Influence of Metal Post in Adjacent Teeth in the Detection of Vertical Root Fracture Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography with Different Acquisition Parameters

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the detection of vertical root fracture (VRF) in the presence of adjacent teeth restored with a metal post and the influence of acquisition parameters (tube current and metal artifact reduction [MAR] algorithm) on this diagnostic task. Cone-beam computed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2020-11, Vol.46 (11), p.1655-1661
Hauptverfasser: Gaêta-Araujo, Hugo, de Oliveira Reis, Larissa, Nascimento, Eduarda Helena Leandro, Oliveira-Santos, Nicolly, Oliveira-Santos, Christiano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of the present study was to evaluate the detection of vertical root fracture (VRF) in the presence of adjacent teeth restored with a metal post and the influence of acquisition parameters (tube current and metal artifact reduction [MAR] algorithm) on this diagnostic task. Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 10 single-rooted teeth were acquired before and after the simulation of VRF. The acquisitions were set up to simulate different conditions regarding the presence of adjacent teeth restored with a metal post (control, 1 adjacent tooth, and both adjacent teeth), different tube currents (4, 8, and 10 mA), and the use of MAR (without MAR and with MAR). Images were assessed by 5 oral and maxillofacial radiologists using a 5-point scale for the presence of VRF. Diagnostic values were calculated and compared by 2-way analysis of variance (significance level of 5%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) values for VRF detection were affected by the presence of adjacent teeth and the variation of milliamperes. For 4 mA, when both restored teeth were present, Az values were significantly lower than the control group (P ≤ .05). In the presence of both restored teeth, 8 mA presented significantly higher Az values compared with 4 mA (P ≤ .05). The presence of both adjacent teeth restored with a metal post impairs VRF detection; however, an increase in tube current up to 8 mA may aid in this diagnostic task. Moreover, the MAR tool does not seem to be efficient in those cases.
ISSN:0099-2399
1878-3554
DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2020.08.013