The perils of untested assumptions in theory testing: A reply to Patrick et al. (2020)
We respond to a critique by Patrick et al. (2020) of our recent study (Roy et al., 2020) that raised questions regarding the three-factor model of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM). Roy et al. demonstrated that a replicable model involving seven unidimensional factors accounted for the TriPM...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Personality disorders 2021-01, Vol.12 (1), p.24-28 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 28 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 24 |
| container_title | Personality disorders |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Roy, Sandeep Vize, Colin Uzieblo, Kasia van Dongen, Josanne D M Miller, Joshua D Lynam, Donald R Brazil, Inti Yoon, Dahlnym Mokros, Andreas Gray, Nicola S Snowden, Robert Neumann, Craig S |
| description | We respond to a critique by Patrick et al. (2020) of our recent study (Roy et al., 2020) that raised questions regarding the three-factor model of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM). Roy et al. demonstrated that a replicable model involving seven unidimensional factors accounted for the TriPM items across North American and European general population samples, as well as European male offenders. Despite having access to large TriPM datasets, the Patrick et al. critique relied on tangential analyses of general personality traits, using a single college sample with TriPM data as supplemental. Thus, Patrick et al. ignored findings highlighting multidimensional TriPM scales and the uncertainty they introduce with respect to the larger nomological network of psychopathy. In our reply, we demonstrate additional problems with the three-factor TriPM model and show that the seven-factor model out-performs the three-factor model in predicting correlates of psychopathy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/per0000461 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440900032</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2440706971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c5849a45262d236f837acf90b606b45f8de60738e4d82a00a75d9d2e1f41892d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRrFYv_gBZ8FKF1NmP7Ga9leIXFPRQvYZtsrGpSTbuJof-e7e2VnAuM8w8vAwPQhcExgSYvG2Ng1BckAN0QhRXEZWUHe5nEg_QqfcrAKFiLo_RgNFESVDiBL3PlwaHgLLy2Ba4bzrjO5Nj7X1ft11pG4_LBndLY90ab45l83GHJ9iZtgoLi19158rsE5sO62qMRxQoXJ-ho0JX3pzv-hC9PdzPp0_R7OXxeTqZRRmHuIuyOOFK85gKmlMmioRJnRUKFgLEgsdFkhsBkiWG5wnVAFrGucqpIQUniaI5G6LRNrd19qsP36V16TNTVboxtvcp5RxUcMNoQK_-oSvbuyZ890PJIEeSQN1sqcxZ750p0taVtXbrlEC6sZ3-2Q7w5S6yX9Qm36O_etk3ueh3JA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440706971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The perils of untested assumptions in theory testing: A reply to Patrick et al. (2020)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Roy, Sandeep ; Vize, Colin ; Uzieblo, Kasia ; van Dongen, Josanne D M ; Miller, Joshua D ; Lynam, Donald R ; Brazil, Inti ; Yoon, Dahlnym ; Mokros, Andreas ; Gray, Nicola S ; Snowden, Robert ; Neumann, Craig S</creator><creatorcontrib>Roy, Sandeep ; Vize, Colin ; Uzieblo, Kasia ; van Dongen, Josanne D M ; Miller, Joshua D ; Lynam, Donald R ; Brazil, Inti ; Yoon, Dahlnym ; Mokros, Andreas ; Gray, Nicola S ; Snowden, Robert ; Neumann, Craig S</creatorcontrib><description>We respond to a critique by Patrick et al. (2020) of our recent study (Roy et al., 2020) that raised questions regarding the three-factor model of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM). Roy et al. demonstrated that a replicable model involving seven unidimensional factors accounted for the TriPM items across North American and European general population samples, as well as European male offenders. Despite having access to large TriPM datasets, the Patrick et al. critique relied on tangential analyses of general personality traits, using a single college sample with TriPM data as supplemental. Thus, Patrick et al. ignored findings highlighting multidimensional TriPM scales and the uncertainty they introduce with respect to the larger nomological network of psychopathy. In our reply, we demonstrate additional problems with the three-factor TriPM model and show that the seven-factor model out-performs the three-factor model in predicting correlates of psychopathy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-2715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-2723</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/per0000461</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32897096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Antisocial Personality Disorder ; Criminals ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Male Criminal Offenders ; Personality Measures ; Personality Traits ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychopathy ; Structural Equation Modeling ; Universities</subject><ispartof>Personality disorders, 2021-01, Vol.12 (1), p.24-28</ispartof><rights>2020, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c5849a45262d236f837acf90b606b45f8de60738e4d82a00a75d9d2e1f41892d3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3849-8118 ; 0000-0003-1280-2863 ; 0000-0002-3825-2153 ; 0000-0001-9900-480X ; 0000-0001-8306-498X ; 0000-0002-1120-8654 ; 0000-0001-5824-0902 ; 0000-0002-9706-0928 ; 0000-0002-3148-2343 ; 0000-0002-3672-2377</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32897096$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roy, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vize, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzieblo, Kasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dongen, Josanne D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Joshua D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynam, Donald R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazil, Inti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Dahlnym</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokros, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Nicola S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snowden, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Craig S</creatorcontrib><title>The perils of untested assumptions in theory testing: A reply to Patrick et al. (2020)</title><title>Personality disorders</title><addtitle>Personal Disord</addtitle><description>We respond to a critique by Patrick et al. (2020) of our recent study (Roy et al., 2020) that raised questions regarding the three-factor model of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM). Roy et al. demonstrated that a replicable model involving seven unidimensional factors accounted for the TriPM items across North American and European general population samples, as well as European male offenders. Despite having access to large TriPM datasets, the Patrick et al. critique relied on tangential analyses of general personality traits, using a single college sample with TriPM data as supplemental. Thus, Patrick et al. ignored findings highlighting multidimensional TriPM scales and the uncertainty they introduce with respect to the larger nomological network of psychopathy. In our reply, we demonstrate additional problems with the three-factor TriPM model and show that the seven-factor model out-performs the three-factor model in predicting correlates of psychopathy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</description><subject>Antisocial Personality Disorder</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male Criminal Offenders</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Personality Traits</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychopathy</subject><subject>Structural Equation Modeling</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>1949-2715</issn><issn>1949-2723</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRrFYv_gBZ8FKF1NmP7Ga9leIXFPRQvYZtsrGpSTbuJof-e7e2VnAuM8w8vAwPQhcExgSYvG2Ng1BckAN0QhRXEZWUHe5nEg_QqfcrAKFiLo_RgNFESVDiBL3PlwaHgLLy2Ba4bzrjO5Nj7X1ft11pG4_LBndLY90ab45l83GHJ9iZtgoLi19158rsE5sO62qMRxQoXJ-ho0JX3pzv-hC9PdzPp0_R7OXxeTqZRRmHuIuyOOFK85gKmlMmioRJnRUKFgLEgsdFkhsBkiWG5wnVAFrGucqpIQUniaI5G6LRNrd19qsP36V16TNTVboxtvcp5RxUcMNoQK_-oSvbuyZ890PJIEeSQN1sqcxZ750p0taVtXbrlEC6sZ3-2Q7w5S6yX9Qm36O_etk3ueh3JA</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Roy, Sandeep</creator><creator>Vize, Colin</creator><creator>Uzieblo, Kasia</creator><creator>van Dongen, Josanne D M</creator><creator>Miller, Joshua D</creator><creator>Lynam, Donald R</creator><creator>Brazil, Inti</creator><creator>Yoon, Dahlnym</creator><creator>Mokros, Andreas</creator><creator>Gray, Nicola S</creator><creator>Snowden, Robert</creator><creator>Neumann, Craig S</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3849-8118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-2863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3825-2153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9900-480X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-498X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-8654</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-0902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-0928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3148-2343</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3672-2377</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>The perils of untested assumptions in theory testing: A reply to Patrick et al. (2020)</title><author>Roy, Sandeep ; Vize, Colin ; Uzieblo, Kasia ; van Dongen, Josanne D M ; Miller, Joshua D ; Lynam, Donald R ; Brazil, Inti ; Yoon, Dahlnym ; Mokros, Andreas ; Gray, Nicola S ; Snowden, Robert ; Neumann, Craig S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-c5849a45262d236f837acf90b606b45f8de60738e4d82a00a75d9d2e1f41892d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antisocial Personality Disorder</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male Criminal Offenders</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Personality Traits</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychopathy</topic><topic>Structural Equation Modeling</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roy, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vize, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzieblo, Kasia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dongen, Josanne D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Joshua D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynam, Donald R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazil, Inti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Dahlnym</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokros, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Nicola S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snowden, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Craig S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Personality disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roy, Sandeep</au><au>Vize, Colin</au><au>Uzieblo, Kasia</au><au>van Dongen, Josanne D M</au><au>Miller, Joshua D</au><au>Lynam, Donald R</au><au>Brazil, Inti</au><au>Yoon, Dahlnym</au><au>Mokros, Andreas</au><au>Gray, Nicola S</au><au>Snowden, Robert</au><au>Neumann, Craig S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The perils of untested assumptions in theory testing: A reply to Patrick et al. (2020)</atitle><jtitle>Personality disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Personal Disord</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>24-28</pages><issn>1949-2715</issn><eissn>1949-2723</eissn><abstract>We respond to a critique by Patrick et al. (2020) of our recent study (Roy et al., 2020) that raised questions regarding the three-factor model of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM). Roy et al. demonstrated that a replicable model involving seven unidimensional factors accounted for the TriPM items across North American and European general population samples, as well as European male offenders. Despite having access to large TriPM datasets, the Patrick et al. critique relied on tangential analyses of general personality traits, using a single college sample with TriPM data as supplemental. Thus, Patrick et al. ignored findings highlighting multidimensional TriPM scales and the uncertainty they introduce with respect to the larger nomological network of psychopathy. In our reply, we demonstrate additional problems with the three-factor TriPM model and show that the seven-factor model out-performs the three-factor model in predicting correlates of psychopathy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><pmid>32897096</pmid><doi>10.1037/per0000461</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3849-8118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1280-2863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3825-2153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9900-480X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8306-498X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-8654</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-0902</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-0928</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3148-2343</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3672-2377</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1949-2715 |
| ispartof | Personality disorders, 2021-01, Vol.12 (1), p.24-28 |
| issn | 1949-2715 1949-2723 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440900032 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Antisocial Personality Disorder Criminals Female Human Humans Male Male Criminal Offenders Personality Measures Personality Traits Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychopathy Structural Equation Modeling Universities |
| title | The perils of untested assumptions in theory testing: A reply to Patrick et al. (2020) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T06%3A49%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20perils%20of%20untested%20assumptions%20in%20theory%20testing:%20A%20reply%20to%20Patrick%20et%20al.%20(2020)&rft.jtitle=Personality%20disorders&rft.au=Roy,%20Sandeep&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=24-28&rft.issn=1949-2715&rft.eissn=1949-2723&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/per0000461&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440706971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440706971&rft_id=info:pmid/32897096&rfr_iscdi=true |