Comparative Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan and the United States, 2013 to 2017

Adoption of the results of large-scale randomized controlled trials in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may differ internationally, yet few studies have described the potential variations in PCI practice patterns. Using representative national registries, we compared temporal trends in proce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2020-09, Vol.76 (11), p.1328-1340
Hauptverfasser: Inohara, Taku, Kohsaka, Shun, Spertus, John A., Masoudi, Frederick A., Rumsfeld, John S., Kennedy, Kevin F., Wang, Tracy Y., Yamaji, Kyohei, Amano, Tetsuya, Nakamura, Masato
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Adoption of the results of large-scale randomized controlled trials in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may differ internationally, yet few studies have described the potential variations in PCI practice patterns. Using representative national registries, we compared temporal trends in procedural volume, patient characteristics, pre-procedural testing, procedural characteristics, and quality metrics in the United States and Japan. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI was used to describe care in the United States, and the J-PCI was used to assess practice patterns in Japan (numbers of participating hospitals: 1,752 in the United States and 1,108 in Japan). Both registries were summarized between 2013 and 2017. PCI volume increased by 15.8% in the United States from 550,872 in 2013 to 637,650 in 2017, primarily because of an increase in nonelective PCIs (p for trend 
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.037