Differentiated timing of induction for women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy—A historical cohort study
Introduction Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy‐specific liver disease characterized by pruritus and abnormal liver function tests and it has been associated with intrauterine fetal distress and stillbirth. We compared two guidelines of the management of ICP: one mandating in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2021-02, Vol.100 (2), p.279-285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Nielsen, Julie Helmer Lykke, Jacob Alexander |
description | Introduction
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy‐specific liver disease characterized by pruritus and abnormal liver function tests and it has been associated with intrauterine fetal distress and stillbirth. We compared two guidelines of the management of ICP: one mandating induction at 38 weeks of gestation (Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital before 2012) and another separating ICP into mild and severe forms, and only women with severe ICP were recommended for induction at 38 weeks (Hvidovre Hospital after 2012).
Material and methods
We performed a historical cohort study at two Copenhagen Hospitals from 2004 to 2015. We included 62 937 women with singleton deliveries at Rigshospitalet and 71 015 at Hvidovre Hospital, of whom 971 women (1.5%) and 998 women (1.4%) were diagnosed with ICP at Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital, respectively. Data were retrieved from a local medical database. For the analysis of induction and comparison of obstetrical outcomes we only included pregnancies with an ICP diagnosis and excluded women with other medical conditions that could mandate induction. Main outcome measures were induction and cesarean section rates, asphyxia and stillbirth.
Results
We found no changes in the rate of spontaneous labor, cesarean section and induction over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .17) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .38). For women with intended vaginal delivery we found no change in the final mode of delivery over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .28) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .57).
Conclusions
The two approaches to the management of mild ICP regarding the timing of induction are comparable. Women with mild ICP and their clinicians should be encouraged to engage in shared decision‐making when discussing timing of induction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aogs.13998 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2446665156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2478995715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4581c382bc1c39688be870acfd510b820d3384e60e02258abbeed86709eb56c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9O3DAQh60KVLa0Fx4AWeKCkAL-kzj2cQUtrYTEAXqOHGeyMUrsxXa02hsPwRP2SertUg491JeRNd98Gs0PoRNKLml-V9qv4iXlSskPaEEFIQUpKTtAC0IILQQv1RH6FONT_rG6lB_REWeqJpKVCxRvbN9DAJesTtDhZCfrVtj32LpuNsl6h3sf8MZP4PDGpiE3UtADrHWyBpvBjxCTjjbuhtYBVk47s_318rrEg43JB2v0iI0ffEg4prnbfkaHvR4jfHmrx-jnt6-P19-Lu_vbH9fLu8JwxWVRVpIaLllrclFCyhZkTbTpu4qSVjLScS5LEAQIY5XUbQvQSVETBW0lTMWP0fneuw7-ec5bNpONBsZRO_BzbFhZCiEqWomMnv2DPvk5uLxdpmqpVFXTnfBiT5ngYwzQN-tgJx22DSXNLopmF0XzJ4oMn74p53aC7h39e_sM0D2wsSNs_6Nqlve3D3vpb3OHlkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478995715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differentiated timing of induction for women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy—A historical cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Nielsen, Julie Helmer ; Lykke, Jacob Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Julie Helmer ; Lykke, Jacob Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy‐specific liver disease characterized by pruritus and abnormal liver function tests and it has been associated with intrauterine fetal distress and stillbirth. We compared two guidelines of the management of ICP: one mandating induction at 38 weeks of gestation (Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital before 2012) and another separating ICP into mild and severe forms, and only women with severe ICP were recommended for induction at 38 weeks (Hvidovre Hospital after 2012).
Material and methods
We performed a historical cohort study at two Copenhagen Hospitals from 2004 to 2015. We included 62 937 women with singleton deliveries at Rigshospitalet and 71 015 at Hvidovre Hospital, of whom 971 women (1.5%) and 998 women (1.4%) were diagnosed with ICP at Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital, respectively. Data were retrieved from a local medical database. For the analysis of induction and comparison of obstetrical outcomes we only included pregnancies with an ICP diagnosis and excluded women with other medical conditions that could mandate induction. Main outcome measures were induction and cesarean section rates, asphyxia and stillbirth.
Results
We found no changes in the rate of spontaneous labor, cesarean section and induction over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .17) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .38). For women with intended vaginal delivery we found no change in the final mode of delivery over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .28) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .57).
Conclusions
The two approaches to the management of mild ICP regarding the timing of induction are comparable. Women with mild ICP and their clinicians should be encouraged to engage in shared decision‐making when discussing timing of induction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13998</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32970824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Asphyxia Neonatorum - epidemiology ; Cesarean section ; Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data ; Cholestasis, Intrahepatic - epidemiology ; Clinical outcomes ; Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Delivery, Obstetric ; Denmark - epidemiology ; Female ; Gallbladder diseases ; Humans ; Induced labor ; induction of labor ; intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy ; Labor, Induced ; obstetrical outcome ; perinatal outcome ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy complications ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stillbirth ; Stillbirth - epidemiology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021-02, Vol.100 (2), p.279-285</ispartof><rights>2020 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4581c382bc1c39688be870acfd510b820d3384e60e02258abbeed86709eb56c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4581c382bc1c39688be870acfd510b820d3384e60e02258abbeed86709eb56c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3680-9736 ; 0000-0002-3698-9792</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faogs.13998$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faogs.13998$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32970824$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Julie Helmer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lykke, Jacob Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Differentiated timing of induction for women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy—A historical cohort study</title><title>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><description>Introduction
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy‐specific liver disease characterized by pruritus and abnormal liver function tests and it has been associated with intrauterine fetal distress and stillbirth. We compared two guidelines of the management of ICP: one mandating induction at 38 weeks of gestation (Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital before 2012) and another separating ICP into mild and severe forms, and only women with severe ICP were recommended for induction at 38 weeks (Hvidovre Hospital after 2012).
Material and methods
We performed a historical cohort study at two Copenhagen Hospitals from 2004 to 2015. We included 62 937 women with singleton deliveries at Rigshospitalet and 71 015 at Hvidovre Hospital, of whom 971 women (1.5%) and 998 women (1.4%) were diagnosed with ICP at Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital, respectively. Data were retrieved from a local medical database. For the analysis of induction and comparison of obstetrical outcomes we only included pregnancies with an ICP diagnosis and excluded women with other medical conditions that could mandate induction. Main outcome measures were induction and cesarean section rates, asphyxia and stillbirth.
Results
We found no changes in the rate of spontaneous labor, cesarean section and induction over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .17) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .38). For women with intended vaginal delivery we found no change in the final mode of delivery over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .28) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .57).
Conclusions
The two approaches to the management of mild ICP regarding the timing of induction are comparable. Women with mild ICP and their clinicians should be encouraged to engage in shared decision‐making when discussing timing of induction.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asphyxia Neonatorum - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Cholestasis, Intrahepatic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric</subject><subject>Denmark - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallbladder diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Induced labor</subject><subject>induction of labor</subject><subject>intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy</subject><subject>Labor, Induced</subject><subject>obstetrical outcome</subject><subject>perinatal outcome</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy complications</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stillbirth</subject><subject>Stillbirth - epidemiology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0001-6349</issn><issn>1600-0412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9O3DAQh60KVLa0Fx4AWeKCkAL-kzj2cQUtrYTEAXqOHGeyMUrsxXa02hsPwRP2SertUg491JeRNd98Gs0PoRNKLml-V9qv4iXlSskPaEEFIQUpKTtAC0IILQQv1RH6FONT_rG6lB_REWeqJpKVCxRvbN9DAJesTtDhZCfrVtj32LpuNsl6h3sf8MZP4PDGpiE3UtADrHWyBpvBjxCTjjbuhtYBVk47s_318rrEg43JB2v0iI0ffEg4prnbfkaHvR4jfHmrx-jnt6-P19-Lu_vbH9fLu8JwxWVRVpIaLllrclFCyhZkTbTpu4qSVjLScS5LEAQIY5XUbQvQSVETBW0lTMWP0fneuw7-ec5bNpONBsZRO_BzbFhZCiEqWomMnv2DPvk5uLxdpmqpVFXTnfBiT5ngYwzQN-tgJx22DSXNLopmF0XzJ4oMn74p53aC7h39e_sM0D2wsSNs_6Nqlve3D3vpb3OHlkQ</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Nielsen, Julie Helmer</creator><creator>Lykke, Jacob Alexander</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-9736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3698-9792</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Differentiated timing of induction for women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy—A historical cohort study</title><author>Nielsen, Julie Helmer ; Lykke, Jacob Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3938-4581c382bc1c39688be870acfd510b820d3384e60e02258abbeed86709eb56c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asphyxia Neonatorum - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Cholestasis, Intrahepatic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric</topic><topic>Denmark - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallbladder diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Induced labor</topic><topic>induction of labor</topic><topic>intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy</topic><topic>Labor, Induced</topic><topic>obstetrical outcome</topic><topic>perinatal outcome</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy complications</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stillbirth</topic><topic>Stillbirth - epidemiology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Julie Helmer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lykke, Jacob Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nielsen, Julie Helmer</au><au>Lykke, Jacob Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differentiated timing of induction for women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy—A historical cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>279-285</pages><issn>0001-6349</issn><eissn>1600-0412</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy‐specific liver disease characterized by pruritus and abnormal liver function tests and it has been associated with intrauterine fetal distress and stillbirth. We compared two guidelines of the management of ICP: one mandating induction at 38 weeks of gestation (Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital before 2012) and another separating ICP into mild and severe forms, and only women with severe ICP were recommended for induction at 38 weeks (Hvidovre Hospital after 2012).
Material and methods
We performed a historical cohort study at two Copenhagen Hospitals from 2004 to 2015. We included 62 937 women with singleton deliveries at Rigshospitalet and 71 015 at Hvidovre Hospital, of whom 971 women (1.5%) and 998 women (1.4%) were diagnosed with ICP at Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital, respectively. Data were retrieved from a local medical database. For the analysis of induction and comparison of obstetrical outcomes we only included pregnancies with an ICP diagnosis and excluded women with other medical conditions that could mandate induction. Main outcome measures were induction and cesarean section rates, asphyxia and stillbirth.
Results
We found no changes in the rate of spontaneous labor, cesarean section and induction over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .17) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .38). For women with intended vaginal delivery we found no change in the final mode of delivery over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .28) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .57).
Conclusions
The two approaches to the management of mild ICP regarding the timing of induction are comparable. Women with mild ICP and their clinicians should be encouraged to engage in shared decision‐making when discussing timing of induction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32970824</pmid><doi>10.1111/aogs.13998</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3680-9736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3698-9792</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6349 |
ispartof | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2021-02, Vol.100 (2), p.279-285 |
issn | 0001-6349 1600-0412 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2446665156 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Adult Asphyxia Neonatorum - epidemiology Cesarean section Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data Cholestasis, Intrahepatic - epidemiology Clinical outcomes Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Delivery, Obstetric Denmark - epidemiology Female Gallbladder diseases Humans Induced labor induction of labor intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy Labor, Induced obstetrical outcome perinatal outcome Practice Guidelines as Topic Pregnancy Pregnancy complications Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology Severity of Illness Index Stillbirth Stillbirth - epidemiology Womens health |
title | Differentiated timing of induction for women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy—A historical cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T08%3A18%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differentiated%20timing%20of%20induction%20for%20women%20with%20intrahepatic%20cholestasis%20of%20pregnancy%E2%80%94A%20historical%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20obstetricia%20et%20gynecologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Nielsen,%20Julie%20Helmer&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=279-285&rft.issn=0001-6349&rft.eissn=1600-0412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aogs.13998&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2478995715%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478995715&rft_id=info:pmid/32970824&rfr_iscdi=true |