Vocal-motor interference eliminates the memory advantage for vocal melodies
[Display omitted] •Vocal-motor interference during melody encoding disrupted the memory advantage for vocal melodies.•A vocal-memory advantage was present in non-vocal motor interference and no-interference conditions.•Spontaneous sensorimotor simulation accounts for the vocal-memory advantage.•Sens...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain and cognition 2020-11, Vol.145, p.105622-105622, Article 105622 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 105622 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105622 |
container_title | Brain and cognition |
container_volume | 145 |
creator | Wood, Emily A. Rovetti, Joseph Russo, Frank A. |
description | [Display omitted]
•Vocal-motor interference during melody encoding disrupted the memory advantage for vocal melodies.•A vocal-memory advantage was present in non-vocal motor interference and no-interference conditions.•Spontaneous sensorimotor simulation accounts for the vocal-memory advantage.•Sensorimotor simulation of action is related to subsequent recognition of that action.
Spontaneous motor cortical activity during passive perception of action has been interpreted as a sensorimotor simulation of the observed action. There is currently interest in how sensorimotor simulation can support higher-up cognitive functions, such as memory, but this is relatively unexplored in the auditory domain. In the present study, we examined whether the established memory advantage for vocal melodies over non-vocal melodies is attributable to stronger sensorimotor simulation during perception of vocal relative to non-vocal action. Participants listened to 24 unfamiliar folk melodies presented in vocal or piano timbres. These were encoded during three interference conditions: whispering (vocal-motor interference), tapping (non-vocal motor interference), and no-interference. Afterwards, participants heard the original 24 melodies presented among 24 foils and judged whether melodies were old or new. A vocal-memory advantage was found in the no-interference and tapping conditions; however, the advantage was eliminated in the whispering condition. This suggests that sensorimotor simulationduring the perception of vocal melodies is responsible for the observed vocal-memory advantage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105622 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444383725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278262620302256</els_id><sourcerecordid>2466059265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-35cf5813a24118921e8320f827646ef44b5c032e4bf9ab2d12b7d0c5642e10eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EouXjFyChSCwsKfbZcZKBAVV8iUoswGo5zgVcJXGxk0r99yS0MDAwnXT3vHenh5AzRmeMMnm1nBW6Lc0MKIydRALskSmjOY2BiXSfTCmkWQwS5IQchbCklOYC4JBMOOQiz0Q6JU9vzug6blznfGTbDn2FHluDEda2sa3uMETdB0YNNs5vIl2uddvpd4yqIbAew8OodqXFcEIOKl0HPN3VY_J6d_syf4gXz_eP85tFbASHLuaJqZKMcQ2CsSwHhhkHWmWQSiGxEqJIDOWAoqhyXUDJoEhLahIpABnFgh-Ty-3elXefPYZONTYYrGvdouuDAiEEz3gKyYBe_EGXrvft8N1ASUmTHORI8S1lvAvBY6VW3jbabxSjanStlurbtRpdq63rIXW-290XDZa_mR-5A3C9BXCQsbboVTB2dFtaj6ZTpbP_HvgCceCPBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2466059265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vocal-motor interference eliminates the memory advantage for vocal melodies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wood, Emily A. ; Rovetti, Joseph ; Russo, Frank A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wood, Emily A. ; Rovetti, Joseph ; Russo, Frank A.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Vocal-motor interference during melody encoding disrupted the memory advantage for vocal melodies.•A vocal-memory advantage was present in non-vocal motor interference and no-interference conditions.•Spontaneous sensorimotor simulation accounts for the vocal-memory advantage.•Sensorimotor simulation of action is related to subsequent recognition of that action.
Spontaneous motor cortical activity during passive perception of action has been interpreted as a sensorimotor simulation of the observed action. There is currently interest in how sensorimotor simulation can support higher-up cognitive functions, such as memory, but this is relatively unexplored in the auditory domain. In the present study, we examined whether the established memory advantage for vocal melodies over non-vocal melodies is attributable to stronger sensorimotor simulation during perception of vocal relative to non-vocal action. Participants listened to 24 unfamiliar folk melodies presented in vocal or piano timbres. These were encoded during three interference conditions: whispering (vocal-motor interference), tapping (non-vocal motor interference), and no-interference. Afterwards, participants heard the original 24 melodies presented among 24 foils and judged whether melodies were old or new. A vocal-memory advantage was found in the no-interference and tapping conditions; however, the advantage was eliminated in the whispering condition. This suggests that sensorimotor simulationduring the perception of vocal melodies is responsible for the observed vocal-memory advantage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105622</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32949847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Auditory Perception ; Cognitive ability ; Embodied cognition ; Hearing ; Humans ; Memory ; Motor system ; Music ; Perception ; Sensorimotor simulation ; Sensorimotor system ; Simulation ; Singing ; Voice</subject><ispartof>Brain and cognition, 2020-11, Vol.145, p.105622-105622, Article 105622</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-35cf5813a24118921e8320f827646ef44b5c032e4bf9ab2d12b7d0c5642e10eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-35cf5813a24118921e8320f827646ef44b5c032e4bf9ab2d12b7d0c5642e10eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262620302256$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32949847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wood, Emily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovetti, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, Frank A.</creatorcontrib><title>Vocal-motor interference eliminates the memory advantage for vocal melodies</title><title>Brain and cognition</title><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><description>[Display omitted]
•Vocal-motor interference during melody encoding disrupted the memory advantage for vocal melodies.•A vocal-memory advantage was present in non-vocal motor interference and no-interference conditions.•Spontaneous sensorimotor simulation accounts for the vocal-memory advantage.•Sensorimotor simulation of action is related to subsequent recognition of that action.
Spontaneous motor cortical activity during passive perception of action has been interpreted as a sensorimotor simulation of the observed action. There is currently interest in how sensorimotor simulation can support higher-up cognitive functions, such as memory, but this is relatively unexplored in the auditory domain. In the present study, we examined whether the established memory advantage for vocal melodies over non-vocal melodies is attributable to stronger sensorimotor simulation during perception of vocal relative to non-vocal action. Participants listened to 24 unfamiliar folk melodies presented in vocal or piano timbres. These were encoded during three interference conditions: whispering (vocal-motor interference), tapping (non-vocal motor interference), and no-interference. Afterwards, participants heard the original 24 melodies presented among 24 foils and judged whether melodies were old or new. A vocal-memory advantage was found in the no-interference and tapping conditions; however, the advantage was eliminated in the whispering condition. This suggests that sensorimotor simulationduring the perception of vocal melodies is responsible for the observed vocal-memory advantage.</description><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Embodied cognition</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Motor system</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Sensorimotor simulation</subject><subject>Sensorimotor system</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Singing</subject><subject>Voice</subject><issn>0278-2626</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EouXjFyChSCwsKfbZcZKBAVV8iUoswGo5zgVcJXGxk0r99yS0MDAwnXT3vHenh5AzRmeMMnm1nBW6Lc0MKIydRALskSmjOY2BiXSfTCmkWQwS5IQchbCklOYC4JBMOOQiz0Q6JU9vzug6blznfGTbDn2FHluDEda2sa3uMETdB0YNNs5vIl2uddvpd4yqIbAew8OodqXFcEIOKl0HPN3VY_J6d_syf4gXz_eP85tFbASHLuaJqZKMcQ2CsSwHhhkHWmWQSiGxEqJIDOWAoqhyXUDJoEhLahIpABnFgh-Ty-3elXefPYZONTYYrGvdouuDAiEEz3gKyYBe_EGXrvft8N1ASUmTHORI8S1lvAvBY6VW3jbabxSjanStlurbtRpdq63rIXW-290XDZa_mR-5A3C9BXCQsbboVTB2dFtaj6ZTpbP_HvgCceCPBg</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Wood, Emily A.</creator><creator>Rovetti, Joseph</creator><creator>Russo, Frank A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Vocal-motor interference eliminates the memory advantage for vocal melodies</title><author>Wood, Emily A. ; Rovetti, Joseph ; Russo, Frank A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-35cf5813a24118921e8320f827646ef44b5c032e4bf9ab2d12b7d0c5642e10eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Embodied cognition</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Motor system</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Sensorimotor simulation</topic><topic>Sensorimotor system</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Singing</topic><topic>Voice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wood, Emily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rovetti, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, Frank A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wood, Emily A.</au><au>Rovetti, Joseph</au><au>Russo, Frank A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vocal-motor interference eliminates the memory advantage for vocal melodies</atitle><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>145</volume><spage>105622</spage><epage>105622</epage><pages>105622-105622</pages><artnum>105622</artnum><issn>0278-2626</issn><eissn>1090-2147</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Vocal-motor interference during melody encoding disrupted the memory advantage for vocal melodies.•A vocal-memory advantage was present in non-vocal motor interference and no-interference conditions.•Spontaneous sensorimotor simulation accounts for the vocal-memory advantage.•Sensorimotor simulation of action is related to subsequent recognition of that action.
Spontaneous motor cortical activity during passive perception of action has been interpreted as a sensorimotor simulation of the observed action. There is currently interest in how sensorimotor simulation can support higher-up cognitive functions, such as memory, but this is relatively unexplored in the auditory domain. In the present study, we examined whether the established memory advantage for vocal melodies over non-vocal melodies is attributable to stronger sensorimotor simulation during perception of vocal relative to non-vocal action. Participants listened to 24 unfamiliar folk melodies presented in vocal or piano timbres. These were encoded during three interference conditions: whispering (vocal-motor interference), tapping (non-vocal motor interference), and no-interference. Afterwards, participants heard the original 24 melodies presented among 24 foils and judged whether melodies were old or new. A vocal-memory advantage was found in the no-interference and tapping conditions; however, the advantage was eliminated in the whispering condition. This suggests that sensorimotor simulationduring the perception of vocal melodies is responsible for the observed vocal-memory advantage.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32949847</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105622</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-2626 |
ispartof | Brain and cognition, 2020-11, Vol.145, p.105622-105622, Article 105622 |
issn | 0278-2626 1090-2147 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444383725 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Auditory Perception Cognitive ability Embodied cognition Hearing Humans Memory Motor system Music Perception Sensorimotor simulation Sensorimotor system Simulation Singing Voice |
title | Vocal-motor interference eliminates the memory advantage for vocal melodies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T02%3A08%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vocal-motor%20interference%20eliminates%20the%20memory%20advantage%20for%20vocal%20melodies&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Wood,%20Emily%20A.&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=145&rft.spage=105622&rft.epage=105622&rft.pages=105622-105622&rft.artnum=105622&rft.issn=0278-2626&rft.eissn=1090-2147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105622&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2466059265%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2466059265&rft_id=info:pmid/32949847&rft_els_id=S0278262620302256&rfr_iscdi=true |