Genomic expression assay testing among American Indian and Alaska Native women with breast cancer

Background Breast cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer mortality for all women, including American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The use of the 21‐gene recurrence score (RS) appears to be predictive of the benefit of chemotherapy for women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2020-12, Vol.126 (24), p.5222-5229
Hauptverfasser: Marmor, Schelomo, Longacre, Colleen F., Altman, Ariella M., Hui, Jane Y. C., Jensen, Eric H., Tuttle, Todd M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5229
container_issue 24
container_start_page 5222
container_title Cancer
container_volume 126
creator Marmor, Schelomo
Longacre, Colleen F.
Altman, Ariella M.
Hui, Jane Y. C.
Jensen, Eric H.
Tuttle, Todd M.
description Background Breast cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer mortality for all women, including American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The use of the 21‐gene recurrence score (RS) appears to be predictive of the benefit of chemotherapy for women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer. The objective of the current study was to compare RS testing between AI/AN and non‐Hispanic White (NHW) women with breast cancer. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to identify women with ER‐positive breast cancer from 2004 through 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with RS use, with high‐risk RS, and with chemotherapy use among those with a high‐risk RS. Results A total of 363,387 NHW patients and 1951 AI/AN patients with ER‐positive breast cancer were identified. AI/AN women were found to be less likely to undergo RS testing and, when tested, were more likely to have a high‐risk RS. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, AI/AN women were found to be significantly more likely to have a high‐risk RS (odds ratio,1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.66). Among untested women, chemotherapy use was higher for AI/AN women; however, the use of chemotherapy was not found to be significantly different between the groups with a high‐risk RS. Using Cox proportional hazards models, AI/AN race was found to be significantly associated with worse overall survival. Conclusions AI/AN women were less likely to undergo RS testing compared with NHW women and were more likely to have a high‐risk RS. Reversing the disparity in genomic expression assay testing is critical to ensure guideline‐based breast cancer treatment and improve survival rates for AI/AN women with breast cancer. Compared with non‐Hispanic White (NHW) women, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women with estrogen receptor—positive breast cancer appear to be less likely to undergo genomic expression assay testing. Among tested women, AI/AN patients with breast cancer are more likely to have high‐risk recurrence scores compared with NHW women.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.33150
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2442840707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2442840707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3930-fb31412598b05c8838a569ebc8ac7a09ee30de0a79132213b7b0c6b28dedee263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLAzEUBeAgiq3VjT9AAm5EGL1J5rksxReIgii4G-5kbjU6k6nJ1Np_b7TVhQs3uQQ-DofD2L6AEwEgT7XV7kQpkcAGGwoosghELDfZEADyKInV44DteP8SvplM1DYbKFnINFbJkOEF2a41mtPHzJH3prMcvccl78n3xj5xbLvwjltyRqPlV7Y24aCt-bhB_4r8BnvzTnzRtWT5wvTPvHKEvueBa3K7bGuKjae99R2xh_Oz-8lldH17cTUZX0daFQqiaaVELGRS5BUkOs9VjklaUKVz1BlCQaSgJsCsEEpKoaqsAp1WMq-pJpKpGrGjVe7MdW_zUL5sjdfUNGipm_tSxrHMY8ggC_TwD33p5s6GdkGlKsliFTqN2PFKadd572hazpxp0S1LAeXX8OXX8OX38AEfrCPnVUv1L_1ZOgCxAgvT0PKfqHJyM7lbhX4Co5aNTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2463574339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genomic expression assay testing among American Indian and Alaska Native women with breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Marmor, Schelomo ; Longacre, Colleen F. ; Altman, Ariella M. ; Hui, Jane Y. C. ; Jensen, Eric H. ; Tuttle, Todd M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Schelomo ; Longacre, Colleen F. ; Altman, Ariella M. ; Hui, Jane Y. C. ; Jensen, Eric H. ; Tuttle, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Breast cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer mortality for all women, including American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The use of the 21‐gene recurrence score (RS) appears to be predictive of the benefit of chemotherapy for women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer. The objective of the current study was to compare RS testing between AI/AN and non‐Hispanic White (NHW) women with breast cancer. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to identify women with ER‐positive breast cancer from 2004 through 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with RS use, with high‐risk RS, and with chemotherapy use among those with a high‐risk RS. Results A total of 363,387 NHW patients and 1951 AI/AN patients with ER‐positive breast cancer were identified. AI/AN women were found to be less likely to undergo RS testing and, when tested, were more likely to have a high‐risk RS. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, AI/AN women were found to be significantly more likely to have a high‐risk RS (odds ratio,1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.66). Among untested women, chemotherapy use was higher for AI/AN women; however, the use of chemotherapy was not found to be significantly different between the groups with a high‐risk RS. Using Cox proportional hazards models, AI/AN race was found to be significantly associated with worse overall survival. Conclusions AI/AN women were less likely to undergo RS testing compared with NHW women and were more likely to have a high‐risk RS. Reversing the disparity in genomic expression assay testing is critical to ensure guideline‐based breast cancer treatment and improve survival rates for AI/AN women with breast cancer. Compared with non‐Hispanic White (NHW) women, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women with estrogen receptor—positive breast cancer appear to be less likely to undergo genomic expression assay testing. Among tested women, AI/AN patients with breast cancer are more likely to have high‐risk recurrence scores compared with NHW women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33150</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32926435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>21‐gene recurrence score ; Adult ; Aged ; Alaska Native ; Alaska Natives - genetics ; American Indian ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Chemotherapy ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - methods ; Confidence intervals ; Epidemiology ; Estrogen receptors ; Estrogens ; Female ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling - methods ; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic - drug effects ; genomic expression assays ; Humans ; Indians, North American - genetics ; Logistic Models ; Mastectomy ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; racial disparities ; Regression analysis ; Risk ; SEER Program ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical models ; Survival ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2020-12, Vol.126 (24), p.5222-5229</ispartof><rights>2020 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2020 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3930-fb31412598b05c8838a569ebc8ac7a09ee30de0a79132213b7b0c6b28dedee263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3930-fb31412598b05c8838a569ebc8ac7a09ee30de0a79132213b7b0c6b28dedee263</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0880-2721 ; 0000-0001-6603-2062 ; 0000-0002-2628-0720 ; 0000-0003-4191-0679 ; 0000-0002-5484-5004</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.33150$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.33150$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32926435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Schelomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longacre, Colleen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altman, Ariella M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Jane Y. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Eric H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><title>Genomic expression assay testing among American Indian and Alaska Native women with breast cancer</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background Breast cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer mortality for all women, including American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The use of the 21‐gene recurrence score (RS) appears to be predictive of the benefit of chemotherapy for women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer. The objective of the current study was to compare RS testing between AI/AN and non‐Hispanic White (NHW) women with breast cancer. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to identify women with ER‐positive breast cancer from 2004 through 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with RS use, with high‐risk RS, and with chemotherapy use among those with a high‐risk RS. Results A total of 363,387 NHW patients and 1951 AI/AN patients with ER‐positive breast cancer were identified. AI/AN women were found to be less likely to undergo RS testing and, when tested, were more likely to have a high‐risk RS. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, AI/AN women were found to be significantly more likely to have a high‐risk RS (odds ratio,1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.66). Among untested women, chemotherapy use was higher for AI/AN women; however, the use of chemotherapy was not found to be significantly different between the groups with a high‐risk RS. Using Cox proportional hazards models, AI/AN race was found to be significantly associated with worse overall survival. Conclusions AI/AN women were less likely to undergo RS testing compared with NHW women and were more likely to have a high‐risk RS. Reversing the disparity in genomic expression assay testing is critical to ensure guideline‐based breast cancer treatment and improve survival rates for AI/AN women with breast cancer. Compared with non‐Hispanic White (NHW) women, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women with estrogen receptor—positive breast cancer appear to be less likely to undergo genomic expression assay testing. Among tested women, AI/AN patients with breast cancer are more likely to have high‐risk recurrence scores compared with NHW women.</description><subject>21‐gene recurrence score</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alaska Native</subject><subject>Alaska Natives - genetics</subject><subject>American Indian</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - methods</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estrogen receptors</subject><subject>Estrogens</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling - methods</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic - drug effects</subject><subject>genomic expression assays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indians, North American - genetics</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>racial disparities</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90EtLAzEUBeAgiq3VjT9AAm5EGL1J5rksxReIgii4G-5kbjU6k6nJ1Np_b7TVhQs3uQQ-DofD2L6AEwEgT7XV7kQpkcAGGwoosghELDfZEADyKInV44DteP8SvplM1DYbKFnINFbJkOEF2a41mtPHzJH3prMcvccl78n3xj5xbLvwjltyRqPlV7Y24aCt-bhB_4r8BnvzTnzRtWT5wvTPvHKEvueBa3K7bGuKjae99R2xh_Oz-8lldH17cTUZX0daFQqiaaVELGRS5BUkOs9VjklaUKVz1BlCQaSgJsCsEEpKoaqsAp1WMq-pJpKpGrGjVe7MdW_zUL5sjdfUNGipm_tSxrHMY8ggC_TwD33p5s6GdkGlKsliFTqN2PFKadd572hazpxp0S1LAeXX8OXX8OX38AEfrCPnVUv1L_1ZOgCxAgvT0PKfqHJyM7lbhX4Co5aNTA</recordid><startdate>20201215</startdate><enddate>20201215</enddate><creator>Marmor, Schelomo</creator><creator>Longacre, Colleen F.</creator><creator>Altman, Ariella M.</creator><creator>Hui, Jane Y. C.</creator><creator>Jensen, Eric H.</creator><creator>Tuttle, Todd M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-2721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6603-2062</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2628-0720</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4191-0679</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5484-5004</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201215</creationdate><title>Genomic expression assay testing among American Indian and Alaska Native women with breast cancer</title><author>Marmor, Schelomo ; Longacre, Colleen F. ; Altman, Ariella M. ; Hui, Jane Y. C. ; Jensen, Eric H. ; Tuttle, Todd M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3930-fb31412598b05c8838a569ebc8ac7a09ee30de0a79132213b7b0c6b28dedee263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>21‐gene recurrence score</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alaska Native</topic><topic>Alaska Natives - genetics</topic><topic>American Indian</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - methods</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estrogen receptors</topic><topic>Estrogens</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling - methods</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic - drug effects</topic><topic>genomic expression assays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indians, North American - genetics</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>racial disparities</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Schelomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longacre, Colleen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altman, Ariella M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Jane Y. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Eric H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marmor, Schelomo</au><au>Longacre, Colleen F.</au><au>Altman, Ariella M.</au><au>Hui, Jane Y. C.</au><au>Jensen, Eric H.</au><au>Tuttle, Todd M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genomic expression assay testing among American Indian and Alaska Native women with breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2020-12-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>5222</spage><epage>5229</epage><pages>5222-5229</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background Breast cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer mortality for all women, including American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The use of the 21‐gene recurrence score (RS) appears to be predictive of the benefit of chemotherapy for women with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer. The objective of the current study was to compare RS testing between AI/AN and non‐Hispanic White (NHW) women with breast cancer. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to identify women with ER‐positive breast cancer from 2004 through 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with RS use, with high‐risk RS, and with chemotherapy use among those with a high‐risk RS. Results A total of 363,387 NHW patients and 1951 AI/AN patients with ER‐positive breast cancer were identified. AI/AN women were found to be less likely to undergo RS testing and, when tested, were more likely to have a high‐risk RS. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, AI/AN women were found to be significantly more likely to have a high‐risk RS (odds ratio,1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.66). Among untested women, chemotherapy use was higher for AI/AN women; however, the use of chemotherapy was not found to be significantly different between the groups with a high‐risk RS. Using Cox proportional hazards models, AI/AN race was found to be significantly associated with worse overall survival. Conclusions AI/AN women were less likely to undergo RS testing compared with NHW women and were more likely to have a high‐risk RS. Reversing the disparity in genomic expression assay testing is critical to ensure guideline‐based breast cancer treatment and improve survival rates for AI/AN women with breast cancer. Compared with non‐Hispanic White (NHW) women, American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women with estrogen receptor—positive breast cancer appear to be less likely to undergo genomic expression assay testing. Among tested women, AI/AN patients with breast cancer are more likely to have high‐risk recurrence scores compared with NHW women.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32926435</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.33150</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-2721</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6603-2062</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2628-0720</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4191-0679</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5484-5004</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2020-12, Vol.126 (24), p.5222-5229
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2442840707
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 21‐gene recurrence score
Adult
Aged
Alaska Native
Alaska Natives - genetics
American Indian
Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - methods
Confidence intervals
Epidemiology
Estrogen receptors
Estrogens
Female
Gene expression
Gene Expression Profiling - methods
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic - drug effects
genomic expression assays
Humans
Indians, North American - genetics
Logistic Models
Mastectomy
Middle Aged
Oncology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
racial disparities
Regression analysis
Risk
SEER Program
Statistical analysis
Statistical models
Survival
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Genomic expression assay testing among American Indian and Alaska Native women with breast cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T18%3A02%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomic%20expression%20assay%20testing%20among%20American%20Indian%20and%20Alaska%20Native%20women%20with%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Marmor,%20Schelomo&rft.date=2020-12-15&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=5222&rft.epage=5229&rft.pages=5222-5229&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.33150&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2442840707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2463574339&rft_id=info:pmid/32926435&rfr_iscdi=true