Breaking the wave of peri‐implantitis

Peri‐implant diseases are prevalent with a weighted mean prevalence rate of 43% across Europe and 22% across South and North America. Although the main etiologic agent is bacterial biofilm, a myriad of factors influence the initiation and progression of the disease. Unfortunately, the treatment of p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Periodontology 2000 2020-10, Vol.84 (1), p.145-160
Hauptverfasser: Fu, Jia‐Hui, Wang, Hom‐Lay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 160
container_issue 1
container_start_page 145
container_title Periodontology 2000
container_volume 84
creator Fu, Jia‐Hui
Wang, Hom‐Lay
description Peri‐implant diseases are prevalent with a weighted mean prevalence rate of 43% across Europe and 22% across South and North America. Although the main etiologic agent is bacterial biofilm, a myriad of factors influence the initiation and progression of the disease. Unfortunately, the treatment of peri‐implant diseases is at best favorable in the short term with a high rate of persistent inflammation and recurrence. Therefore, it is sensible to consider and control all potential factors that may predispose an implant to peri‐implant tissue inflammation in an attempt to avoid the disease. This paper reviews recent evidence on factors that may predispose implants to peri‐implantitis and measures that can be taken to prevent it.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/prd.12335
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2437403607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2437403607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4035-880ccb4fcf7b6394e29149d2842515585084dc46e25789643e194cb3906478a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqGw4AbZAYu0dvy_hPIrVQIhWFuJMwFD0gQ7peqOI3BGToIhbHmb0ZO-mXl6CB0SPCVRs95XU5JTyrdQQgTGGZZcbqMEaywyIQndRXshvGBMpKY8QUdnHopXt3xKh2dI18U7pF2d9uDd18ena_umWA5ucGEf7dRFE-Dgb07Q4-XFw_w6W9xe3cxPF5llmPJMKWxtyWpby1JQzSDXhOkqVyznhHPFsWKVZQJyLpUWjALRzJY0pmNSFYRO0PF4t_fd2wrCYFoXLDQxB3SrYHJGZfwksIzoyYha34XgoTa9d23hN4Zg81NG9JX5LSOys5FduwY2_4Pm7v583PgG40Jekg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2437403607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breaking the wave of peri‐implantitis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Fu, Jia‐Hui ; Wang, Hom‐Lay</creator><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jia‐Hui ; Wang, Hom‐Lay</creatorcontrib><description>Peri‐implant diseases are prevalent with a weighted mean prevalence rate of 43% across Europe and 22% across South and North America. Although the main etiologic agent is bacterial biofilm, a myriad of factors influence the initiation and progression of the disease. Unfortunately, the treatment of peri‐implant diseases is at best favorable in the short term with a high rate of persistent inflammation and recurrence. Therefore, it is sensible to consider and control all potential factors that may predispose an implant to peri‐implant tissue inflammation in an attempt to avoid the disease. This paper reviews recent evidence on factors that may predispose implants to peri‐implantitis and measures that can be taken to prevent it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0906-6713</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/prd.12335</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>dental implants ; dental Plaque ; Dentistry ; inflammation ; occlusion ; peri-implantitis</subject><ispartof>Periodontology 2000, 2020-10, Vol.84 (1), p.145-160</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4035-880ccb4fcf7b6394e29149d2842515585084dc46e25789643e194cb3906478a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4035-880ccb4fcf7b6394e29149d2842515585084dc46e25789643e194cb3906478a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fprd.12335$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fprd.12335$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jia‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hom‐Lay</creatorcontrib><title>Breaking the wave of peri‐implantitis</title><title>Periodontology 2000</title><description>Peri‐implant diseases are prevalent with a weighted mean prevalence rate of 43% across Europe and 22% across South and North America. Although the main etiologic agent is bacterial biofilm, a myriad of factors influence the initiation and progression of the disease. Unfortunately, the treatment of peri‐implant diseases is at best favorable in the short term with a high rate of persistent inflammation and recurrence. Therefore, it is sensible to consider and control all potential factors that may predispose an implant to peri‐implant tissue inflammation in an attempt to avoid the disease. This paper reviews recent evidence on factors that may predispose implants to peri‐implantitis and measures that can be taken to prevent it.</description><subject>dental implants</subject><subject>dental Plaque</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>inflammation</subject><subject>occlusion</subject><subject>peri-implantitis</subject><issn>0906-6713</issn><issn>1600-0757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhS0EEqGw4AbZAYu0dvy_hPIrVQIhWFuJMwFD0gQ7peqOI3BGToIhbHmb0ZO-mXl6CB0SPCVRs95XU5JTyrdQQgTGGZZcbqMEaywyIQndRXshvGBMpKY8QUdnHopXt3xKh2dI18U7pF2d9uDd18ena_umWA5ucGEf7dRFE-Dgb07Q4-XFw_w6W9xe3cxPF5llmPJMKWxtyWpby1JQzSDXhOkqVyznhHPFsWKVZQJyLpUWjALRzJY0pmNSFYRO0PF4t_fd2wrCYFoXLDQxB3SrYHJGZfwksIzoyYha34XgoTa9d23hN4Zg81NG9JX5LSOys5FduwY2_4Pm7v583PgG40Jekg</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Fu, Jia‐Hui</creator><creator>Wang, Hom‐Lay</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Breaking the wave of peri‐implantitis</title><author>Fu, Jia‐Hui ; Wang, Hom‐Lay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4035-880ccb4fcf7b6394e29149d2842515585084dc46e25789643e194cb3906478a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>dental implants</topic><topic>dental Plaque</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>inflammation</topic><topic>occlusion</topic><topic>peri-implantitis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jia‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hom‐Lay</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Periodontology 2000</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fu, Jia‐Hui</au><au>Wang, Hom‐Lay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breaking the wave of peri‐implantitis</atitle><jtitle>Periodontology 2000</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>145-160</pages><issn>0906-6713</issn><eissn>1600-0757</eissn><abstract>Peri‐implant diseases are prevalent with a weighted mean prevalence rate of 43% across Europe and 22% across South and North America. Although the main etiologic agent is bacterial biofilm, a myriad of factors influence the initiation and progression of the disease. Unfortunately, the treatment of peri‐implant diseases is at best favorable in the short term with a high rate of persistent inflammation and recurrence. Therefore, it is sensible to consider and control all potential factors that may predispose an implant to peri‐implant tissue inflammation in an attempt to avoid the disease. This paper reviews recent evidence on factors that may predispose implants to peri‐implantitis and measures that can be taken to prevent it.</abstract><doi>10.1111/prd.12335</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0906-6713
ispartof Periodontology 2000, 2020-10, Vol.84 (1), p.145-160
issn 0906-6713
1600-0757
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2437403607
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects dental implants
dental Plaque
Dentistry
inflammation
occlusion
peri-implantitis
title Breaking the wave of peri‐implantitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A25%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breaking%20the%20wave%20of%20peri%E2%80%90implantitis&rft.jtitle=Periodontology%202000&rft.au=Fu,%20Jia%E2%80%90Hui&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=145-160&rft.issn=0906-6713&rft.eissn=1600-0757&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/prd.12335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2437403607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2437403607&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true