A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations

There is compelling evidence on the impact of diet as preventative medicine, and with rising health care costs healthcare organizations are attempting to identify interventions to improve patient health outcomes. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to characterize existing healthcare o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nutrition 2020-11, Vol.150 (11), p.2859-2873
Hauptverfasser: Veldheer, Susan, Scartozzi, Christina, Knehans, Amy, Oser, Tamara, Sood, Natasha, George, Daniel R, Smith, Andrew, Cohen, Alicia, Winkels, Renate M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2873
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2859
container_title The Journal of nutrition
container_volume 150
creator Veldheer, Susan
Scartozzi, Christina
Knehans, Amy
Oser, Tamara
Sood, Natasha
George, Daniel R
Smith, Andrew
Cohen, Alicia
Winkels, Renate M
description There is compelling evidence on the impact of diet as preventative medicine, and with rising health care costs healthcare organizations are attempting to identify interventions to improve patient health outcomes. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to characterize existing healthcare organization-based interventions to improve access to fruits and vegetables (F&V) for their patient populations. In addition, we aimed to review the impact of identified interventions on dietary intake and health outcomes. Titles and abstracts were searched in PubMed ®(MEDLINE®), Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Library® from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2019. To be selected for inclusion, original studies must have included a healthcare organization and have had a programmatic focus on increasing access to or providing fresh F&V to patients in an outpatient, naturalistic setting. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess study quality in 6 domains (selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals and dropouts). A total of 8876 abstracts were screened, yielding 44 manuscripts or abstracts from 27 programs. Six program models were identified: 1) a cash-back rebate program, 2) F&V voucher programs, 3) garden-based programs, 4) subsidized food box programs, 5) home-delivery meal programs, and 6) collaborative food pantry-clinical programs. Only 6 of 27 studies included a control group. The overall quality of the studies was weak due to participant selection bias and incomplete reporting on data collection tools, confounders, and dropouts. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes measured and weak study quality, conclusions regarding dietary and health-related outcomes were limited. Healthcare-based initiatives to improve patient access to F&V are novel and have promise. However, future studies will need rigorous study designs and validated data collection tools, particularly related to dietary intake, to better determine the effect of these interventions on health-related outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jn/nxaa209
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438684958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jn/nxaa209</oup_id><els_id>S0022316622023604</els_id><sourcerecordid>2464176023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5e36be84d6ebf8d3336fb5c60de70f7790ecfe461ab757ccc1def8c6de9e370c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90dGK1DAUBuAgijuu3vgAEhBBhLpJk6bt5bA4jrCwi7t6G9LT09kMnaQmqev6Br61kY5eiHgVOHznJ5yfkOecveWsFWd7d-a-GVOy9gFZ8UryQnHGHpIVY2VZCK7UCXkS454xxmXbPCYnomwqxWq5Ij_W9Po-JjyYZIFeg5-s29GP-NXiHfUD3fo7ukUzplswAell2Blnv2fsXaTrPNkYsKNNeZL31gAYI02ebsJsU6TG9fQz7jCZbsRIraM3t2gDvcoeXaJXfprHJe0peTSYMeKz43tKPm3e3Zxvi4vL9x_O1xcFyFKlokKhOmxkr7Abml4IoYauAsV6rNlQ1y1DGFAqbrq6qgGA9zg0oHpsUdQMxCl5veROwX-ZMSZ9sBFwHI1DP0ddStGoRrZVk-nLv-jez8Hl32WlJK8VK0VWbxYFwccYcNBTsAcT7jVn-ldBeu_0saCMXxwj5-6A_R_6u5EMXi3Az9P_g-TiMN8qtxV0hHxSwN4GhKR7b_-19hOBH63K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464176023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Veldheer, Susan ; Scartozzi, Christina ; Knehans, Amy ; Oser, Tamara ; Sood, Natasha ; George, Daniel R ; Smith, Andrew ; Cohen, Alicia ; Winkels, Renate M</creator><creatorcontrib>Veldheer, Susan ; Scartozzi, Christina ; Knehans, Amy ; Oser, Tamara ; Sood, Natasha ; George, Daniel R ; Smith, Andrew ; Cohen, Alicia ; Winkels, Renate M</creatorcontrib><description>There is compelling evidence on the impact of diet as preventative medicine, and with rising health care costs healthcare organizations are attempting to identify interventions to improve patient health outcomes. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to characterize existing healthcare organization-based interventions to improve access to fruits and vegetables (F&amp;V) for their patient populations. In addition, we aimed to review the impact of identified interventions on dietary intake and health outcomes. Titles and abstracts were searched in PubMed ®(MEDLINE®), Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Library® from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2019. To be selected for inclusion, original studies must have included a healthcare organization and have had a programmatic focus on increasing access to or providing fresh F&amp;V to patients in an outpatient, naturalistic setting. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess study quality in 6 domains (selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals and dropouts). A total of 8876 abstracts were screened, yielding 44 manuscripts or abstracts from 27 programs. Six program models were identified: 1) a cash-back rebate program, 2) F&amp;V voucher programs, 3) garden-based programs, 4) subsidized food box programs, 5) home-delivery meal programs, and 6) collaborative food pantry-clinical programs. Only 6 of 27 studies included a control group. The overall quality of the studies was weak due to participant selection bias and incomplete reporting on data collection tools, confounders, and dropouts. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes measured and weak study quality, conclusions regarding dietary and health-related outcomes were limited. Healthcare-based initiatives to improve patient access to F&amp;V are novel and have promise. However, future studies will need rigorous study designs and validated data collection tools, particularly related to dietary intake, to better determine the effect of these interventions on health-related outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-6100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxaa209</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32856074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; Clinical outcomes ; Data collection ; Delivery of Health Care ; Diet ; Dietary intake ; Dropouts ; Food intake ; food is medicine ; Food Supply ; Fruit ; Fruits ; fruits and vegetables ; Health care ; Health care industry ; health care organizations ; healthy food access ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Organizations ; Patients ; Populations ; Public health ; Quality assessment ; systematic scoping review ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nutrition, 2020-11, Vol.150 (11), p.2859-2873</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020. 2020</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Nutrition Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5e36be84d6ebf8d3336fb5c60de70f7790ecfe461ab757ccc1def8c6de9e370c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5e36be84d6ebf8d3336fb5c60de70f7790ecfe461ab757ccc1def8c6de9e370c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6592-9249</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32856074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veldheer, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scartozzi, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knehans, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oser, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sood, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Daniel R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkels, Renate M</creatorcontrib><title>A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations</title><title>The Journal of nutrition</title><addtitle>J Nutr</addtitle><description>There is compelling evidence on the impact of diet as preventative medicine, and with rising health care costs healthcare organizations are attempting to identify interventions to improve patient health outcomes. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to characterize existing healthcare organization-based interventions to improve access to fruits and vegetables (F&amp;V) for their patient populations. In addition, we aimed to review the impact of identified interventions on dietary intake and health outcomes. Titles and abstracts were searched in PubMed ®(MEDLINE®), Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Library® from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2019. To be selected for inclusion, original studies must have included a healthcare organization and have had a programmatic focus on increasing access to or providing fresh F&amp;V to patients in an outpatient, naturalistic setting. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess study quality in 6 domains (selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals and dropouts). A total of 8876 abstracts were screened, yielding 44 manuscripts or abstracts from 27 programs. Six program models were identified: 1) a cash-back rebate program, 2) F&amp;V voucher programs, 3) garden-based programs, 4) subsidized food box programs, 5) home-delivery meal programs, and 6) collaborative food pantry-clinical programs. Only 6 of 27 studies included a control group. The overall quality of the studies was weak due to participant selection bias and incomplete reporting on data collection tools, confounders, and dropouts. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes measured and weak study quality, conclusions regarding dietary and health-related outcomes were limited. Healthcare-based initiatives to improve patient access to F&amp;V are novel and have promise. However, future studies will need rigorous study designs and validated data collection tools, particularly related to dietary intake, to better determine the effect of these interventions on health-related outcomes.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary intake</subject><subject>Dropouts</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>food is medicine</subject><subject>Food Supply</subject><subject>Fruit</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>fruits and vegetables</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>health care organizations</subject><subject>healthy food access</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>systematic scoping review</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0022-3166</issn><issn>1541-6100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90dGK1DAUBuAgijuu3vgAEhBBhLpJk6bt5bA4jrCwi7t6G9LT09kMnaQmqev6Br61kY5eiHgVOHznJ5yfkOecveWsFWd7d-a-GVOy9gFZ8UryQnHGHpIVY2VZCK7UCXkS454xxmXbPCYnomwqxWq5Ij_W9Po-JjyYZIFeg5-s29GP-NXiHfUD3fo7ukUzplswAell2Blnv2fsXaTrPNkYsKNNeZL31gAYI02ebsJsU6TG9fQz7jCZbsRIraM3t2gDvcoeXaJXfprHJe0peTSYMeKz43tKPm3e3Zxvi4vL9x_O1xcFyFKlokKhOmxkr7Abml4IoYauAsV6rNlQ1y1DGFAqbrq6qgGA9zg0oHpsUdQMxCl5veROwX-ZMSZ9sBFwHI1DP0ddStGoRrZVk-nLv-jez8Hl32WlJK8VK0VWbxYFwccYcNBTsAcT7jVn-ldBeu_0saCMXxwj5-6A_R_6u5EMXi3Az9P_g-TiMN8qtxV0hHxSwN4GhKR7b_-19hOBH63K</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Veldheer, Susan</creator><creator>Scartozzi, Christina</creator><creator>Knehans, Amy</creator><creator>Oser, Tamara</creator><creator>Sood, Natasha</creator><creator>George, Daniel R</creator><creator>Smith, Andrew</creator><creator>Cohen, Alicia</creator><creator>Winkels, Renate M</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>American Institute of Nutrition</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6592-9249</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations</title><author>Veldheer, Susan ; Scartozzi, Christina ; Knehans, Amy ; Oser, Tamara ; Sood, Natasha ; George, Daniel R ; Smith, Andrew ; Cohen, Alicia ; Winkels, Renate M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5e36be84d6ebf8d3336fb5c60de70f7790ecfe461ab757ccc1def8c6de9e370c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary intake</topic><topic>Dropouts</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>food is medicine</topic><topic>Food Supply</topic><topic>Fruit</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>fruits and vegetables</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>health care organizations</topic><topic>healthy food access</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>systematic scoping review</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veldheer, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scartozzi, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knehans, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oser, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sood, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Daniel R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkels, Renate M</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veldheer, Susan</au><au>Scartozzi, Christina</au><au>Knehans, Amy</au><au>Oser, Tamara</au><au>Sood, Natasha</au><au>George, Daniel R</au><au>Smith, Andrew</au><au>Cohen, Alicia</au><au>Winkels, Renate M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>J Nutr</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2859</spage><epage>2873</epage><pages>2859-2873</pages><issn>0022-3166</issn><eissn>1541-6100</eissn><abstract>There is compelling evidence on the impact of diet as preventative medicine, and with rising health care costs healthcare organizations are attempting to identify interventions to improve patient health outcomes. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to characterize existing healthcare organization-based interventions to improve access to fruits and vegetables (F&amp;V) for their patient populations. In addition, we aimed to review the impact of identified interventions on dietary intake and health outcomes. Titles and abstracts were searched in PubMed ®(MEDLINE®), Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Library® from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2019. To be selected for inclusion, original studies must have included a healthcare organization and have had a programmatic focus on increasing access to or providing fresh F&amp;V to patients in an outpatient, naturalistic setting. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess study quality in 6 domains (selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals and dropouts). A total of 8876 abstracts were screened, yielding 44 manuscripts or abstracts from 27 programs. Six program models were identified: 1) a cash-back rebate program, 2) F&amp;V voucher programs, 3) garden-based programs, 4) subsidized food box programs, 5) home-delivery meal programs, and 6) collaborative food pantry-clinical programs. Only 6 of 27 studies included a control group. The overall quality of the studies was weak due to participant selection bias and incomplete reporting on data collection tools, confounders, and dropouts. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes measured and weak study quality, conclusions regarding dietary and health-related outcomes were limited. Healthcare-based initiatives to improve patient access to F&amp;V are novel and have promise. However, future studies will need rigorous study designs and validated data collection tools, particularly related to dietary intake, to better determine the effect of these interventions on health-related outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32856074</pmid><doi>10.1093/jn/nxaa209</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6592-9249</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3166
ispartof The Journal of nutrition, 2020-11, Vol.150 (11), p.2859-2873
issn 0022-3166
1541-6100
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438684958
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bias
Clinical outcomes
Data collection
Delivery of Health Care
Diet
Dietary intake
Dropouts
Food intake
food is medicine
Food Supply
Fruit
Fruits
fruits and vegetables
Health care
Health care industry
health care organizations
healthy food access
Heterogeneity
Humans
Organizations
Patients
Populations
Public health
Quality assessment
systematic scoping review
Vegetables
title A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A34%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Systematic%20Scoping%20Review%20of%20How%20Healthcare%20Organizations%20Are%20Facilitating%20Access%20to%20Fruits%20and%20Vegetables%20in%20Their%20Patient%20Populations&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nutrition&rft.au=Veldheer,%20Susan&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2859&rft.epage=2873&rft.pages=2859-2873&rft.issn=0022-3166&rft.eissn=1541-6100&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jn/nxaa209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2464176023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464176023&rft_id=info:pmid/32856074&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jn/nxaa209&rft_els_id=S0022316622023604&rfr_iscdi=true