Atrial fibrillation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Outcome prediction from an observational registry

Little is known about the role of different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We investigated the epidemiological and prognostic impact of different types of AF in DCM during long-term follow-up. We evaluated consecutive DCM patients enrolled in the Trieste Muscle He...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2021-01, Vol.323, p.140-147
Hauptverfasser: Nuzzi, Vincenzo, Cannatà, Antonio, Manca, Paolo, Castrichini, Matteo, Barbati, Giulia, Aleksova, Aneta, Fabris, Enrico, Zecchin, Massimo, Merlo, Marco, Boriani, Giuseppe, Sinagra, Gianfranco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147
container_issue
container_start_page 140
container_title International journal of cardiology
container_volume 323
creator Nuzzi, Vincenzo
Cannatà, Antonio
Manca, Paolo
Castrichini, Matteo
Barbati, Giulia
Aleksova, Aneta
Fabris, Enrico
Zecchin, Massimo
Merlo, Marco
Boriani, Giuseppe
Sinagra, Gianfranco
description Little is known about the role of different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We investigated the epidemiological and prognostic impact of different types of AF in DCM during long-term follow-up. We evaluated consecutive DCM patients enrolled in the Trieste Muscle Heart Disease Registry. Uni- and multivariable, extended Kaplan-Meier and propensity score-matching analyses were performed for a composite outcome including death/heart transplantation/ventricular-assist device implantation. Out of 1181 DCM patients (71% males, age 49 ± 15 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 11%), 46 (3.9%) had baseline permanent AF (permAF), while 66 (5.6%) had a history of paroxysmal/persistent AF. Compared with sinus rhythm (SR) patients, permAF patients were older (48 ± 15 vs. 61 ± 11 respectively, p = 0.001), were more frequently in NYHA class III-IV (18% vs. 30%, p = 0.002) and had larger left atrium diameter (40 ± 8 vs. 50 ± 10 mm, respectively). Paroxysmal/persistent AF patients had intermediate characteristics between permAF and SR. During a median follow-up of 135 (75–210) months, 63 patients developed permAF (0.45 new cases/100patients/year). At multivariable analysis, permAF as a time-dependent variable was an independent outcome predictor (HR 2.45; 95% C.I. 2.61–3.63, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438676518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167527320336457</els_id><sourcerecordid>2438676518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e88ed04ecf25f009b5d30ff18971ed2edc75cb052658a76b860443949debcbff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi1UBMvCP6iqHHtJGDu243CotELlQ0LiAmeT2GPq1SZO7SzS_vt6WeiR08zhmffVPIR8p1BRoPJyXfm16aKtGDCoQFUg2RFZUNXwkjaCfyOLjDWlYE19Ss5SWgMAb1t1Qk5rpkQtpVyQl9UcfbcpnO-j32y62Yex8GNhfd7RFvsGH4ZdmLr5z-6qeNzOJgxYTBGtN--0i2EourEIfcL49p6QAyO--jTH3Tk5dt0m4cXHXJLnm99P13flw-Pt_fXqoTS1ZHOJSqEFjsYx4QDaXtganKOqbShahtY0wvQgmBSqa2SvJHBet7y12JveuXpJfh5ypxj-bjHNevDJYH5pxLBNmvFayUYKqjLKD6iJIaWITk_RD13caQp671av9cGt3rvVoHR2m89-fDRs-wHt_6NPmRn4dQAw__nmMepkPI4mm4poZm2D_7rhHzbnjso</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2438676518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atrial fibrillation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Outcome prediction from an observational registry</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Nuzzi, Vincenzo ; Cannatà, Antonio ; Manca, Paolo ; Castrichini, Matteo ; Barbati, Giulia ; Aleksova, Aneta ; Fabris, Enrico ; Zecchin, Massimo ; Merlo, Marco ; Boriani, Giuseppe ; Sinagra, Gianfranco</creator><creatorcontrib>Nuzzi, Vincenzo ; Cannatà, Antonio ; Manca, Paolo ; Castrichini, Matteo ; Barbati, Giulia ; Aleksova, Aneta ; Fabris, Enrico ; Zecchin, Massimo ; Merlo, Marco ; Boriani, Giuseppe ; Sinagra, Gianfranco</creatorcontrib><description>Little is known about the role of different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We investigated the epidemiological and prognostic impact of different types of AF in DCM during long-term follow-up. We evaluated consecutive DCM patients enrolled in the Trieste Muscle Heart Disease Registry. Uni- and multivariable, extended Kaplan-Meier and propensity score-matching analyses were performed for a composite outcome including death/heart transplantation/ventricular-assist device implantation. Out of 1181 DCM patients (71% males, age 49 ± 15 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 11%), 46 (3.9%) had baseline permanent AF (permAF), while 66 (5.6%) had a history of paroxysmal/persistent AF. Compared with sinus rhythm (SR) patients, permAF patients were older (48 ± 15 vs. 61 ± 11 respectively, p = 0.001), were more frequently in NYHA class III-IV (18% vs. 30%, p = 0.002) and had larger left atrium diameter (40 ± 8 vs. 50 ± 10 mm, respectively). Paroxysmal/persistent AF patients had intermediate characteristics between permAF and SR. During a median follow-up of 135 (75–210) months, 63 patients developed permAF (0.45 new cases/100patients/year). At multivariable analysis, permAF as a time-dependent variable was an independent outcome predictor (HR 2.45; 95% C.I. 2.61–3.63, p &lt; 0.001), together with creatinine, NYHA class, restrictive filling pattern and moderate-severe mitral regurgitation, while paroxysmal/persistent AF was neutral. Propensity score-matching analysis confirmed the higher rate of primary outcome events in patients with baseline or incident permAF versus patients without permAF during a very long-term follow-up (70% vs. 20%, p &lt; 0.001). PermAF in a large DCM cohort had low prevalence and incidence but had a relevant. prognostic role on hard outcomes. Patients with non-dilated left atrium and without permAF (upper figure) are those with the best prognosis. LA enlargement (middle figure) is associated with adverse outcome. The worst prognosis is proper of patients with permAF at baseline (bottom figure) or incident at follow-up. Patients with dilated atria are at higher risk for permAF incidence. The arrow on the right represents the prognosis (green: favourable outcome; red: adverse outcome). Legend. LA: left atrium. [Display omitted] •DCM is a particular HF setting where AF is relatively infrequent.•The prognostic role of AF depends on the type of AF.•Paroxysmal or persistent AF do not significantly affect prognosis.•Permanent AF, at baseline or incident, carries a relevant negative prognostic impact.•Dilated atria increase the risk of permanent AF incident.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32853666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Chronic heart failure ; Dilated cardiomyopathy ; Long-term outcome ; Permanent atrial fibrillation</subject><ispartof>International journal of cardiology, 2021-01, Vol.323, p.140-147</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e88ed04ecf25f009b5d30ff18971ed2edc75cb052658a76b860443949debcbff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e88ed04ecf25f009b5d30ff18971ed2edc75cb052658a76b860443949debcbff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527320336457$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32853666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nuzzi, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannatà, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manca, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castrichini, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbati, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleksova, Aneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabris, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zecchin, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merlo, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boriani, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinagra, Gianfranco</creatorcontrib><title>Atrial fibrillation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Outcome prediction from an observational registry</title><title>International journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Little is known about the role of different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We investigated the epidemiological and prognostic impact of different types of AF in DCM during long-term follow-up. We evaluated consecutive DCM patients enrolled in the Trieste Muscle Heart Disease Registry. Uni- and multivariable, extended Kaplan-Meier and propensity score-matching analyses were performed for a composite outcome including death/heart transplantation/ventricular-assist device implantation. Out of 1181 DCM patients (71% males, age 49 ± 15 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 11%), 46 (3.9%) had baseline permanent AF (permAF), while 66 (5.6%) had a history of paroxysmal/persistent AF. Compared with sinus rhythm (SR) patients, permAF patients were older (48 ± 15 vs. 61 ± 11 respectively, p = 0.001), were more frequently in NYHA class III-IV (18% vs. 30%, p = 0.002) and had larger left atrium diameter (40 ± 8 vs. 50 ± 10 mm, respectively). Paroxysmal/persistent AF patients had intermediate characteristics between permAF and SR. During a median follow-up of 135 (75–210) months, 63 patients developed permAF (0.45 new cases/100patients/year). At multivariable analysis, permAF as a time-dependent variable was an independent outcome predictor (HR 2.45; 95% C.I. 2.61–3.63, p &lt; 0.001), together with creatinine, NYHA class, restrictive filling pattern and moderate-severe mitral regurgitation, while paroxysmal/persistent AF was neutral. Propensity score-matching analysis confirmed the higher rate of primary outcome events in patients with baseline or incident permAF versus patients without permAF during a very long-term follow-up (70% vs. 20%, p &lt; 0.001). PermAF in a large DCM cohort had low prevalence and incidence but had a relevant. prognostic role on hard outcomes. Patients with non-dilated left atrium and without permAF (upper figure) are those with the best prognosis. LA enlargement (middle figure) is associated with adverse outcome. The worst prognosis is proper of patients with permAF at baseline (bottom figure) or incident at follow-up. Patients with dilated atria are at higher risk for permAF incidence. The arrow on the right represents the prognosis (green: favourable outcome; red: adverse outcome). Legend. LA: left atrium. [Display omitted] •DCM is a particular HF setting where AF is relatively infrequent.•The prognostic role of AF depends on the type of AF.•Paroxysmal or persistent AF do not significantly affect prognosis.•Permanent AF, at baseline or incident, carries a relevant negative prognostic impact.•Dilated atria increase the risk of permanent AF incident.</description><subject>Chronic heart failure</subject><subject>Dilated cardiomyopathy</subject><subject>Long-term outcome</subject><subject>Permanent atrial fibrillation</subject><issn>0167-5273</issn><issn>1874-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi1UBMvCP6iqHHtJGDu243CotELlQ0LiAmeT2GPq1SZO7SzS_vt6WeiR08zhmffVPIR8p1BRoPJyXfm16aKtGDCoQFUg2RFZUNXwkjaCfyOLjDWlYE19Ss5SWgMAb1t1Qk5rpkQtpVyQl9UcfbcpnO-j32y62Yex8GNhfd7RFvsGH4ZdmLr5z-6qeNzOJgxYTBGtN--0i2EourEIfcL49p6QAyO--jTH3Tk5dt0m4cXHXJLnm99P13flw-Pt_fXqoTS1ZHOJSqEFjsYx4QDaXtganKOqbShahtY0wvQgmBSqa2SvJHBet7y12JveuXpJfh5ypxj-bjHNevDJYH5pxLBNmvFayUYKqjLKD6iJIaWITk_RD13caQp671av9cGt3rvVoHR2m89-fDRs-wHt_6NPmRn4dQAw__nmMepkPI4mm4poZm2D_7rhHzbnjso</recordid><startdate>20210115</startdate><enddate>20210115</enddate><creator>Nuzzi, Vincenzo</creator><creator>Cannatà, Antonio</creator><creator>Manca, Paolo</creator><creator>Castrichini, Matteo</creator><creator>Barbati, Giulia</creator><creator>Aleksova, Aneta</creator><creator>Fabris, Enrico</creator><creator>Zecchin, Massimo</creator><creator>Merlo, Marco</creator><creator>Boriani, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Sinagra, Gianfranco</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210115</creationdate><title>Atrial fibrillation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Outcome prediction from an observational registry</title><author>Nuzzi, Vincenzo ; Cannatà, Antonio ; Manca, Paolo ; Castrichini, Matteo ; Barbati, Giulia ; Aleksova, Aneta ; Fabris, Enrico ; Zecchin, Massimo ; Merlo, Marco ; Boriani, Giuseppe ; Sinagra, Gianfranco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e88ed04ecf25f009b5d30ff18971ed2edc75cb052658a76b860443949debcbff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chronic heart failure</topic><topic>Dilated cardiomyopathy</topic><topic>Long-term outcome</topic><topic>Permanent atrial fibrillation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nuzzi, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannatà, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manca, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castrichini, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbati, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleksova, Aneta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabris, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zecchin, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merlo, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boriani, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinagra, Gianfranco</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nuzzi, Vincenzo</au><au>Cannatà, Antonio</au><au>Manca, Paolo</au><au>Castrichini, Matteo</au><au>Barbati, Giulia</au><au>Aleksova, Aneta</au><au>Fabris, Enrico</au><au>Zecchin, Massimo</au><au>Merlo, Marco</au><au>Boriani, Giuseppe</au><au>Sinagra, Gianfranco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atrial fibrillation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Outcome prediction from an observational registry</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2021-01-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>323</volume><spage>140</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>140-147</pages><issn>0167-5273</issn><eissn>1874-1754</eissn><abstract>Little is known about the role of different types of atrial fibrillation (AF) in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We investigated the epidemiological and prognostic impact of different types of AF in DCM during long-term follow-up. We evaluated consecutive DCM patients enrolled in the Trieste Muscle Heart Disease Registry. Uni- and multivariable, extended Kaplan-Meier and propensity score-matching analyses were performed for a composite outcome including death/heart transplantation/ventricular-assist device implantation. Out of 1181 DCM patients (71% males, age 49 ± 15 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 33 ± 11%), 46 (3.9%) had baseline permanent AF (permAF), while 66 (5.6%) had a history of paroxysmal/persistent AF. Compared with sinus rhythm (SR) patients, permAF patients were older (48 ± 15 vs. 61 ± 11 respectively, p = 0.001), were more frequently in NYHA class III-IV (18% vs. 30%, p = 0.002) and had larger left atrium diameter (40 ± 8 vs. 50 ± 10 mm, respectively). Paroxysmal/persistent AF patients had intermediate characteristics between permAF and SR. During a median follow-up of 135 (75–210) months, 63 patients developed permAF (0.45 new cases/100patients/year). At multivariable analysis, permAF as a time-dependent variable was an independent outcome predictor (HR 2.45; 95% C.I. 2.61–3.63, p &lt; 0.001), together with creatinine, NYHA class, restrictive filling pattern and moderate-severe mitral regurgitation, while paroxysmal/persistent AF was neutral. Propensity score-matching analysis confirmed the higher rate of primary outcome events in patients with baseline or incident permAF versus patients without permAF during a very long-term follow-up (70% vs. 20%, p &lt; 0.001). PermAF in a large DCM cohort had low prevalence and incidence but had a relevant. prognostic role on hard outcomes. Patients with non-dilated left atrium and without permAF (upper figure) are those with the best prognosis. LA enlargement (middle figure) is associated with adverse outcome. The worst prognosis is proper of patients with permAF at baseline (bottom figure) or incident at follow-up. Patients with dilated atria are at higher risk for permAF incidence. The arrow on the right represents the prognosis (green: favourable outcome; red: adverse outcome). Legend. LA: left atrium. [Display omitted] •DCM is a particular HF setting where AF is relatively infrequent.•The prognostic role of AF depends on the type of AF.•Paroxysmal or persistent AF do not significantly affect prognosis.•Permanent AF, at baseline or incident, carries a relevant negative prognostic impact.•Dilated atria increase the risk of permanent AF incident.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32853666</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.062</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5273
ispartof International journal of cardiology, 2021-01, Vol.323, p.140-147
issn 0167-5273
1874-1754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2438676518
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Chronic heart failure
Dilated cardiomyopathy
Long-term outcome
Permanent atrial fibrillation
title Atrial fibrillation in dilated cardiomyopathy: Outcome prediction from an observational registry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A53%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atrial%20fibrillation%20in%20dilated%20cardiomyopathy:%20Outcome%20prediction%20from%20an%20observational%20registry&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Nuzzi,%20Vincenzo&rft.date=2021-01-15&rft.volume=323&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=140-147&rft.issn=0167-5273&rft.eissn=1874-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.08.062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2438676518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2438676518&rft_id=info:pmid/32853666&rft_els_id=S0167527320336457&rfr_iscdi=true