Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk

Although mammography is the standard of care for breast cancer screening, dense breast tissue decreases mammographic sensitivity. We report the prevalent cancer detection rate (CDR) from the first clinical implementation of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MR) as a supplemental scre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2020-11, Vol.38 (33), p.3874-3882
Hauptverfasser: Weinstein, Susan P, Korhonen, Katrina, Cirelli, Claire, Schnall, Mitchell D, McDonald, Elizabeth S, Pantel, Austin R, Zuckerman, Samantha, Borthakur, Ari, Conant, Emily F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3882
container_issue 33
container_start_page 3874
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 38
creator Weinstein, Susan P
Korhonen, Katrina
Cirelli, Claire
Schnall, Mitchell D
McDonald, Elizabeth S
Pantel, Austin R
Zuckerman, Samantha
Borthakur, Ari
Conant, Emily F
description Although mammography is the standard of care for breast cancer screening, dense breast tissue decreases mammographic sensitivity. We report the prevalent cancer detection rate (CDR) from the first clinical implementation of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MR) as a supplemental screening test in women with dense breasts. The study was approved by the institutional review board and is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act complaint. This retrospective review includes women who were imaged between January 1, 2016 and February 28, 2019. On a 1.5 Tesla magnet, the imaging protocol consisted of three sequences: Short-TI Inversion Recovery (STIR), precontrast, and postcontrast. A subtraction sequence and a maximum intensity projection were generated. We report the patient-level CDR and the positive predictive value of AB-MR examinations after negative/benign digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Out of 511 prevalent rounds of AB-MR examinations, 36 women were excluded. The remaining 475 asymptomatic women with dense breasts had negative/benign DBT examinations before the AB-MR. There were 420 of 475 (88.4%) benign/negative examinations, 13 of 475 (2.7%) follow-up recommendations, and 42 biopsy recommendations. Thirty-nine biopsies were completed, resulting in 12/39 (30.8%) malignancies in 12 women: seven invasive carcinomas and five ductal carcinoma in situ. One additional patient was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma at the time of 6-month follow-up. The CDR was 27.4 per 1,000 (13 of 475; 95% CI, 16.1 to 46.3). The size of invasive carcinomas ranged from 0.6-1.0 cm (mean, 0.5 cm). Of the seven women who underwent surgical evaluation of the axilla, zero of seven patients had positive nodes. There were no interval cancers at 1-year follow-up. Preliminary results from clinical implementation of screening AB-MR resulted in a CDR of 27.4/1,000 at the patient level after DBT in women with dense breasts. Additional evaluation is warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JCO.19.02198
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2443519539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2443519539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-bb3221ec0a7acbe6bc351cd3b7787afe1884c4f5ab563986b7c9c6a652c416173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EgvLYmJFHBlL8iON4LOVVBEJqQWWLbOcmBBKn2Ekl_j0BCtOVvnt0hoPQMSVjygg5v5s-jqkaE0ZVuoVGVDAZSSnENhoRyVlEU_6yh_ZDeCOExikXu2iPM8UpV8kI9RNjPKwr3UGOLzzo0OEHXTroKovnEFqnnQU8a3RZuRIXrceLfrWqoQHX6RovrAdw36-2wMt2WPGy6l7xJbgAG2HA2uV4sgavS8DzKrwfop1C1wGONvcAPV9fPU1vo_vHm9l0ch9ZpmgXGcMZo2CJltoaSIzlgtqcGylTqQugaRrbuBDaiISrNDHSKpvoRDAb04RKfoBOf70r3370ELqsqYKFutYO2j5kLI4HoxJcDejZL2p9G4KHIlv5qtH-M6Mk-w6dDaEzqrKf0AN-sjH3poH8H_4ry78AvkR5fg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2443519539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Weinstein, Susan P ; Korhonen, Katrina ; Cirelli, Claire ; Schnall, Mitchell D ; McDonald, Elizabeth S ; Pantel, Austin R ; Zuckerman, Samantha ; Borthakur, Ari ; Conant, Emily F</creator><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Susan P ; Korhonen, Katrina ; Cirelli, Claire ; Schnall, Mitchell D ; McDonald, Elizabeth S ; Pantel, Austin R ; Zuckerman, Samantha ; Borthakur, Ari ; Conant, Emily F</creatorcontrib><description>Although mammography is the standard of care for breast cancer screening, dense breast tissue decreases mammographic sensitivity. We report the prevalent cancer detection rate (CDR) from the first clinical implementation of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MR) as a supplemental screening test in women with dense breasts. The study was approved by the institutional review board and is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act complaint. This retrospective review includes women who were imaged between January 1, 2016 and February 28, 2019. On a 1.5 Tesla magnet, the imaging protocol consisted of three sequences: Short-TI Inversion Recovery (STIR), precontrast, and postcontrast. A subtraction sequence and a maximum intensity projection were generated. We report the patient-level CDR and the positive predictive value of AB-MR examinations after negative/benign digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Out of 511 prevalent rounds of AB-MR examinations, 36 women were excluded. The remaining 475 asymptomatic women with dense breasts had negative/benign DBT examinations before the AB-MR. There were 420 of 475 (88.4%) benign/negative examinations, 13 of 475 (2.7%) follow-up recommendations, and 42 biopsy recommendations. Thirty-nine biopsies were completed, resulting in 12/39 (30.8%) malignancies in 12 women: seven invasive carcinomas and five ductal carcinoma in situ. One additional patient was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma at the time of 6-month follow-up. The CDR was 27.4 per 1,000 (13 of 475; 95% CI, 16.1 to 46.3). The size of invasive carcinomas ranged from 0.6-1.0 cm (mean, 0.5 cm). Of the seven women who underwent surgical evaluation of the axilla, zero of seven patients had positive nodes. There were no interval cancers at 1-year follow-up. Preliminary results from clinical implementation of screening AB-MR resulted in a CDR of 27.4/1,000 at the patient level after DBT in women with dense breasts. Additional evaluation is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.02198</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32931396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biopsy - methods ; Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Breast - pathology ; Breast Density ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2020-11, Vol.38 (33), p.3874-3882</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-bb3221ec0a7acbe6bc351cd3b7787afe1884c4f5ab563986b7c9c6a652c416173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-bb3221ec0a7acbe6bc351cd3b7787afe1884c4f5ab563986b7c9c6a652c416173</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7209-4216 ; 0000-0002-8872-2846 ; 0000-0002-3567-4203 ; 0000-0001-5763-8847 ; 0000-0001-9331-644X ; 0000-0001-6159-1500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3715,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32931396$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Susan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cirelli, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnall, Mitchell D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Elizabeth S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantel, Austin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borthakur, Ari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conant, Emily F</creatorcontrib><title>Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Although mammography is the standard of care for breast cancer screening, dense breast tissue decreases mammographic sensitivity. We report the prevalent cancer detection rate (CDR) from the first clinical implementation of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MR) as a supplemental screening test in women with dense breasts. The study was approved by the institutional review board and is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act complaint. This retrospective review includes women who were imaged between January 1, 2016 and February 28, 2019. On a 1.5 Tesla magnet, the imaging protocol consisted of three sequences: Short-TI Inversion Recovery (STIR), precontrast, and postcontrast. A subtraction sequence and a maximum intensity projection were generated. We report the patient-level CDR and the positive predictive value of AB-MR examinations after negative/benign digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Out of 511 prevalent rounds of AB-MR examinations, 36 women were excluded. The remaining 475 asymptomatic women with dense breasts had negative/benign DBT examinations before the AB-MR. There were 420 of 475 (88.4%) benign/negative examinations, 13 of 475 (2.7%) follow-up recommendations, and 42 biopsy recommendations. Thirty-nine biopsies were completed, resulting in 12/39 (30.8%) malignancies in 12 women: seven invasive carcinomas and five ductal carcinoma in situ. One additional patient was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma at the time of 6-month follow-up. The CDR was 27.4 per 1,000 (13 of 475; 95% CI, 16.1 to 46.3). The size of invasive carcinomas ranged from 0.6-1.0 cm (mean, 0.5 cm). Of the seven women who underwent surgical evaluation of the axilla, zero of seven patients had positive nodes. There were no interval cancers at 1-year follow-up. Preliminary results from clinical implementation of screening AB-MR resulted in a CDR of 27.4/1,000 at the patient level after DBT in women with dense breasts. Additional evaluation is warranted.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Density</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAURi0EgvLYmJFHBlL8iON4LOVVBEJqQWWLbOcmBBKn2Ekl_j0BCtOVvnt0hoPQMSVjygg5v5s-jqkaE0ZVuoVGVDAZSSnENhoRyVlEU_6yh_ZDeCOExikXu2iPM8UpV8kI9RNjPKwr3UGOLzzo0OEHXTroKovnEFqnnQU8a3RZuRIXrceLfrWqoQHX6RovrAdw36-2wMt2WPGy6l7xJbgAG2HA2uV4sgavS8DzKrwfop1C1wGONvcAPV9fPU1vo_vHm9l0ch9ZpmgXGcMZo2CJltoaSIzlgtqcGylTqQugaRrbuBDaiISrNDHSKpvoRDAb04RKfoBOf70r3370ELqsqYKFutYO2j5kLI4HoxJcDejZL2p9G4KHIlv5qtH-M6Mk-w6dDaEzqrKf0AN-sjH3poH8H_4ry78AvkR5fg</recordid><startdate>20201120</startdate><enddate>20201120</enddate><creator>Weinstein, Susan P</creator><creator>Korhonen, Katrina</creator><creator>Cirelli, Claire</creator><creator>Schnall, Mitchell D</creator><creator>McDonald, Elizabeth S</creator><creator>Pantel, Austin R</creator><creator>Zuckerman, Samantha</creator><creator>Borthakur, Ari</creator><creator>Conant, Emily F</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7209-4216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8872-2846</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3567-4203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5763-8847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9331-644X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-1500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201120</creationdate><title>Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk</title><author>Weinstein, Susan P ; Korhonen, Katrina ; Cirelli, Claire ; Schnall, Mitchell D ; McDonald, Elizabeth S ; Pantel, Austin R ; Zuckerman, Samantha ; Borthakur, Ari ; Conant, Emily F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-bb3221ec0a7acbe6bc351cd3b7787afe1884c4f5ab563986b7c9c6a652c416173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Density</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Susan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korhonen, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cirelli, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnall, Mitchell D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Elizabeth S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantel, Austin R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borthakur, Ari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conant, Emily F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weinstein, Susan P</au><au>Korhonen, Katrina</au><au>Cirelli, Claire</au><au>Schnall, Mitchell D</au><au>McDonald, Elizabeth S</au><au>Pantel, Austin R</au><au>Zuckerman, Samantha</au><au>Borthakur, Ari</au><au>Conant, Emily F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-11-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>33</issue><spage>3874</spage><epage>3882</epage><pages>3874-3882</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Although mammography is the standard of care for breast cancer screening, dense breast tissue decreases mammographic sensitivity. We report the prevalent cancer detection rate (CDR) from the first clinical implementation of abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MR) as a supplemental screening test in women with dense breasts. The study was approved by the institutional review board and is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act complaint. This retrospective review includes women who were imaged between January 1, 2016 and February 28, 2019. On a 1.5 Tesla magnet, the imaging protocol consisted of three sequences: Short-TI Inversion Recovery (STIR), precontrast, and postcontrast. A subtraction sequence and a maximum intensity projection were generated. We report the patient-level CDR and the positive predictive value of AB-MR examinations after negative/benign digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Out of 511 prevalent rounds of AB-MR examinations, 36 women were excluded. The remaining 475 asymptomatic women with dense breasts had negative/benign DBT examinations before the AB-MR. There were 420 of 475 (88.4%) benign/negative examinations, 13 of 475 (2.7%) follow-up recommendations, and 42 biopsy recommendations. Thirty-nine biopsies were completed, resulting in 12/39 (30.8%) malignancies in 12 women: seven invasive carcinomas and five ductal carcinoma in situ. One additional patient was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma at the time of 6-month follow-up. The CDR was 27.4 per 1,000 (13 of 475; 95% CI, 16.1 to 46.3). The size of invasive carcinomas ranged from 0.6-1.0 cm (mean, 0.5 cm). Of the seven women who underwent surgical evaluation of the axilla, zero of seven patients had positive nodes. There were no interval cancers at 1-year follow-up. Preliminary results from clinical implementation of screening AB-MR resulted in a CDR of 27.4/1,000 at the patient level after DBT in women with dense breasts. Additional evaluation is warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32931396</pmid><doi>10.1200/JCO.19.02198</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7209-4216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8872-2846</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3567-4203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5763-8847</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9331-644X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-1500</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2020-11, Vol.38 (33), p.3874-3882
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2443519539
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Biopsy - methods
Breast - diagnostic imaging
Breast - pathology
Breast Density
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
title Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T17%3A07%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abbreviated%20Breast%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20for%20Supplemental%20Screening%20of%20Women%20With%20Dense%20Breasts%20and%20Average%20Risk&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Weinstein,%20Susan%20P&rft.date=2020-11-20&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=33&rft.spage=3874&rft.epage=3882&rft.pages=3874-3882&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JCO.19.02198&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2443519539%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2443519539&rft_id=info:pmid/32931396&rfr_iscdi=true