The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire
In this study, we review the psychometric literature on mating effort and find that extant instruments (1) have not been adequately evaluated in terms of internal structure and measurement invariance, and (2) disproportionately focus on mate retention and intrasexual competition tactics designed to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of sexual behavior 2021-02, Vol.50 (2), p.511-530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 530 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 511 |
container_title | Archives of sexual behavior |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Albert, Graham Richardson, George B. Arnocky, Steven Senveli, Zeynep Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R. |
description | In this study, we review the psychometric literature on mating effort and find that extant instruments (1) have not been adequately evaluated in terms of internal structure and measurement invariance, and (2) disproportionately focus on mate retention and intrasexual competition tactics designed to repel competitors, relative to attraction and investment effort. To address these gaps in the literature, we carried out two studies to develop and validate a new Mating Effort Questionnaire (MEQ). In Study 1, we report a pilot study in which participants’ responses to an item pool were submitted to exploratory factor analysis. In Study 2, we replicated the structure found in Study 1 using confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample. A three-factor solution yielded the best fit. The three factors reflected respondents’ allocation of energy to attracting high mate value partners when already mated, seeking out romantic partners when single, and investing in their current romantic partner and relationships. Strong partial measurement invariance held across the sexes, implying that observed scores may be used to compare them. We also found evidence of concurrent validity via associations between the MEQ and constructs such as sociosexual orientation, K-factor, mate retention behaviors, and respondents’ sexual behavior. These findings suggest that the MEQ is a valid and novel measure of individual differences in mating effort which is well suited to complement existing mating effort measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10508-020-01799-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2437121936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2437121936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ea48254952da40e4ef93dc35c45109b4916866622138a5665ee9b50bf4859d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2Kqiy0f4ADssSFS9rxd3xEsJRKfFXani1vMoGgJF7sZCv-fb3dbZE4cPGH5pl3Rg8hRwy-MgDzLTFQUBbAoQBmrC3kBzJjyoiClwB7ZAYAssgH3ycHKT3ll9FSfSL7gpfCWiFm5H7xiPQC19iFVY_DSP1Q0_v0Uj2GHsfYVnS-9t3kxzYMNDTU01v8TW_yf3ig86YJcaQ_J0yb-uDbiJ_Jx8Z3Cb_s7kPy63K-OL8qru--_zg_uy4qYdRYNAq9LLmSVvHaS0CJjRV1JVQlFQO7lJbpUmvNOROlV1orRLtUsGxkqWwtDsnpNncVw_NmAde3qcKu8wOGKTkuhWGcWaEzevIGfQpTHPJ2mbIgrDHaZIpvqSqGlCI2bhXb3scXx8BtfLutb5d9u7--ncxNx7voadlj_b_ln-AMiC2Qcml4wPg6-53YP6hmiQs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490397767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Albert, Graham ; Richardson, George B. ; Arnocky, Steven ; Senveli, Zeynep ; Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Albert, Graham ; Richardson, George B. ; Arnocky, Steven ; Senveli, Zeynep ; Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we review the psychometric literature on mating effort and find that extant instruments (1) have not been adequately evaluated in terms of internal structure and measurement invariance, and (2) disproportionately focus on mate retention and intrasexual competition tactics designed to repel competitors, relative to attraction and investment effort. To address these gaps in the literature, we carried out two studies to develop and validate a new Mating Effort Questionnaire (MEQ). In Study 1, we report a pilot study in which participants’ responses to an item pool were submitted to exploratory factor analysis. In Study 2, we replicated the structure found in Study 1 using confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample. A three-factor solution yielded the best fit. The three factors reflected respondents’ allocation of energy to attracting high mate value partners when already mated, seeking out romantic partners when single, and investing in their current romantic partner and relationships. Strong partial measurement invariance held across the sexes, implying that observed scores may be used to compare them. We also found evidence of concurrent validity via associations between the MEQ and constructs such as sociosexual orientation, K-factor, mate retention behaviors, and respondents’ sexual behavior. These findings suggest that the MEQ is a valid and novel measure of individual differences in mating effort which is well suited to complement existing mating effort measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10508-020-01799-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32839933</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Animal reproduction ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Courtship - psychology ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Gender Identity ; Humans ; Internal-External Control ; Male ; Original Paper ; Pilot Projects ; Psychology ; Psychometrics ; Public Health ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Retention ; Self Concept ; Sexual Behavior ; Sexual Behavior - psychology ; Sexual Partners - psychology ; Social Sciences ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Archives of sexual behavior, 2021-02, Vol.50 (2), p.511-530</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ea48254952da40e4ef93dc35c45109b4916866622138a5665ee9b50bf4859d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ea48254952da40e4ef93dc35c45109b4916866622138a5665ee9b50bf4859d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5866-7479</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10508-020-01799-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10508-020-01799-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32839933$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Albert, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, George B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnocky, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senveli, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire</title><title>Archives of sexual behavior</title><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><description>In this study, we review the psychometric literature on mating effort and find that extant instruments (1) have not been adequately evaluated in terms of internal structure and measurement invariance, and (2) disproportionately focus on mate retention and intrasexual competition tactics designed to repel competitors, relative to attraction and investment effort. To address these gaps in the literature, we carried out two studies to develop and validate a new Mating Effort Questionnaire (MEQ). In Study 1, we report a pilot study in which participants’ responses to an item pool were submitted to exploratory factor analysis. In Study 2, we replicated the structure found in Study 1 using confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample. A three-factor solution yielded the best fit. The three factors reflected respondents’ allocation of energy to attracting high mate value partners when already mated, seeking out romantic partners when single, and investing in their current romantic partner and relationships. Strong partial measurement invariance held across the sexes, implying that observed scores may be used to compare them. We also found evidence of concurrent validity via associations between the MEQ and constructs such as sociosexual orientation, K-factor, mate retention behaviors, and respondents’ sexual behavior. These findings suggest that the MEQ is a valid and novel measure of individual differences in mating effort which is well suited to complement existing mating effort measures.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Courtship - psychology</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender Identity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal-External Control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Sexual Partners - psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0004-0002</issn><issn>1573-2800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2Kqiy0f4ADssSFS9rxd3xEsJRKfFXani1vMoGgJF7sZCv-fb3dbZE4cPGH5pl3Rg8hRwy-MgDzLTFQUBbAoQBmrC3kBzJjyoiClwB7ZAYAssgH3ycHKT3ll9FSfSL7gpfCWiFm5H7xiPQC19iFVY_DSP1Q0_v0Uj2GHsfYVnS-9t3kxzYMNDTU01v8TW_yf3ig86YJcaQ_J0yb-uDbiJ_Jx8Z3Cb_s7kPy63K-OL8qru--_zg_uy4qYdRYNAq9LLmSVvHaS0CJjRV1JVQlFQO7lJbpUmvNOROlV1orRLtUsGxkqWwtDsnpNncVw_NmAde3qcKu8wOGKTkuhWGcWaEzevIGfQpTHPJ2mbIgrDHaZIpvqSqGlCI2bhXb3scXx8BtfLutb5d9u7--ncxNx7voadlj_b_ln-AMiC2Qcml4wPg6-53YP6hmiQs</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Albert, Graham</creator><creator>Richardson, George B.</creator><creator>Arnocky, Steven</creator><creator>Senveli, Zeynep</creator><creator>Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5866-7479</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire</title><author>Albert, Graham ; Richardson, George B. ; Arnocky, Steven ; Senveli, Zeynep ; Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f5ea48254952da40e4ef93dc35c45109b4916866622138a5665ee9b50bf4859d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Courtship - psychology</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender Identity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal-External Control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Sexual Partners - psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Albert, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, George B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnocky, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senveli, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of sexual behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Albert, Graham</au><au>Richardson, George B.</au><au>Arnocky, Steven</au><au>Senveli, Zeynep</au><au>Hodges-Simeon, Carolyn R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>Archives of sexual behavior</jtitle><stitle>Arch Sex Behav</stitle><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>511</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>511-530</pages><issn>0004-0002</issn><eissn>1573-2800</eissn><abstract>In this study, we review the psychometric literature on mating effort and find that extant instruments (1) have not been adequately evaluated in terms of internal structure and measurement invariance, and (2) disproportionately focus on mate retention and intrasexual competition tactics designed to repel competitors, relative to attraction and investment effort. To address these gaps in the literature, we carried out two studies to develop and validate a new Mating Effort Questionnaire (MEQ). In Study 1, we report a pilot study in which participants’ responses to an item pool were submitted to exploratory factor analysis. In Study 2, we replicated the structure found in Study 1 using confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample. A three-factor solution yielded the best fit. The three factors reflected respondents’ allocation of energy to attracting high mate value partners when already mated, seeking out romantic partners when single, and investing in their current romantic partner and relationships. Strong partial measurement invariance held across the sexes, implying that observed scores may be used to compare them. We also found evidence of concurrent validity via associations between the MEQ and constructs such as sociosexual orientation, K-factor, mate retention behaviors, and respondents’ sexual behavior. These findings suggest that the MEQ is a valid and novel measure of individual differences in mating effort which is well suited to complement existing mating effort measures.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32839933</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10508-020-01799-4</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5866-7479</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-0002 |
ispartof | Archives of sexual behavior, 2021-02, Vol.50 (2), p.511-530 |
issn | 0004-0002 1573-2800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2437121936 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Animal reproduction Behavioral Science and Psychology Courtship - psychology Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Gender Identity Humans Internal-External Control Male Original Paper Pilot Projects Psychology Psychometrics Public Health Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Retention Self Concept Sexual Behavior Sexual Behavior - psychology Sexual Partners - psychology Social Sciences Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Validity |
title | The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A30%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Development%20and%20Psychometric%20Evaluation%20of%20a%20New%20Mating%20Effort%20Questionnaire&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20sexual%20behavior&rft.au=Albert,%20Graham&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=511-530&rft.issn=0004-0002&rft.eissn=1573-2800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10508-020-01799-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2437121936%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490397767&rft_id=info:pmid/32839933&rfr_iscdi=true |