Factors influencing the Landing Error Scoring System: Systematic review with meta-analysis

Systematically review the literature addressing age, sex, previous injury, and intervention program as influencing factors of the Landing Error Scoring System. Systematic review with meta-analysis. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science®, and Scopus®) were searched on 1 April 2020. Original studies...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of science and medicine in sport 2021-03, Vol.24 (3), p.269-280
Hauptverfasser: Hanzlíková, Ivana, Athens, Josie, Hébert-Losier, Kim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 280
container_issue 3
container_start_page 269
container_title Journal of science and medicine in sport
container_volume 24
creator Hanzlíková, Ivana
Athens, Josie
Hébert-Losier, Kim
description Systematically review the literature addressing age, sex, previous injury, and intervention program as influencing factors of the Landing Error Scoring System. Systematic review with meta-analysis. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science®, and Scopus®) were searched on 1 April 2020. Original studies using the Landing Error Scoring System as primary outcome and exploring age, sex, previous injury, and intervention program were included, assessed for risk of bias, and critically appraised. Three meta-analyses were performed using one random and two mixed effect models with dependent variables: sex, previous injury and intervention program, respectively. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the strength of the evidence. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018107210. Fifty-two studies were included. Pooled data indicated that females have higher Landing Error Scoring System scores than males (p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.08.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444604927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1440244020307519</els_id><sourcerecordid>2444604927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-fbefcf8b16ec02bdd03002185cdd8bf46772e092b5571b1f9766a330189d93a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqAu0v6ASitQLl6RjOx8OEgeEdgFpJQ60l14sx54UR_lYbAe0_x5vd-HAoRfPWHpm5tVDyHcKGQVa_uyyzqvBZwwYZCAyoPwTOaaiEikVJf0c-zyHlMVnQU687wBYUfHqC1lwVhe0rspj8meldJicT-zY9jOO2o5_k_CIyVqNZtcvnZtc8qAnt_s9bH3A4eJQVbA6cfhs8SV5seExGTCoVI2q33rrv5KjVvUevx3qKfm9Wv66vk3X9zd311frVOechbRtsNWtaGiJGlhjDPAYlIpCGyOaNi-riiHUrCmKija0jbFLxTlQUZuaK8pPyfl-78ZNTzP6IAfrNfa9GnGavYwC8hLymlUR_fEB7abZxbyRKoCVLBccIsX3lHaT9w5buXF2UG4rKcidetnJf-rlTr0EIaP6OHV22D03A5r3mTfXEbjcAxhlRGdOem2jcTTWoQ7STPa_B14BSaGVqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2502624830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing the Landing Error Scoring System: Systematic review with meta-analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Hanzlíková, Ivana ; Athens, Josie ; Hébert-Losier, Kim</creator><creatorcontrib>Hanzlíková, Ivana ; Athens, Josie ; Hébert-Losier, Kim</creatorcontrib><description>Systematically review the literature addressing age, sex, previous injury, and intervention program as influencing factors of the Landing Error Scoring System. Systematic review with meta-analysis. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science®, and Scopus®) were searched on 1 April 2020. Original studies using the Landing Error Scoring System as primary outcome and exploring age, sex, previous injury, and intervention program were included, assessed for risk of bias, and critically appraised. Three meta-analyses were performed using one random and two mixed effect models with dependent variables: sex, previous injury and intervention program, respectively. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the strength of the evidence. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018107210. Fifty-two studies were included. Pooled data indicated that females have higher Landing Error Scoring System scores than males (p&lt;0.001, mean difference=0.6 error). Participants with previous anterior cruciate ligament injury have higher LESS scores than healthy controls (p=0.004, mean difference 1.2 error). Neuromuscular training programs lasting a minimum of six weeks and other intervention programs decrease Landing Error Scoring System scores (p&lt;0.001, mean difference 1.2 error and p=0.042, mean difference 0.5 error, respectively). There is limited evidence suggesting that age may influence Landing Error Scoring System scores in clinically meaningful manner. Overall, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation ratings suggest very low strength of evidence. History of anterior cruciate ligament injury and undertaking neuromuscular training for a minimum of six weeks meaningfully altered Landing Error Scoring System scores. These findings, however, should be interpreted cautiously considering the very low Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation rating of the evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1440-2440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.08.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32951976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament injuries ; Athletic injuries ; Bias ; Biomechanics ; Injuries ; Intervention ; Jump-landing ; Meta-analysis ; Movement screen ; Risk assessment ; Soft tissue injuries ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of science and medicine in sport, 2021-03, Vol.24 (3), p.269-280</ispartof><rights>2020 Sports Medicine Australia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Sports Medicine Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-fbefcf8b16ec02bdd03002185cdd8bf46772e092b5571b1f9766a330189d93a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-fbefcf8b16ec02bdd03002185cdd8bf46772e092b5571b1f9766a330189d93a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2259-9312</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2502624830?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32951976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hanzlíková, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athens, Josie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hébert-Losier, Kim</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing the Landing Error Scoring System: Systematic review with meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of science and medicine in sport</title><addtitle>J Sci Med Sport</addtitle><description>Systematically review the literature addressing age, sex, previous injury, and intervention program as influencing factors of the Landing Error Scoring System. Systematic review with meta-analysis. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science®, and Scopus®) were searched on 1 April 2020. Original studies using the Landing Error Scoring System as primary outcome and exploring age, sex, previous injury, and intervention program were included, assessed for risk of bias, and critically appraised. Three meta-analyses were performed using one random and two mixed effect models with dependent variables: sex, previous injury and intervention program, respectively. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the strength of the evidence. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018107210. Fifty-two studies were included. Pooled data indicated that females have higher Landing Error Scoring System scores than males (p&lt;0.001, mean difference=0.6 error). Participants with previous anterior cruciate ligament injury have higher LESS scores than healthy controls (p=0.004, mean difference 1.2 error). Neuromuscular training programs lasting a minimum of six weeks and other intervention programs decrease Landing Error Scoring System scores (p&lt;0.001, mean difference 1.2 error and p=0.042, mean difference 0.5 error, respectively). There is limited evidence suggesting that age may influence Landing Error Scoring System scores in clinically meaningful manner. Overall, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation ratings suggest very low strength of evidence. History of anterior cruciate ligament injury and undertaking neuromuscular training for a minimum of six weeks meaningfully altered Landing Error Scoring System scores. These findings, however, should be interpreted cautiously considering the very low Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation rating of the evidence.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament injuries</subject><subject>Athletic injuries</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Jump-landing</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Movement screen</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Soft tissue injuries</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1440-2440</issn><issn>1878-1861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqAu0v6ASitQLl6RjOx8OEgeEdgFpJQ60l14sx54UR_lYbAe0_x5vd-HAoRfPWHpm5tVDyHcKGQVa_uyyzqvBZwwYZCAyoPwTOaaiEikVJf0c-zyHlMVnQU687wBYUfHqC1lwVhe0rspj8meldJicT-zY9jOO2o5_k_CIyVqNZtcvnZtc8qAnt_s9bH3A4eJQVbA6cfhs8SV5seExGTCoVI2q33rrv5KjVvUevx3qKfm9Wv66vk3X9zd311frVOechbRtsNWtaGiJGlhjDPAYlIpCGyOaNi-riiHUrCmKija0jbFLxTlQUZuaK8pPyfl-78ZNTzP6IAfrNfa9GnGavYwC8hLymlUR_fEB7abZxbyRKoCVLBccIsX3lHaT9w5buXF2UG4rKcidetnJf-rlTr0EIaP6OHV22D03A5r3mTfXEbjcAxhlRGdOem2jcTTWoQ7STPa_B14BSaGVqw</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Hanzlíková, Ivana</creator><creator>Athens, Josie</creator><creator>Hébert-Losier, Kim</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2259-9312</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Factors influencing the Landing Error Scoring System: Systematic review with meta-analysis</title><author>Hanzlíková, Ivana ; Athens, Josie ; Hébert-Losier, Kim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-fbefcf8b16ec02bdd03002185cdd8bf46772e092b5571b1f9766a330189d93a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament injuries</topic><topic>Athletic injuries</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Jump-landing</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Movement screen</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Soft tissue injuries</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hanzlíková, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athens, Josie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hébert-Losier, Kim</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of science and medicine in sport</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hanzlíková, Ivana</au><au>Athens, Josie</au><au>Hébert-Losier, Kim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing the Landing Error Scoring System: Systematic review with meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of science and medicine in sport</jtitle><addtitle>J Sci Med Sport</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>269-280</pages><issn>1440-2440</issn><eissn>1878-1861</eissn><abstract>Systematically review the literature addressing age, sex, previous injury, and intervention program as influencing factors of the Landing Error Scoring System. Systematic review with meta-analysis. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science®, and Scopus®) were searched on 1 April 2020. Original studies using the Landing Error Scoring System as primary outcome and exploring age, sex, previous injury, and intervention program were included, assessed for risk of bias, and critically appraised. Three meta-analyses were performed using one random and two mixed effect models with dependent variables: sex, previous injury and intervention program, respectively. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the strength of the evidence. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018107210. Fifty-two studies were included. Pooled data indicated that females have higher Landing Error Scoring System scores than males (p&lt;0.001, mean difference=0.6 error). Participants with previous anterior cruciate ligament injury have higher LESS scores than healthy controls (p=0.004, mean difference 1.2 error). Neuromuscular training programs lasting a minimum of six weeks and other intervention programs decrease Landing Error Scoring System scores (p&lt;0.001, mean difference 1.2 error and p=0.042, mean difference 0.5 error, respectively). There is limited evidence suggesting that age may influence Landing Error Scoring System scores in clinically meaningful manner. Overall, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation ratings suggest very low strength of evidence. History of anterior cruciate ligament injury and undertaking neuromuscular training for a minimum of six weeks meaningfully altered Landing Error Scoring System scores. These findings, however, should be interpreted cautiously considering the very low Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation rating of the evidence.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32951976</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsams.2020.08.013</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2259-9312</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1440-2440
ispartof Journal of science and medicine in sport, 2021-03, Vol.24 (3), p.269-280
issn 1440-2440
1878-1861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444604927
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Age
Anterior Cruciate Ligament injuries
Athletic injuries
Bias
Biomechanics
Injuries
Intervention
Jump-landing
Meta-analysis
Movement screen
Risk assessment
Soft tissue injuries
Systematic review
title Factors influencing the Landing Error Scoring System: Systematic review with meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20the%20Landing%20Error%20Scoring%20System:%20Systematic%20review%20with%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20science%20and%20medicine%20in%20sport&rft.au=Hanzl%C3%ADkov%C3%A1,%20Ivana&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=269-280&rft.issn=1440-2440&rft.eissn=1878-1861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsams.2020.08.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2444604927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2502624830&rft_id=info:pmid/32951976&rft_els_id=S1440244020307519&rfr_iscdi=true