Comment to the article “Hydroxyl radical scavenging by solid mineral surfaces in oxidative treatment systems: Rate constants and implications” published by K. Rusevova Crincoli and S. G. Huling in Water Research 169, 2020, 115240

The fate of radicals in aqueous suspensions can be significantly affected by surfaces scavenging reactions. When short-lived radicals such as •OH are considered, mass-transfer limitation may come into play. Disregarding these limitations may lead to heavy overestimation of surface-mediated reactions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2020-11, Vol.186, p.116308-116308, Article 116308
1. Verfasser: Kopinke, Frank-Dieter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116308
container_issue
container_start_page 116308
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 186
creator Kopinke, Frank-Dieter
description The fate of radicals in aqueous suspensions can be significantly affected by surfaces scavenging reactions. When short-lived radicals such as •OH are considered, mass-transfer limitation may come into play. Disregarding these limitations may lead to heavy overestimation of surface-mediated reactions. The present comment exposes a potential misinterpretation of experimental data in a recent study with implications for in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) techniques. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116308
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2439978123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135420308447</els_id><sourcerecordid>2439978123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5e4c88ee1503c3959d8ddbaa3d172358456efc35b42372b23354045afe553ab23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuOEzEQHCGQCIE_4NBHDpvBz2SGAxKKYIN2JaQA4mg5dmfjaMYOtidsbvsh8HN74y_Ws-HMqdWPquruqqrXlNSU0Pnbff1L54ipZoSVEp1z0jypJrRZtDMmRPO0mhAi-IxyKZ5XL1LaE0IY4-2k-rsMfY8-Qw6Qdwg6Zmc6hPu736uTjeH21EHU1hndQTL6iP7G-RvYnCCFzlnoncc49oa41QYTOA_h1lmd3RGhLKXzI306pYx9egdrnRFM8ClrnxNob8H1h64IZFeq93d_4DBsOpd2aEeZqxrWQ8JjOGpYRudNkX1Efa3hsobV0I37FNUfhTjCGhPqaHZA5-0FjP-4AEolE-Rl9Wyru4Sv_sVp9f3Tx2_L1ez6y-Xn5YfrmeG8zTOJwjQNIpWEG97K1jbWbrTmli4Yl42Qc9waLjeC8QXbMF5-SoTUW5SS65JPqzdn3kMMPwdMWfUuGew67TEMSTHB23bR0IKcVuI8amJIKeJWHaLrdTwpStTorNqrs7NqvESdnS2w92cYljOODqNKxqE3aF1Ek5UN7v8ED31vsfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439978123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment to the article “Hydroxyl radical scavenging by solid mineral surfaces in oxidative treatment systems: Rate constants and implications” published by K. Rusevova Crincoli and S. G. Huling in Water Research 169, 2020, 115240</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kopinke, Frank-Dieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Kopinke, Frank-Dieter</creatorcontrib><description>The fate of radicals in aqueous suspensions can be significantly affected by surfaces scavenging reactions. When short-lived radicals such as •OH are considered, mass-transfer limitation may come into play. Disregarding these limitations may lead to heavy overestimation of surface-mediated reactions. The present comment exposes a potential misinterpretation of experimental data in a recent study with implications for in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) techniques. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>In-situ chemical oxidation ; Mass-transfer limitation ; Radical reactions ; Surface scavenging</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2020-11, Vol.186, p.116308-116308, Article 116308</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5e4c88ee1503c3959d8ddbaa3d172358456efc35b42372b23354045afe553ab23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5e4c88ee1503c3959d8ddbaa3d172358456efc35b42372b23354045afe553ab23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116308$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kopinke, Frank-Dieter</creatorcontrib><title>Comment to the article “Hydroxyl radical scavenging by solid mineral surfaces in oxidative treatment systems: Rate constants and implications” published by K. Rusevova Crincoli and S. G. Huling in Water Research 169, 2020, 115240</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><description>The fate of radicals in aqueous suspensions can be significantly affected by surfaces scavenging reactions. When short-lived radicals such as •OH are considered, mass-transfer limitation may come into play. Disregarding these limitations may lead to heavy overestimation of surface-mediated reactions. The present comment exposes a potential misinterpretation of experimental data in a recent study with implications for in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) techniques. [Display omitted]</description><subject>In-situ chemical oxidation</subject><subject>Mass-transfer limitation</subject><subject>Radical reactions</subject><subject>Surface scavenging</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcuOEzEQHCGQCIE_4NBHDpvBz2SGAxKKYIN2JaQA4mg5dmfjaMYOtidsbvsh8HN74y_Ws-HMqdWPquruqqrXlNSU0Pnbff1L54ipZoSVEp1z0jypJrRZtDMmRPO0mhAi-IxyKZ5XL1LaE0IY4-2k-rsMfY8-Qw6Qdwg6Zmc6hPu736uTjeH21EHU1hndQTL6iP7G-RvYnCCFzlnoncc49oa41QYTOA_h1lmd3RGhLKXzI306pYx9egdrnRFM8ClrnxNob8H1h64IZFeq93d_4DBsOpd2aEeZqxrWQ8JjOGpYRudNkX1Efa3hsobV0I37FNUfhTjCGhPqaHZA5-0FjP-4AEolE-Rl9Wyru4Sv_sVp9f3Tx2_L1ez6y-Xn5YfrmeG8zTOJwjQNIpWEG97K1jbWbrTmli4Yl42Qc9waLjeC8QXbMF5-SoTUW5SS65JPqzdn3kMMPwdMWfUuGew67TEMSTHB23bR0IKcVuI8amJIKeJWHaLrdTwpStTorNqrs7NqvESdnS2w92cYljOODqNKxqE3aF1Ek5UN7v8ED31vsfw</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Kopinke, Frank-Dieter</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Comment to the article “Hydroxyl radical scavenging by solid mineral surfaces in oxidative treatment systems: Rate constants and implications” published by K. Rusevova Crincoli and S. G. Huling in Water Research 169, 2020, 115240</title><author>Kopinke, Frank-Dieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-5e4c88ee1503c3959d8ddbaa3d172358456efc35b42372b23354045afe553ab23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>In-situ chemical oxidation</topic><topic>Mass-transfer limitation</topic><topic>Radical reactions</topic><topic>Surface scavenging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kopinke, Frank-Dieter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kopinke, Frank-Dieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment to the article “Hydroxyl radical scavenging by solid mineral surfaces in oxidative treatment systems: Rate constants and implications” published by K. Rusevova Crincoli and S. G. Huling in Water Research 169, 2020, 115240</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>186</volume><spage>116308</spage><epage>116308</epage><pages>116308-116308</pages><artnum>116308</artnum><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>The fate of radicals in aqueous suspensions can be significantly affected by surfaces scavenging reactions. When short-lived radicals such as •OH are considered, mass-transfer limitation may come into play. Disregarding these limitations may lead to heavy overestimation of surface-mediated reactions. The present comment exposes a potential misinterpretation of experimental data in a recent study with implications for in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) techniques. [Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2020.116308</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2020-11, Vol.186, p.116308-116308, Article 116308
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2439978123
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects In-situ chemical oxidation
Mass-transfer limitation
Radical reactions
Surface scavenging
title Comment to the article “Hydroxyl radical scavenging by solid mineral surfaces in oxidative treatment systems: Rate constants and implications” published by K. Rusevova Crincoli and S. G. Huling in Water Research 169, 2020, 115240
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A55%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20to%20the%20article%20%E2%80%9CHydroxyl%20radical%20scavenging%20by%20solid%20mineral%20surfaces%20in%20oxidative%20treatment%20systems:%20Rate%20constants%20and%20implications%E2%80%9D%20published%20by%20K.%20Rusevova%20Crincoli%20and%20S.%20G.%20Huling%20in%20Water%20Research%20169,%202020,%20115240&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Kopinke,%20Frank-Dieter&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=186&rft.spage=116308&rft.epage=116308&rft.pages=116308-116308&rft.artnum=116308&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116308&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2439978123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439978123&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0043135420308447&rfr_iscdi=true