A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis
The aim of this research was to investigate the best methodology for disc hernia diagnosis using foot force measurements from the designed platform. Based on the subjective neurological examination that examines muscle weakness on the nerve endings of the skin area on feet and concludes about origin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers in biology and medicine 2020-10, Vol.125, p.103978-103978, Article 103978 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 103978 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103978 |
container_title | Computers in biology and medicine |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Šušteršič, Tijana Milovanović, Vladimir Ranković, Vesna Filipović, Nenad |
description | The aim of this research was to investigate the best methodology for disc hernia diagnosis using foot force measurements from the designed platform. Based on the subjective neurological examination that examines muscle weakness on the nerve endings of the skin area on feet and concludes about origins of nerve roots between spine discs, a platform for objective recordings of the aforementioned muscle weakness has been designed. The dataset included 33 patients with pre-diagnosed L4/L5 and L5/S1 disc hernia on the left or the right side, confirmed with the MRI scanning and neurological exam. We have implemented 5 different classifiers that were found to be the most suitable for smaller dataset and investigated the accuracy of classification depending on the normalization method, linearity/non-linearity of the algorithm, and dataset splitting variation (32–1, 31–2, 30–3, 29-4 patients for training and testing, respectively). The classifier is able to distinguish between four different diagnoses L4/L5 on the left side, L4/L5 on the right side, L5/S1 on the left side and L5/S1 on the right side, as well as to recognize healthy subjects (without disc herniation). The results show that non-linear algorithms achieved better accuracy in comparison to tested linear classifiers, suggesting the expected non-linear connection between the foot force values and the level of disc herniation. Two algorithms with highest accuracy turned out to be Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes, depending on the normalization method. The system is also able to record and recognize improvements in muscle weakness after surgical operation and physical therapy.
[Display omitted]
•Implementation of several classifiers for objective disc hernia diagnostics.•Patients with L5/S1 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding forefoot.•Patients with L4/L5 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding heel.•The system distinguishes between the healthy subjects and subjects with disc hernia.•Stability improvement after surgery/physical therapy is detected using our method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103978 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438678117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010482520303097</els_id><sourcerecordid>2456392350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-3f367c6ffc76313d9ba406e754f96c5280e6983ed3c706600bffc08dd5eae2023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVo6G6TfoUi6CUXb0eWLcvHNCRpIdBLchZaebzRYluOxg7k21fGWQq59DQg_d78eY8xLmAnQKgfx50L_bj3ocdml0O-PMu60mdsK3RVZ1DK4hPbAgjICp2XG_aF6AgABUj4zDYy10pAobfs5ZovrWz0FAYeWu46S-Rbj5G4H_g6wzvbcfKHIZUxBocJGQ7cEre8QefJJzHN4xjixOmNJuwXcePJ8WeMg0-Yt4chkKdLdt7ajvDre71gT3e3jze_soc_979vrh8yV0A-ZbKVqnKqbV2lpJBNvbcFKKzKoq2VK3MNqGotsZGuAqUA9gkF3TQlWkyWyAt2tfZNC7_MSJPp0zrYdXbAMJPJC6lVpYWoEvr9A3oMc0zHLlSpZJ3LEhKlV8rFQBSxNWP0vY1vRoBZYjFH8y8Ws8Ri1liS9Nv7gHm__J2EpxwS8HMFMDnymsw35DwOLlkf0U2mCf7_U_4CCVKkLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2456392350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Šušteršič, Tijana ; Milovanović, Vladimir ; Ranković, Vesna ; Filipović, Nenad</creator><creatorcontrib>Šušteršič, Tijana ; Milovanović, Vladimir ; Ranković, Vesna ; Filipović, Nenad</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this research was to investigate the best methodology for disc hernia diagnosis using foot force measurements from the designed platform. Based on the subjective neurological examination that examines muscle weakness on the nerve endings of the skin area on feet and concludes about origins of nerve roots between spine discs, a platform for objective recordings of the aforementioned muscle weakness has been designed. The dataset included 33 patients with pre-diagnosed L4/L5 and L5/S1 disc hernia on the left or the right side, confirmed with the MRI scanning and neurological exam. We have implemented 5 different classifiers that were found to be the most suitable for smaller dataset and investigated the accuracy of classification depending on the normalization method, linearity/non-linearity of the algorithm, and dataset splitting variation (32–1, 31–2, 30–3, 29-4 patients for training and testing, respectively). The classifier is able to distinguish between four different diagnoses L4/L5 on the left side, L4/L5 on the right side, L5/S1 on the left side and L5/S1 on the right side, as well as to recognize healthy subjects (without disc herniation). The results show that non-linear algorithms achieved better accuracy in comparison to tested linear classifiers, suggesting the expected non-linear connection between the foot force values and the level of disc herniation. Two algorithms with highest accuracy turned out to be Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes, depending on the normalization method. The system is also able to record and recognize improvements in muscle weakness after surgical operation and physical therapy.
[Display omitted]
•Implementation of several classifiers for objective disc hernia diagnostics.•Patients with L5/S1 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding forefoot.•Patients with L4/L5 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding heel.•The system distinguishes between the healthy subjects and subjects with disc hernia.•Stability improvement after surgery/physical therapy is detected using our method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103978</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32861048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Bayesian analysis ; Classification ; Classifiers ; Datasets ; Decision support system ; Decision support systems ; Decision tree ; Decision trees ; Dermatomes ; Diabetes ; Diagnosis ; Disc herniation ; Feet ; Force measurement ; Gait ; Hernia ; Intervertebral discs ; Linearity ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Males ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medical screening ; Muscles ; Nerve endings ; Nonlinearity ; Pain ; Pressure distribution ; Sensors ; Signal classification ; Signal processing ; Spine</subject><ispartof>Computers in biology and medicine, 2020-10, Vol.125, p.103978-103978, Article 103978</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-3f367c6ffc76313d9ba406e754f96c5280e6983ed3c706600bffc08dd5eae2023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-3f367c6ffc76313d9ba406e754f96c5280e6983ed3c706600bffc08dd5eae2023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1417-0521 ; 0000-0002-5445-9971 ; 0000-0002-6787-4058 ; 0000-0001-9964-5615</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482520303097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32861048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Šušteršič, Tijana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milovanović, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranković, Vesna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipović, Nenad</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis</title><title>Computers in biology and medicine</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><description>The aim of this research was to investigate the best methodology for disc hernia diagnosis using foot force measurements from the designed platform. Based on the subjective neurological examination that examines muscle weakness on the nerve endings of the skin area on feet and concludes about origins of nerve roots between spine discs, a platform for objective recordings of the aforementioned muscle weakness has been designed. The dataset included 33 patients with pre-diagnosed L4/L5 and L5/S1 disc hernia on the left or the right side, confirmed with the MRI scanning and neurological exam. We have implemented 5 different classifiers that were found to be the most suitable for smaller dataset and investigated the accuracy of classification depending on the normalization method, linearity/non-linearity of the algorithm, and dataset splitting variation (32–1, 31–2, 30–3, 29-4 patients for training and testing, respectively). The classifier is able to distinguish between four different diagnoses L4/L5 on the left side, L4/L5 on the right side, L5/S1 on the left side and L5/S1 on the right side, as well as to recognize healthy subjects (without disc herniation). The results show that non-linear algorithms achieved better accuracy in comparison to tested linear classifiers, suggesting the expected non-linear connection between the foot force values and the level of disc herniation. Two algorithms with highest accuracy turned out to be Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes, depending on the normalization method. The system is also able to record and recognize improvements in muscle weakness after surgical operation and physical therapy.
[Display omitted]
•Implementation of several classifiers for objective disc hernia diagnostics.•Patients with L5/S1 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding forefoot.•Patients with L4/L5 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding heel.•The system distinguishes between the healthy subjects and subjects with disc hernia.•Stability improvement after surgery/physical therapy is detected using our method.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision support system</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Decision tree</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Dermatomes</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disc herniation</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Force measurement</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Intervertebral discs</subject><subject>Linearity</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Nerve endings</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pressure distribution</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Signal classification</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Spine</subject><issn>0010-4825</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVo6G6TfoUi6CUXb0eWLcvHNCRpIdBLchZaebzRYluOxg7k21fGWQq59DQg_d78eY8xLmAnQKgfx50L_bj3ocdml0O-PMu60mdsK3RVZ1DK4hPbAgjICp2XG_aF6AgABUj4zDYy10pAobfs5ZovrWz0FAYeWu46S-Rbj5G4H_g6wzvbcfKHIZUxBocJGQ7cEre8QefJJzHN4xjixOmNJuwXcePJ8WeMg0-Yt4chkKdLdt7ajvDre71gT3e3jze_soc_979vrh8yV0A-ZbKVqnKqbV2lpJBNvbcFKKzKoq2VK3MNqGotsZGuAqUA9gkF3TQlWkyWyAt2tfZNC7_MSJPp0zrYdXbAMJPJC6lVpYWoEvr9A3oMc0zHLlSpZJ3LEhKlV8rFQBSxNWP0vY1vRoBZYjFH8y8Ws8Ri1liS9Nv7gHm__J2EpxwS8HMFMDnymsw35DwOLlkf0U2mCf7_U_4CCVKkLQ</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Šušteršič, Tijana</creator><creator>Milovanović, Vladimir</creator><creator>Ranković, Vesna</creator><creator>Filipović, Nenad</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1417-0521</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5445-9971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-4058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9964-5615</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis</title><author>Šušteršič, Tijana ; Milovanović, Vladimir ; Ranković, Vesna ; Filipović, Nenad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-3f367c6ffc76313d9ba406e754f96c5280e6983ed3c706600bffc08dd5eae2023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision support system</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Decision tree</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Dermatomes</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disc herniation</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Force measurement</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Intervertebral discs</topic><topic>Linearity</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Nerve endings</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pressure distribution</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Signal classification</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Spine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Šušteršič, Tijana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milovanović, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranković, Vesna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipović, Nenad</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Šušteršič, Tijana</au><au>Milovanović, Vladimir</au><au>Ranković, Vesna</au><au>Filipović, Nenad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><spage>103978</spage><epage>103978</epage><pages>103978-103978</pages><artnum>103978</artnum><issn>0010-4825</issn><eissn>1879-0534</eissn><abstract>The aim of this research was to investigate the best methodology for disc hernia diagnosis using foot force measurements from the designed platform. Based on the subjective neurological examination that examines muscle weakness on the nerve endings of the skin area on feet and concludes about origins of nerve roots between spine discs, a platform for objective recordings of the aforementioned muscle weakness has been designed. The dataset included 33 patients with pre-diagnosed L4/L5 and L5/S1 disc hernia on the left or the right side, confirmed with the MRI scanning and neurological exam. We have implemented 5 different classifiers that were found to be the most suitable for smaller dataset and investigated the accuracy of classification depending on the normalization method, linearity/non-linearity of the algorithm, and dataset splitting variation (32–1, 31–2, 30–3, 29-4 patients for training and testing, respectively). The classifier is able to distinguish between four different diagnoses L4/L5 on the left side, L4/L5 on the right side, L5/S1 on the left side and L5/S1 on the right side, as well as to recognize healthy subjects (without disc herniation). The results show that non-linear algorithms achieved better accuracy in comparison to tested linear classifiers, suggesting the expected non-linear connection between the foot force values and the level of disc herniation. Two algorithms with highest accuracy turned out to be Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes, depending on the normalization method. The system is also able to record and recognize improvements in muscle weakness after surgical operation and physical therapy.
[Display omitted]
•Implementation of several classifiers for objective disc hernia diagnostics.•Patients with L5/S1 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding forefoot.•Patients with L4/L5 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding heel.•The system distinguishes between the healthy subjects and subjects with disc hernia.•Stability improvement after surgery/physical therapy is detected using our method.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32861048</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103978</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1417-0521</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5445-9971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-4058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9964-5615</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-4825 |
ispartof | Computers in biology and medicine, 2020-10, Vol.125, p.103978-103978, Article 103978 |
issn | 0010-4825 1879-0534 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438678117 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Bayesian analysis Classification Classifiers Datasets Decision support system Decision support systems Decision tree Decision trees Dermatomes Diabetes Diagnosis Disc herniation Feet Force measurement Gait Hernia Intervertebral discs Linearity Magnetic resonance imaging Males Medical diagnosis Medical imaging Medical screening Muscles Nerve endings Nonlinearity Pain Pressure distribution Sensors Signal classification Signal processing Spine |
title | A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T21%3A24%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20classifiers%20in%20biomedical%20signal%20processing%20as%20a%20decision%20support%20system%20in%20disc%20hernia%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=%C5%A0u%C5%A1ter%C5%A1i%C4%8D,%20Tijana&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=125&rft.spage=103978&rft.epage=103978&rft.pages=103978-103978&rft.artnum=103978&rft.issn=0010-4825&rft.eissn=1879-0534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103978&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2456392350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2456392350&rft_id=info:pmid/32861048&rft_els_id=S0010482520303097&rfr_iscdi=true |