Effectiveness of a radiation protective device for anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography operators in structural heart disease interventions

In structural heart disease (SHD) interventions, the exposure of staff other than the first operator such as anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) operators to the radiation can also pose the risks of cancer and cataracts in the long term. This study was conducted to test our...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics 2021-10, Vol.36 (4), p.523-531
Hauptverfasser: Miyazaki, Hitoshi, Umezu, Yoshiyuki, Kinoshita, Emi, Ogawa, Kazuhisa, Hiasa, Ken-ichi, Sonoda, Hiromichi, Karashima, Yuji, Kato, Toyoyuki, Shiose, Akira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 531
container_issue 4
container_start_page 523
container_title Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics
container_volume 36
creator Miyazaki, Hitoshi
Umezu, Yoshiyuki
Kinoshita, Emi
Ogawa, Kazuhisa
Hiasa, Ken-ichi
Sonoda, Hiromichi
Karashima, Yuji
Kato, Toyoyuki
Shiose, Akira
description In structural heart disease (SHD) interventions, the exposure of staff other than the first operator such as anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) operators to the radiation can also pose the risks of cancer and cataracts in the long term. This study was conducted to test our new radiation protective device (RPD) for anesthesiologists and TEE operators in SHD interventions. The RPD, which consists of a head side shield and a cradle shield, was mounted on a 0.25 mm Pb-equivalent unleaded radiation protection sheet on a self-made J-shaped acrylic table, and it was placed on the head side and cradle on the operating table. A CT human body phantom was placed on the operating table, and the C-arm was set in five directions: posteroanterior, right anterior oblique 30°, left anterior oblique 30°, caudal 30°, and cranial 30°. The ambient dose equivalent rate at the usual positions of the anesthesiologist and TEE operator were measured under a fluoroscopic sequence with and without the RPD, and the dose reduction rate was obtained. The height of each measurement point was set to 100, 130 or 160 cm. The reduction rates at the positions of the anesthesiologist and the TEE operator were 82.6–86.4% and 77.9–89.5% at the height of 100 cm, 48.5–68.4% and 83.3–91.0% at 130 cm, and 23.6–62.9% and 72.9–86.1% at 160 cm, respectively. The newly developed RPD can thus effectively reduce the radiation exposure of anesthesiologists and TEE operators during SHD interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12928-020-00708-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2443520037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2443520037</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9b6aa2a49269ae327fa8167e2af26c135190b89f770c38731d6329952c38dfb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1O3TAQhSMEUhHwAl15ySatf3KTeFkh2iIhsYG1NdcZ3xiFOJ1xkHiYvmt9G9jijT2eb2Z8fKrqq5LflJTdd1ba6r6WWtYllH1tT6pz1bd93WjbnX6cjZRfqivmZ1mWttY25rz6exsC-hxfcUZmkYIAQTBEyDHNYqGUt6wY8DV6FCGRgILmETmmKR0iZy43g8gEMyOnZYQDwiTQj8kDDTEdCJbxTaQFCXIiFnEWnGn1eaUCjgiUxRAZgbHkMlJ5zXE-X1ZnASbGq_f9onr6eft487u-f_h1d_PjvvaNanJt9y2Ahsbq1gIa3QXoVduhhqBbr8xOWbnvbeg66U3fGTW0pnzATpdoCHtrLqrrrW8R_Gct6txLZI_TVKSmlZ1uGrPTUpquoHpDPSVmwuAWii9Ab05Jd7TDbXa4Yof7b4c79jdbERd4PiC557TSXCR9VvUPVc2SXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2443520037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of a radiation protective device for anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography operators in structural heart disease interventions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Miyazaki, Hitoshi ; Umezu, Yoshiyuki ; Kinoshita, Emi ; Ogawa, Kazuhisa ; Hiasa, Ken-ichi ; Sonoda, Hiromichi ; Karashima, Yuji ; Kato, Toyoyuki ; Shiose, Akira</creator><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Hitoshi ; Umezu, Yoshiyuki ; Kinoshita, Emi ; Ogawa, Kazuhisa ; Hiasa, Ken-ichi ; Sonoda, Hiromichi ; Karashima, Yuji ; Kato, Toyoyuki ; Shiose, Akira</creatorcontrib><description>In structural heart disease (SHD) interventions, the exposure of staff other than the first operator such as anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) operators to the radiation can also pose the risks of cancer and cataracts in the long term. This study was conducted to test our new radiation protective device (RPD) for anesthesiologists and TEE operators in SHD interventions. The RPD, which consists of a head side shield and a cradle shield, was mounted on a 0.25 mm Pb-equivalent unleaded radiation protection sheet on a self-made J-shaped acrylic table, and it was placed on the head side and cradle on the operating table. A CT human body phantom was placed on the operating table, and the C-arm was set in five directions: posteroanterior, right anterior oblique 30°, left anterior oblique 30°, caudal 30°, and cranial 30°. The ambient dose equivalent rate at the usual positions of the anesthesiologist and TEE operator were measured under a fluoroscopic sequence with and without the RPD, and the dose reduction rate was obtained. The height of each measurement point was set to 100, 130 or 160 cm. The reduction rates at the positions of the anesthesiologist and the TEE operator were 82.6–86.4% and 77.9–89.5% at the height of 100 cm, 48.5–68.4% and 83.3–91.0% at 130 cm, and 23.6–62.9% and 72.9–86.1% at 160 cm, respectively. The newly developed RPD can thus effectively reduce the radiation exposure of anesthesiologists and TEE operators during SHD interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-4300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-4297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12928-020-00708-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Interventional Radiology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Article</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2021-10, Vol.36 (4), p.523-531</ispartof><rights>Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9b6aa2a49269ae327fa8167e2af26c135190b89f770c38731d6329952c38dfb93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9b6aa2a49269ae327fa8167e2af26c135190b89f770c38731d6329952c38dfb93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12928-020-00708-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12928-020-00708-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umezu, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Emi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Kazuhisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiasa, Ken-ichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonoda, Hiromichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karashima, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Toyoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiose, Akira</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of a radiation protective device for anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography operators in structural heart disease interventions</title><title>Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics</title><addtitle>Cardiovasc Interv and Ther</addtitle><description>In structural heart disease (SHD) interventions, the exposure of staff other than the first operator such as anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) operators to the radiation can also pose the risks of cancer and cataracts in the long term. This study was conducted to test our new radiation protective device (RPD) for anesthesiologists and TEE operators in SHD interventions. The RPD, which consists of a head side shield and a cradle shield, was mounted on a 0.25 mm Pb-equivalent unleaded radiation protection sheet on a self-made J-shaped acrylic table, and it was placed on the head side and cradle on the operating table. A CT human body phantom was placed on the operating table, and the C-arm was set in five directions: posteroanterior, right anterior oblique 30°, left anterior oblique 30°, caudal 30°, and cranial 30°. The ambient dose equivalent rate at the usual positions of the anesthesiologist and TEE operator were measured under a fluoroscopic sequence with and without the RPD, and the dose reduction rate was obtained. The height of each measurement point was set to 100, 130 or 160 cm. The reduction rates at the positions of the anesthesiologist and the TEE operator were 82.6–86.4% and 77.9–89.5% at the height of 100 cm, 48.5–68.4% and 83.3–91.0% at 130 cm, and 23.6–62.9% and 72.9–86.1% at 160 cm, respectively. The newly developed RPD can thus effectively reduce the radiation exposure of anesthesiologists and TEE operators during SHD interventions.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><issn>1868-4300</issn><issn>1868-4297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1O3TAQhSMEUhHwAl15ySatf3KTeFkh2iIhsYG1NdcZ3xiFOJ1xkHiYvmt9G9jijT2eb2Z8fKrqq5LflJTdd1ba6r6WWtYllH1tT6pz1bd93WjbnX6cjZRfqivmZ1mWttY25rz6exsC-hxfcUZmkYIAQTBEyDHNYqGUt6wY8DV6FCGRgILmETmmKR0iZy43g8gEMyOnZYQDwiTQj8kDDTEdCJbxTaQFCXIiFnEWnGn1eaUCjgiUxRAZgbHkMlJ5zXE-X1ZnASbGq_f9onr6eft487u-f_h1d_PjvvaNanJt9y2Ahsbq1gIa3QXoVduhhqBbr8xOWbnvbeg66U3fGTW0pnzATpdoCHtrLqrrrW8R_Gct6txLZI_TVKSmlZ1uGrPTUpquoHpDPSVmwuAWii9Ab05Jd7TDbXa4Yof7b4c79jdbERd4PiC557TSXCR9VvUPVc2SXQ</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Miyazaki, Hitoshi</creator><creator>Umezu, Yoshiyuki</creator><creator>Kinoshita, Emi</creator><creator>Ogawa, Kazuhisa</creator><creator>Hiasa, Ken-ichi</creator><creator>Sonoda, Hiromichi</creator><creator>Karashima, Yuji</creator><creator>Kato, Toyoyuki</creator><creator>Shiose, Akira</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of a radiation protective device for anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography operators in structural heart disease interventions</title><author>Miyazaki, Hitoshi ; Umezu, Yoshiyuki ; Kinoshita, Emi ; Ogawa, Kazuhisa ; Hiasa, Ken-ichi ; Sonoda, Hiromichi ; Karashima, Yuji ; Kato, Toyoyuki ; Shiose, Akira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9b6aa2a49269ae327fa8167e2af26c135190b89f770c38731d6329952c38dfb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umezu, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Emi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Kazuhisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiasa, Ken-ichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonoda, Hiromichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karashima, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Toyoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiose, Akira</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miyazaki, Hitoshi</au><au>Umezu, Yoshiyuki</au><au>Kinoshita, Emi</au><au>Ogawa, Kazuhisa</au><au>Hiasa, Ken-ichi</au><au>Sonoda, Hiromichi</au><au>Karashima, Yuji</au><au>Kato, Toyoyuki</au><au>Shiose, Akira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of a radiation protective device for anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography operators in structural heart disease interventions</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics</jtitle><stitle>Cardiovasc Interv and Ther</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>523</spage><epage>531</epage><pages>523-531</pages><issn>1868-4300</issn><eissn>1868-4297</eissn><abstract>In structural heart disease (SHD) interventions, the exposure of staff other than the first operator such as anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) operators to the radiation can also pose the risks of cancer and cataracts in the long term. This study was conducted to test our new radiation protective device (RPD) for anesthesiologists and TEE operators in SHD interventions. The RPD, which consists of a head side shield and a cradle shield, was mounted on a 0.25 mm Pb-equivalent unleaded radiation protection sheet on a self-made J-shaped acrylic table, and it was placed on the head side and cradle on the operating table. A CT human body phantom was placed on the operating table, and the C-arm was set in five directions: posteroanterior, right anterior oblique 30°, left anterior oblique 30°, caudal 30°, and cranial 30°. The ambient dose equivalent rate at the usual positions of the anesthesiologist and TEE operator were measured under a fluoroscopic sequence with and without the RPD, and the dose reduction rate was obtained. The height of each measurement point was set to 100, 130 or 160 cm. The reduction rates at the positions of the anesthesiologist and the TEE operator were 82.6–86.4% and 77.9–89.5% at the height of 100 cm, 48.5–68.4% and 83.3–91.0% at 130 cm, and 23.6–62.9% and 72.9–86.1% at 160 cm, respectively. The newly developed RPD can thus effectively reduce the radiation exposure of anesthesiologists and TEE operators during SHD interventions.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s12928-020-00708-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1868-4300
ispartof Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2021-10, Vol.36 (4), p.523-531
issn 1868-4300
1868-4297
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2443520037
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Cardiology
Interventional Radiology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article
title Effectiveness of a radiation protective device for anesthesiologists and transesophageal echocardiography operators in structural heart disease interventions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A24%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20a%20radiation%20protective%20device%20for%20anesthesiologists%20and%20transesophageal%20echocardiography%20operators%20in%20structural%20heart%20disease%20interventions&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20intervention%20and%20therapeutics&rft.au=Miyazaki,%20Hitoshi&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=523&rft.epage=531&rft.pages=523-531&rft.issn=1868-4300&rft.eissn=1868-4297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12928-020-00708-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2443520037%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2443520037&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true