Right bundle branch block–type wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6: Development and validation of electrocardiographic differentiation criteria
Differentiation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) pattern from ventricular tachycardia (VT) is difficult, particularly when the R/S ratio in lead V6 is below 1.0. We sought to investigate the electrocardiographic criteria for distinguishing between these a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart rhythm 2021-02, Vol.18 (2), p.181-188 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 188 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Heart rhythm |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Kim, Minsu Kwon, Chang Hee Lee, Ji Hyun Hwang, Ki Won Choi, Hyung Oh Kim, Yong-Giun Lee, Kwang-No Ahn, Jinhee Park, Hyoung-Seob Nam, Gi-Byoung |
description | Differentiation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) pattern from ventricular tachycardia (VT) is difficult, particularly when the R/S ratio in lead V6 is below 1.0.
We sought to investigate the electrocardiographic criteria for distinguishing between these arrhythmias.
We investigated electrocardiographic parameters from 111 consecutive patients who had RBBB pattern wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S ratio in lead V6 (72 VTs, 39 SVTs). Diagnostic criteria from the previous algorithms were compared with our new criterion, the RS/QRS ratio, which was defined as the ratio of the interval from the onset of the QRS complex to the nadir of the S wave, divided by the QRS width in lead V6. The RS/QRS ratio was further tested in a prospective population (31 fascicular VTs, 29 SVTs).
The diagnostic accuracy of previous criteria (Brugada algorithm, Vereckei algorithm, and R-wave peak time criterion) was only modest. However, the RS/QRS ratio in lead V6 was significantly lower in SVT than in VT (0.36 ± 0.04 vs 0.50 ± 0.08; P < .001). A cutoff value of the RS/QRS ratio >0.41 differentiated VT from SVT with a high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 97.2%; specificity 89.7%). When tested in a prospective population with fascicular VT, the diagnostic accuracy of the criteria was maintained (sensitivity 90.3%; specificity 86.2%).
The RS/QRS ratio >0.41 in lead V6 is a simple and reliable index for distinguishing VT from SVT in RBBB pattern wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6. This criterion was particularly useful for the differential diagnosis of fascicular VT from RBBB pattern SVT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2442843739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1547527120308663</els_id><sourcerecordid>2442843739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-7e58304d043944c4a1bdebc88b1f0ab0df44720ed73674b94647df8a02a6dfc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQxyNEJUrLE3DxkUtSfyXOInFA5aNIlRDLx9Wa2JPGixMH27uwt74DT9JX4knIdpG49TQjze8_0syvKJ4zWjHKmotNNcQ8jBWnnFa0rSgXj4pTVtdNKVrFHh96qcqaK_akeJrShlK-aqg4Le7W7mbIpNtO1iPpIkxmIJ0P5vuf2995PyP56SyST-vPxIRx9viLZDDD3kC0DpZhHgiQiDuMCS1ZX_zn3EQ8giXfmpfkzQL4MI84ZQKTJTvwzkJ2YSKhJ-jR5Bjud4abCPPgDLGu7zEuAXfkTHQZo4Pz4qQHn_DZv3pWfH339svlVXn98f2Hy9fXpeE1y6XCuhVUWirFSkojgXUWO9O2HespdNT2UipO0SrRKNmtZCOV7VugHBrbGyXOihfHvXMMP7aYsh5dMug9TBi2SXMpeSuFEqsFFUfUxJBSxF7P0Y0Q95pRfRCkN_pekD4I0rTVi6Al9eqYwuWKncOok3E4GbQuLv_QNrgH838BFGqfoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2442843739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Right bundle branch block–type wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6: Development and validation of electrocardiographic differentiation criteria</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kim, Minsu ; Kwon, Chang Hee ; Lee, Ji Hyun ; Hwang, Ki Won ; Choi, Hyung Oh ; Kim, Yong-Giun ; Lee, Kwang-No ; Ahn, Jinhee ; Park, Hyoung-Seob ; Nam, Gi-Byoung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minsu ; Kwon, Chang Hee ; Lee, Ji Hyun ; Hwang, Ki Won ; Choi, Hyung Oh ; Kim, Yong-Giun ; Lee, Kwang-No ; Ahn, Jinhee ; Park, Hyoung-Seob ; Nam, Gi-Byoung</creatorcontrib><description>Differentiation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) pattern from ventricular tachycardia (VT) is difficult, particularly when the R/S ratio in lead V6 is below 1.0.
We sought to investigate the electrocardiographic criteria for distinguishing between these arrhythmias.
We investigated electrocardiographic parameters from 111 consecutive patients who had RBBB pattern wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S ratio in lead V6 (72 VTs, 39 SVTs). Diagnostic criteria from the previous algorithms were compared with our new criterion, the RS/QRS ratio, which was defined as the ratio of the interval from the onset of the QRS complex to the nadir of the S wave, divided by the QRS width in lead V6. The RS/QRS ratio was further tested in a prospective population (31 fascicular VTs, 29 SVTs).
The diagnostic accuracy of previous criteria (Brugada algorithm, Vereckei algorithm, and R-wave peak time criterion) was only modest. However, the RS/QRS ratio in lead V6 was significantly lower in SVT than in VT (0.36 ± 0.04 vs 0.50 ± 0.08; P < .001). A cutoff value of the RS/QRS ratio >0.41 differentiated VT from SVT with a high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 97.2%; specificity 89.7%). When tested in a prospective population with fascicular VT, the diagnostic accuracy of the criteria was maintained (sensitivity 90.3%; specificity 86.2%).
The RS/QRS ratio >0.41 in lead V6 is a simple and reliable index for distinguishing VT from SVT in RBBB pattern wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6. This criterion was particularly useful for the differential diagnosis of fascicular VT from RBBB pattern SVT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-5271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Differential diagnosis ; Electrocardiography ; Fascicular ventricular tachycardia ; Supraventricular tachycardia ; Ventricular tachycardia</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm, 2021-02, Vol.18 (2), p.181-188</ispartof><rights>2020 Heart Rhythm Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-7e58304d043944c4a1bdebc88b1f0ab0df44720ed73674b94647df8a02a6dfc73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-7e58304d043944c4a1bdebc88b1f0ab0df44720ed73674b94647df8a02a6dfc73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1372-330X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Chang Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Ki Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Hyung Oh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong-Giun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kwang-No</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jinhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyoung-Seob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Gi-Byoung</creatorcontrib><title>Right bundle branch block–type wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6: Development and validation of electrocardiographic differentiation criteria</title><title>Heart rhythm</title><description>Differentiation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) pattern from ventricular tachycardia (VT) is difficult, particularly when the R/S ratio in lead V6 is below 1.0.
We sought to investigate the electrocardiographic criteria for distinguishing between these arrhythmias.
We investigated electrocardiographic parameters from 111 consecutive patients who had RBBB pattern wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S ratio in lead V6 (72 VTs, 39 SVTs). Diagnostic criteria from the previous algorithms were compared with our new criterion, the RS/QRS ratio, which was defined as the ratio of the interval from the onset of the QRS complex to the nadir of the S wave, divided by the QRS width in lead V6. The RS/QRS ratio was further tested in a prospective population (31 fascicular VTs, 29 SVTs).
The diagnostic accuracy of previous criteria (Brugada algorithm, Vereckei algorithm, and R-wave peak time criterion) was only modest. However, the RS/QRS ratio in lead V6 was significantly lower in SVT than in VT (0.36 ± 0.04 vs 0.50 ± 0.08; P < .001). A cutoff value of the RS/QRS ratio >0.41 differentiated VT from SVT with a high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 97.2%; specificity 89.7%). When tested in a prospective population with fascicular VT, the diagnostic accuracy of the criteria was maintained (sensitivity 90.3%; specificity 86.2%).
The RS/QRS ratio >0.41 in lead V6 is a simple and reliable index for distinguishing VT from SVT in RBBB pattern wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6. This criterion was particularly useful for the differential diagnosis of fascicular VT from RBBB pattern SVT.</description><subject>Differential diagnosis</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Fascicular ventricular tachycardia</subject><subject>Supraventricular tachycardia</subject><subject>Ventricular tachycardia</subject><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQxyNEJUrLE3DxkUtSfyXOInFA5aNIlRDLx9Wa2JPGixMH27uwt74DT9JX4knIdpG49TQjze8_0syvKJ4zWjHKmotNNcQ8jBWnnFa0rSgXj4pTVtdNKVrFHh96qcqaK_akeJrShlK-aqg4Le7W7mbIpNtO1iPpIkxmIJ0P5vuf2995PyP56SyST-vPxIRx9viLZDDD3kC0DpZhHgiQiDuMCS1ZX_zn3EQ8giXfmpfkzQL4MI84ZQKTJTvwzkJ2YSKhJ-jR5Bjud4abCPPgDLGu7zEuAXfkTHQZo4Pz4qQHn_DZv3pWfH339svlVXn98f2Hy9fXpeE1y6XCuhVUWirFSkojgXUWO9O2HespdNT2UipO0SrRKNmtZCOV7VugHBrbGyXOihfHvXMMP7aYsh5dMug9TBi2SXMpeSuFEqsFFUfUxJBSxF7P0Y0Q95pRfRCkN_pekD4I0rTVi6Al9eqYwuWKncOok3E4GbQuLv_QNrgH838BFGqfoQ</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Kim, Minsu</creator><creator>Kwon, Chang Hee</creator><creator>Lee, Ji Hyun</creator><creator>Hwang, Ki Won</creator><creator>Choi, Hyung Oh</creator><creator>Kim, Yong-Giun</creator><creator>Lee, Kwang-No</creator><creator>Ahn, Jinhee</creator><creator>Park, Hyoung-Seob</creator><creator>Nam, Gi-Byoung</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-330X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Right bundle branch block–type wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6: Development and validation of electrocardiographic differentiation criteria</title><author>Kim, Minsu ; Kwon, Chang Hee ; Lee, Ji Hyun ; Hwang, Ki Won ; Choi, Hyung Oh ; Kim, Yong-Giun ; Lee, Kwang-No ; Ahn, Jinhee ; Park, Hyoung-Seob ; Nam, Gi-Byoung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-7e58304d043944c4a1bdebc88b1f0ab0df44720ed73674b94647df8a02a6dfc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Differential diagnosis</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Fascicular ventricular tachycardia</topic><topic>Supraventricular tachycardia</topic><topic>Ventricular tachycardia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Minsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Chang Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Ji Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Ki Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Hyung Oh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong-Giun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kwang-No</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jinhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hyoung-Seob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nam, Gi-Byoung</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Minsu</au><au>Kwon, Chang Hee</au><au>Lee, Ji Hyun</au><au>Hwang, Ki Won</au><au>Choi, Hyung Oh</au><au>Kim, Yong-Giun</au><au>Lee, Kwang-No</au><au>Ahn, Jinhee</au><au>Park, Hyoung-Seob</au><au>Nam, Gi-Byoung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Right bundle branch block–type wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6: Development and validation of electrocardiographic differentiation criteria</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>181-188</pages><issn>1547-5271</issn><eissn>1556-3871</eissn><abstract>Differentiation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with a right bundle branch block (RBBB) pattern from ventricular tachycardia (VT) is difficult, particularly when the R/S ratio in lead V6 is below 1.0.
We sought to investigate the electrocardiographic criteria for distinguishing between these arrhythmias.
We investigated electrocardiographic parameters from 111 consecutive patients who had RBBB pattern wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S ratio in lead V6 (72 VTs, 39 SVTs). Diagnostic criteria from the previous algorithms were compared with our new criterion, the RS/QRS ratio, which was defined as the ratio of the interval from the onset of the QRS complex to the nadir of the S wave, divided by the QRS width in lead V6. The RS/QRS ratio was further tested in a prospective population (31 fascicular VTs, 29 SVTs).
The diagnostic accuracy of previous criteria (Brugada algorithm, Vereckei algorithm, and R-wave peak time criterion) was only modest. However, the RS/QRS ratio in lead V6 was significantly lower in SVT than in VT (0.36 ± 0.04 vs 0.50 ± 0.08; P < .001). A cutoff value of the RS/QRS ratio >0.41 differentiated VT from SVT with a high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 97.2%; specificity 89.7%). When tested in a prospective population with fascicular VT, the diagnostic accuracy of the criteria was maintained (sensitivity 90.3%; specificity 86.2%).
The RS/QRS ratio >0.41 in lead V6 is a simple and reliable index for distinguishing VT from SVT in RBBB pattern wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6. This criterion was particularly useful for the differential diagnosis of fascicular VT from RBBB pattern SVT.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.023</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1372-330X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1547-5271 |
ispartof | Heart rhythm, 2021-02, Vol.18 (2), p.181-188 |
issn | 1547-5271 1556-3871 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2442843739 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Differential diagnosis Electrocardiography Fascicular ventricular tachycardia Supraventricular tachycardia Ventricular tachycardia |
title | Right bundle branch block–type wide QRS complex tachycardia with a reversed R/S complex in lead V6: Development and validation of electrocardiographic differentiation criteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T20%3A53%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Right%20bundle%20branch%20block%E2%80%93type%20wide%20QRS%20complex%20tachycardia%20with%20a%20reversed%20R/S%20complex%20in%20lead%20V6:%20Development%20and%20validation%20of%20electrocardiographic%20differentiation%20criteria&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm&rft.au=Kim,%20Minsu&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=181-188&rft.issn=1547-5271&rft.eissn=1556-3871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2442843739%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2442843739&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1547527120308663&rfr_iscdi=true |