Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience
Summary Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplant international 2020-12, Vol.33 (12), p.1788-1798 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1798 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1788 |
container_title | Transplant international |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Sef, Davorin Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra Mohite, Prashant Stock, Ulrich Trkulja, Vladimir Raj, Binu Garcia Saez, Diana Mahesh, Balakrishnan De Robertis, Fabio Simon, Andre |
description | Summary
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). All consecutive LTxs performed between April 2017 and March 2019 at our tertiary center were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, utilization of ECMO, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between DCD and DBD LTx. Multivariate models (frequentist and Bayes) were fitted to evaluate an independent effect of DCD on the intra‐ and postoperative need for ECMO. Out of 105 enrolled patients, 25 (23.8%) were DCD LTx. Donors’ and preoperative recipients’ characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperatively, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more common in DCD LTx (56.0% vs. 36.2%), but the adjusted difference was minor (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.64–2.12; P = 0.613). MCS duration, and first and second lung ischemia time were longer in the DCD group. Postoperatively, DCD recipients more commonly required ECMO (32.0% vs. 7.5%) and the difference remained considerable after adjustment for the pre‐ and intraoperative covariates: RR = 4.11 (95% CI 0.95–17.7), P = 0.058, Bayes RR = 4.15 (95% CrI 1.28–13.0). Sensitivity analyses (two DCD‐DBD matching procedures) supported a higher risk of postoperative ECMO need in DCD patients. Incidence of delayed chest closure, postoperative chest drainage, and renal replacement therapy was higher in the DCD group. Early postoperative outcomes after DCD LTx appeared generally comparable to those after DBD LTx. DCD was associated with a higher need for postoperative ECMO which could influence clinical outcomes. However, as the DCD group had a significantly higher use of EVLP with more common ECMO preoperatively, this might have contributed to worse outcomes in the DCD group. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/tri.13754 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2447310440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2464945379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-3a3ba944a6017549de01d67f2948d72755822446a111ba9af4dc13e9db3e548a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURi1UBFNgwQsgS93QxYD_Mo7ZlZkWkJCQEKwjT3IzMkrsYCfqpKs-Qp-xT9JbAiwq1RvL0rlH3_VHyDFnZxzPeR_dGZc6UztkxpUUcyG0_kBmzEg1Z7lW--RjSk-MMZFnbI_sS2Fyo_NsRsbH3jXuh-1d8DTUFLZ9tGWIXYhgG9pCu47WAw3bcQN-wpynq-WKWl_R1eWKNoPfUJzyqWus79MFtVT8_vlrBBtpcn7TAL5K8D1E9HcQHfgSDslubZsER6_3AXn89vVheT2_vbu6WX65nZcyw_jSyrU1StkF47ihqYDxaqFrYVReaaGzLBdCqYXFj0DQ1qoquQRTrSVkKrfygJxO3i6G5wFSX7QuldBgVghDKnBYS86UYoh--gd9CkP0mA6phTIqk9og9XmiyhhSilAXXXStjWPBWfG3jwL7KF76QPbk1TisW6jeybcCEDifgO-ugfH_puLh_mZS_gEFyZY8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464945379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sef, Davorin ; Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra ; Mohite, Prashant ; Stock, Ulrich ; Trkulja, Vladimir ; Raj, Binu ; Garcia Saez, Diana ; Mahesh, Balakrishnan ; De Robertis, Fabio ; Simon, Andre</creator><creatorcontrib>Sef, Davorin ; Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra ; Mohite, Prashant ; Stock, Ulrich ; Trkulja, Vladimir ; Raj, Binu ; Garcia Saez, Diana ; Mahesh, Balakrishnan ; De Robertis, Fabio ; Simon, Andre</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). All consecutive LTxs performed between April 2017 and March 2019 at our tertiary center were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, utilization of ECMO, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between DCD and DBD LTx. Multivariate models (frequentist and Bayes) were fitted to evaluate an independent effect of DCD on the intra‐ and postoperative need for ECMO. Out of 105 enrolled patients, 25 (23.8%) were DCD LTx. Donors’ and preoperative recipients’ characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperatively, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more common in DCD LTx (56.0% vs. 36.2%), but the adjusted difference was minor (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.64–2.12; P = 0.613). MCS duration, and first and second lung ischemia time were longer in the DCD group. Postoperatively, DCD recipients more commonly required ECMO (32.0% vs. 7.5%) and the difference remained considerable after adjustment for the pre‐ and intraoperative covariates: RR = 4.11 (95% CI 0.95–17.7), P = 0.058, Bayes RR = 4.15 (95% CrI 1.28–13.0). Sensitivity analyses (two DCD‐DBD matching procedures) supported a higher risk of postoperative ECMO need in DCD patients. Incidence of delayed chest closure, postoperative chest drainage, and renal replacement therapy was higher in the DCD group. Early postoperative outcomes after DCD LTx appeared generally comparable to those after DBD LTx. DCD was associated with a higher need for postoperative ECMO which could influence clinical outcomes. However, as the DCD group had a significantly higher use of EVLP with more common ECMO preoperatively, this might have contributed to worse outcomes in the DCD group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-0874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tri.13754</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32989785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Chest ; Clinical outcomes ; donation after brain death ; donation after circulatory death ; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ; Ischemia ; Lung transplantation ; Lungs ; Membranes ; Organ donors ; Oxygenation ; Sensitivity analysis ; Transplantation ; Transplants ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Transplant international, 2020-12, Vol.33 (12), p.1788-1798</ispartof><rights>2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-3a3ba944a6017549de01d67f2948d72755822446a111ba9af4dc13e9db3e548a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-3a3ba944a6017549de01d67f2948d72755822446a111ba9af4dc13e9db3e548a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4621-3736 ; 0000-0001-8045-5846 ; 0000-0001-5533-3089 ; 0000-0001-5053-3815 ; 0000-0002-5049-7559</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftri.13754$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftri.13754$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32989785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sef, Davorin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohite, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trkulja, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Binu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Saez, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, Balakrishnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Robertis, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Andre</creatorcontrib><title>Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience</title><title>Transplant international</title><addtitle>Transpl Int</addtitle><description>Summary
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). All consecutive LTxs performed between April 2017 and March 2019 at our tertiary center were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, utilization of ECMO, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between DCD and DBD LTx. Multivariate models (frequentist and Bayes) were fitted to evaluate an independent effect of DCD on the intra‐ and postoperative need for ECMO. Out of 105 enrolled patients, 25 (23.8%) were DCD LTx. Donors’ and preoperative recipients’ characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperatively, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more common in DCD LTx (56.0% vs. 36.2%), but the adjusted difference was minor (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.64–2.12; P = 0.613). MCS duration, and first and second lung ischemia time were longer in the DCD group. Postoperatively, DCD recipients more commonly required ECMO (32.0% vs. 7.5%) and the difference remained considerable after adjustment for the pre‐ and intraoperative covariates: RR = 4.11 (95% CI 0.95–17.7), P = 0.058, Bayes RR = 4.15 (95% CrI 1.28–13.0). Sensitivity analyses (two DCD‐DBD matching procedures) supported a higher risk of postoperative ECMO need in DCD patients. Incidence of delayed chest closure, postoperative chest drainage, and renal replacement therapy was higher in the DCD group. Early postoperative outcomes after DCD LTx appeared generally comparable to those after DBD LTx. DCD was associated with a higher need for postoperative ECMO which could influence clinical outcomes. However, as the DCD group had a significantly higher use of EVLP with more common ECMO preoperatively, this might have contributed to worse outcomes in the DCD group.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Chest</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>donation after brain death</subject><subject>donation after circulatory death</subject><subject>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Lung transplantation</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Organ donors</subject><subject>Oxygenation</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplants</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0934-0874</issn><issn>1432-2277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURi1UBFNgwQsgS93QxYD_Mo7ZlZkWkJCQEKwjT3IzMkrsYCfqpKs-Qp-xT9JbAiwq1RvL0rlH3_VHyDFnZxzPeR_dGZc6UztkxpUUcyG0_kBmzEg1Z7lW--RjSk-MMZFnbI_sS2Fyo_NsRsbH3jXuh-1d8DTUFLZ9tGWIXYhgG9pCu47WAw3bcQN-wpynq-WKWl_R1eWKNoPfUJzyqWus79MFtVT8_vlrBBtpcn7TAL5K8D1E9HcQHfgSDslubZsER6_3AXn89vVheT2_vbu6WX65nZcyw_jSyrU1StkF47ihqYDxaqFrYVReaaGzLBdCqYXFj0DQ1qoquQRTrSVkKrfygJxO3i6G5wFSX7QuldBgVghDKnBYS86UYoh--gd9CkP0mA6phTIqk9og9XmiyhhSilAXXXStjWPBWfG3jwL7KF76QPbk1TisW6jeybcCEDifgO-ugfH_puLh_mZS_gEFyZY8</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Sef, Davorin</creator><creator>Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra</creator><creator>Mohite, Prashant</creator><creator>Stock, Ulrich</creator><creator>Trkulja, Vladimir</creator><creator>Raj, Binu</creator><creator>Garcia Saez, Diana</creator><creator>Mahesh, Balakrishnan</creator><creator>De Robertis, Fabio</creator><creator>Simon, Andre</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4621-3736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8045-5846</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-3089</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5053-3815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-7559</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience</title><author>Sef, Davorin ; Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra ; Mohite, Prashant ; Stock, Ulrich ; Trkulja, Vladimir ; Raj, Binu ; Garcia Saez, Diana ; Mahesh, Balakrishnan ; De Robertis, Fabio ; Simon, Andre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-3a3ba944a6017549de01d67f2948d72755822446a111ba9af4dc13e9db3e548a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Chest</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>donation after brain death</topic><topic>donation after circulatory death</topic><topic>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Lung transplantation</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Organ donors</topic><topic>Oxygenation</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplants</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sef, Davorin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohite, Prashant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trkulja, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raj, Binu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Saez, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahesh, Balakrishnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Robertis, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Andre</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplant international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sef, Davorin</au><au>Verzelloni Sef, Alessandra</au><au>Mohite, Prashant</au><au>Stock, Ulrich</au><au>Trkulja, Vladimir</au><au>Raj, Binu</au><au>Garcia Saez, Diana</au><au>Mahesh, Balakrishnan</au><au>De Robertis, Fabio</au><au>Simon, Andre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience</atitle><jtitle>Transplant international</jtitle><addtitle>Transpl Int</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1788</spage><epage>1798</epage><pages>1788-1798</pages><issn>0934-0874</issn><eissn>1432-2277</eissn><abstract>Summary
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). All consecutive LTxs performed between April 2017 and March 2019 at our tertiary center were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, utilization of ECMO, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between DCD and DBD LTx. Multivariate models (frequentist and Bayes) were fitted to evaluate an independent effect of DCD on the intra‐ and postoperative need for ECMO. Out of 105 enrolled patients, 25 (23.8%) were DCD LTx. Donors’ and preoperative recipients’ characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperatively, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more common in DCD LTx (56.0% vs. 36.2%), but the adjusted difference was minor (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.64–2.12; P = 0.613). MCS duration, and first and second lung ischemia time were longer in the DCD group. Postoperatively, DCD recipients more commonly required ECMO (32.0% vs. 7.5%) and the difference remained considerable after adjustment for the pre‐ and intraoperative covariates: RR = 4.11 (95% CI 0.95–17.7), P = 0.058, Bayes RR = 4.15 (95% CrI 1.28–13.0). Sensitivity analyses (two DCD‐DBD matching procedures) supported a higher risk of postoperative ECMO need in DCD patients. Incidence of delayed chest closure, postoperative chest drainage, and renal replacement therapy was higher in the DCD group. Early postoperative outcomes after DCD LTx appeared generally comparable to those after DBD LTx. DCD was associated with a higher need for postoperative ECMO which could influence clinical outcomes. However, as the DCD group had a significantly higher use of EVLP with more common ECMO preoperatively, this might have contributed to worse outcomes in the DCD group.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32989785</pmid><doi>10.1111/tri.13754</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4621-3736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8045-5846</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5533-3089</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5053-3815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-7559</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0934-0874 |
ispartof | Transplant international, 2020-12, Vol.33 (12), p.1788-1798 |
issn | 0934-0874 1432-2277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2447310440 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Bayesian analysis Chest Clinical outcomes donation after brain death donation after circulatory death Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Ischemia Lung transplantation Lungs Membranes Organ donors Oxygenation Sensitivity analysis Transplantation Transplants Transplants & implants |
title | Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2‐year single‐center experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A52%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilization%20of%20extracorporeal%20membrane%20oxygenation%20in%20DCD%20and%20DBD%20lung%20transplants:%20a%202%E2%80%90year%20single%E2%80%90center%20experience&rft.jtitle=Transplant%20international&rft.au=Sef,%20Davorin&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1788&rft.epage=1798&rft.pages=1788-1798&rft.issn=0934-0874&rft.eissn=1432-2277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tri.13754&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2464945379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464945379&rft_id=info:pmid/32989785&rfr_iscdi=true |