Percutaneous and Open Tracheostomy in Patients with COVID-19: Comparison and Outcomes of an Institutional Series in New York City
OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to report the safety, efficacy, and early results of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 and determine whether differences exist between percutaneous and open methods. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Prolonged respiratory failure is common in symptomatic patients with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgery 2021-03, Vol.273 (3), p.403-409 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 409 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 403 |
container_title | Annals of surgery |
container_volume | 273 |
creator | Long, Sallie M. Chern, Alexander Feit, Noah Z. Chung, Sei Ramaswamy, Apoorva T. Li, Carol Cooley, Victoria Hill, Shanna Rajwani, Kapil Villena-Vargas, Jonathan Schenck, Edward Stiles, Brendon Tassler, Andrew B. |
description | OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to report the safety, efficacy, and early results of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 and determine whether differences exist between percutaneous and open methods.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Prolonged respiratory failure is common in symptomatic patients with COVID-19, the disease process caused by infection with the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Tracheostomy, although posing potential risk to the operative team and other healthcare workers, may be beneficial for safe weaning of sedation and ventilator support. However, short- and long-term outcomes remain largely unknown.
METHODS:A prospectively collected database of patients with COVID-19 undergoing tracheostomy at a major medical center in New York City between April 4 and April 30, 2020 was reviewed. The primary endpoint was need for continued mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, sedation weaning, and need for intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. Patient characteristics, perioperative conditions, and outcomes between percutaneous and open groups were analyzed.
RESULTS:During the study period, 67 consecutive patients underwent tracheostomy, including 48 males and 19 females with a median age of 66 years [interquartile range (IQR) 52–72]. Two surgeons alternated techniques, with 35 tracheostomies performed percutaneously and 32 via an open approach. The median time from intubation to tracheostomy was 23 days (IQR 20–26). At a median follow-up of 26 days, 52 patients (78%) no longer required mechanical ventilation and 58 patients (87%) were off continuous sedation. Five patients (7.5%) died of systemic causes. There were 11 total complications (16%) in 10 patients, most of which involved minor bleeding. There were no significant differences in outcomes between percutaneous and open methods.
CONCLUSIONS:Tracheostomy under apneic conditions by either percutaneous or open technique can be safely performed in patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Tracheostomy facilitated weaning from continuous intravenous sedation and mechanical ventilation. Continued follow-up of these patients to ascertain long-term outcome data is ongoing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004428 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440467884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2440467884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3508-f31f1f3c608639c5b54fdab9f4bf7ac323af38d866dc35b74dc6f902c14a39c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9P2zAUxa1paBTYN0DIj3sJ-F8Sh7cqG1CpopVgk_YUOY6tek3iYjuq-sg3xyXdhPYAfrHuvb9zru4B4ByjS4yK_OphPr1Ebx5jhH8CE5wSnmDM0GcwiV2asIKSY3Di_R-EMOMo_wKOKeG84DydgOelcnIIold28FD0DVxsVA8fnZArZX2w3Q6aHi5FMKoPHm5NWMFy8Wv2PcHFNSxttxHOeNuP2iFI2ykPrY41nPU-mDAEY3vRwgflTBxFt3u1hb-tW8PShN0ZONKi9err4T8FP29-PJZ3yXxxOyun80TSFPFEU6yxpjJDPKOFTOuU6UbUhWa1zoWkhApNecOzrImCOmeNzHSBiMRM7Hl6Cr6NvhtnnwblQ9UZL1XbjrdXhDHEspxzFlE2otJZ753S1caZTrhdhVG1D7-K4Vf_hx9lF4cNQ92p5p_ob9oR4COwtW1Qzq_bYatctVKiDauPvNk70lcuS3lCEMGIxiLZd1L6AqytoNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2440467884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous and Open Tracheostomy in Patients with COVID-19: Comparison and Outcomes of an Institutional Series in New York City</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Long, Sallie M. ; Chern, Alexander ; Feit, Noah Z. ; Chung, Sei ; Ramaswamy, Apoorva T. ; Li, Carol ; Cooley, Victoria ; Hill, Shanna ; Rajwani, Kapil ; Villena-Vargas, Jonathan ; Schenck, Edward ; Stiles, Brendon ; Tassler, Andrew B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Long, Sallie M. ; Chern, Alexander ; Feit, Noah Z. ; Chung, Sei ; Ramaswamy, Apoorva T. ; Li, Carol ; Cooley, Victoria ; Hill, Shanna ; Rajwani, Kapil ; Villena-Vargas, Jonathan ; Schenck, Edward ; Stiles, Brendon ; Tassler, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to report the safety, efficacy, and early results of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 and determine whether differences exist between percutaneous and open methods.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Prolonged respiratory failure is common in symptomatic patients with COVID-19, the disease process caused by infection with the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Tracheostomy, although posing potential risk to the operative team and other healthcare workers, may be beneficial for safe weaning of sedation and ventilator support. However, short- and long-term outcomes remain largely unknown.
METHODS:A prospectively collected database of patients with COVID-19 undergoing tracheostomy at a major medical center in New York City between April 4 and April 30, 2020 was reviewed. The primary endpoint was need for continued mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, sedation weaning, and need for intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. Patient characteristics, perioperative conditions, and outcomes between percutaneous and open groups were analyzed.
RESULTS:During the study period, 67 consecutive patients underwent tracheostomy, including 48 males and 19 females with a median age of 66 years [interquartile range (IQR) 52–72]. Two surgeons alternated techniques, with 35 tracheostomies performed percutaneously and 32 via an open approach. The median time from intubation to tracheostomy was 23 days (IQR 20–26). At a median follow-up of 26 days, 52 patients (78%) no longer required mechanical ventilation and 58 patients (87%) were off continuous sedation. Five patients (7.5%) died of systemic causes. There were 11 total complications (16%) in 10 patients, most of which involved minor bleeding. There were no significant differences in outcomes between percutaneous and open methods.
CONCLUSIONS:Tracheostomy under apneic conditions by either percutaneous or open technique can be safely performed in patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Tracheostomy facilitated weaning from continuous intravenous sedation and mechanical ventilation. Continued follow-up of these patients to ascertain long-term outcome data is ongoing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004428</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32889885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort Studies ; COVID-19 - complications ; COVID-19 - mortality ; COVID-19 - therapy ; Critical Care ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; New York City ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Respiration, Artificial ; Survival Rate ; Tracheostomy - adverse effects ; Tracheostomy - methods</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2021-03, Vol.273 (3), p.403-409</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3508-f31f1f3c608639c5b54fdab9f4bf7ac323af38d866dc35b74dc6f902c14a39c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32889885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Long, Sallie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chern, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feit, Noah Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Sei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaswamy, Apoorva T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooley, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Shanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajwani, Kapil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villena-Vargas, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schenck, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiles, Brendon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tassler, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous and Open Tracheostomy in Patients with COVID-19: Comparison and Outcomes of an Institutional Series in New York City</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to report the safety, efficacy, and early results of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 and determine whether differences exist between percutaneous and open methods.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Prolonged respiratory failure is common in symptomatic patients with COVID-19, the disease process caused by infection with the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Tracheostomy, although posing potential risk to the operative team and other healthcare workers, may be beneficial for safe weaning of sedation and ventilator support. However, short- and long-term outcomes remain largely unknown.
METHODS:A prospectively collected database of patients with COVID-19 undergoing tracheostomy at a major medical center in New York City between April 4 and April 30, 2020 was reviewed. The primary endpoint was need for continued mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, sedation weaning, and need for intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. Patient characteristics, perioperative conditions, and outcomes between percutaneous and open groups were analyzed.
RESULTS:During the study period, 67 consecutive patients underwent tracheostomy, including 48 males and 19 females with a median age of 66 years [interquartile range (IQR) 52–72]. Two surgeons alternated techniques, with 35 tracheostomies performed percutaneously and 32 via an open approach. The median time from intubation to tracheostomy was 23 days (IQR 20–26). At a median follow-up of 26 days, 52 patients (78%) no longer required mechanical ventilation and 58 patients (87%) were off continuous sedation. Five patients (7.5%) died of systemic causes. There were 11 total complications (16%) in 10 patients, most of which involved minor bleeding. There were no significant differences in outcomes between percutaneous and open methods.
CONCLUSIONS:Tracheostomy under apneic conditions by either percutaneous or open technique can be safely performed in patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Tracheostomy facilitated weaning from continuous intravenous sedation and mechanical ventilation. Continued follow-up of these patients to ascertain long-term outcome data is ongoing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>COVID-19 - complications</subject><subject>COVID-19 - mortality</subject><subject>COVID-19 - therapy</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>New York City</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tracheostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tracheostomy - methods</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9P2zAUxa1paBTYN0DIj3sJ-F8Sh7cqG1CpopVgk_YUOY6tek3iYjuq-sg3xyXdhPYAfrHuvb9zru4B4ByjS4yK_OphPr1Ebx5jhH8CE5wSnmDM0GcwiV2asIKSY3Di_R-EMOMo_wKOKeG84DydgOelcnIIold28FD0DVxsVA8fnZArZX2w3Q6aHi5FMKoPHm5NWMFy8Wv2PcHFNSxttxHOeNuP2iFI2ykPrY41nPU-mDAEY3vRwgflTBxFt3u1hb-tW8PShN0ZONKi9err4T8FP29-PJZ3yXxxOyun80TSFPFEU6yxpjJDPKOFTOuU6UbUhWa1zoWkhApNecOzrImCOmeNzHSBiMRM7Hl6Cr6NvhtnnwblQ9UZL1XbjrdXhDHEspxzFlE2otJZ753S1caZTrhdhVG1D7-K4Vf_hx9lF4cNQ92p5p_ob9oR4COwtW1Qzq_bYatctVKiDauPvNk70lcuS3lCEMGIxiLZd1L6AqytoNA</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Long, Sallie M.</creator><creator>Chern, Alexander</creator><creator>Feit, Noah Z.</creator><creator>Chung, Sei</creator><creator>Ramaswamy, Apoorva T.</creator><creator>Li, Carol</creator><creator>Cooley, Victoria</creator><creator>Hill, Shanna</creator><creator>Rajwani, Kapil</creator><creator>Villena-Vargas, Jonathan</creator><creator>Schenck, Edward</creator><creator>Stiles, Brendon</creator><creator>Tassler, Andrew B.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Percutaneous and Open Tracheostomy in Patients with COVID-19: Comparison and Outcomes of an Institutional Series in New York City</title><author>Long, Sallie M. ; Chern, Alexander ; Feit, Noah Z. ; Chung, Sei ; Ramaswamy, Apoorva T. ; Li, Carol ; Cooley, Victoria ; Hill, Shanna ; Rajwani, Kapil ; Villena-Vargas, Jonathan ; Schenck, Edward ; Stiles, Brendon ; Tassler, Andrew B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3508-f31f1f3c608639c5b54fdab9f4bf7ac323af38d866dc35b74dc6f902c14a39c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>COVID-19 - complications</topic><topic>COVID-19 - mortality</topic><topic>COVID-19 - therapy</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>New York City</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tracheostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tracheostomy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Long, Sallie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chern, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feit, Noah Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Sei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaswamy, Apoorva T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooley, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Shanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajwani, Kapil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villena-Vargas, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schenck, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiles, Brendon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tassler, Andrew B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Long, Sallie M.</au><au>Chern, Alexander</au><au>Feit, Noah Z.</au><au>Chung, Sei</au><au>Ramaswamy, Apoorva T.</au><au>Li, Carol</au><au>Cooley, Victoria</au><au>Hill, Shanna</au><au>Rajwani, Kapil</au><au>Villena-Vargas, Jonathan</au><au>Schenck, Edward</au><au>Stiles, Brendon</au><au>Tassler, Andrew B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous and Open Tracheostomy in Patients with COVID-19: Comparison and Outcomes of an Institutional Series in New York City</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>273</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>403-409</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to report the safety, efficacy, and early results of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 and determine whether differences exist between percutaneous and open methods.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:Prolonged respiratory failure is common in symptomatic patients with COVID-19, the disease process caused by infection with the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Tracheostomy, although posing potential risk to the operative team and other healthcare workers, may be beneficial for safe weaning of sedation and ventilator support. However, short- and long-term outcomes remain largely unknown.
METHODS:A prospectively collected database of patients with COVID-19 undergoing tracheostomy at a major medical center in New York City between April 4 and April 30, 2020 was reviewed. The primary endpoint was need for continued mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, sedation weaning, and need for intensive care unit (ICU) level of care. Patient characteristics, perioperative conditions, and outcomes between percutaneous and open groups were analyzed.
RESULTS:During the study period, 67 consecutive patients underwent tracheostomy, including 48 males and 19 females with a median age of 66 years [interquartile range (IQR) 52–72]. Two surgeons alternated techniques, with 35 tracheostomies performed percutaneously and 32 via an open approach. The median time from intubation to tracheostomy was 23 days (IQR 20–26). At a median follow-up of 26 days, 52 patients (78%) no longer required mechanical ventilation and 58 patients (87%) were off continuous sedation. Five patients (7.5%) died of systemic causes. There were 11 total complications (16%) in 10 patients, most of which involved minor bleeding. There were no significant differences in outcomes between percutaneous and open methods.
CONCLUSIONS:Tracheostomy under apneic conditions by either percutaneous or open technique can be safely performed in patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Tracheostomy facilitated weaning from continuous intravenous sedation and mechanical ventilation. Continued follow-up of these patients to ascertain long-term outcome data is ongoing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>32889885</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0000000000004428</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4932 |
ispartof | Annals of surgery, 2021-03, Vol.273 (3), p.403-409 |
issn | 0003-4932 1528-1140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2440467884 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cohort Studies COVID-19 - complications COVID-19 - mortality COVID-19 - therapy Critical Care Female Humans Male Middle Aged New York City Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Respiration, Artificial Survival Rate Tracheostomy - adverse effects Tracheostomy - methods |
title | Percutaneous and Open Tracheostomy in Patients with COVID-19: Comparison and Outcomes of an Institutional Series in New York City |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T01%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20and%20Open%20Tracheostomy%20in%20Patients%20with%20COVID-19:%20Comparison%20and%20Outcomes%20of%20an%20Institutional%20Series%20in%20New%20York%20City&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Long,%20Sallie%20M.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=273&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=403-409&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004428&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440467884%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2440467884&rft_id=info:pmid/32889885&rfr_iscdi=true |