A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis

The aim of this research was to investigate the best methodology for disc hernia diagnosis using foot force measurements from the designed platform. Based on the subjective neurological examination that examines muscle weakness on the nerve endings of the skin area on feet and concludes about origin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers in biology and medicine 2020-10, Vol.125, p.103978-103978, Article 103978
Hauptverfasser: Šušteršič, Tijana, Milovanović, Vladimir, Ranković, Vesna, Filipović, Nenad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 103978
container_issue
container_start_page 103978
container_title Computers in biology and medicine
container_volume 125
creator Šušteršič, Tijana
Milovanović, Vladimir
Ranković, Vesna
Filipović, Nenad
description The aim of this research was to investigate the best methodology for disc hernia diagnosis using foot force measurements from the designed platform. Based on the subjective neurological examination that examines muscle weakness on the nerve endings of the skin area on feet and concludes about origins of nerve roots between spine discs, a platform for objective recordings of the aforementioned muscle weakness has been designed. The dataset included 33 patients with pre-diagnosed L4/L5 and L5/S1 disc hernia on the left or the right side, confirmed with the MRI scanning and neurological exam. We have implemented 5 different classifiers that were found to be the most suitable for smaller dataset and investigated the accuracy of classification depending on the normalization method, linearity/non-linearity of the algorithm, and dataset splitting variation (32–1, 31–2, 30–3, 29-4 patients for training and testing, respectively). The classifier is able to distinguish between four different diagnoses L4/L5 on the left side, L4/L5 on the right side, L5/S1 on the left side and L5/S1 on the right side, as well as to recognize healthy subjects (without disc herniation). The results show that non-linear algorithms achieved better accuracy in comparison to tested linear classifiers, suggesting the expected non-linear connection between the foot force values and the level of disc herniation. Two algorithms with highest accuracy turned out to be Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes, depending on the normalization method. The system is also able to record and recognize improvements in muscle weakness after surgical operation and physical therapy. [Display omitted] •Implementation of several classifiers for objective disc hernia diagnostics.•Patients with L5/S1 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding forefoot.•Patients with L4/L5 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding heel.•The system distinguishes between the healthy subjects and subjects with disc hernia.•Stability improvement after surgery/physical therapy is detected using our method.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103978
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438678117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010482520303097</els_id><sourcerecordid>2456392350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-3f367c6ffc76313d9ba406e754f96c5280e6983ed3c706600bffc08dd5eae2023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVo6G6TfoUi6CUXb0eWLcvHNCRpIdBLchZaebzRYluOxg7k21fGWQq59DQg_d78eY8xLmAnQKgfx50L_bj3ocdml0O-PMu60mdsK3RVZ1DK4hPbAgjICp2XG_aF6AgABUj4zDYy10pAobfs5ZovrWz0FAYeWu46S-Rbj5G4H_g6wzvbcfKHIZUxBocJGQ7cEre8QefJJzHN4xjixOmNJuwXcePJ8WeMg0-Yt4chkKdLdt7ajvDre71gT3e3jze_soc_979vrh8yV0A-ZbKVqnKqbV2lpJBNvbcFKKzKoq2VK3MNqGotsZGuAqUA9gkF3TQlWkyWyAt2tfZNC7_MSJPp0zrYdXbAMJPJC6lVpYWoEvr9A3oMc0zHLlSpZJ3LEhKlV8rFQBSxNWP0vY1vRoBZYjFH8y8Ws8Ri1liS9Nv7gHm__J2EpxwS8HMFMDnymsw35DwOLlkf0U2mCf7_U_4CCVKkLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2456392350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Šušteršič, Tijana ; Milovanović, Vladimir ; Ranković, Vesna ; Filipović, Nenad</creator><creatorcontrib>Šušteršič, Tijana ; Milovanović, Vladimir ; Ranković, Vesna ; Filipović, Nenad</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this research was to investigate the best methodology for disc hernia diagnosis using foot force measurements from the designed platform. Based on the subjective neurological examination that examines muscle weakness on the nerve endings of the skin area on feet and concludes about origins of nerve roots between spine discs, a platform for objective recordings of the aforementioned muscle weakness has been designed. The dataset included 33 patients with pre-diagnosed L4/L5 and L5/S1 disc hernia on the left or the right side, confirmed with the MRI scanning and neurological exam. We have implemented 5 different classifiers that were found to be the most suitable for smaller dataset and investigated the accuracy of classification depending on the normalization method, linearity/non-linearity of the algorithm, and dataset splitting variation (32–1, 31–2, 30–3, 29-4 patients for training and testing, respectively). The classifier is able to distinguish between four different diagnoses L4/L5 on the left side, L4/L5 on the right side, L5/S1 on the left side and L5/S1 on the right side, as well as to recognize healthy subjects (without disc herniation). The results show that non-linear algorithms achieved better accuracy in comparison to tested linear classifiers, suggesting the expected non-linear connection between the foot force values and the level of disc herniation. Two algorithms with highest accuracy turned out to be Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes, depending on the normalization method. The system is also able to record and recognize improvements in muscle weakness after surgical operation and physical therapy. [Display omitted] •Implementation of several classifiers for objective disc hernia diagnostics.•Patients with L5/S1 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding forefoot.•Patients with L4/L5 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding heel.•The system distinguishes between the healthy subjects and subjects with disc hernia.•Stability improvement after surgery/physical therapy is detected using our method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103978</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32861048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Bayesian analysis ; Classification ; Classifiers ; Datasets ; Decision support system ; Decision support systems ; Decision tree ; Decision trees ; Dermatomes ; Diabetes ; Diagnosis ; Disc herniation ; Feet ; Force measurement ; Gait ; Hernia ; Intervertebral discs ; Linearity ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Males ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medical screening ; Muscles ; Nerve endings ; Nonlinearity ; Pain ; Pressure distribution ; Sensors ; Signal classification ; Signal processing ; Spine</subject><ispartof>Computers in biology and medicine, 2020-10, Vol.125, p.103978-103978, Article 103978</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-3f367c6ffc76313d9ba406e754f96c5280e6983ed3c706600bffc08dd5eae2023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-3f367c6ffc76313d9ba406e754f96c5280e6983ed3c706600bffc08dd5eae2023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1417-0521 ; 0000-0002-5445-9971 ; 0000-0002-6787-4058 ; 0000-0001-9964-5615</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482520303097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32861048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Šušteršič, Tijana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milovanović, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranković, Vesna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipović, Nenad</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis</title><title>Computers in biology and medicine</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><description>The aim of this research was to investigate the best methodology for disc hernia diagnosis using foot force measurements from the designed platform. Based on the subjective neurological examination that examines muscle weakness on the nerve endings of the skin area on feet and concludes about origins of nerve roots between spine discs, a platform for objective recordings of the aforementioned muscle weakness has been designed. The dataset included 33 patients with pre-diagnosed L4/L5 and L5/S1 disc hernia on the left or the right side, confirmed with the MRI scanning and neurological exam. We have implemented 5 different classifiers that were found to be the most suitable for smaller dataset and investigated the accuracy of classification depending on the normalization method, linearity/non-linearity of the algorithm, and dataset splitting variation (32–1, 31–2, 30–3, 29-4 patients for training and testing, respectively). The classifier is able to distinguish between four different diagnoses L4/L5 on the left side, L4/L5 on the right side, L5/S1 on the left side and L5/S1 on the right side, as well as to recognize healthy subjects (without disc herniation). The results show that non-linear algorithms achieved better accuracy in comparison to tested linear classifiers, suggesting the expected non-linear connection between the foot force values and the level of disc herniation. Two algorithms with highest accuracy turned out to be Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes, depending on the normalization method. The system is also able to record and recognize improvements in muscle weakness after surgical operation and physical therapy. [Display omitted] •Implementation of several classifiers for objective disc hernia diagnostics.•Patients with L5/S1 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding forefoot.•Patients with L4/L5 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding heel.•The system distinguishes between the healthy subjects and subjects with disc hernia.•Stability improvement after surgery/physical therapy is detected using our method.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision support system</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Decision tree</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Dermatomes</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disc herniation</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Force measurement</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Intervertebral discs</subject><subject>Linearity</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Nerve endings</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pressure distribution</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Signal classification</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Spine</subject><issn>0010-4825</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVo6G6TfoUi6CUXb0eWLcvHNCRpIdBLchZaebzRYluOxg7k21fGWQq59DQg_d78eY8xLmAnQKgfx50L_bj3ocdml0O-PMu60mdsK3RVZ1DK4hPbAgjICp2XG_aF6AgABUj4zDYy10pAobfs5ZovrWz0FAYeWu46S-Rbj5G4H_g6wzvbcfKHIZUxBocJGQ7cEre8QefJJzHN4xjixOmNJuwXcePJ8WeMg0-Yt4chkKdLdt7ajvDre71gT3e3jze_soc_979vrh8yV0A-ZbKVqnKqbV2lpJBNvbcFKKzKoq2VK3MNqGotsZGuAqUA9gkF3TQlWkyWyAt2tfZNC7_MSJPp0zrYdXbAMJPJC6lVpYWoEvr9A3oMc0zHLlSpZJ3LEhKlV8rFQBSxNWP0vY1vRoBZYjFH8y8Ws8Ri1liS9Nv7gHm__J2EpxwS8HMFMDnymsw35DwOLlkf0U2mCf7_U_4CCVKkLQ</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Šušteršič, Tijana</creator><creator>Milovanović, Vladimir</creator><creator>Ranković, Vesna</creator><creator>Filipović, Nenad</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1417-0521</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5445-9971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-4058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9964-5615</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis</title><author>Šušteršič, Tijana ; Milovanović, Vladimir ; Ranković, Vesna ; Filipović, Nenad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-3f367c6ffc76313d9ba406e754f96c5280e6983ed3c706600bffc08dd5eae2023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision support system</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Decision tree</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Dermatomes</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disc herniation</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Force measurement</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Intervertebral discs</topic><topic>Linearity</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Nerve endings</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pressure distribution</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Signal classification</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Spine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Šušteršič, Tijana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milovanović, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranković, Vesna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filipović, Nenad</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Šušteršič, Tijana</au><au>Milovanović, Vladimir</au><au>Ranković, Vesna</au><au>Filipović, Nenad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><spage>103978</spage><epage>103978</epage><pages>103978-103978</pages><artnum>103978</artnum><issn>0010-4825</issn><eissn>1879-0534</eissn><abstract>The aim of this research was to investigate the best methodology for disc hernia diagnosis using foot force measurements from the designed platform. Based on the subjective neurological examination that examines muscle weakness on the nerve endings of the skin area on feet and concludes about origins of nerve roots between spine discs, a platform for objective recordings of the aforementioned muscle weakness has been designed. The dataset included 33 patients with pre-diagnosed L4/L5 and L5/S1 disc hernia on the left or the right side, confirmed with the MRI scanning and neurological exam. We have implemented 5 different classifiers that were found to be the most suitable for smaller dataset and investigated the accuracy of classification depending on the normalization method, linearity/non-linearity of the algorithm, and dataset splitting variation (32–1, 31–2, 30–3, 29-4 patients for training and testing, respectively). The classifier is able to distinguish between four different diagnoses L4/L5 on the left side, L4/L5 on the right side, L5/S1 on the left side and L5/S1 on the right side, as well as to recognize healthy subjects (without disc herniation). The results show that non-linear algorithms achieved better accuracy in comparison to tested linear classifiers, suggesting the expected non-linear connection between the foot force values and the level of disc herniation. Two algorithms with highest accuracy turned out to be Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes, depending on the normalization method. The system is also able to record and recognize improvements in muscle weakness after surgical operation and physical therapy. [Display omitted] •Implementation of several classifiers for objective disc hernia diagnostics.•Patients with L5/S1 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding forefoot.•Patients with L4/L5 disc hernia show muscle weakness on the corresponding heel.•The system distinguishes between the healthy subjects and subjects with disc hernia.•Stability improvement after surgery/physical therapy is detected using our method.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32861048</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103978</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1417-0521</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5445-9971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-4058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9964-5615</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4825
ispartof Computers in biology and medicine, 2020-10, Vol.125, p.103978-103978, Article 103978
issn 0010-4825
1879-0534
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438678117
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Bayesian analysis
Classification
Classifiers
Datasets
Decision support system
Decision support systems
Decision tree
Decision trees
Dermatomes
Diabetes
Diagnosis
Disc herniation
Feet
Force measurement
Gait
Hernia
Intervertebral discs
Linearity
Magnetic resonance imaging
Males
Medical diagnosis
Medical imaging
Medical screening
Muscles
Nerve endings
Nonlinearity
Pain
Pressure distribution
Sensors
Signal classification
Signal processing
Spine
title A comparison of classifiers in biomedical signal processing as a decision support system in disc hernia diagnosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T21%3A24%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20classifiers%20in%20biomedical%20signal%20processing%20as%20a%20decision%20support%20system%20in%20disc%20hernia%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=%C5%A0u%C5%A1ter%C5%A1i%C4%8D,%20Tijana&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=125&rft.spage=103978&rft.epage=103978&rft.pages=103978-103978&rft.artnum=103978&rft.issn=0010-4825&rft.eissn=1879-0534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103978&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2456392350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2456392350&rft_id=info:pmid/32861048&rft_els_id=S0010482520303097&rfr_iscdi=true