Comparison in Patients < 75 Years of Age - Versus – Those > 75 Years on One-year-Events With Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Appendage Occluder (From the Prospective Multicenter German LAARGE Registry)

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation for the prevention of embolic stroke and systemic embolism. Although elderly patients (>75 years) have both higher ischemic and bleeding risk as compared with y...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2020-12, Vol.136, p.81-86
Hauptverfasser: Nasasra, Aref El, Brachmann, Johannes, Lewalter, Thorsten, Akin, Ibrahim, Sievert, Horst, Nienaber, Christoph A., Weiß, Christian, Pleger, Sven T., Ince, Hüseyin, Maier, Jens, Achenbach, Stephan, Sigusch, Holger H., Hochadel, Matthias, Schneider, Steffen, Senges, Jochen, Zeymer, Uwe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 86
container_issue
container_start_page 81
container_title The American journal of cardiology
container_volume 136
creator Nasasra, Aref El
Brachmann, Johannes
Lewalter, Thorsten
Akin, Ibrahim
Sievert, Horst
Nienaber, Christoph A.
Weiß, Christian
Pleger, Sven T.
Ince, Hüseyin
Maier, Jens
Achenbach, Stephan
Sigusch, Holger H.
Hochadel, Matthias
Schneider, Steffen
Senges, Jochen
Zeymer, Uwe
description Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation for the prevention of embolic stroke and systemic embolism. Although elderly patients (>75 years) have both higher ischemic and bleeding risk as compared with younger patients, they benefit from optimal anticoagulation. The subanalysis aimed to assess the indications, the safety, efficacy, and 1-year outcomes of interventional LAAC in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) compared with younger (< 75 years) patients in clinical practice. We analyzed data from the prospective Left-Atrium-Appendage Occluder Registry Germany. A total of 638 patients were included in the registry, 402 (63%) were aged ≥ 75 years. Compared with younger subjects, patients aged ≥75 were more likely to have higher CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores. Procedural success rate was high und similar in both groups (97.6%). Periprocedural adverse events were not statistically significant in groups (11.9% in
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444380154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002914920309553</els_id><sourcerecordid>2444380154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-205fe5f962a81830e6716be868989bba7ca29280d05e0fe644a4da90013a43c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCKC7LIsZ7Pm3hKhGURKQglJVBcTK8njuNI7mD9sTKTveoQ_Wd-BJcEmK2LGyrvzdc3TuIeQ1oyGjLHu3C2W3U9LUYUQjGlIeUpY_ITNW5DxgnMVPyYxSGgWcJfyMvLB250fG0uw5OYsjnmRFRmfkfj50ozTaDj3oHq6k09g7C-8hT-E7SmNhaKC8RQjgKxo7Wfj18w5utoNF-PAP1MOmx-Dgh2Cx_yPxTbstlM5o2cJSV0a3rVf3oOxrWGPjHj_LccS-lt5jo1Q71WjgYmmGDtwW4coMdkTl9B7h89Q6rby4J1ZoOtnDuiyvVwu4xlttnTm8fUmeNbK1-Or0npMvy8XN_GOw3qw-zct1oOIsdUFE0wbThmeRLFgRU8xyllVYZAUveFXJXMmIRwWtaYq0wSxJZFJL7g8YyyRWaXxOLo66oxl-TGid6LRV6CP2OExWREmSxAVlaeLR9IgqH8UabMRodCfNQTAqHroUO3HqUjx0KSgXvku_9-ZkMVUd1n-3HsvzwOURQB90r9EIq3x7Cmtt_MVEPej_WPwGWm2y9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2444380154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison in Patients &lt; 75 Years of Age - Versus – Those &gt; 75 Years on One-year-Events With Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Appendage Occluder (From the Prospective Multicenter German LAARGE Registry)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Nasasra, Aref El ; Brachmann, Johannes ; Lewalter, Thorsten ; Akin, Ibrahim ; Sievert, Horst ; Nienaber, Christoph A. ; Weiß, Christian ; Pleger, Sven T. ; Ince, Hüseyin ; Maier, Jens ; Achenbach, Stephan ; Sigusch, Holger H. ; Hochadel, Matthias ; Schneider, Steffen ; Senges, Jochen ; Zeymer, Uwe</creator><creatorcontrib>Nasasra, Aref El ; Brachmann, Johannes ; Lewalter, Thorsten ; Akin, Ibrahim ; Sievert, Horst ; Nienaber, Christoph A. ; Weiß, Christian ; Pleger, Sven T. ; Ince, Hüseyin ; Maier, Jens ; Achenbach, Stephan ; Sigusch, Holger H. ; Hochadel, Matthias ; Schneider, Steffen ; Senges, Jochen ; Zeymer, Uwe</creatorcontrib><description>Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation for the prevention of embolic stroke and systemic embolism. Although elderly patients (&gt;75 years) have both higher ischemic and bleeding risk as compared with younger patients, they benefit from optimal anticoagulation. The subanalysis aimed to assess the indications, the safety, efficacy, and 1-year outcomes of interventional LAAC in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) compared with younger (&lt; 75 years) patients in clinical practice. We analyzed data from the prospective Left-Atrium-Appendage Occluder Registry Germany. A total of 638 patients were included in the registry, 402 (63%) were aged ≥ 75 years. Compared with younger subjects, patients aged ≥75 were more likely to have higher CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores. Procedural success rate was high und similar in both groups (97.6%). Periprocedural adverse events were not statistically significant in groups (11.9% in &lt;75 years vs 12.9% in ≥75 years; p = 0.80). At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was higher in patients aged ≥75 compared withwith younger group (13.0% vs 7.8 %,p = 0.04), mainly due to non-cardiovascular causes (10.6% vs 6.0%). No significant differences in major bleeding, stroke, systemic embolism were observed. In conclusion, LAAC is feasible and safe in patients with AF at high stroke risk and with contraindications for OAC and should be considered as candidates for LAA closure. Elderly patients often present these characteristics and could benefit from this novel therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32946860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Atrial Appendage - surgery ; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Germany ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Registries ; Septal Occluder Device ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The American journal of cardiology, 2020-12, Vol.136, p.81-86</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-205fe5f962a81830e6716be868989bba7ca29280d05e0fe644a4da90013a43c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-205fe5f962a81830e6716be868989bba7ca29280d05e0fe644a4da90013a43c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0499-704X ; 0000-0002-9221-9856 ; 0000-0003-3256-0726</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994,64386</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32946860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nasasra, Aref El</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brachmann, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewalter, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akin, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sievert, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nienaber, Christoph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiß, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pleger, Sven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ince, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maier, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achenbach, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigusch, Holger H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochadel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senges, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeymer, Uwe</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison in Patients &lt; 75 Years of Age - Versus – Those &gt; 75 Years on One-year-Events With Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Appendage Occluder (From the Prospective Multicenter German LAARGE Registry)</title><title>The American journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation for the prevention of embolic stroke and systemic embolism. Although elderly patients (&gt;75 years) have both higher ischemic and bleeding risk as compared with younger patients, they benefit from optimal anticoagulation. The subanalysis aimed to assess the indications, the safety, efficacy, and 1-year outcomes of interventional LAAC in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) compared with younger (&lt; 75 years) patients in clinical practice. We analyzed data from the prospective Left-Atrium-Appendage Occluder Registry Germany. A total of 638 patients were included in the registry, 402 (63%) were aged ≥ 75 years. Compared with younger subjects, patients aged ≥75 were more likely to have higher CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores. Procedural success rate was high und similar in both groups (97.6%). Periprocedural adverse events were not statistically significant in groups (11.9% in &lt;75 years vs 12.9% in ≥75 years; p = 0.80). At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was higher in patients aged ≥75 compared withwith younger group (13.0% vs 7.8 %,p = 0.04), mainly due to non-cardiovascular causes (10.6% vs 6.0%). No significant differences in major bleeding, stroke, systemic embolism were observed. In conclusion, LAAC is feasible and safe in patients with AF at high stroke risk and with contraindications for OAC and should be considered as candidates for LAA closure. Elderly patients often present these characteristics and could benefit from this novel therapy.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Atrial Appendage - surgery</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Septal Occluder Device</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0002-9149</issn><issn>1879-1913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCKC7LIsZ7Pm3hKhGURKQglJVBcTK8njuNI7mD9sTKTveoQ_Wd-BJcEmK2LGyrvzdc3TuIeQ1oyGjLHu3C2W3U9LUYUQjGlIeUpY_ITNW5DxgnMVPyYxSGgWcJfyMvLB250fG0uw5OYsjnmRFRmfkfj50ozTaDj3oHq6k09g7C-8hT-E7SmNhaKC8RQjgKxo7Wfj18w5utoNF-PAP1MOmx-Dgh2Cx_yPxTbstlM5o2cJSV0a3rVf3oOxrWGPjHj_LccS-lt5jo1Q71WjgYmmGDtwW4coMdkTl9B7h89Q6rby4J1ZoOtnDuiyvVwu4xlttnTm8fUmeNbK1-Or0npMvy8XN_GOw3qw-zct1oOIsdUFE0wbThmeRLFgRU8xyllVYZAUveFXJXMmIRwWtaYq0wSxJZFJL7g8YyyRWaXxOLo66oxl-TGid6LRV6CP2OExWREmSxAVlaeLR9IgqH8UabMRodCfNQTAqHroUO3HqUjx0KSgXvku_9-ZkMVUd1n-3HsvzwOURQB90r9EIq3x7Cmtt_MVEPej_WPwGWm2y9w</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Nasasra, Aref El</creator><creator>Brachmann, Johannes</creator><creator>Lewalter, Thorsten</creator><creator>Akin, Ibrahim</creator><creator>Sievert, Horst</creator><creator>Nienaber, Christoph A.</creator><creator>Weiß, Christian</creator><creator>Pleger, Sven T.</creator><creator>Ince, Hüseyin</creator><creator>Maier, Jens</creator><creator>Achenbach, Stephan</creator><creator>Sigusch, Holger H.</creator><creator>Hochadel, Matthias</creator><creator>Schneider, Steffen</creator><creator>Senges, Jochen</creator><creator>Zeymer, Uwe</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0499-704X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9221-9856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3256-0726</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Comparison in Patients &lt; 75 Years of Age - Versus – Those &gt; 75 Years on One-year-Events With Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Appendage Occluder (From the Prospective Multicenter German LAARGE Registry)</title><author>Nasasra, Aref El ; Brachmann, Johannes ; Lewalter, Thorsten ; Akin, Ibrahim ; Sievert, Horst ; Nienaber, Christoph A. ; Weiß, Christian ; Pleger, Sven T. ; Ince, Hüseyin ; Maier, Jens ; Achenbach, Stephan ; Sigusch, Holger H. ; Hochadel, Matthias ; Schneider, Steffen ; Senges, Jochen ; Zeymer, Uwe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-205fe5f962a81830e6716be868989bba7ca29280d05e0fe644a4da90013a43c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Atrial Appendage - surgery</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Septal Occluder Device</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nasasra, Aref El</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brachmann, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewalter, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akin, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sievert, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nienaber, Christoph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiß, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pleger, Sven T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ince, Hüseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maier, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achenbach, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigusch, Holger H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochadel, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senges, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeymer, Uwe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nasasra, Aref El</au><au>Brachmann, Johannes</au><au>Lewalter, Thorsten</au><au>Akin, Ibrahim</au><au>Sievert, Horst</au><au>Nienaber, Christoph A.</au><au>Weiß, Christian</au><au>Pleger, Sven T.</au><au>Ince, Hüseyin</au><au>Maier, Jens</au><au>Achenbach, Stephan</au><au>Sigusch, Holger H.</au><au>Hochadel, Matthias</au><au>Schneider, Steffen</au><au>Senges, Jochen</au><au>Zeymer, Uwe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison in Patients &lt; 75 Years of Age - Versus – Those &gt; 75 Years on One-year-Events With Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Appendage Occluder (From the Prospective Multicenter German LAARGE Registry)</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>136</volume><spage>81</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>81-86</pages><issn>0002-9149</issn><eissn>1879-1913</eissn><abstract>Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative to oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation for the prevention of embolic stroke and systemic embolism. Although elderly patients (&gt;75 years) have both higher ischemic and bleeding risk as compared with younger patients, they benefit from optimal anticoagulation. The subanalysis aimed to assess the indications, the safety, efficacy, and 1-year outcomes of interventional LAAC in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) compared with younger (&lt; 75 years) patients in clinical practice. We analyzed data from the prospective Left-Atrium-Appendage Occluder Registry Germany. A total of 638 patients were included in the registry, 402 (63%) were aged ≥ 75 years. Compared with younger subjects, patients aged ≥75 were more likely to have higher CHA2DS2-VASC and HAS-BLED scores. Procedural success rate was high und similar in both groups (97.6%). Periprocedural adverse events were not statistically significant in groups (11.9% in &lt;75 years vs 12.9% in ≥75 years; p = 0.80). At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was higher in patients aged ≥75 compared withwith younger group (13.0% vs 7.8 %,p = 0.04), mainly due to non-cardiovascular causes (10.6% vs 6.0%). No significant differences in major bleeding, stroke, systemic embolism were observed. In conclusion, LAAC is feasible and safe in patients with AF at high stroke risk and with contraindications for OAC and should be considered as candidates for LAA closure. Elderly patients often present these characteristics and could benefit from this novel therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32946860</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.017</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0499-704X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9221-9856</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3256-0726</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9149
ispartof The American journal of cardiology, 2020-12, Vol.136, p.81-86
issn 0002-9149
1879-1913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2444380154
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Atrial Appendage - surgery
Atrial Fibrillation - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Germany
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Registries
Septal Occluder Device
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Comparison in Patients < 75 Years of Age - Versus – Those > 75 Years on One-year-Events With Atrial Fibrillation and Left Atrial Appendage Occluder (From the Prospective Multicenter German LAARGE Registry)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T11%3A25%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20in%20Patients%20%3C%2075%20Years%20of%20Age%20-%20Versus%20%E2%80%93%20Those%20%3E%2075%20Years%20on%20One-year-Events%20With%20Atrial%20Fibrillation%20and%20Left%20Atrial%20Appendage%20Occluder%20(From%20the%20Prospective%20Multicenter%20German%20LAARGE%20Registry)&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Nasasra,%20Aref%20El&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=81-86&rft.issn=0002-9149&rft.eissn=1879-1913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2444380154%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2444380154&rft_id=info:pmid/32946860&rft_els_id=S0002914920309553&rfr_iscdi=true