center were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, utilization of ECMO, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between DCD and DBD LTx. Multivariate models (frequentist and Bayes) were fitted to evaluate an independent effect of DCD on the intra‐ and postoperative need for ECMO. Out of 105 enrolled patients, 25 (23.8%) were DCD LTx. Donors’ and preoperative recipients’ characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperatively, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more common in DCD LTx (56.0% vs. 36.2%), but the adjusted difference was minor (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.64–2.12; P = 0.613). MCS duration, and first and second lung ischemia time were longer in the DCD group. Postoperatively, DCD recipients more commonly required ECMO (32.0% vs. 7.5%) and the difference remained considerable after adjustment for the pre‐ and intraoperative covariates: RR = 4.11 (95% CI 0.95–17.7), P = 0.058, Bayes RR = 4.15 (95% CrI 1.28–13.0). Sensitivity analyses (two DCD‐DBD matching procedures) supported a higher risk of postoperative ECMO need in DCD patients. Incidence of delayed chest closure, postoperative chest drainage, and renal replacement therapy was higher in the DCD group. Early postoperative outcomes after DCD LTx appeared generally comparable to those after DBD LTx. DCD was associated with a higher need for postoperative ECMO which could influence clinical outcomes. However, as the DCD group had a significantly higher use of EVLP with more common ECMO preoperatively, this might have contributed to worse outcomes in the DCD group.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/tri.13754
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2447310440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2464945379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-3a3ba944a6017549de01d67f2948d72755822446a111ba9af4dc13e9db3e548a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURi1UBFNgwQsgS93QxYD_Mo7ZlZkWkJCQEKwjT3IzMkrsYCfqpKs-Qp-xT9JbAiwq1RvL0rlH3_VHyDFnZxzPeR_dGZc6UztkxpUUcyG0_kBmzEg1Z7lW--RjSk-MMZFnbI_sS2Fyo_NsRsbH3jXuh-1d8DTUFLZ9tGWIXYhgG9pCu47WAw3bcQN-wpynq-WKWl_R1eWKNoPfUJzyqWus79MFtVT8_vlrBBtpcn7TAL5K8D1E9HcQHfgSDslubZsER6_3AXn89vVheT2_vbu6WX65nZcyw_jSyrU1StkF47ihqYDxaqFrYVReaaGzLBdCqYXFj0DQ1qoquQRTrSVkKrfygJxO3i6G5wFSX7QuldBgVghDKnBYS86UYoh--gd9CkP0mA6phTIqk9og9XmiyhhSilAXXXStjWPBWfG3jwL7KF76QPbk1TisW6jeybcCEDifgO-ugfH_puLh_mZS_gEFyZY8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464945379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sef, Davorin ; Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra ; Mohite, Prashant ; Stock, Ulrich ; Trkulja, Vladimir ; Raj, Binu ; Garcia Saez, Diana ; Mahesh, Balakrishnan ; De Robertis, Fabio ; Simon, Andre</creator><creatorcontrib>Sef, Davorin ; Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra ; Mohite, Prashant ; Stock, Ulrich ; Trkulja, Vladimir ; Raj, Binu ; Garcia Saez, Diana ; Mahesh, Balakrishnan ; De Robertis, Fabio ; Simon, Andre</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). All consecutive LTxs performed between April 2017 and March 2019 at our tertiary center were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, utilization of ECMO, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between DCD and DBD LTx. Multivariate models (frequentist and Bayes) were fitted to evaluate an independent effect of DCD on the intra‐ and postoperative need for ECMO. Out of 105 enrolled patients, 25 (23.8%) were DCD LTx. Donors’ and preoperative recipients’ characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperatively, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more common in DCD LTx (56.0% vs. 36.2%), but the adjusted difference was minor (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.64–2.12; P = 0.613). MCS duration, and first and second lung ischemia time were longer in the DCD group. Postoperatively, DCD recipients more commonly required ECMO (32.0% vs. 7.5%) and the difference remained considerable after adjustment for the pre‐ and intraoperative covariates: RR = 4.11 (95% CI 0.95–17.7), P = 0.058, Bayes RR = 4.15 (95% CrI 1.28–13.0). Sensitivity analyses (two DCD‐DBD matching procedures) supported a higher risk of postoperative ECMO need in DCD patients. Incidence of delayed chest closure, postoperative chest drainage, and renal replacement therapy was higher in the DCD group. Early postoperative outcomes after DCD LTx appeared generally comparable to those after DBD LTx. DCD was associated with a higher need for postoperative ECMO which could influence clinical outcomes. However, as the DCD group had a significantly higher use of EVLP with more common ECMO preoperatively, this might have contributed to worse outcomes in the DCD group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-0874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tri.13754</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32989785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Chest ; Clinical outcomes ; donation after brain death ; donation after circulatory death ; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ; Ischemia ; Lung transplantation ; Lungs ; Membranes ; Organ donors ; Oxygenation ; Sensitivity analysis ; Transplantation ; Transplants ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Transplant international, 2020-12, Vol.33 (12), p.1788-1798</ispartof><rights>2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-3a3ba944a6017549de01d67f2948d72755822446a111ba9af4dc13e9db3e548a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-3a3ba944a6017549de01d67f2948d72755822446a111ba9af4dc13e9db3e548a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4621-3736 ; 0000-0001-8045-5846 ; 0000-0001-5533-3089 ; 0000-0001-5053-3815 ; 0000-0002-5049-7559</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftri.13754$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftri.13754$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32989785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sef, Davorin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohite, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trkulja, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Binu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Saez, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, Balakrishnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Robertis, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Andre</creatorcontrib><title>Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience</title><title>Transplant international</title><addtitle>Transpl Int</addtitle><description>Summary Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). All consecutive LTxs performed between April 2017 and March 2019 at our tertiary center were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, utilization of ECMO, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between DCD and DBD LTx. Multivariate models (frequentist and Bayes) were fitted to evaluate an independent effect of DCD on the intra‐ and postoperative need for ECMO. Out of 105 enrolled patients, 25 (23.8%) were DCD LTx. Donors’ and preoperative recipients’ characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperatively, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more common in DCD LTx (56.0% vs. 36.2%), but the adjusted difference was minor (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.64–2.12; P = 0.613). MCS duration, and first and second lung ischemia time were longer in the DCD group. Postoperatively, DCD recipients more commonly required ECMO (32.0% vs. 7.5%) and the difference remained considerable after adjustment for the pre‐ and intraoperative covariates: RR = 4.11 (95% CI 0.95–17.7), P = 0.058, Bayes RR = 4.15 (95% CrI 1.28–13.0). Sensitivity analyses (two DCD‐DBD matching procedures) supported a higher risk of postoperative ECMO need in DCD patients. Incidence of delayed chest closure, postoperative chest drainage, and renal replacement therapy was higher in the DCD group. Early postoperative outcomes after DCD LTx appeared generally comparable to those after DBD LTx. DCD was associated with a higher need for postoperative ECMO which could influence clinical outcomes. However, as the DCD group had a significantly higher use of EVLP with more common ECMO preoperatively, this might have contributed to worse outcomes in the DCD group.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Chest</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>donation after brain death</subject><subject>donation after circulatory death</subject><subject>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Lung transplantation</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Organ donors</subject><subject>Oxygenation</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplants</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>0934-0874</issn><issn>1432-2277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURi1UBFNgwQsgS93QxYD_Mo7ZlZkWkJCQEKwjT3IzMkrsYCfqpKs-Qp-xT9JbAiwq1RvL0rlH3_VHyDFnZxzPeR_dGZc6UztkxpUUcyG0_kBmzEg1Z7lW--RjSk-MMZFnbI_sS2Fyo_NsRsbH3jXuh-1d8DTUFLZ9tGWIXYhgG9pCu47WAw3bcQN-wpynq-WKWl_R1eWKNoPfUJzyqWus79MFtVT8_vlrBBtpcn7TAL5K8D1E9HcQHfgSDslubZsER6_3AXn89vVheT2_vbu6WX65nZcyw_jSyrU1StkF47ihqYDxaqFrYVReaaGzLBdCqYXFj0DQ1qoquQRTrSVkKrfygJxO3i6G5wFSX7QuldBgVghDKnBYS86UYoh--gd9CkP0mA6phTIqk9og9XmiyhhSilAXXXStjWPBWfG3jwL7KF76QPbk1TisW6jeybcCEDifgO-ugfH_puLh_mZS_gEFyZY8</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Sef, Davorin</creator><creator>Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra</creator><creator>Mohite, Prashant</creator><creator>Stock, Ulrich</creator><creator>Trkulja, Vladimir</creator><creator>Raj, Binu</creator><creator>Garcia Saez, Diana</creator><creator>Mahesh, Balakrishnan</creator><creator>De Robertis, Fabio</creator><creator>Simon, Andre</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4621-3736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8045-5846</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-3089</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5053-3815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-7559</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience</title><author>Sef, Davorin ; Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra ; Mohite, Prashant ; Stock, Ulrich ; Trkulja, Vladimir ; Raj, Binu ; Garcia Saez, Diana ; Mahesh, Balakrishnan ; De Robertis, Fabio ; Simon, Andre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-3a3ba944a6017549de01d67f2948d72755822446a111ba9af4dc13e9db3e548a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Chest</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>donation after brain death</topic><topic>donation after circulatory death</topic><topic>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Lung transplantation</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Organ donors</topic><topic>Oxygenation</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplants</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sef, Davorin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohite, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trkulja, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Binu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Saez, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, Balakrishnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Robertis, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Andre</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplant international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sef, Davorin</au><au>Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra</au><au>Mohite, Prashant</au><au>Stock, Ulrich</au><au>Trkulja, Vladimir</au><au>Raj, Binu</au><au>Garcia Saez, Diana</au><au>Mahesh, Balakrishnan</au><au>De Robertis, Fabio</au><au>Simon, Andre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience</atitle><jtitle>Transplant international</jtitle><addtitle>Transpl Int</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1788</spage><epage>1798</epage><pages>1788-1798</pages><issn>0934-0874</issn><eissn>1432-2277</eissn><abstract>Summary Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). All consecutive LTxs performed between April 2017 and March 2019 at our tertiary center were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, utilization of ECMO, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between DCD and DBD LTx. Multivariate models (frequentist and Bayes) were fitted to evaluate an independent effect of DCD on the intra‐ and postoperative need for ECMO. Out of 105 enrolled patients, 25 (23.8%) were DCD LTx. Donors’ and preoperative recipients’ characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperatively, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more common in DCD LTx (56.0% vs. 36.2%), but the adjusted difference was minor (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.64–2.12; P = 0.613). MCS duration, and first and second lung ischemia time were longer in the DCD group. Postoperatively, DCD recipients more commonly required ECMO (32.0% vs. 7.5%) and the difference remained considerable after adjustment for the pre‐ and intraoperative covariates: RR = 4.11 (95% CI 0.95–17.7), P = 0.058, Bayes RR = 4.15 (95% CrI 1.28–13.0). Sensitivity analyses (two DCD‐DBD matching procedures) supported a higher risk of postoperative ECMO need in DCD patients. Incidence of delayed chest closure, postoperative chest drainage, and renal replacement therapy was higher in the DCD group. Early postoperative outcomes after DCD LTx appeared generally comparable to those after DBD LTx. DCD was associated with a higher need for postoperative ECMO which could influence clinical outcomes. However, as the DCD group had a significantly higher use of EVLP with more common ECMO preoperatively, this might have contributed to worse outcomes in the DCD group.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32989785</pmid><doi>10.1111/tri.13754</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4621-3736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8045-5846</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-3089</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5053-3815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-7559</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0934-0874
ispartof Transplant international, 2020-12, Vol.33 (12), p.1788-1798
issn 0934-0874
1432-2277
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2447310440
source Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Bayesian analysis
Chest
Clinical outcomes
donation after brain death
donation after circulatory death
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
Ischemia
Lung transplantation
Lungs
Membranes
Organ donors
Oxygenation
Sensitivity analysis
Transplantation
Transplants
Transplants & implants
title Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A52%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilization%20of%20extracorporeal%20membrane%20oxygenation%20in%20DCD%20and%20DBD%20lung%20transplants:%20a%202%E2%80%90year%20single%E2%80%90center%20experience&rft.jtitle=Transplant%20international&rft.au=Sef,%20Davorin&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1788&rft.epage=1798&rft.pages=1788-1798&rft.issn=0934-0874&rft.eissn=1432-2277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tri.13754&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2464945379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464945379&rft_id=info:pmid/32989785&rfr_iscdi=true