A multicentre analysis of the outcome of arteriovenous fistula in maintenance haemodialysis

Introduction: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are the preferred choice for vascular access in hemodialysis. We aim to identify factors that may contribute to AVF failure. Methods: Data regarding AVF survival were collected from 441 patients. All AVFs were either radial or brachial, of the end‐to‐side v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seminars in dialysis 2020-09, Vol.33 (5), p.388-393
Hauptverfasser: Jothi, Swathi, KG, Hareesh, Lesley, Nancy, Vijayan, Madhusudan, Haridas Anupama, Sneha, Mathew, Milly, Parthasarathy, Rajeevalochana, Sundarajan, Saravanan, P, Nagarajan, Kumaraswamy, Latha, Abraham, Georgi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 393
container_issue 5
container_start_page 388
container_title Seminars in dialysis
container_volume 33
creator Jothi, Swathi
KG, Hareesh
Lesley, Nancy
Vijayan, Madhusudan
Haridas Anupama, Sneha
Mathew, Milly
Parthasarathy, Rajeevalochana
Sundarajan, Saravanan
P, Nagarajan
Kumaraswamy, Latha
Abraham, Georgi
description Introduction: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are the preferred choice for vascular access in hemodialysis. We aim to identify factors that may contribute to AVF failure. Methods: Data regarding AVF survival were collected from 441 patients. All AVFs were either radial or brachial, of the end‐to‐side variety. Parameters studied were age, gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension prior to end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD), site of fistula, blood flow rate, venous pressure, dialysis vintage and frequency, needle gauge used during dialysis, year of fistula creation, and details of fistula failure. Findings: The 6‐month, 1‐year and 2‐year AVF survival rates were 98.41%, 95.01%, and 89.57%. Failure rates were 17.2%, 5.5%, 26.8%, and 14.4% for dominant radial, non‐dominant radial, dominant brachial and non‐dominant brachial respectively (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sdi.12907
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2436392801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2436392801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3257-eaa71524594b119e905f670a65538a7ab023c59583daa39e593e171d43179e873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK0e_AOyRz1E9yPbzR5L_SoIHlQQPCzTZEJXkt2aTZT-e1NTvTmXYeDh4Z2XkFPOLnk_V7Fwl1wYpvfImCuhEi7N6z4Zs8ykCTPKjMhRjO-McSl0ekhGUmSCZSkbk7cZrbuqdTn6tkEKHqpNdJGGkrYrpKFr81Dj9oSmxcaFT_Shi7R0se0qoM7TGpxv0YPPka4A61C4QXJMDkqoIp7s9oS83N48z--Th8e7xXz2kORSKJ0ggO5Tp8qkS84NGqbKqWYwVUpmoGHJhMyVUZksAKRBZSRyzYtUcm0w03JCzgfvugkfHcbW1i7mWFXgsc9qRSqn0oisf39CLgY0b0KMDZZ23bgamo3lzG67tH2X9qfLnj3babtljcUf-VteD1wNwJercPO_yT5dLwblNxnOfeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2436392801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multicentre analysis of the outcome of arteriovenous fistula in maintenance haemodialysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jothi, Swathi ; KG, Hareesh ; Lesley, Nancy ; Vijayan, Madhusudan ; Haridas Anupama, Sneha ; Mathew, Milly ; Parthasarathy, Rajeevalochana ; Sundarajan, Saravanan ; P, Nagarajan ; Kumaraswamy, Latha ; Abraham, Georgi</creator><creatorcontrib>Jothi, Swathi ; KG, Hareesh ; Lesley, Nancy ; Vijayan, Madhusudan ; Haridas Anupama, Sneha ; Mathew, Milly ; Parthasarathy, Rajeevalochana ; Sundarajan, Saravanan ; P, Nagarajan ; Kumaraswamy, Latha ; Abraham, Georgi</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are the preferred choice for vascular access in hemodialysis. We aim to identify factors that may contribute to AVF failure. Methods: Data regarding AVF survival were collected from 441 patients. All AVFs were either radial or brachial, of the end‐to‐side variety. Parameters studied were age, gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension prior to end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD), site of fistula, blood flow rate, venous pressure, dialysis vintage and frequency, needle gauge used during dialysis, year of fistula creation, and details of fistula failure. Findings: The 6‐month, 1‐year and 2‐year AVF survival rates were 98.41%, 95.01%, and 89.57%. Failure rates were 17.2%, 5.5%, 26.8%, and 14.4% for dominant radial, non‐dominant radial, dominant brachial and non‐dominant brachial respectively (P &lt; 0.001). Using a larger needle size had better AVF survival rate (P &lt; 0.05). All other factors had no significant correlation with AVF failure. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in AVF patency with respect to gender, age, blood flow rate, presence of diabetes mellitus or systemic hypertension. A distally placed AVF in the nondominant arm had the best survival rate. Using a larger needle size, specifically 15G during dialysis, was associated with lowest AVF failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-0959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-139X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12907</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32820840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>arteriovenous fistula survival ; hemodialysis ; vascular access</subject><ispartof>Seminars in dialysis, 2020-09, Vol.33 (5), p.388-393</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3257-eaa71524594b119e905f670a65538a7ab023c59583daa39e593e171d43179e873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3257-eaa71524594b119e905f670a65538a7ab023c59583daa39e593e171d43179e873</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0728-8468 ; 0000-0002-9517-1456 ; 0000-0002-6957-2432</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsdi.12907$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsdi.12907$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32820840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jothi, Swathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KG, Hareesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesley, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayan, Madhusudan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haridas Anupama, Sneha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Milly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parthasarathy, Rajeevalochana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundarajan, Saravanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>P, Nagarajan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaraswamy, Latha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Georgi</creatorcontrib><title>A multicentre analysis of the outcome of arteriovenous fistula in maintenance haemodialysis</title><title>Seminars in dialysis</title><addtitle>Semin Dial</addtitle><description>Introduction: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are the preferred choice for vascular access in hemodialysis. We aim to identify factors that may contribute to AVF failure. Methods: Data regarding AVF survival were collected from 441 patients. All AVFs were either radial or brachial, of the end‐to‐side variety. Parameters studied were age, gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension prior to end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD), site of fistula, blood flow rate, venous pressure, dialysis vintage and frequency, needle gauge used during dialysis, year of fistula creation, and details of fistula failure. Findings: The 6‐month, 1‐year and 2‐year AVF survival rates were 98.41%, 95.01%, and 89.57%. Failure rates were 17.2%, 5.5%, 26.8%, and 14.4% for dominant radial, non‐dominant radial, dominant brachial and non‐dominant brachial respectively (P &lt; 0.001). Using a larger needle size had better AVF survival rate (P &lt; 0.05). All other factors had no significant correlation with AVF failure. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in AVF patency with respect to gender, age, blood flow rate, presence of diabetes mellitus or systemic hypertension. A distally placed AVF in the nondominant arm had the best survival rate. Using a larger needle size, specifically 15G during dialysis, was associated with lowest AVF failure.</description><subject>arteriovenous fistula survival</subject><subject>hemodialysis</subject><subject>vascular access</subject><issn>0894-0959</issn><issn>1525-139X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK0e_AOyRz1E9yPbzR5L_SoIHlQQPCzTZEJXkt2aTZT-e1NTvTmXYeDh4Z2XkFPOLnk_V7Fwl1wYpvfImCuhEi7N6z4Zs8ykCTPKjMhRjO-McSl0ekhGUmSCZSkbk7cZrbuqdTn6tkEKHqpNdJGGkrYrpKFr81Dj9oSmxcaFT_Shi7R0se0qoM7TGpxv0YPPka4A61C4QXJMDkqoIp7s9oS83N48z--Th8e7xXz2kORSKJ0ggO5Tp8qkS84NGqbKqWYwVUpmoGHJhMyVUZksAKRBZSRyzYtUcm0w03JCzgfvugkfHcbW1i7mWFXgsc9qRSqn0oisf39CLgY0b0KMDZZ23bgamo3lzG67tH2X9qfLnj3babtljcUf-VteD1wNwJercPO_yT5dLwblNxnOfeg</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Jothi, Swathi</creator><creator>KG, Hareesh</creator><creator>Lesley, Nancy</creator><creator>Vijayan, Madhusudan</creator><creator>Haridas Anupama, Sneha</creator><creator>Mathew, Milly</creator><creator>Parthasarathy, Rajeevalochana</creator><creator>Sundarajan, Saravanan</creator><creator>P, Nagarajan</creator><creator>Kumaraswamy, Latha</creator><creator>Abraham, Georgi</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0728-8468</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-1456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6957-2432</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>A multicentre analysis of the outcome of arteriovenous fistula in maintenance haemodialysis</title><author>Jothi, Swathi ; KG, Hareesh ; Lesley, Nancy ; Vijayan, Madhusudan ; Haridas Anupama, Sneha ; Mathew, Milly ; Parthasarathy, Rajeevalochana ; Sundarajan, Saravanan ; P, Nagarajan ; Kumaraswamy, Latha ; Abraham, Georgi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3257-eaa71524594b119e905f670a65538a7ab023c59583daa39e593e171d43179e873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>arteriovenous fistula survival</topic><topic>hemodialysis</topic><topic>vascular access</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jothi, Swathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KG, Hareesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lesley, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayan, Madhusudan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haridas Anupama, Sneha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Milly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parthasarathy, Rajeevalochana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundarajan, Saravanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>P, Nagarajan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaraswamy, Latha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Georgi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in dialysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jothi, Swathi</au><au>KG, Hareesh</au><au>Lesley, Nancy</au><au>Vijayan, Madhusudan</au><au>Haridas Anupama, Sneha</au><au>Mathew, Milly</au><au>Parthasarathy, Rajeevalochana</au><au>Sundarajan, Saravanan</au><au>P, Nagarajan</au><au>Kumaraswamy, Latha</au><au>Abraham, Georgi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multicentre analysis of the outcome of arteriovenous fistula in maintenance haemodialysis</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in dialysis</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Dial</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>388</spage><epage>393</epage><pages>388-393</pages><issn>0894-0959</issn><eissn>1525-139X</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are the preferred choice for vascular access in hemodialysis. We aim to identify factors that may contribute to AVF failure. Methods: Data regarding AVF survival were collected from 441 patients. All AVFs were either radial or brachial, of the end‐to‐side variety. Parameters studied were age, gender, diabetes mellitus, hypertension prior to end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD), site of fistula, blood flow rate, venous pressure, dialysis vintage and frequency, needle gauge used during dialysis, year of fistula creation, and details of fistula failure. Findings: The 6‐month, 1‐year and 2‐year AVF survival rates were 98.41%, 95.01%, and 89.57%. Failure rates were 17.2%, 5.5%, 26.8%, and 14.4% for dominant radial, non‐dominant radial, dominant brachial and non‐dominant brachial respectively (P &lt; 0.001). Using a larger needle size had better AVF survival rate (P &lt; 0.05). All other factors had no significant correlation with AVF failure. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in AVF patency with respect to gender, age, blood flow rate, presence of diabetes mellitus or systemic hypertension. A distally placed AVF in the nondominant arm had the best survival rate. Using a larger needle size, specifically 15G during dialysis, was associated with lowest AVF failure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32820840</pmid><doi>10.1111/sdi.12907</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0728-8468</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9517-1456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6957-2432</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-0959
ispartof Seminars in dialysis, 2020-09, Vol.33 (5), p.388-393
issn 0894-0959
1525-139X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2436392801
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects arteriovenous fistula survival
hemodialysis
vascular access
title A multicentre analysis of the outcome of arteriovenous fistula in maintenance haemodialysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T12%3A54%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multicentre%20analysis%20of%20the%20outcome%20of%20arteriovenous%20fistula%20in%20maintenance%20haemodialysis&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20dialysis&rft.au=Jothi,%20Swathi&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=388&rft.epage=393&rft.pages=388-393&rft.issn=0894-0959&rft.eissn=1525-139X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sdi.12907&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2436392801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2436392801&rft_id=info:pmid/32820840&rfr_iscdi=true