A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations
There is compelling evidence on the impact of diet as preventative medicine, and with rising health care costs healthcare organizations are attempting to identify interventions to improve patient health outcomes. The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to characterize existing healthcare o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of nutrition 2020-11, Vol.150 (11), p.2859-2873 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2873 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2859 |
container_title | The Journal of nutrition |
container_volume | 150 |
creator | Veldheer, Susan Scartozzi, Christina Knehans, Amy Oser, Tamara Sood, Natasha George, Daniel R Smith, Andrew Cohen, Alicia Winkels, Renate M |
description | There is compelling evidence on the impact of diet as preventative medicine, and with rising health care costs healthcare organizations are attempting to identify interventions to improve patient health outcomes.
The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to characterize existing healthcare organization-based interventions to improve access to fruits and vegetables (F&V) for their patient populations. In addition, we aimed to review the impact of identified interventions on dietary intake and health outcomes.
Titles and abstracts were searched in PubMed ®(MEDLINE®), Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Library® from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2019. To be selected for inclusion, original studies must have included a healthcare organization and have had a programmatic focus on increasing access to or providing fresh F&V to patients in an outpatient, naturalistic setting. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess study quality in 6 domains (selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals and dropouts).
A total of 8876 abstracts were screened, yielding 44 manuscripts or abstracts from 27 programs. Six program models were identified: 1) a cash-back rebate program, 2) F&V voucher programs, 3) garden-based programs, 4) subsidized food box programs, 5) home-delivery meal programs, and 6) collaborative food pantry-clinical programs. Only 6 of 27 studies included a control group. The overall quality of the studies was weak due to participant selection bias and incomplete reporting on data collection tools, confounders, and dropouts. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes measured and weak study quality, conclusions regarding dietary and health-related outcomes were limited.
Healthcare-based initiatives to improve patient access to F&V are novel and have promise. However, future studies will need rigorous study designs and validated data collection tools, particularly related to dietary intake, to better determine the effect of these interventions on health-related outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jn/nxaa209 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438684958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jn/nxaa209</oup_id><els_id>S0022316622023604</els_id><sourcerecordid>2464176023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5e36be84d6ebf8d3336fb5c60de70f7790ecfe461ab757ccc1def8c6de9e370c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90dGK1DAUBuAgijuu3vgAEhBBhLpJk6bt5bA4jrCwi7t6G9LT09kMnaQmqev6Br61kY5eiHgVOHznJ5yfkOecveWsFWd7d-a-GVOy9gFZ8UryQnHGHpIVY2VZCK7UCXkS454xxmXbPCYnomwqxWq5Ij_W9Po-JjyYZIFeg5-s29GP-NXiHfUD3fo7ukUzplswAell2Blnv2fsXaTrPNkYsKNNeZL31gAYI02ebsJsU6TG9fQz7jCZbsRIraM3t2gDvcoeXaJXfprHJe0peTSYMeKz43tKPm3e3Zxvi4vL9x_O1xcFyFKlokKhOmxkr7Abml4IoYauAsV6rNlQ1y1DGFAqbrq6qgGA9zg0oHpsUdQMxCl5veROwX-ZMSZ9sBFwHI1DP0ddStGoRrZVk-nLv-jez8Hl32WlJK8VK0VWbxYFwccYcNBTsAcT7jVn-ldBeu_0saCMXxwj5-6A_R_6u5EMXi3Az9P_g-TiMN8qtxV0hHxSwN4GhKR7b_-19hOBH63K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464176023</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Veldheer, Susan ; Scartozzi, Christina ; Knehans, Amy ; Oser, Tamara ; Sood, Natasha ; George, Daniel R ; Smith, Andrew ; Cohen, Alicia ; Winkels, Renate M</creator><creatorcontrib>Veldheer, Susan ; Scartozzi, Christina ; Knehans, Amy ; Oser, Tamara ; Sood, Natasha ; George, Daniel R ; Smith, Andrew ; Cohen, Alicia ; Winkels, Renate M</creatorcontrib><description>There is compelling evidence on the impact of diet as preventative medicine, and with rising health care costs healthcare organizations are attempting to identify interventions to improve patient health outcomes.
The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to characterize existing healthcare organization-based interventions to improve access to fruits and vegetables (F&V) for their patient populations. In addition, we aimed to review the impact of identified interventions on dietary intake and health outcomes.
Titles and abstracts were searched in PubMed ®(MEDLINE®), Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Library® from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2019. To be selected for inclusion, original studies must have included a healthcare organization and have had a programmatic focus on increasing access to or providing fresh F&V to patients in an outpatient, naturalistic setting. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess study quality in 6 domains (selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals and dropouts).
A total of 8876 abstracts were screened, yielding 44 manuscripts or abstracts from 27 programs. Six program models were identified: 1) a cash-back rebate program, 2) F&V voucher programs, 3) garden-based programs, 4) subsidized food box programs, 5) home-delivery meal programs, and 6) collaborative food pantry-clinical programs. Only 6 of 27 studies included a control group. The overall quality of the studies was weak due to participant selection bias and incomplete reporting on data collection tools, confounders, and dropouts. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes measured and weak study quality, conclusions regarding dietary and health-related outcomes were limited.
Healthcare-based initiatives to improve patient access to F&V are novel and have promise. However, future studies will need rigorous study designs and validated data collection tools, particularly related to dietary intake, to better determine the effect of these interventions on health-related outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-6100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxaa209</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32856074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; Clinical outcomes ; Data collection ; Delivery of Health Care ; Diet ; Dietary intake ; Dropouts ; Food intake ; food is medicine ; Food Supply ; Fruit ; Fruits ; fruits and vegetables ; Health care ; Health care industry ; health care organizations ; healthy food access ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Organizations ; Patients ; Populations ; Public health ; Quality assessment ; systematic scoping review ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nutrition, 2020-11, Vol.150 (11), p.2859-2873</ispartof><rights>2020 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020. 2020</rights><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Nutrition Nov 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5e36be84d6ebf8d3336fb5c60de70f7790ecfe461ab757ccc1def8c6de9e370c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5e36be84d6ebf8d3336fb5c60de70f7790ecfe461ab757ccc1def8c6de9e370c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6592-9249</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32856074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veldheer, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scartozzi, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knehans, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oser, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sood, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Daniel R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkels, Renate M</creatorcontrib><title>A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations</title><title>The Journal of nutrition</title><addtitle>J Nutr</addtitle><description>There is compelling evidence on the impact of diet as preventative medicine, and with rising health care costs healthcare organizations are attempting to identify interventions to improve patient health outcomes.
The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to characterize existing healthcare organization-based interventions to improve access to fruits and vegetables (F&V) for their patient populations. In addition, we aimed to review the impact of identified interventions on dietary intake and health outcomes.
Titles and abstracts were searched in PubMed ®(MEDLINE®), Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Library® from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2019. To be selected for inclusion, original studies must have included a healthcare organization and have had a programmatic focus on increasing access to or providing fresh F&V to patients in an outpatient, naturalistic setting. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess study quality in 6 domains (selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals and dropouts).
A total of 8876 abstracts were screened, yielding 44 manuscripts or abstracts from 27 programs. Six program models were identified: 1) a cash-back rebate program, 2) F&V voucher programs, 3) garden-based programs, 4) subsidized food box programs, 5) home-delivery meal programs, and 6) collaborative food pantry-clinical programs. Only 6 of 27 studies included a control group. The overall quality of the studies was weak due to participant selection bias and incomplete reporting on data collection tools, confounders, and dropouts. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes measured and weak study quality, conclusions regarding dietary and health-related outcomes were limited.
Healthcare-based initiatives to improve patient access to F&V are novel and have promise. However, future studies will need rigorous study designs and validated data collection tools, particularly related to dietary intake, to better determine the effect of these interventions on health-related outcomes.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary intake</subject><subject>Dropouts</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>food is medicine</subject><subject>Food Supply</subject><subject>Fruit</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>fruits and vegetables</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>health care organizations</subject><subject>healthy food access</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>systematic scoping review</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0022-3166</issn><issn>1541-6100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90dGK1DAUBuAgijuu3vgAEhBBhLpJk6bt5bA4jrCwi7t6G9LT09kMnaQmqev6Br61kY5eiHgVOHznJ5yfkOecveWsFWd7d-a-GVOy9gFZ8UryQnHGHpIVY2VZCK7UCXkS454xxmXbPCYnomwqxWq5Ij_W9Po-JjyYZIFeg5-s29GP-NXiHfUD3fo7ukUzplswAell2Blnv2fsXaTrPNkYsKNNeZL31gAYI02ebsJsU6TG9fQz7jCZbsRIraM3t2gDvcoeXaJXfprHJe0peTSYMeKz43tKPm3e3Zxvi4vL9x_O1xcFyFKlokKhOmxkr7Abml4IoYauAsV6rNlQ1y1DGFAqbrq6qgGA9zg0oHpsUdQMxCl5veROwX-ZMSZ9sBFwHI1DP0ddStGoRrZVk-nLv-jez8Hl32WlJK8VK0VWbxYFwccYcNBTsAcT7jVn-ldBeu_0saCMXxwj5-6A_R_6u5EMXi3Az9P_g-TiMN8qtxV0hHxSwN4GhKR7b_-19hOBH63K</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Veldheer, Susan</creator><creator>Scartozzi, Christina</creator><creator>Knehans, Amy</creator><creator>Oser, Tamara</creator><creator>Sood, Natasha</creator><creator>George, Daniel R</creator><creator>Smith, Andrew</creator><creator>Cohen, Alicia</creator><creator>Winkels, Renate M</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>American Institute of Nutrition</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6592-9249</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations</title><author>Veldheer, Susan ; Scartozzi, Christina ; Knehans, Amy ; Oser, Tamara ; Sood, Natasha ; George, Daniel R ; Smith, Andrew ; Cohen, Alicia ; Winkels, Renate M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-5e36be84d6ebf8d3336fb5c60de70f7790ecfe461ab757ccc1def8c6de9e370c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary intake</topic><topic>Dropouts</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>food is medicine</topic><topic>Food Supply</topic><topic>Fruit</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>fruits and vegetables</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>health care organizations</topic><topic>healthy food access</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>systematic scoping review</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veldheer, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scartozzi, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knehans, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oser, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sood, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Daniel R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkels, Renate M</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veldheer, Susan</au><au>Scartozzi, Christina</au><au>Knehans, Amy</au><au>Oser, Tamara</au><au>Sood, Natasha</au><au>George, Daniel R</au><au>Smith, Andrew</au><au>Cohen, Alicia</au><au>Winkels, Renate M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>J Nutr</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2859</spage><epage>2873</epage><pages>2859-2873</pages><issn>0022-3166</issn><eissn>1541-6100</eissn><abstract>There is compelling evidence on the impact of diet as preventative medicine, and with rising health care costs healthcare organizations are attempting to identify interventions to improve patient health outcomes.
The purpose of this systematic scoping review was to characterize existing healthcare organization-based interventions to improve access to fruits and vegetables (F&V) for their patient populations. In addition, we aimed to review the impact of identified interventions on dietary intake and health outcomes.
Titles and abstracts were searched in PubMed ®(MEDLINE®), Embase®, CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Library® from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2019. To be selected for inclusion, original studies must have included a healthcare organization and have had a programmatic focus on increasing access to or providing fresh F&V to patients in an outpatient, naturalistic setting. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess study quality in 6 domains (selection bias, study design, confounders, blinding, data collection methods, and withdrawals and dropouts).
A total of 8876 abstracts were screened, yielding 44 manuscripts or abstracts from 27 programs. Six program models were identified: 1) a cash-back rebate program, 2) F&V voucher programs, 3) garden-based programs, 4) subsidized food box programs, 5) home-delivery meal programs, and 6) collaborative food pantry-clinical programs. Only 6 of 27 studies included a control group. The overall quality of the studies was weak due to participant selection bias and incomplete reporting on data collection tools, confounders, and dropouts. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes measured and weak study quality, conclusions regarding dietary and health-related outcomes were limited.
Healthcare-based initiatives to improve patient access to F&V are novel and have promise. However, future studies will need rigorous study designs and validated data collection tools, particularly related to dietary intake, to better determine the effect of these interventions on health-related outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32856074</pmid><doi>10.1093/jn/nxaa209</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6592-9249</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3166 |
ispartof | The Journal of nutrition, 2020-11, Vol.150 (11), p.2859-2873 |
issn | 0022-3166 1541-6100 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438684958 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bias Clinical outcomes Data collection Delivery of Health Care Diet Dietary intake Dropouts Food intake food is medicine Food Supply Fruit Fruits fruits and vegetables Health care Health care industry health care organizations healthy food access Heterogeneity Humans Organizations Patients Populations Public health Quality assessment systematic scoping review Vegetables |
title | A Systematic Scoping Review of How Healthcare Organizations Are Facilitating Access to Fruits and Vegetables in Their Patient Populations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A34%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Systematic%20Scoping%20Review%20of%20How%20Healthcare%20Organizations%20Are%20Facilitating%20Access%20to%20Fruits%20and%20Vegetables%20in%20Their%20Patient%20Populations&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nutrition&rft.au=Veldheer,%20Susan&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2859&rft.epage=2873&rft.pages=2859-2873&rft.issn=0022-3166&rft.eissn=1541-6100&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jn/nxaa209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2464176023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464176023&rft_id=info:pmid/32856074&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jn/nxaa209&rft_els_id=S0022316622023604&rfr_iscdi=true |