Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) has not been studied systematically to date. Purpose To investigate the value of DWI combined with DCE-M...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta radiologica (1987) 2021-09, Vol.62 (9), p.1238-1247 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1247 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1238 |
container_title | Acta radiologica (1987) |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Yang, Lu Tan, Yuchuan Dan, Hanli Hu, Lin Zhang, Jiuquan |
description | Background
The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) has not been studied systematically to date.
Purpose
To investigate the value of DWI combined with DCE-MRI quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of PCa.
Material and Methods
A systematic search was conducted through PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases without any restriction to language up to 10 December 2019. Studies that used a combination of DWI and DCE-MRI for diagnosing PCa were included.
Results
Nine studies with 778 participants were included. The combination of DWI and DCE-MRI provide accurate performance in diagnosing PCa with pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratios of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76–0.81), 0.85 (95% CI = 0.83–0.86), 6.58 (95% CI = 3.93–11.00), 0.24 (95% CI = 0.17–0.34), and 36.43 (95% CI = 14.41–92.12), respectively. The pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9268. Moreover, 1.5-T MR scanners demonstrated a slightly better performance than 3.0-T scanners.
Conclusion
Combined DCE-MRI and DWI could demonstrate a highly accurate area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for detecting PCa. More studies with large sample sizes are warranted to confirm these results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0284185120956269 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2441613631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0284185120956269</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2441613631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-d34550f678273895d8114aa101807b5926d03af9d02384c9903b44145f4993ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kTtvGzEQhIkgBqI46VOyTMOYPPIeTGc4sR3AgBu7Pqz4ONHQkQqXsqC_lV9oXuQ0AVwR4Mx8u4Ml5Ivg34To-wveDEoMrWi4brum0-_ISnScM67a9j1ZLTJb9A_kI-IT56LpW7Eif34EmGLCEgzduexTniEaR5OnNni_x5AiO7gwbYqzNMwwhThRk-Z1iPXjEMqG2mOEueZNiiUDFubiZoFYWu3RLejsMMW_4H-IOonuch0MxVGzSPk7BYpHLG6GU-Y5uAOFWDmuAIMI2yMG_ETOPGzRfX59z8nj9c-Hq1t2d3_z6-ryjhkpVGFW1ubcd_3Q9HLQrR2EUACCi4H361Y3neUSvLa8kYMyWnO5Vkqo1iutJVh5Tr6euHXN33uHZZwDGrfdQnRpj2NT3Z2QnRTVyk9WUxthdn7c5Vo0H0fBx-U84__nqRF2iiBMbnxK-1zr4dv-F9-skqY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441613631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Yang, Lu ; Tan, Yuchuan ; Dan, Hanli ; Hu, Lin ; Zhang, Jiuquan</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lu ; Tan, Yuchuan ; Dan, Hanli ; Hu, Lin ; Zhang, Jiuquan</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) has not been studied systematically to date.
Purpose
To investigate the value of DWI combined with DCE-MRI quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of PCa.
Material and Methods
A systematic search was conducted through PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases without any restriction to language up to 10 December 2019. Studies that used a combination of DWI and DCE-MRI for diagnosing PCa were included.
Results
Nine studies with 778 participants were included. The combination of DWI and DCE-MRI provide accurate performance in diagnosing PCa with pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratios of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76–0.81), 0.85 (95% CI = 0.83–0.86), 6.58 (95% CI = 3.93–11.00), 0.24 (95% CI = 0.17–0.34), and 36.43 (95% CI = 14.41–92.12), respectively. The pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9268. Moreover, 1.5-T MR scanners demonstrated a slightly better performance than 3.0-T scanners.
Conclusion
Combined DCE-MRI and DWI could demonstrate a highly accurate area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for detecting PCa. More studies with large sample sizes are warranted to confirm these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-1851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0284185120956269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Acta radiologica (1987), 2021-09, Vol.62 (9), p.1238-1247</ispartof><rights>The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-d34550f678273895d8114aa101807b5926d03af9d02384c9903b44145f4993ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-d34550f678273895d8114aa101807b5926d03af9d02384c9903b44145f4993ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0239-6988</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0284185120956269$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0284185120956269$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yuchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dan, Hanli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiuquan</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Acta radiologica (1987)</title><description>Background
The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) has not been studied systematically to date.
Purpose
To investigate the value of DWI combined with DCE-MRI quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of PCa.
Material and Methods
A systematic search was conducted through PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases without any restriction to language up to 10 December 2019. Studies that used a combination of DWI and DCE-MRI for diagnosing PCa were included.
Results
Nine studies with 778 participants were included. The combination of DWI and DCE-MRI provide accurate performance in diagnosing PCa with pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratios of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76–0.81), 0.85 (95% CI = 0.83–0.86), 6.58 (95% CI = 3.93–11.00), 0.24 (95% CI = 0.17–0.34), and 36.43 (95% CI = 14.41–92.12), respectively. The pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9268. Moreover, 1.5-T MR scanners demonstrated a slightly better performance than 3.0-T scanners.
Conclusion
Combined DCE-MRI and DWI could demonstrate a highly accurate area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for detecting PCa. More studies with large sample sizes are warranted to confirm these results.</description><issn>0284-1851</issn><issn>1600-0455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kTtvGzEQhIkgBqI46VOyTMOYPPIeTGc4sR3AgBu7Pqz4ONHQkQqXsqC_lV9oXuQ0AVwR4Mx8u4Ml5Ivg34To-wveDEoMrWi4brum0-_ISnScM67a9j1ZLTJb9A_kI-IT56LpW7Eif34EmGLCEgzduexTniEaR5OnNni_x5AiO7gwbYqzNMwwhThRk-Z1iPXjEMqG2mOEueZNiiUDFubiZoFYWu3RLejsMMW_4H-IOonuch0MxVGzSPk7BYpHLG6GU-Y5uAOFWDmuAIMI2yMG_ETOPGzRfX59z8nj9c-Hq1t2d3_z6-ryjhkpVGFW1ubcd_3Q9HLQrR2EUACCi4H361Y3neUSvLa8kYMyWnO5Vkqo1iutJVh5Tr6euHXN33uHZZwDGrfdQnRpj2NT3Z2QnRTVyk9WUxthdn7c5Vo0H0fBx-U84__nqRF2iiBMbnxK-1zr4dv-F9-skqY</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Yang, Lu</creator><creator>Tan, Yuchuan</creator><creator>Dan, Hanli</creator><creator>Hu, Lin</creator><creator>Zhang, Jiuquan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-6988</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Yang, Lu ; Tan, Yuchuan ; Dan, Hanli ; Hu, Lin ; Zhang, Jiuquan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-d34550f678273895d8114aa101807b5926d03af9d02384c9903b44145f4993ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Yuchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dan, Hanli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiuquan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Lu</au><au>Tan, Yuchuan</au><au>Dan, Hanli</au><au>Hu, Lin</au><au>Zhang, Jiuquan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1238</spage><epage>1247</epage><pages>1238-1247</pages><issn>0284-1851</issn><eissn>1600-0455</eissn><abstract>Background
The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) has not been studied systematically to date.
Purpose
To investigate the value of DWI combined with DCE-MRI quantitative analysis in the diagnosis of PCa.
Material and Methods
A systematic search was conducted through PubMed, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases without any restriction to language up to 10 December 2019. Studies that used a combination of DWI and DCE-MRI for diagnosing PCa were included.
Results
Nine studies with 778 participants were included. The combination of DWI and DCE-MRI provide accurate performance in diagnosing PCa with pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratios of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76–0.81), 0.85 (95% CI = 0.83–0.86), 6.58 (95% CI = 3.93–11.00), 0.24 (95% CI = 0.17–0.34), and 36.43 (95% CI = 14.41–92.12), respectively. The pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.9268. Moreover, 1.5-T MR scanners demonstrated a slightly better performance than 3.0-T scanners.
Conclusion
Combined DCE-MRI and DWI could demonstrate a highly accurate area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for detecting PCa. More studies with large sample sizes are warranted to confirm these results.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0284185120956269</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-6988</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0284-1851 |
ispartof | Acta radiologica (1987), 2021-09, Vol.62 (9), p.1238-1247 |
issn | 0284-1851 1600-0455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2441613631 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
title | Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A24%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20performance%20of%20diffusion-weighted%20imaging%20combined%20with%20dynamic%20contrast-enhanced%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20for%20prostate%20cancer:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Acta%20radiologica%20(1987)&rft.au=Yang,%20Lu&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1238&rft.epage=1247&rft.pages=1238-1247&rft.issn=0284-1851&rft.eissn=1600-0455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0284185120956269&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2441613631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441613631&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0284185120956269&rfr_iscdi=true |