Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients

CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human mutation 2020-12, Vol.41 (12), p.2128-2142
Hauptverfasser: Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia, Valle, Jesús, Rofes, Paula, Gausachs, Mireia, Stradella, Agostina, Moreno‐Cabrera, José M., Velasco, Angela, Tornero, Eva, Menéndez, Mireia, Muñoz, Xavier, Iglesias, Silvia, López‐Doriga, Adriana, Azuara, Daniel, Campos, Olga, Cuesta, Raquel, Darder, Esther, Cid, Rafael, González, Sara, Teulé, Alex, Navarro, Matilde, Brunet, Joan, Capellá, Gabriel, Pineda, Marta, Feliubadaló, Lídia, Lázaro, Conxi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2142
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2128
container_title Human mutation
container_volume 41
creator Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia
Valle, Jesús
Rofes, Paula
Gausachs, Mireia
Stradella, Agostina
Moreno‐Cabrera, José M.
Velasco, Angela
Tornero, Eva
Menéndez, Mireia
Muñoz, Xavier
Iglesias, Silvia
López‐Doriga, Adriana
Azuara, Daniel
Campos, Olga
Cuesta, Raquel
Darder, Esther
Cid, Rafael
González, Sara
Teulé, Alex
Navarro, Matilde
Brunet, Joan
Capellá, Gabriel
Pineda, Marta
Feliubadaló, Lídia
Lázaro, Conxi
description CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification. First, three CHEK2 frequent variants were screened in a retrospective Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer cohort of 516 patients. After, the whole CHEK2 coding region was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing in 1848 prospective patients with HC suspicion. We refined ACMG‐AMP criteria and applied different combined rules to classify CHEK2 variants and define risk alleles. We identified 10 CHEK2 null variants, 6 missense variants with discordant interpretation in ClinVar database, and 35 additional variants of unknown significance. Twelve variants were classified as (likely)‐pathogenic; two can also be considered “established risk‐alleles” and one as “likely risk‐allele.” The prevalence of (likely)‐pathogenic variants in the HC cohort was 0.8% (1.3% in breast cancer patients and 1.0% in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients). Here, we provide ACMG adjustment guidelines to classify CHEK2 variants. We hope that this study would be useful for variant classification of other genes with low effect variants. Comprehensive analysis of CHEK2 variants found in 2346 hereditary cancer patients and adjustment of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/humu.24110
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2441603614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2441603614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3080-a4c3386c0c33f10ceba66d792446de289f0bdc08c9df87a27e7cca5da85ffef13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgitbqxgeQgBsRRk_mmlmWobaixY1dD2lyQlPmUpNOpTsfwWf0SUxtdeHC1TkkHz-cn5ALBrcMILybd3V3G8aMwQHpMch54J_jw-2e5EGW5fEJOXVuAQA8SaJjchKFOaQhS3pEF229tDjHxpk1UtGIauOM84uig2Iy-nz_mAmHispKOGe0kWJl2oa2mhbj4WNI18Ia0awcNQ2do0VlVsJuqBSNREuXXqP_PSNHWlQOz_ezT6b3w5diHDw9jx6KwVMgI-AQiFhGEU8l-KEZSJyJNFVZHsZxqjDkuYaZksBlrjTPRJhhJqVIlOCJ1qhZ1CfXu9ylbV87dKuyNk5iVYkG286VPoilEKUs9vTqD120nfX3b1UaJ1HOs8yrm52StnXOoi6X1tT-wpJBuW2_3LZffrfv8eU-spvVqH7pT90esB14MxVu_okqx9PJdBf6Bc48kQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464539877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia ; Valle, Jesús ; Rofes, Paula ; Gausachs, Mireia ; Stradella, Agostina ; Moreno‐Cabrera, José M. ; Velasco, Angela ; Tornero, Eva ; Menéndez, Mireia ; Muñoz, Xavier ; Iglesias, Silvia ; López‐Doriga, Adriana ; Azuara, Daniel ; Campos, Olga ; Cuesta, Raquel ; Darder, Esther ; Cid, Rafael ; González, Sara ; Teulé, Alex ; Navarro, Matilde ; Brunet, Joan ; Capellá, Gabriel ; Pineda, Marta ; Feliubadaló, Lídia ; Lázaro, Conxi</creator><creatorcontrib>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia ; Valle, Jesús ; Rofes, Paula ; Gausachs, Mireia ; Stradella, Agostina ; Moreno‐Cabrera, José M. ; Velasco, Angela ; Tornero, Eva ; Menéndez, Mireia ; Muñoz, Xavier ; Iglesias, Silvia ; López‐Doriga, Adriana ; Azuara, Daniel ; Campos, Olga ; Cuesta, Raquel ; Darder, Esther ; Cid, Rafael ; González, Sara ; Teulé, Alex ; Navarro, Matilde ; Brunet, Joan ; Capellá, Gabriel ; Pineda, Marta ; Feliubadaló, Lídia ; Lázaro, Conxi</creatorcontrib><description>CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification. First, three CHEK2 frequent variants were screened in a retrospective Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer cohort of 516 patients. After, the whole CHEK2 coding region was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing in 1848 prospective patients with HC suspicion. We refined ACMG‐AMP criteria and applied different combined rules to classify CHEK2 variants and define risk alleles. We identified 10 CHEK2 null variants, 6 missense variants with discordant interpretation in ClinVar database, and 35 additional variants of unknown significance. Twelve variants were classified as (likely)‐pathogenic; two can also be considered “established risk‐alleles” and one as “likely risk‐allele.” The prevalence of (likely)‐pathogenic variants in the HC cohort was 0.8% (1.3% in breast cancer patients and 1.0% in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients). Here, we provide ACMG adjustment guidelines to classify CHEK2 variants. We hope that this study would be useful for variant classification of other genes with low effect variants. Comprehensive analysis of CHEK2 variants found in 2346 hereditary cancer patients and adjustment of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-7794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/humu.24110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32906215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Breast cancer ; CHEK2 ; Classification ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Genetic disorders ; hereditary cancer ; low penetrance ; molecular diagnosis ; Ovarian cancer ; risk allele ; variant classification</subject><ispartof>Human mutation, 2020-12, Vol.41 (12), p.2128-2142</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3080-a4c3386c0c33f10ceba66d792446de289f0bdc08c9df87a27e7cca5da85ffef13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3080-a4c3386c0c33f10ceba66d792446de289f0bdc08c9df87a27e7cca5da85ffef13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1378-736X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhumu.24110$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhumu.24110$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32906215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rofes, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gausachs, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stradella, Agostina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno‐Cabrera, José M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velasco, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tornero, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menéndez, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iglesias, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Doriga, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azuara, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuesta, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darder, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cid, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teulé, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Matilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capellá, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pineda, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feliubadaló, Lídia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lázaro, Conxi</creatorcontrib><title>Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients</title><title>Human mutation</title><addtitle>Hum Mutat</addtitle><description>CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification. First, three CHEK2 frequent variants were screened in a retrospective Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer cohort of 516 patients. After, the whole CHEK2 coding region was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing in 1848 prospective patients with HC suspicion. We refined ACMG‐AMP criteria and applied different combined rules to classify CHEK2 variants and define risk alleles. We identified 10 CHEK2 null variants, 6 missense variants with discordant interpretation in ClinVar database, and 35 additional variants of unknown significance. Twelve variants were classified as (likely)‐pathogenic; two can also be considered “established risk‐alleles” and one as “likely risk‐allele.” The prevalence of (likely)‐pathogenic variants in the HC cohort was 0.8% (1.3% in breast cancer patients and 1.0% in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients). Here, we provide ACMG adjustment guidelines to classify CHEK2 variants. We hope that this study would be useful for variant classification of other genes with low effect variants. Comprehensive analysis of CHEK2 variants found in 2346 hereditary cancer patients and adjustment of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>CHEK2</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Genetic disorders</subject><subject>hereditary cancer</subject><subject>low penetrance</subject><subject>molecular diagnosis</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>risk allele</subject><subject>variant classification</subject><issn>1059-7794</issn><issn>1098-1004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgitbqxgeQgBsRRk_mmlmWobaixY1dD2lyQlPmUpNOpTsfwWf0SUxtdeHC1TkkHz-cn5ALBrcMILybd3V3G8aMwQHpMch54J_jw-2e5EGW5fEJOXVuAQA8SaJjchKFOaQhS3pEF229tDjHxpk1UtGIauOM84uig2Iy-nz_mAmHispKOGe0kWJl2oa2mhbj4WNI18Ia0awcNQ2do0VlVsJuqBSNREuXXqP_PSNHWlQOz_ezT6b3w5diHDw9jx6KwVMgI-AQiFhGEU8l-KEZSJyJNFVZHsZxqjDkuYaZksBlrjTPRJhhJqVIlOCJ1qhZ1CfXu9ylbV87dKuyNk5iVYkG286VPoilEKUs9vTqD120nfX3b1UaJ1HOs8yrm52StnXOoi6X1tT-wpJBuW2_3LZffrfv8eU-spvVqH7pT90esB14MxVu_okqx9PJdBf6Bc48kQg</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia</creator><creator>Valle, Jesús</creator><creator>Rofes, Paula</creator><creator>Gausachs, Mireia</creator><creator>Stradella, Agostina</creator><creator>Moreno‐Cabrera, José M.</creator><creator>Velasco, Angela</creator><creator>Tornero, Eva</creator><creator>Menéndez, Mireia</creator><creator>Muñoz, Xavier</creator><creator>Iglesias, Silvia</creator><creator>López‐Doriga, Adriana</creator><creator>Azuara, Daniel</creator><creator>Campos, Olga</creator><creator>Cuesta, Raquel</creator><creator>Darder, Esther</creator><creator>Cid, Rafael</creator><creator>González, Sara</creator><creator>Teulé, Alex</creator><creator>Navarro, Matilde</creator><creator>Brunet, Joan</creator><creator>Capellá, Gabriel</creator><creator>Pineda, Marta</creator><creator>Feliubadaló, Lídia</creator><creator>Lázaro, Conxi</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-736X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients</title><author>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia ; Valle, Jesús ; Rofes, Paula ; Gausachs, Mireia ; Stradella, Agostina ; Moreno‐Cabrera, José M. ; Velasco, Angela ; Tornero, Eva ; Menéndez, Mireia ; Muñoz, Xavier ; Iglesias, Silvia ; López‐Doriga, Adriana ; Azuara, Daniel ; Campos, Olga ; Cuesta, Raquel ; Darder, Esther ; Cid, Rafael ; González, Sara ; Teulé, Alex ; Navarro, Matilde ; Brunet, Joan ; Capellá, Gabriel ; Pineda, Marta ; Feliubadaló, Lídia ; Lázaro, Conxi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3080-a4c3386c0c33f10ceba66d792446de289f0bdc08c9df87a27e7cca5da85ffef13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>CHEK2</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Genetic disorders</topic><topic>hereditary cancer</topic><topic>low penetrance</topic><topic>molecular diagnosis</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>risk allele</topic><topic>variant classification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rofes, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gausachs, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stradella, Agostina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno‐Cabrera, José M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velasco, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tornero, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menéndez, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iglesias, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Doriga, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azuara, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuesta, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darder, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cid, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teulé, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Matilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capellá, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pineda, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feliubadaló, Lídia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lázaro, Conxi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human mutation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia</au><au>Valle, Jesús</au><au>Rofes, Paula</au><au>Gausachs, Mireia</au><au>Stradella, Agostina</au><au>Moreno‐Cabrera, José M.</au><au>Velasco, Angela</au><au>Tornero, Eva</au><au>Menéndez, Mireia</au><au>Muñoz, Xavier</au><au>Iglesias, Silvia</au><au>López‐Doriga, Adriana</au><au>Azuara, Daniel</au><au>Campos, Olga</au><au>Cuesta, Raquel</au><au>Darder, Esther</au><au>Cid, Rafael</au><au>González, Sara</au><au>Teulé, Alex</au><au>Navarro, Matilde</au><au>Brunet, Joan</au><au>Capellá, Gabriel</au><au>Pineda, Marta</au><au>Feliubadaló, Lídia</au><au>Lázaro, Conxi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Human mutation</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Mutat</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2128</spage><epage>2142</epage><pages>2128-2142</pages><issn>1059-7794</issn><eissn>1098-1004</eissn><abstract>CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification. First, three CHEK2 frequent variants were screened in a retrospective Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer cohort of 516 patients. After, the whole CHEK2 coding region was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing in 1848 prospective patients with HC suspicion. We refined ACMG‐AMP criteria and applied different combined rules to classify CHEK2 variants and define risk alleles. We identified 10 CHEK2 null variants, 6 missense variants with discordant interpretation in ClinVar database, and 35 additional variants of unknown significance. Twelve variants were classified as (likely)‐pathogenic; two can also be considered “established risk‐alleles” and one as “likely risk‐allele.” The prevalence of (likely)‐pathogenic variants in the HC cohort was 0.8% (1.3% in breast cancer patients and 1.0% in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients). Here, we provide ACMG adjustment guidelines to classify CHEK2 variants. We hope that this study would be useful for variant classification of other genes with low effect variants. Comprehensive analysis of CHEK2 variants found in 2346 hereditary cancer patients and adjustment of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>32906215</pmid><doi>10.1002/humu.24110</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-736X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-7794
ispartof Human mutation, 2020-12, Vol.41 (12), p.2128-2142
issn 1059-7794
1098-1004
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2441603614
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Alleles
Breast cancer
CHEK2
Classification
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal carcinoma
Genetic disorders
hereditary cancer
low penetrance
molecular diagnosis
Ovarian cancer
risk allele
variant classification
title Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A20%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comprehensive%20analysis%20and%20ACMG%E2%80%90based%20classification%20of%20CHEK2%20variants%20in%20hereditary%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Human%20mutation&rft.au=Vargas%E2%80%90Parra,%20Gardenia&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2128&rft.epage=2142&rft.pages=2128-2142&rft.issn=1059-7794&rft.eissn=1098-1004&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/humu.24110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2441603614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464539877&rft_id=info:pmid/32906215&rfr_iscdi=true