Implementation of the three-dimensional printing technology in treatment of bone tumours: a case series
Purpose With the ability to overcome specific anatomical and pathological challenges, 3D printing technology is setting itself as an important tool in patient-specific orthopaedics, delivering anatomical models, patient-specific instruments, and custom-made implants. One of the most demanding proced...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International orthopaedics 2021-04, Vol.45 (4), p.1079-1085 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1085 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1079 |
container_title | International orthopaedics |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Jovičić, Marijana Šimić Vuletić, Filip Ribičić, Tomislav Šimunić, Sven Petrović, Tadija Kolundžić, Robert |
description | Purpose
With the ability to overcome specific anatomical and pathological challenges, 3D printing technology is setting itself as an important tool in patient-specific orthopaedics, delivering anatomical models, patient-specific instruments, and custom-made implants. One of the most demanding procedures in limb salvage surgery is the reconstruction of bony defects after tumour resection. Even though still limited in clinical practice, early results of the use of 3D technology are gradually revealing its potentially huge impact in bone tumour surgery. Here, we present a case series illustrating our experience with the use of 3D printing technology in the reconstruction of bone defects after tumour resection, and its impact on cosmesis and quality of life.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 11 patients in whom a custom-made 3D-printed prosthesis was used to reconstruct a bone defect after resection for a bone tumour. Ten out of 11 patients were children (aged between 5 and 16 years) with osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis (2 children) or the arm (8 children), and one patient was a 67-year-old lady with a chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. All underwent wide resections resulting in considerable bone defects necessitating further reconstruction.
Results
Custom-made implants were extremely useful both in reconstruction of bone defects and in terms of cosmesis, recovery facilitation, and quality of life. In this respect, pelvic and humeral reconstructions with 3D-printed custom implants particularly showed a great potential. The mean follow-up was 33 months. Four patients died of disease (36%) and overall the major and minor complication rate was 54% (6 out of 11 patients). Three patients had implant dislocation (27% [3/11 cases]), one had leg-compartment syndrome, and one patient reported limited range of motion. Only two out of 11 patients developed local recurrence.
Conclusion
Use of 3D customized implant helped us achieve two major goals in orthopaedic oncology—clear surgical resection and functional recovery with a good quality of life. Large studies with long-term follow-up are needed to reveal the value and future of 3D printing in orthopaedic oncology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00264-020-04787-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2441262049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2441262049</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-1c8de664d9f660a20f96ec1ec4dd5d247a10ffe17d2e99e908dfc1ccb2a9402e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFuGyEQhlHUKnGcvEAOFcdeSGdYzJreKitpI0XqpTkjDLP2RruLC-zBb18cpz32MEIa_u-X5mPsDuEeAdovGUBqJUCCANWuW6Eu2AJVI8UKzeoDW0CjUEhtVlfsOudXAGz1Gi_ZVSMNYNPggu2exsNAI03FlT5OPHa87KlOIhKhrx-5rt3AD6mfSj_teCG_n-IQd0feT7wkcuWEn8htnCo6j3FO-St33LtMPFPqKd-wj50bMt2-v0v28vjwa_NDPP_8_rT59ix8Y7AI9OtAWqtgOq3BSeiMJo_kVQirIFXrELqOsA2SjCED69B59H4rnVEgqVmyz-feQ4q_Z8rFjn32NAxuojhnK5VCqSUoU6PyHPUp5pyos_XG0aWjRbAnwfYs2FbB9k2wVRX69N4_b0cK_5C_RmugOQfyydiOkn2tOqrB_L_aP4E0iGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441262049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of the three-dimensional printing technology in treatment of bone tumours: a case series</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Jovičić, Marijana Šimić ; Vuletić, Filip ; Ribičić, Tomislav ; Šimunić, Sven ; Petrović, Tadija ; Kolundžić, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Jovičić, Marijana Šimić ; Vuletić, Filip ; Ribičić, Tomislav ; Šimunić, Sven ; Petrović, Tadija ; Kolundžić, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
With the ability to overcome specific anatomical and pathological challenges, 3D printing technology is setting itself as an important tool in patient-specific orthopaedics, delivering anatomical models, patient-specific instruments, and custom-made implants. One of the most demanding procedures in limb salvage surgery is the reconstruction of bony defects after tumour resection. Even though still limited in clinical practice, early results of the use of 3D technology are gradually revealing its potentially huge impact in bone tumour surgery. Here, we present a case series illustrating our experience with the use of 3D printing technology in the reconstruction of bone defects after tumour resection, and its impact on cosmesis and quality of life.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 11 patients in whom a custom-made 3D-printed prosthesis was used to reconstruct a bone defect after resection for a bone tumour. Ten out of 11 patients were children (aged between 5 and 16 years) with osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis (2 children) or the arm (8 children), and one patient was a 67-year-old lady with a chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. All underwent wide resections resulting in considerable bone defects necessitating further reconstruction.
Results
Custom-made implants were extremely useful both in reconstruction of bone defects and in terms of cosmesis, recovery facilitation, and quality of life. In this respect, pelvic and humeral reconstructions with 3D-printed custom implants particularly showed a great potential. The mean follow-up was 33 months. Four patients died of disease (36%) and overall the major and minor complication rate was 54% (6 out of 11 patients). Three patients had implant dislocation (27% [3/11 cases]), one had leg-compartment syndrome, and one patient reported limited range of motion. Only two out of 11 patients developed local recurrence.
Conclusion
Use of 3D customized implant helped us achieve two major goals in orthopaedic oncology—clear surgical resection and functional recovery with a good quality of life. Large studies with long-term follow-up are needed to reveal the value and future of 3D printing in orthopaedic oncology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0341-2695</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04787-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32901331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Bone Neoplasms - surgery ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Paper ; Orthopedics ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Prostheses and Implants ; Quality of Life ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>International orthopaedics, 2021-04, Vol.45 (4), p.1079-1085</ispartof><rights>SICOT aisbl 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-1c8de664d9f660a20f96ec1ec4dd5d247a10ffe17d2e99e908dfc1ccb2a9402e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-1c8de664d9f660a20f96ec1ec4dd5d247a10ffe17d2e99e908dfc1ccb2a9402e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00264-020-04787-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00264-020-04787-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jovičić, Marijana Šimić</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuletić, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribičić, Tomislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šimunić, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrović, Tadija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolundžić, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of the three-dimensional printing technology in treatment of bone tumours: a case series</title><title>International orthopaedics</title><addtitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</addtitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><description>Purpose
With the ability to overcome specific anatomical and pathological challenges, 3D printing technology is setting itself as an important tool in patient-specific orthopaedics, delivering anatomical models, patient-specific instruments, and custom-made implants. One of the most demanding procedures in limb salvage surgery is the reconstruction of bony defects after tumour resection. Even though still limited in clinical practice, early results of the use of 3D technology are gradually revealing its potentially huge impact in bone tumour surgery. Here, we present a case series illustrating our experience with the use of 3D printing technology in the reconstruction of bone defects after tumour resection, and its impact on cosmesis and quality of life.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 11 patients in whom a custom-made 3D-printed prosthesis was used to reconstruct a bone defect after resection for a bone tumour. Ten out of 11 patients were children (aged between 5 and 16 years) with osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis (2 children) or the arm (8 children), and one patient was a 67-year-old lady with a chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. All underwent wide resections resulting in considerable bone defects necessitating further reconstruction.
Results
Custom-made implants were extremely useful both in reconstruction of bone defects and in terms of cosmesis, recovery facilitation, and quality of life. In this respect, pelvic and humeral reconstructions with 3D-printed custom implants particularly showed a great potential. The mean follow-up was 33 months. Four patients died of disease (36%) and overall the major and minor complication rate was 54% (6 out of 11 patients). Three patients had implant dislocation (27% [3/11 cases]), one had leg-compartment syndrome, and one patient reported limited range of motion. Only two out of 11 patients developed local recurrence.
Conclusion
Use of 3D customized implant helped us achieve two major goals in orthopaedic oncology—clear surgical resection and functional recovery with a good quality of life. Large studies with long-term follow-up are needed to reveal the value and future of 3D printing in orthopaedic oncology.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Printing, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0341-2695</issn><issn>1432-5195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFuGyEQhlHUKnGcvEAOFcdeSGdYzJreKitpI0XqpTkjDLP2RruLC-zBb18cpz32MEIa_u-X5mPsDuEeAdovGUBqJUCCANWuW6Eu2AJVI8UKzeoDW0CjUEhtVlfsOudXAGz1Gi_ZVSMNYNPggu2exsNAI03FlT5OPHa87KlOIhKhrx-5rt3AD6mfSj_teCG_n-IQd0feT7wkcuWEn8htnCo6j3FO-St33LtMPFPqKd-wj50bMt2-v0v28vjwa_NDPP_8_rT59ix8Y7AI9OtAWqtgOq3BSeiMJo_kVQirIFXrELqOsA2SjCED69B59H4rnVEgqVmyz-feQ4q_Z8rFjn32NAxuojhnK5VCqSUoU6PyHPUp5pyos_XG0aWjRbAnwfYs2FbB9k2wVRX69N4_b0cK_5C_RmugOQfyydiOkn2tOqrB_L_aP4E0iGk</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Jovičić, Marijana Šimić</creator><creator>Vuletić, Filip</creator><creator>Ribičić, Tomislav</creator><creator>Šimunić, Sven</creator><creator>Petrović, Tadija</creator><creator>Kolundžić, Robert</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Implementation of the three-dimensional printing technology in treatment of bone tumours: a case series</title><author>Jovičić, Marijana Šimić ; Vuletić, Filip ; Ribičić, Tomislav ; Šimunić, Sven ; Petrović, Tadija ; Kolundžić, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-1c8de664d9f660a20f96ec1ec4dd5d247a10ffe17d2e99e908dfc1ccb2a9402e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Printing, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jovičić, Marijana Šimić</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuletić, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribičić, Tomislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Šimunić, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrović, Tadija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolundžić, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jovičić, Marijana Šimić</au><au>Vuletić, Filip</au><au>Ribičić, Tomislav</au><au>Šimunić, Sven</au><au>Petrović, Tadija</au><au>Kolundžić, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of the three-dimensional printing technology in treatment of bone tumours: a case series</atitle><jtitle>International orthopaedics</jtitle><stitle>International Orthopaedics (SICOT)</stitle><addtitle>Int Orthop</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1079</spage><epage>1085</epage><pages>1079-1085</pages><issn>0341-2695</issn><eissn>1432-5195</eissn><abstract>Purpose
With the ability to overcome specific anatomical and pathological challenges, 3D printing technology is setting itself as an important tool in patient-specific orthopaedics, delivering anatomical models, patient-specific instruments, and custom-made implants. One of the most demanding procedures in limb salvage surgery is the reconstruction of bony defects after tumour resection. Even though still limited in clinical practice, early results of the use of 3D technology are gradually revealing its potentially huge impact in bone tumour surgery. Here, we present a case series illustrating our experience with the use of 3D printing technology in the reconstruction of bone defects after tumour resection, and its impact on cosmesis and quality of life.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 11 patients in whom a custom-made 3D-printed prosthesis was used to reconstruct a bone defect after resection for a bone tumour. Ten out of 11 patients were children (aged between 5 and 16 years) with osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis (2 children) or the arm (8 children), and one patient was a 67-year-old lady with a chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. All underwent wide resections resulting in considerable bone defects necessitating further reconstruction.
Results
Custom-made implants were extremely useful both in reconstruction of bone defects and in terms of cosmesis, recovery facilitation, and quality of life. In this respect, pelvic and humeral reconstructions with 3D-printed custom implants particularly showed a great potential. The mean follow-up was 33 months. Four patients died of disease (36%) and overall the major and minor complication rate was 54% (6 out of 11 patients). Three patients had implant dislocation (27% [3/11 cases]), one had leg-compartment syndrome, and one patient reported limited range of motion. Only two out of 11 patients developed local recurrence.
Conclusion
Use of 3D customized implant helped us achieve two major goals in orthopaedic oncology—clear surgical resection and functional recovery with a good quality of life. Large studies with long-term follow-up are needed to reveal the value and future of 3D printing in orthopaedic oncology.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32901331</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00264-020-04787-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0341-2695 |
ispartof | International orthopaedics, 2021-04, Vol.45 (4), p.1079-1085 |
issn | 0341-2695 1432-5195 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2441262049 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Bone Neoplasms - surgery Child Child, Preschool Female Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Paper Orthopedics Printing, Three-Dimensional Prostheses and Implants Quality of Life Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Retrospective Studies |
title | Implementation of the three-dimensional printing technology in treatment of bone tumours: a case series |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A23%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20the%20three-dimensional%20printing%20technology%20in%20treatment%20of%20bone%20tumours:%20a%20case%20series&rft.jtitle=International%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Jovi%C4%8Di%C4%87,%20Marijana%20%C5%A0imi%C4%87&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1079&rft.epage=1085&rft.pages=1079-1085&rft.issn=0341-2695&rft.eissn=1432-5195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00264-020-04787-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2441262049%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441262049&rft_id=info:pmid/32901331&rfr_iscdi=true |