Over-diagnosed prostate cancer in solid organ recipients: lessons from the last 3 decades

Introduction Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common neoplasia in men. With aging of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), its incidence is likely to increase. The aim of this study was to analyze PC screening results retrospectively in renal transplant recipients (RTR), hepatic transplant recip...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International urology and nephrology 2021-02, Vol.53 (2), p.241-248
Hauptverfasser: Waeckel, Thibaut, Ait Said, Khelifa, Altieri, Mario, Belin, Annette, Doerfler, Arnaud, Tillou, Xavier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 248
container_issue 2
container_start_page 241
container_title International urology and nephrology
container_volume 53
creator Waeckel, Thibaut
Ait Said, Khelifa
Altieri, Mario
Belin, Annette
Doerfler, Arnaud
Tillou, Xavier
description Introduction Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common neoplasia in men. With aging of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), its incidence is likely to increase. The aim of this study was to analyze PC screening results retrospectively in renal transplant recipients (RTR), hepatic transplant recipients (HTR) and cardiac transplant recipients (CTR). Patients and methods A retrospective monocentric study of PC diagnosed in renal, hepatic or cardiac transplanted patients since 1989 was performed. All the patients were followed annually by digital rectal examination and prostate serum antigen (PSA) dosage. Results 57 PC were diagnosed in 1565 SOTR male patients (3.6%): 35 RTR, 15 HTR, and 7 CTR. Standard incidence ratio (SIR) was 41.9. Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 64.5 (60.5–69.2). Mean time between transplantation and PC diagnosis was 95.7 (39.0–139.5) months. Median PSA rate was 7.0 (6.2–13) ng/mL. Clinical stages were T1, T2, and T3, respectively, for 29, 22 and 6 patients. Diagnosis was done by screening in 52 patients, after prostatitis in 1 and bone pain in another. Three PC were discovered on prostate chips after transurethral resection. Two patients were treated by active surveillance. 39 (68%) patients (25 RTR, 11 HTR and 3 CTR) were treated by radical prostatectomy. Histological results were 30 pT2 and 9 pT3 tumors, with 7 positive surgical margins. Gleason score was 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in, respectively, in 2, 24, 11, 1 and 1 patients. One patient with positive pelvic nodes was treated with hormonal therapy (HT). One had a biochemical relapse at 10 months and underwent salvage radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 85.2 months (46.1–115.0). 23 (40.4%) patients died. Two (3.6%) RTR and 1 (1.8%) CTR died from their PC. Standard incidence ratio were, respectively, 42.4, 48.2 and 39 in RTR, HTR and CTR. Conclusion Systematic screening in male SOTR after 50 years old could not be recommended. In the last 3 decades, we diagnosed too many low-risk prostate cancers strongly increasing the SIR but failing to decrease prostate cancer related mortality. SOTR should undergo individual screening with prior MRI when PSA rates are high. Management should not be different from that of the general population.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11255-020-02636-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2442841648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2486302174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f0954a278164e8d13ef84cdeb6dcff7fee4003bf0747d80635c1fbb99fca58ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PHDEQhq0oKHd8_IEUyFIamg3jj931posQCZGQaEiRyvLa48ue9ryHZw-Jf4_hgEgpKKwp_LzvjB7GPgv4KgDacxJC1nUFEsprVFPJD2wp6lZVsjb6I1uCAlGJRqoFOyRaA0BnAD6xhZJdCQi9ZH9u7jFXYXCrNBEGvs0TzW5G7l3ymPmQOE3jEPiUVy7xjH7YDphm-sZHJJoS8ZinDZ__Ih8dzVzxgN4FpGN2EN1IePIyj9jvH5e3F1fV9c3PXxffryuv2nquInS1drI1otFoglAYjfYB-yb4GNuIqAFUH6HVbTDQqNqL2PddF72rjXfqiJ3te8vpdzuk2W4G8jiOLuG0Iyu1lkaXdlPQL_-h62mXU7muUKZRIEWrCyX3lC8uKGO02zxsXH6wAuyTeLsXb4t4-yzeyhI6fane9RsMb5FX0wVQe4DKV1ph_rf7ndpHOz6N_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486302174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Over-diagnosed prostate cancer in solid organ recipients: lessons from the last 3 decades</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Waeckel, Thibaut ; Ait Said, Khelifa ; Altieri, Mario ; Belin, Annette ; Doerfler, Arnaud ; Tillou, Xavier</creator><creatorcontrib>Waeckel, Thibaut ; Ait Said, Khelifa ; Altieri, Mario ; Belin, Annette ; Doerfler, Arnaud ; Tillou, Xavier</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common neoplasia in men. With aging of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), its incidence is likely to increase. The aim of this study was to analyze PC screening results retrospectively in renal transplant recipients (RTR), hepatic transplant recipients (HTR) and cardiac transplant recipients (CTR). Patients and methods A retrospective monocentric study of PC diagnosed in renal, hepatic or cardiac transplanted patients since 1989 was performed. All the patients were followed annually by digital rectal examination and prostate serum antigen (PSA) dosage. Results 57 PC were diagnosed in 1565 SOTR male patients (3.6%): 35 RTR, 15 HTR, and 7 CTR. Standard incidence ratio (SIR) was 41.9. Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 64.5 (60.5–69.2). Mean time between transplantation and PC diagnosis was 95.7 (39.0–139.5) months. Median PSA rate was 7.0 (6.2–13) ng/mL. Clinical stages were T1, T2, and T3, respectively, for 29, 22 and 6 patients. Diagnosis was done by screening in 52 patients, after prostatitis in 1 and bone pain in another. Three PC were discovered on prostate chips after transurethral resection. Two patients were treated by active surveillance. 39 (68%) patients (25 RTR, 11 HTR and 3 CTR) were treated by radical prostatectomy. Histological results were 30 pT2 and 9 pT3 tumors, with 7 positive surgical margins. Gleason score was 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in, respectively, in 2, 24, 11, 1 and 1 patients. One patient with positive pelvic nodes was treated with hormonal therapy (HT). One had a biochemical relapse at 10 months and underwent salvage radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 85.2 months (46.1–115.0). 23 (40.4%) patients died. Two (3.6%) RTR and 1 (1.8%) CTR died from their PC. Standard incidence ratio were, respectively, 42.4, 48.2 and 39 in RTR, HTR and CTR. Conclusion Systematic screening in male SOTR after 50 years old could not be recommended. In the last 3 decades, we diagnosed too many low-risk prostate cancers strongly increasing the SIR but failing to decrease prostate cancer related mortality. SOTR should undergo individual screening with prior MRI when PSA rates are high. Management should not be different from that of the general population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-1623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02636-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32926314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aging ; Cancer surgery ; Diagnosis ; Heart transplantation ; Kidney transplantation ; Liver transplantation ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nephrology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatitis ; Radiation therapy ; Rectum ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Tumors ; Urological surgery ; Urology ; Urology - Original Paper</subject><ispartof>International urology and nephrology, 2021-02, Vol.53 (2), p.241-248</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f0954a278164e8d13ef84cdeb6dcff7fee4003bf0747d80635c1fbb99fca58ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f0954a278164e8d13ef84cdeb6dcff7fee4003bf0747d80635c1fbb99fca58ca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11255-020-02636-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11255-020-02636-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32926314$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waeckel, Thibaut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ait Said, Khelifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altieri, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belin, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerfler, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tillou, Xavier</creatorcontrib><title>Over-diagnosed prostate cancer in solid organ recipients: lessons from the last 3 decades</title><title>International urology and nephrology</title><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><description>Introduction Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common neoplasia in men. With aging of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), its incidence is likely to increase. The aim of this study was to analyze PC screening results retrospectively in renal transplant recipients (RTR), hepatic transplant recipients (HTR) and cardiac transplant recipients (CTR). Patients and methods A retrospective monocentric study of PC diagnosed in renal, hepatic or cardiac transplanted patients since 1989 was performed. All the patients were followed annually by digital rectal examination and prostate serum antigen (PSA) dosage. Results 57 PC were diagnosed in 1565 SOTR male patients (3.6%): 35 RTR, 15 HTR, and 7 CTR. Standard incidence ratio (SIR) was 41.9. Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 64.5 (60.5–69.2). Mean time between transplantation and PC diagnosis was 95.7 (39.0–139.5) months. Median PSA rate was 7.0 (6.2–13) ng/mL. Clinical stages were T1, T2, and T3, respectively, for 29, 22 and 6 patients. Diagnosis was done by screening in 52 patients, after prostatitis in 1 and bone pain in another. Three PC were discovered on prostate chips after transurethral resection. Two patients were treated by active surveillance. 39 (68%) patients (25 RTR, 11 HTR and 3 CTR) were treated by radical prostatectomy. Histological results were 30 pT2 and 9 pT3 tumors, with 7 positive surgical margins. Gleason score was 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in, respectively, in 2, 24, 11, 1 and 1 patients. One patient with positive pelvic nodes was treated with hormonal therapy (HT). One had a biochemical relapse at 10 months and underwent salvage radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 85.2 months (46.1–115.0). 23 (40.4%) patients died. Two (3.6%) RTR and 1 (1.8%) CTR died from their PC. Standard incidence ratio were, respectively, 42.4, 48.2 and 39 in RTR, HTR and CTR. Conclusion Systematic screening in male SOTR after 50 years old could not be recommended. In the last 3 decades, we diagnosed too many low-risk prostate cancers strongly increasing the SIR but failing to decrease prostate cancer related mortality. SOTR should undergo individual screening with prior MRI when PSA rates are high. Management should not be different from that of the general population.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart transplantation</subject><subject>Kidney transplantation</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatitis</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Urology - Original Paper</subject><issn>0301-1623</issn><issn>1573-2584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PHDEQhq0oKHd8_IEUyFIamg3jj931posQCZGQaEiRyvLa48ue9ryHZw-Jf4_hgEgpKKwp_LzvjB7GPgv4KgDacxJC1nUFEsprVFPJD2wp6lZVsjb6I1uCAlGJRqoFOyRaA0BnAD6xhZJdCQi9ZH9u7jFXYXCrNBEGvs0TzW5G7l3ymPmQOE3jEPiUVy7xjH7YDphm-sZHJJoS8ZinDZ__Ih8dzVzxgN4FpGN2EN1IePIyj9jvH5e3F1fV9c3PXxffryuv2nquInS1drI1otFoglAYjfYB-yb4GNuIqAFUH6HVbTDQqNqL2PddF72rjXfqiJ3te8vpdzuk2W4G8jiOLuG0Iyu1lkaXdlPQL_-h62mXU7muUKZRIEWrCyX3lC8uKGO02zxsXH6wAuyTeLsXb4t4-yzeyhI6fane9RsMb5FX0wVQe4DKV1ph_rf7ndpHOz6N_Q</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Waeckel, Thibaut</creator><creator>Ait Said, Khelifa</creator><creator>Altieri, Mario</creator><creator>Belin, Annette</creator><creator>Doerfler, Arnaud</creator><creator>Tillou, Xavier</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Over-diagnosed prostate cancer in solid organ recipients: lessons from the last 3 decades</title><author>Waeckel, Thibaut ; Ait Said, Khelifa ; Altieri, Mario ; Belin, Annette ; Doerfler, Arnaud ; Tillou, Xavier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f0954a278164e8d13ef84cdeb6dcff7fee4003bf0747d80635c1fbb99fca58ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart transplantation</topic><topic>Kidney transplantation</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatitis</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Urology - Original Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waeckel, Thibaut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ait Said, Khelifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altieri, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belin, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerfler, Arnaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tillou, Xavier</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waeckel, Thibaut</au><au>Ait Said, Khelifa</au><au>Altieri, Mario</au><au>Belin, Annette</au><au>Doerfler, Arnaud</au><au>Tillou, Xavier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Over-diagnosed prostate cancer in solid organ recipients: lessons from the last 3 decades</atitle><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle><stitle>Int Urol Nephrol</stitle><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>241-248</pages><issn>0301-1623</issn><eissn>1573-2584</eissn><abstract>Introduction Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common neoplasia in men. With aging of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), its incidence is likely to increase. The aim of this study was to analyze PC screening results retrospectively in renal transplant recipients (RTR), hepatic transplant recipients (HTR) and cardiac transplant recipients (CTR). Patients and methods A retrospective monocentric study of PC diagnosed in renal, hepatic or cardiac transplanted patients since 1989 was performed. All the patients were followed annually by digital rectal examination and prostate serum antigen (PSA) dosage. Results 57 PC were diagnosed in 1565 SOTR male patients (3.6%): 35 RTR, 15 HTR, and 7 CTR. Standard incidence ratio (SIR) was 41.9. Mean age at the time of diagnosis was 64.5 (60.5–69.2). Mean time between transplantation and PC diagnosis was 95.7 (39.0–139.5) months. Median PSA rate was 7.0 (6.2–13) ng/mL. Clinical stages were T1, T2, and T3, respectively, for 29, 22 and 6 patients. Diagnosis was done by screening in 52 patients, after prostatitis in 1 and bone pain in another. Three PC were discovered on prostate chips after transurethral resection. Two patients were treated by active surveillance. 39 (68%) patients (25 RTR, 11 HTR and 3 CTR) were treated by radical prostatectomy. Histological results were 30 pT2 and 9 pT3 tumors, with 7 positive surgical margins. Gleason score was 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in, respectively, in 2, 24, 11, 1 and 1 patients. One patient with positive pelvic nodes was treated with hormonal therapy (HT). One had a biochemical relapse at 10 months and underwent salvage radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 85.2 months (46.1–115.0). 23 (40.4%) patients died. Two (3.6%) RTR and 1 (1.8%) CTR died from their PC. Standard incidence ratio were, respectively, 42.4, 48.2 and 39 in RTR, HTR and CTR. Conclusion Systematic screening in male SOTR after 50 years old could not be recommended. In the last 3 decades, we diagnosed too many low-risk prostate cancers strongly increasing the SIR but failing to decrease prostate cancer related mortality. SOTR should undergo individual screening with prior MRI when PSA rates are high. Management should not be different from that of the general population.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>32926314</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11255-020-02636-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-1623
ispartof International urology and nephrology, 2021-02, Vol.53 (2), p.241-248
issn 0301-1623
1573-2584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2442841648
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Aging
Cancer surgery
Diagnosis
Heart transplantation
Kidney transplantation
Liver transplantation
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nephrology
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Prostatitis
Radiation therapy
Rectum
Transplants & implants
Tumors
Urological surgery
Urology
Urology - Original Paper
title Over-diagnosed prostate cancer in solid organ recipients: lessons from the last 3 decades
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T12%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Over-diagnosed%20prostate%20cancer%20in%20solid%20organ%20recipients:%20lessons%20from%20the%20last%203%20decades&rft.jtitle=International%20urology%20and%20nephrology&rft.au=Waeckel,%20Thibaut&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=241-248&rft.issn=0301-1623&rft.eissn=1573-2584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11255-020-02636-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2486302174%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486302174&rft_id=info:pmid/32926314&rfr_iscdi=true