Cartilage and subchondral bone distributions of the distal radius: a 3-dimensional analysis using cadavers

To quantify the spatial distributions of cartilage and subchondral bone thickness of the distal radius. Using 17 cadaveric wrists, three types of 3-dimensional models were created: a cartilage-bone model, obtained by laser scanning; a bone model, rescanned after dissolving the cartilage; and a subch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2020-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1572-1580
Hauptverfasser: Miyamura, S., Oka, K., Lans, J., Sakai, T., Shiode, R., Kazui, A., Tanaka, H., Shimada, S., Murase, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1580
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1572
container_title Osteoarthritis and cartilage
container_volume 28
creator Miyamura, S.
Oka, K.
Lans, J.
Sakai, T.
Shiode, R.
Kazui, A.
Tanaka, H.
Shimada, S.
Murase, T.
description To quantify the spatial distributions of cartilage and subchondral bone thickness of the distal radius. Using 17 cadaveric wrists, three types of 3-dimensional models were created: a cartilage-bone model, obtained by laser scanning; a bone model, rescanned after dissolving the cartilage; and a subchondral bone model, obtained using computed tomography. By superimposing the bone model onto the cartilage-bone and the subchondral bone models, the cartilage and subchondral bone thickness were determined. Measurements along with the spatial distribution were made at fixed anatomic points including the scaphoid and lunate fossa, sigmoid notch and interfossal ridge, and compared at each of these four regions. Cartilage thickness of the interfossal ridge (0.89 ± 0.23 mm) had a larger average thickness compared to that of the scaphoid fossa (0.70 ± 0.18 mm; p = 0.004), lunate fossa (0.75 ± 0.17 mm; p = 0.044) and sigmoid notch (0.64 ± 0.13 mm; p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joca.2020.08.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438678262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1063458420311183</els_id><sourcerecordid>2438678262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-7c7b8bd0d25e1ca73fd459fbffbe64feeb7db638072bce79eafedc8157047a423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtv1TAQRi0EoqXwB1ggL9kk-JHYDmKDrnhJldjA2vJj3DrKjYsnqdR_X1_dwpLNzGh05pPmEPKWs54zrj7M_VyC6wUTrGemZ8w8I5d8FKKb1Cift5kp2Q2jGS7IK8SZMSY5Zy_JhRRGsWkSl2Q-uLrlxd0AdWukuPtwW9ZY3UJ9WYHGjFvNft9yWZGWRLfb87IB1cW840fqqOxiPsKKDWp718oDZqQ75vWGBhfdPVR8TV4ktyC8eepX5PfXL78O37vrn99-HD5fd2FQaut00N74yKIYgQenZYrDOCWfkgc1JACvo1fSMC18AD2BSxCD4aNmg3aDkFfk_Tn3rpY_O-BmjxkDLItboexoxSCN0kaoEyrOaKgFsUKydzUfXX2wnNmTYzvbk2N7cmyZsc1xO3r3lL_7I8R_J3-lNuDTGYD25X2GajFkWAPEXCFsNpb8v_xHOEuP6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438678262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cartilage and subchondral bone distributions of the distal radius: a 3-dimensional analysis using cadavers</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Miyamura, S. ; Oka, K. ; Lans, J. ; Sakai, T. ; Shiode, R. ; Kazui, A. ; Tanaka, H. ; Shimada, S. ; Murase, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miyamura, S. ; Oka, K. ; Lans, J. ; Sakai, T. ; Shiode, R. ; Kazui, A. ; Tanaka, H. ; Shimada, S. ; Murase, T.</creatorcontrib><description>To quantify the spatial distributions of cartilage and subchondral bone thickness of the distal radius. Using 17 cadaveric wrists, three types of 3-dimensional models were created: a cartilage-bone model, obtained by laser scanning; a bone model, rescanned after dissolving the cartilage; and a subchondral bone model, obtained using computed tomography. By superimposing the bone model onto the cartilage-bone and the subchondral bone models, the cartilage and subchondral bone thickness were determined. Measurements along with the spatial distribution were made at fixed anatomic points including the scaphoid and lunate fossa, sigmoid notch and interfossal ridge, and compared at each of these four regions. Cartilage thickness of the interfossal ridge (0.89 ± 0.23 mm) had a larger average thickness compared to that of the scaphoid fossa (0.70 ± 0.18 mm; p = 0.004), lunate fossa (0.75 ± 0.17 mm; p = 0.044) and sigmoid notch (0.64 ± 0.13 mm; p &lt; 0.001). Subchondral bone was found to be thickest at the scaphoid (2.18 ± 0.72 mm) and lunate fossae (1.94 ± 0.93 mm), which were both thicker than that of sigmoid notch (1.63 ± 1.06 mm: vs scaphoid fossa, p = 0.020) or interfossal ridge (1.54 ± 0.84 mm: vs scaphoid fossa, p = 0.004; vs lunate fossa, p = 0.048). In the volar-ulnar sub-regions of the scaphoid and lunate fossa, the subchondral bone thickened. Our data can be applied when treating distal radius fractures. Cartilage thickness was less than 1 mm across the articular surface, which may give an insight into threshold for an acceptable range of step-offs. The combined findings of subchondral bone appreciate the importance of the volar-ulnar corner of the distal radius in the volar locking plate fixation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-4584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-9653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.08.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32860992</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cartilage ; Computed tomography (CT) ; Distal radius ; Fracture ; Laser scanner ; Subchondral bone</subject><ispartof>Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2020-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1572-1580</ispartof><rights>2020 Osteoarthritis Research Society International</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-7c7b8bd0d25e1ca73fd459fbffbe64feeb7db638072bce79eafedc8157047a423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-7c7b8bd0d25e1ca73fd459fbffbe64feeb7db638072bce79eafedc8157047a423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6159-4645 ; 0000-0001-8622-7422 ; 0000-0002-2245-5554 ; 0000-0002-7770-4634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458420311183$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miyamura, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lans, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiode, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazui, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murase, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Cartilage and subchondral bone distributions of the distal radius: a 3-dimensional analysis using cadavers</title><title>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</title><addtitle>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</addtitle><description>To quantify the spatial distributions of cartilage and subchondral bone thickness of the distal radius. Using 17 cadaveric wrists, three types of 3-dimensional models were created: a cartilage-bone model, obtained by laser scanning; a bone model, rescanned after dissolving the cartilage; and a subchondral bone model, obtained using computed tomography. By superimposing the bone model onto the cartilage-bone and the subchondral bone models, the cartilage and subchondral bone thickness were determined. Measurements along with the spatial distribution were made at fixed anatomic points including the scaphoid and lunate fossa, sigmoid notch and interfossal ridge, and compared at each of these four regions. Cartilage thickness of the interfossal ridge (0.89 ± 0.23 mm) had a larger average thickness compared to that of the scaphoid fossa (0.70 ± 0.18 mm; p = 0.004), lunate fossa (0.75 ± 0.17 mm; p = 0.044) and sigmoid notch (0.64 ± 0.13 mm; p &lt; 0.001). Subchondral bone was found to be thickest at the scaphoid (2.18 ± 0.72 mm) and lunate fossae (1.94 ± 0.93 mm), which were both thicker than that of sigmoid notch (1.63 ± 1.06 mm: vs scaphoid fossa, p = 0.020) or interfossal ridge (1.54 ± 0.84 mm: vs scaphoid fossa, p = 0.004; vs lunate fossa, p = 0.048). In the volar-ulnar sub-regions of the scaphoid and lunate fossa, the subchondral bone thickened. Our data can be applied when treating distal radius fractures. Cartilage thickness was less than 1 mm across the articular surface, which may give an insight into threshold for an acceptable range of step-offs. The combined findings of subchondral bone appreciate the importance of the volar-ulnar corner of the distal radius in the volar locking plate fixation.</description><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Computed tomography (CT)</subject><subject>Distal radius</subject><subject>Fracture</subject><subject>Laser scanner</subject><subject>Subchondral bone</subject><issn>1063-4584</issn><issn>1522-9653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtv1TAQRi0EoqXwB1ggL9kk-JHYDmKDrnhJldjA2vJj3DrKjYsnqdR_X1_dwpLNzGh05pPmEPKWs54zrj7M_VyC6wUTrGemZ8w8I5d8FKKb1Cift5kp2Q2jGS7IK8SZMSY5Zy_JhRRGsWkSl2Q-uLrlxd0AdWukuPtwW9ZY3UJ9WYHGjFvNft9yWZGWRLfb87IB1cW840fqqOxiPsKKDWp718oDZqQ75vWGBhfdPVR8TV4ktyC8eepX5PfXL78O37vrn99-HD5fd2FQaut00N74yKIYgQenZYrDOCWfkgc1JACvo1fSMC18AD2BSxCD4aNmg3aDkFfk_Tn3rpY_O-BmjxkDLItboexoxSCN0kaoEyrOaKgFsUKydzUfXX2wnNmTYzvbk2N7cmyZsc1xO3r3lL_7I8R_J3-lNuDTGYD25X2GajFkWAPEXCFsNpb8v_xHOEuP6A</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Miyamura, S.</creator><creator>Oka, K.</creator><creator>Lans, J.</creator><creator>Sakai, T.</creator><creator>Shiode, R.</creator><creator>Kazui, A.</creator><creator>Tanaka, H.</creator><creator>Shimada, S.</creator><creator>Murase, T.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-4645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8622-7422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-5554</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7770-4634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Cartilage and subchondral bone distributions of the distal radius: a 3-dimensional analysis using cadavers</title><author>Miyamura, S. ; Oka, K. ; Lans, J. ; Sakai, T. ; Shiode, R. ; Kazui, A. ; Tanaka, H. ; Shimada, S. ; Murase, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-7c7b8bd0d25e1ca73fd459fbffbe64feeb7db638072bce79eafedc8157047a423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Computed tomography (CT)</topic><topic>Distal radius</topic><topic>Fracture</topic><topic>Laser scanner</topic><topic>Subchondral bone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miyamura, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lans, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiode, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazui, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimada, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murase, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miyamura, S.</au><au>Oka, K.</au><au>Lans, J.</au><au>Sakai, T.</au><au>Shiode, R.</au><au>Kazui, A.</au><au>Tanaka, H.</au><au>Shimada, S.</au><au>Murase, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cartilage and subchondral bone distributions of the distal radius: a 3-dimensional analysis using cadavers</atitle><jtitle>Osteoarthritis and cartilage</jtitle><addtitle>Osteoarthritis Cartilage</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1572</spage><epage>1580</epage><pages>1572-1580</pages><issn>1063-4584</issn><eissn>1522-9653</eissn><abstract>To quantify the spatial distributions of cartilage and subchondral bone thickness of the distal radius. Using 17 cadaveric wrists, three types of 3-dimensional models were created: a cartilage-bone model, obtained by laser scanning; a bone model, rescanned after dissolving the cartilage; and a subchondral bone model, obtained using computed tomography. By superimposing the bone model onto the cartilage-bone and the subchondral bone models, the cartilage and subchondral bone thickness were determined. Measurements along with the spatial distribution were made at fixed anatomic points including the scaphoid and lunate fossa, sigmoid notch and interfossal ridge, and compared at each of these four regions. Cartilage thickness of the interfossal ridge (0.89 ± 0.23 mm) had a larger average thickness compared to that of the scaphoid fossa (0.70 ± 0.18 mm; p = 0.004), lunate fossa (0.75 ± 0.17 mm; p = 0.044) and sigmoid notch (0.64 ± 0.13 mm; p &lt; 0.001). Subchondral bone was found to be thickest at the scaphoid (2.18 ± 0.72 mm) and lunate fossae (1.94 ± 0.93 mm), which were both thicker than that of sigmoid notch (1.63 ± 1.06 mm: vs scaphoid fossa, p = 0.020) or interfossal ridge (1.54 ± 0.84 mm: vs scaphoid fossa, p = 0.004; vs lunate fossa, p = 0.048). In the volar-ulnar sub-regions of the scaphoid and lunate fossa, the subchondral bone thickened. Our data can be applied when treating distal radius fractures. Cartilage thickness was less than 1 mm across the articular surface, which may give an insight into threshold for an acceptable range of step-offs. The combined findings of subchondral bone appreciate the importance of the volar-ulnar corner of the distal radius in the volar locking plate fixation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32860992</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joca.2020.08.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-4645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8622-7422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2245-5554</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7770-4634</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-4584
ispartof Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2020-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1572-1580
issn 1063-4584
1522-9653
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438678262
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Cartilage
Computed tomography (CT)
Distal radius
Fracture
Laser scanner
Subchondral bone
title Cartilage and subchondral bone distributions of the distal radius: a 3-dimensional analysis using cadavers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cartilage%20and%20subchondral%20bone%20distributions%20of%20the%20distal%20radius:%20a%203-dimensional%20analysis%20using%20cadavers&rft.jtitle=Osteoarthritis%20and%20cartilage&rft.au=Miyamura,%20S.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1572&rft.epage=1580&rft.pages=1572-1580&rft.issn=1063-4584&rft.eissn=1522-9653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joca.2020.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438678262%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438678262&rft_id=info:pmid/32860992&rft_els_id=S1063458420311183&rfr_iscdi=true