Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients
CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human mutation 2020-12, Vol.41 (12), p.2128-2142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2142 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2128 |
container_title | Human mutation |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia Valle, Jesús Rofes, Paula Gausachs, Mireia Stradella, Agostina Moreno‐Cabrera, José M. Velasco, Angela Tornero, Eva Menéndez, Mireia Muñoz, Xavier Iglesias, Silvia López‐Doriga, Adriana Azuara, Daniel Campos, Olga Cuesta, Raquel Darder, Esther Cid, Rafael González, Sara Teulé, Alex Navarro, Matilde Brunet, Joan Capellá, Gabriel Pineda, Marta Feliubadaló, Lídia Lázaro, Conxi |
description | CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification. First, three CHEK2 frequent variants were screened in a retrospective Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer cohort of 516 patients. After, the whole CHEK2 coding region was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing in 1848 prospective patients with HC suspicion. We refined ACMG‐AMP criteria and applied different combined rules to classify CHEK2 variants and define risk alleles. We identified 10 CHEK2 null variants, 6 missense variants with discordant interpretation in ClinVar database, and 35 additional variants of unknown significance. Twelve variants were classified as (likely)‐pathogenic; two can also be considered “established risk‐alleles” and one as “likely risk‐allele.” The prevalence of (likely)‐pathogenic variants in the HC cohort was 0.8% (1.3% in breast cancer patients and 1.0% in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients). Here, we provide ACMG adjustment guidelines to classify CHEK2 variants. We hope that this study would be useful for variant classification of other genes with low effect variants.
Comprehensive analysis of CHEK2 variants found in 2346 hereditary cancer patients and adjustment of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/humu.24110 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2441603614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2441603614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3080-a4c3386c0c33f10ceba66d792446de289f0bdc08c9df87a27e7cca5da85ffef13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgitbqxgeQgBsRRk_mmlmWobaixY1dD2lyQlPmUpNOpTsfwWf0SUxtdeHC1TkkHz-cn5ALBrcMILybd3V3G8aMwQHpMch54J_jw-2e5EGW5fEJOXVuAQA8SaJjchKFOaQhS3pEF229tDjHxpk1UtGIauOM84uig2Iy-nz_mAmHispKOGe0kWJl2oa2mhbj4WNI18Ia0awcNQ2do0VlVsJuqBSNREuXXqP_PSNHWlQOz_ezT6b3w5diHDw9jx6KwVMgI-AQiFhGEU8l-KEZSJyJNFVZHsZxqjDkuYaZksBlrjTPRJhhJqVIlOCJ1qhZ1CfXu9ylbV87dKuyNk5iVYkG286VPoilEKUs9vTqD120nfX3b1UaJ1HOs8yrm52StnXOoi6X1tT-wpJBuW2_3LZffrfv8eU-spvVqH7pT90esB14MxVu_okqx9PJdBf6Bc48kQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464539877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia ; Valle, Jesús ; Rofes, Paula ; Gausachs, Mireia ; Stradella, Agostina ; Moreno‐Cabrera, José M. ; Velasco, Angela ; Tornero, Eva ; Menéndez, Mireia ; Muñoz, Xavier ; Iglesias, Silvia ; López‐Doriga, Adriana ; Azuara, Daniel ; Campos, Olga ; Cuesta, Raquel ; Darder, Esther ; Cid, Rafael ; González, Sara ; Teulé, Alex ; Navarro, Matilde ; Brunet, Joan ; Capellá, Gabriel ; Pineda, Marta ; Feliubadaló, Lídia ; Lázaro, Conxi</creator><creatorcontrib>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia ; Valle, Jesús ; Rofes, Paula ; Gausachs, Mireia ; Stradella, Agostina ; Moreno‐Cabrera, José M. ; Velasco, Angela ; Tornero, Eva ; Menéndez, Mireia ; Muñoz, Xavier ; Iglesias, Silvia ; López‐Doriga, Adriana ; Azuara, Daniel ; Campos, Olga ; Cuesta, Raquel ; Darder, Esther ; Cid, Rafael ; González, Sara ; Teulé, Alex ; Navarro, Matilde ; Brunet, Joan ; Capellá, Gabriel ; Pineda, Marta ; Feliubadaló, Lídia ; Lázaro, Conxi</creatorcontrib><description>CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification. First, three CHEK2 frequent variants were screened in a retrospective Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer cohort of 516 patients. After, the whole CHEK2 coding region was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing in 1848 prospective patients with HC suspicion. We refined ACMG‐AMP criteria and applied different combined rules to classify CHEK2 variants and define risk alleles. We identified 10 CHEK2 null variants, 6 missense variants with discordant interpretation in ClinVar database, and 35 additional variants of unknown significance. Twelve variants were classified as (likely)‐pathogenic; two can also be considered “established risk‐alleles” and one as “likely risk‐allele.” The prevalence of (likely)‐pathogenic variants in the HC cohort was 0.8% (1.3% in breast cancer patients and 1.0% in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients). Here, we provide ACMG adjustment guidelines to classify CHEK2 variants. We hope that this study would be useful for variant classification of other genes with low effect variants.
Comprehensive analysis of CHEK2 variants found in 2346 hereditary cancer patients and adjustment of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-7794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-1004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/humu.24110</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32906215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Breast cancer ; CHEK2 ; Classification ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Genetic disorders ; hereditary cancer ; low penetrance ; molecular diagnosis ; Ovarian cancer ; risk allele ; variant classification</subject><ispartof>Human mutation, 2020-12, Vol.41 (12), p.2128-2142</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3080-a4c3386c0c33f10ceba66d792446de289f0bdc08c9df87a27e7cca5da85ffef13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3080-a4c3386c0c33f10ceba66d792446de289f0bdc08c9df87a27e7cca5da85ffef13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1378-736X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhumu.24110$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhumu.24110$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32906215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rofes, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gausachs, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stradella, Agostina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno‐Cabrera, José M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velasco, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tornero, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menéndez, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iglesias, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Doriga, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azuara, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuesta, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darder, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cid, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teulé, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Matilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capellá, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pineda, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feliubadaló, Lídia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lázaro, Conxi</creatorcontrib><title>Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients</title><title>Human mutation</title><addtitle>Hum Mutat</addtitle><description>CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification. First, three CHEK2 frequent variants were screened in a retrospective Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer cohort of 516 patients. After, the whole CHEK2 coding region was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing in 1848 prospective patients with HC suspicion. We refined ACMG‐AMP criteria and applied different combined rules to classify CHEK2 variants and define risk alleles. We identified 10 CHEK2 null variants, 6 missense variants with discordant interpretation in ClinVar database, and 35 additional variants of unknown significance. Twelve variants were classified as (likely)‐pathogenic; two can also be considered “established risk‐alleles” and one as “likely risk‐allele.” The prevalence of (likely)‐pathogenic variants in the HC cohort was 0.8% (1.3% in breast cancer patients and 1.0% in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients). Here, we provide ACMG adjustment guidelines to classify CHEK2 variants. We hope that this study would be useful for variant classification of other genes with low effect variants.
Comprehensive analysis of CHEK2 variants found in 2346 hereditary cancer patients and adjustment of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>CHEK2</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Genetic disorders</subject><subject>hereditary cancer</subject><subject>low penetrance</subject><subject>molecular diagnosis</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>risk allele</subject><subject>variant classification</subject><issn>1059-7794</issn><issn>1098-1004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgitbqxgeQgBsRRk_mmlmWobaixY1dD2lyQlPmUpNOpTsfwWf0SUxtdeHC1TkkHz-cn5ALBrcMILybd3V3G8aMwQHpMch54J_jw-2e5EGW5fEJOXVuAQA8SaJjchKFOaQhS3pEF229tDjHxpk1UtGIauOM84uig2Iy-nz_mAmHispKOGe0kWJl2oa2mhbj4WNI18Ia0awcNQ2do0VlVsJuqBSNREuXXqP_PSNHWlQOz_ezT6b3w5diHDw9jx6KwVMgI-AQiFhGEU8l-KEZSJyJNFVZHsZxqjDkuYaZksBlrjTPRJhhJqVIlOCJ1qhZ1CfXu9ylbV87dKuyNk5iVYkG286VPoilEKUs9vTqD120nfX3b1UaJ1HOs8yrm52StnXOoi6X1tT-wpJBuW2_3LZffrfv8eU-spvVqH7pT90esB14MxVu_okqx9PJdBf6Bc48kQg</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia</creator><creator>Valle, Jesús</creator><creator>Rofes, Paula</creator><creator>Gausachs, Mireia</creator><creator>Stradella, Agostina</creator><creator>Moreno‐Cabrera, José M.</creator><creator>Velasco, Angela</creator><creator>Tornero, Eva</creator><creator>Menéndez, Mireia</creator><creator>Muñoz, Xavier</creator><creator>Iglesias, Silvia</creator><creator>López‐Doriga, Adriana</creator><creator>Azuara, Daniel</creator><creator>Campos, Olga</creator><creator>Cuesta, Raquel</creator><creator>Darder, Esther</creator><creator>Cid, Rafael</creator><creator>González, Sara</creator><creator>Teulé, Alex</creator><creator>Navarro, Matilde</creator><creator>Brunet, Joan</creator><creator>Capellá, Gabriel</creator><creator>Pineda, Marta</creator><creator>Feliubadaló, Lídia</creator><creator>Lázaro, Conxi</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-736X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients</title><author>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia ; Valle, Jesús ; Rofes, Paula ; Gausachs, Mireia ; Stradella, Agostina ; Moreno‐Cabrera, José M. ; Velasco, Angela ; Tornero, Eva ; Menéndez, Mireia ; Muñoz, Xavier ; Iglesias, Silvia ; López‐Doriga, Adriana ; Azuara, Daniel ; Campos, Olga ; Cuesta, Raquel ; Darder, Esther ; Cid, Rafael ; González, Sara ; Teulé, Alex ; Navarro, Matilde ; Brunet, Joan ; Capellá, Gabriel ; Pineda, Marta ; Feliubadaló, Lídia ; Lázaro, Conxi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3080-a4c3386c0c33f10ceba66d792446de289f0bdc08c9df87a27e7cca5da85ffef13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>CHEK2</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Genetic disorders</topic><topic>hereditary cancer</topic><topic>low penetrance</topic><topic>molecular diagnosis</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>risk allele</topic><topic>variant classification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rofes, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gausachs, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stradella, Agostina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno‐Cabrera, José M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velasco, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tornero, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menéndez, Mireia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iglesias, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Doriga, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azuara, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuesta, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darder, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cid, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teulé, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Matilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunet, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capellá, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pineda, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feliubadaló, Lídia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lázaro, Conxi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human mutation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vargas‐Parra, Gardenia</au><au>Valle, Jesús</au><au>Rofes, Paula</au><au>Gausachs, Mireia</au><au>Stradella, Agostina</au><au>Moreno‐Cabrera, José M.</au><au>Velasco, Angela</au><au>Tornero, Eva</au><au>Menéndez, Mireia</au><au>Muñoz, Xavier</au><au>Iglesias, Silvia</au><au>López‐Doriga, Adriana</au><au>Azuara, Daniel</au><au>Campos, Olga</au><au>Cuesta, Raquel</au><au>Darder, Esther</au><au>Cid, Rafael</au><au>González, Sara</au><au>Teulé, Alex</au><au>Navarro, Matilde</au><au>Brunet, Joan</au><au>Capellá, Gabriel</au><au>Pineda, Marta</au><au>Feliubadaló, Lídia</au><au>Lázaro, Conxi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients</atitle><jtitle>Human mutation</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Mutat</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2128</spage><epage>2142</epage><pages>2128-2142</pages><issn>1059-7794</issn><eissn>1098-1004</eissn><abstract>CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification. First, three CHEK2 frequent variants were screened in a retrospective Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer cohort of 516 patients. After, the whole CHEK2 coding region was analyzed by next‐generation sequencing in 1848 prospective patients with HC suspicion. We refined ACMG‐AMP criteria and applied different combined rules to classify CHEK2 variants and define risk alleles. We identified 10 CHEK2 null variants, 6 missense variants with discordant interpretation in ClinVar database, and 35 additional variants of unknown significance. Twelve variants were classified as (likely)‐pathogenic; two can also be considered “established risk‐alleles” and one as “likely risk‐allele.” The prevalence of (likely)‐pathogenic variants in the HC cohort was 0.8% (1.3% in breast cancer patients and 1.0% in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients). Here, we provide ACMG adjustment guidelines to classify CHEK2 variants. We hope that this study would be useful for variant classification of other genes with low effect variants.
Comprehensive analysis of CHEK2 variants found in 2346 hereditary cancer patients and adjustment of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG‐AMP) guidelines for their classification.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>32906215</pmid><doi>10.1002/humu.24110</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1378-736X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1059-7794 |
ispartof | Human mutation, 2020-12, Vol.41 (12), p.2128-2142 |
issn | 1059-7794 1098-1004 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2441603614 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Alleles Breast cancer CHEK2 Classification Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma Genetic disorders hereditary cancer low penetrance molecular diagnosis Ovarian cancer risk allele variant classification |
title | Comprehensive analysis and ACMG‐based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A20%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comprehensive%20analysis%20and%20ACMG%E2%80%90based%20classification%20of%20CHEK2%20variants%20in%20hereditary%20cancer%20patients&rft.jtitle=Human%20mutation&rft.au=Vargas%E2%80%90Parra,%20Gardenia&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2128&rft.epage=2142&rft.pages=2128-2142&rft.issn=1059-7794&rft.eissn=1098-1004&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/humu.24110&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2441603614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464539877&rft_id=info:pmid/32906215&rfr_iscdi=true |