Rapid evolution and plasticity of genitalia

Genital morphology exhibits tremendous variation and is intimately linked with fitness. Sexual selection, nonmating natural selection and neutral forces have been explored as potential drivers of genital divergence. Though less explored, genitalia may also be plastic in response to the developmental...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evolutionary biology 2020-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1361-1370
Hauptverfasser: Dale Broder, E., Ghalambor, Cameron K., Handelsman, Corey A., Ruell, Emily W., Reznick, David N., Angeloni, Lisa M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1370
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1361
container_title Journal of evolutionary biology
container_volume 33
creator Dale Broder, E.
Ghalambor, Cameron K.
Handelsman, Corey A.
Ruell, Emily W.
Reznick, David N.
Angeloni, Lisa M.
description Genital morphology exhibits tremendous variation and is intimately linked with fitness. Sexual selection, nonmating natural selection and neutral forces have been explored as potential drivers of genital divergence. Though less explored, genitalia may also be plastic in response to the developmental environment. In poeciliid fishes, the length of the male intromittent organ, the gonopodium, may be driven by sexual selection if longer gonopodia attract females or aid in forced copulation attempts or by nonmating natural selection if shorter gonopodia allow predator evasion. The rearing environment may also affect gonopodium development. Using an experimental introduction of Trinidadian guppies into four replicate streams with reduced predation risk, we tested whether this new environment caused the evolution of genitalia. We measured gonopodium length after rearing the source and introduced populations for two generations in the laboratory to remove maternal and other environmental effects. We split full‐sibling brothers into different rearing treatments to additionally test for developmental plasticity of gonopodia in response to predator cues and food levels as well as the evolution of plasticity. The introduced populations had shorter gonopodia after accounting for body size, demonstrating rapid genital evolution in 2–3 years (8–12 generations). Brothers reared on low food levels had longer gonopodia relative to body size than those on high food, reflecting maintenance of gonopodium length despite a reduction in body size. In contrast, gonopodium length was not significantly different in response to the presence or absence of predator cues. Because the plastic response to low food was maintained between the source and introduced populations, there was no evidence that plasticity evolved. This study demonstrates the importance of both evolution and developmental plasticity in explaining genital variation. Male Trinidadian guppies introduced to replicate streams with reduced predation risk evolved shorter gonopodia (after accounting for body size), demonstrating rapid genital evolution in 2–3 years (8–12 generations).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jeb.13700
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440900231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2440900231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-8019c91e300f6216af9f1c8368302a1440feafaa0ce22162aafb5b24545aac963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQQBdRrFYP_gEJeFEk7cxukmaPWuoXBUEUvC2TdFe2pEnMJkr_vVtTPQjuZRbm8RgeYycII_RvvNTZCMUEYIcdYMQhlAi46_-AEEKCrwN26NwSAJMojvfZQPBUJlJMDtjlE9V2EeiPquhaW5UBlYugLsi1NrftOqhM8KZL21Jh6YjtGSqcPt7OIXu5mT1P78L54-399Goe5iJNIUwBZS5RCwCTcEzISIN5KpJUACeMIjCaDBHkmvs1JzJZnPEojmKiXCZiyM57b91U7512rVpZl-uioFJXnVPcKyQAF-jRsz_osuqa0l-3oWQKIp5wT130VN5UzjXaqLqxK2rWCkFtCipfUH0X9Ozp1thlK734JX-SeWDcA5-20Ov_Tephdt0rvwBZKHd4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2449803572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rapid evolution and plasticity of genitalia</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Dale Broder, E. ; Ghalambor, Cameron K. ; Handelsman, Corey A. ; Ruell, Emily W. ; Reznick, David N. ; Angeloni, Lisa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dale Broder, E. ; Ghalambor, Cameron K. ; Handelsman, Corey A. ; Ruell, Emily W. ; Reznick, David N. ; Angeloni, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><description>Genital morphology exhibits tremendous variation and is intimately linked with fitness. Sexual selection, nonmating natural selection and neutral forces have been explored as potential drivers of genital divergence. Though less explored, genitalia may also be plastic in response to the developmental environment. In poeciliid fishes, the length of the male intromittent organ, the gonopodium, may be driven by sexual selection if longer gonopodia attract females or aid in forced copulation attempts or by nonmating natural selection if shorter gonopodia allow predator evasion. The rearing environment may also affect gonopodium development. Using an experimental introduction of Trinidadian guppies into four replicate streams with reduced predation risk, we tested whether this new environment caused the evolution of genitalia. We measured gonopodium length after rearing the source and introduced populations for two generations in the laboratory to remove maternal and other environmental effects. We split full‐sibling brothers into different rearing treatments to additionally test for developmental plasticity of gonopodia in response to predator cues and food levels as well as the evolution of plasticity. The introduced populations had shorter gonopodia after accounting for body size, demonstrating rapid genital evolution in 2–3 years (8–12 generations). Brothers reared on low food levels had longer gonopodia relative to body size than those on high food, reflecting maintenance of gonopodium length despite a reduction in body size. In contrast, gonopodium length was not significantly different in response to the presence or absence of predator cues. Because the plastic response to low food was maintained between the source and introduced populations, there was no evidence that plasticity evolved. This study demonstrates the importance of both evolution and developmental plasticity in explaining genital variation. Male Trinidadian guppies introduced to replicate streams with reduced predation risk evolved shorter gonopodia (after accounting for body size), demonstrating rapid genital evolution in 2–3 years (8–12 generations).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13700</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32896937</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Body size ; Copulation ; Developmental plasticity ; Divergence ; Environmental effects ; Evolution ; Food ; Genitalia ; Morphology ; Natural selection ; Plastic properties ; Plasticity ; Populations ; Predation ; Sexual selection</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2020-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1361-1370</ispartof><rights>2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><rights>2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.</rights><rights>Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2020 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-8019c91e300f6216af9f1c8368302a1440feafaa0ce22162aafb5b24545aac963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-8019c91e300f6216af9f1c8368302a1440feafaa0ce22162aafb5b24545aac963</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3842-1930</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjeb.13700$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjeb.13700$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32896937$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dale Broder, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghalambor, Cameron K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handelsman, Corey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruell, Emily W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reznick, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angeloni, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Rapid evolution and plasticity of genitalia</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>Genital morphology exhibits tremendous variation and is intimately linked with fitness. Sexual selection, nonmating natural selection and neutral forces have been explored as potential drivers of genital divergence. Though less explored, genitalia may also be plastic in response to the developmental environment. In poeciliid fishes, the length of the male intromittent organ, the gonopodium, may be driven by sexual selection if longer gonopodia attract females or aid in forced copulation attempts or by nonmating natural selection if shorter gonopodia allow predator evasion. The rearing environment may also affect gonopodium development. Using an experimental introduction of Trinidadian guppies into four replicate streams with reduced predation risk, we tested whether this new environment caused the evolution of genitalia. We measured gonopodium length after rearing the source and introduced populations for two generations in the laboratory to remove maternal and other environmental effects. We split full‐sibling brothers into different rearing treatments to additionally test for developmental plasticity of gonopodia in response to predator cues and food levels as well as the evolution of plasticity. The introduced populations had shorter gonopodia after accounting for body size, demonstrating rapid genital evolution in 2–3 years (8–12 generations). Brothers reared on low food levels had longer gonopodia relative to body size than those on high food, reflecting maintenance of gonopodium length despite a reduction in body size. In contrast, gonopodium length was not significantly different in response to the presence or absence of predator cues. Because the plastic response to low food was maintained between the source and introduced populations, there was no evidence that plasticity evolved. This study demonstrates the importance of both evolution and developmental plasticity in explaining genital variation. Male Trinidadian guppies introduced to replicate streams with reduced predation risk evolved shorter gonopodia (after accounting for body size), demonstrating rapid genital evolution in 2–3 years (8–12 generations).</description><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Copulation</subject><subject>Developmental plasticity</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Genitalia</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Natural selection</subject><subject>Plastic properties</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQQBdRrFYP_gEJeFEk7cxukmaPWuoXBUEUvC2TdFe2pEnMJkr_vVtTPQjuZRbm8RgeYycII_RvvNTZCMUEYIcdYMQhlAi46_-AEEKCrwN26NwSAJMojvfZQPBUJlJMDtjlE9V2EeiPquhaW5UBlYugLsi1NrftOqhM8KZL21Jh6YjtGSqcPt7OIXu5mT1P78L54-399Goe5iJNIUwBZS5RCwCTcEzISIN5KpJUACeMIjCaDBHkmvs1JzJZnPEojmKiXCZiyM57b91U7512rVpZl-uioFJXnVPcKyQAF-jRsz_osuqa0l-3oWQKIp5wT130VN5UzjXaqLqxK2rWCkFtCipfUH0X9Ozp1thlK734JX-SeWDcA5-20Ov_Tephdt0rvwBZKHd4</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Dale Broder, E.</creator><creator>Ghalambor, Cameron K.</creator><creator>Handelsman, Corey A.</creator><creator>Ruell, Emily W.</creator><creator>Reznick, David N.</creator><creator>Angeloni, Lisa M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3842-1930</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Rapid evolution and plasticity of genitalia</title><author>Dale Broder, E. ; Ghalambor, Cameron K. ; Handelsman, Corey A. ; Ruell, Emily W. ; Reznick, David N. ; Angeloni, Lisa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-8019c91e300f6216af9f1c8368302a1440feafaa0ce22162aafb5b24545aac963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Copulation</topic><topic>Developmental plasticity</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Genitalia</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Natural selection</topic><topic>Plastic properties</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dale Broder, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghalambor, Cameron K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handelsman, Corey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruell, Emily W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reznick, David N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angeloni, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dale Broder, E.</au><au>Ghalambor, Cameron K.</au><au>Handelsman, Corey A.</au><au>Ruell, Emily W.</au><au>Reznick, David N.</au><au>Angeloni, Lisa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rapid evolution and plasticity of genitalia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1361</spage><epage>1370</epage><pages>1361-1370</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>Genital morphology exhibits tremendous variation and is intimately linked with fitness. Sexual selection, nonmating natural selection and neutral forces have been explored as potential drivers of genital divergence. Though less explored, genitalia may also be plastic in response to the developmental environment. In poeciliid fishes, the length of the male intromittent organ, the gonopodium, may be driven by sexual selection if longer gonopodia attract females or aid in forced copulation attempts or by nonmating natural selection if shorter gonopodia allow predator evasion. The rearing environment may also affect gonopodium development. Using an experimental introduction of Trinidadian guppies into four replicate streams with reduced predation risk, we tested whether this new environment caused the evolution of genitalia. We measured gonopodium length after rearing the source and introduced populations for two generations in the laboratory to remove maternal and other environmental effects. We split full‐sibling brothers into different rearing treatments to additionally test for developmental plasticity of gonopodia in response to predator cues and food levels as well as the evolution of plasticity. The introduced populations had shorter gonopodia after accounting for body size, demonstrating rapid genital evolution in 2–3 years (8–12 generations). Brothers reared on low food levels had longer gonopodia relative to body size than those on high food, reflecting maintenance of gonopodium length despite a reduction in body size. In contrast, gonopodium length was not significantly different in response to the presence or absence of predator cues. Because the plastic response to low food was maintained between the source and introduced populations, there was no evidence that plasticity evolved. This study demonstrates the importance of both evolution and developmental plasticity in explaining genital variation. Male Trinidadian guppies introduced to replicate streams with reduced predation risk evolved shorter gonopodia (after accounting for body size), demonstrating rapid genital evolution in 2–3 years (8–12 generations).</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32896937</pmid><doi>10.1111/jeb.13700</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3842-1930</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-061X
ispartof Journal of evolutionary biology, 2020-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1361-1370
issn 1010-061X
1420-9101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440900231
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Body size
Copulation
Developmental plasticity
Divergence
Environmental effects
Evolution
Food
Genitalia
Morphology
Natural selection
Plastic properties
Plasticity
Populations
Predation
Sexual selection
title Rapid evolution and plasticity of genitalia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T13%3A16%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rapid%20evolution%20and%20plasticity%20of%20genitalia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=Dale%20Broder,%20E.&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1361&rft.epage=1370&rft.pages=1361-1370&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jeb.13700&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440900231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2449803572&rft_id=info:pmid/32896937&rfr_iscdi=true