Assessing methods to live-capture wild boars (Sus scrofa) in urban and peri-urban environments
BackgroundWild boar (Sus scrofa) populations are increasing worldwide and invading urban areas. Live-capture can improve the management of this challenge, maximising efficiency, allowing scientific studies and potentially improving animal welfare. This study assesses teleanaesthesia, drop-net, corra...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary record 2020-11, Vol.187 (10), p.e85-e85 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e85 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e85 |
| container_title | Veterinary record |
| container_volume | 187 |
| creator | Torres-Blas, Irene Mentaberre, Gregorio Castillo-Contreras, Raquel Fernández-Aguilar, Xavier Conejero, Carles Valldeperes, Marta González-Crespo, Carlos Colom-Cadena, Andreu Lavín, Santiago López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón |
| description | BackgroundWild boar (Sus scrofa) populations are increasing worldwide and invading urban areas. Live-capture can improve the management of this challenge, maximising efficiency, allowing scientific studies and potentially improving animal welfare. This study assesses teleanaesthesia, drop-net, corral trap and cage trap to live-capture wild boar in urban and peri-urban areas, evaluating efficiency and animal stress through haematology and serum biochemistry.MethodsFrom 2012 to 2018, 655 wild boars were captured in 279 operations (drop-net=17, teleanaesthesia=186, cage trap=66 and corral trap=10) in the urban and peri-urban areas of Barcelona (Spain). Haematological and serum biochemical variables were determined in 145 wild boars (42 drop-netted, 41 teleanaesthetised, 38 cage-trapped and 24 corral-trapped).ResultsPerformance (wild boars captured per operation) was highest for drop-net, followed by corral and cage traps, and finally teleanaesthesia. The three physical capture methods were more stressful than teleanaesthesia, causing a more intense physiological reaction, muscular damage, renal function impairment and homeostasis adaption. Stress response was predominantly adrenergic for drop-net and cortisol-induced for cage and corral traps.ConclusionTeleanaesthesia is the choice in reactive urban situations thanks to its adaptability; drop-net effectively targets wild boars in peri-urban environments; cage and corral traps are useful as long-term methods in specific areas. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/vr.105766 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2436392477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2460219783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3855-4e4aa9ea5558e3431f9836b3ec5a83fdd901f8b557777c3a4a77087480c7f5423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLxTAQhYMoen0s_AMS0IUuqmkeTbq8ii8QBF9LS9pOtZc2vWbaK_57c6m6EDSbZOA7Z2ZOCNmN2XEci-Rk4Y9jpnSSrJAJZ5JHOtFslUzY8i1TxjbIJuKMMZ4qwdfJhuCGJ0KqCXmeIgJi7V5oC_1rVyLtO9rUC4gKO-8HD_S9bkqad9YjPbwfkGLhu8oe0drRwefWUetKOgdfR2MJblH7zrXgetwma5VtEHa-7i3yeHH-cHYV3dxeXp9Nb6JcGKUiCdLaFKxSyoCQIq5SI5JcQKGsEVVZpiyuTK6UDqcQVlqtmdHSsEJXSnKxRQ5H37nv3gbAPmtrLKBprINuwIxLkYiUS60Duv8LnXWDd2G6QCWMx6k2IlBHIxWWRfRQZXNft9Z_ZDHLlqFnC5-NoQd278txyFsof8jvlAPARyBECR9_O2VP5w93pxcifNtSdDCK8nb2T_NP-AaWCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2460219783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing methods to live-capture wild boars (Sus scrofa) in urban and peri-urban environments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Torres-Blas, Irene ; Mentaberre, Gregorio ; Castillo-Contreras, Raquel ; Fernández-Aguilar, Xavier ; Conejero, Carles ; Valldeperes, Marta ; González-Crespo, Carlos ; Colom-Cadena, Andreu ; Lavín, Santiago ; López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón</creator><creatorcontrib>Torres-Blas, Irene ; Mentaberre, Gregorio ; Castillo-Contreras, Raquel ; Fernández-Aguilar, Xavier ; Conejero, Carles ; Valldeperes, Marta ; González-Crespo, Carlos ; Colom-Cadena, Andreu ; Lavín, Santiago ; López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundWild boar (Sus scrofa) populations are increasing worldwide and invading urban areas. Live-capture can improve the management of this challenge, maximising efficiency, allowing scientific studies and potentially improving animal welfare. This study assesses teleanaesthesia, drop-net, corral trap and cage trap to live-capture wild boar in urban and peri-urban areas, evaluating efficiency and animal stress through haematology and serum biochemistry.MethodsFrom 2012 to 2018, 655 wild boars were captured in 279 operations (drop-net=17, teleanaesthesia=186, cage trap=66 and corral trap=10) in the urban and peri-urban areas of Barcelona (Spain). Haematological and serum biochemical variables were determined in 145 wild boars (42 drop-netted, 41 teleanaesthetised, 38 cage-trapped and 24 corral-trapped).ResultsPerformance (wild boars captured per operation) was highest for drop-net, followed by corral and cage traps, and finally teleanaesthesia. The three physical capture methods were more stressful than teleanaesthesia, causing a more intense physiological reaction, muscular damage, renal function impairment and homeostasis adaption. Stress response was predominantly adrenergic for drop-net and cortisol-induced for cage and corral traps.ConclusionTeleanaesthesia is the choice in reactive urban situations thanks to its adaptability; drop-net effectively targets wild boars in peri-urban environments; cage and corral traps are useful as long-term methods in specific areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-4900</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-7670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/vr.105766</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32826345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Limited</publisher><subject>Age ; Animal Husbandry ; Animal welfare ; Animals ; Animals, Wild ; Anticoagulants ; Cities ; Environmental impact ; haematochemistry ; haematology ; Hematology ; Hemoglobin ; Hogs ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Spain ; stress ; Swine ; Traffic accidents & safety ; Urban areas ; Veterinary medicine ; Veterinary services ; wild boar ; wildlife</subject><ispartof>Veterinary record, 2020-11, Vol.187 (10), p.e85-e85</ispartof><rights>British Veterinary Association 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2020 British Veterinary Association</rights><rights>2020 British Veterinary Association 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3855-4e4aa9ea5558e3431f9836b3ec5a83fdd901f8b557777c3a4a77087480c7f5423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3855-4e4aa9ea5558e3431f9836b3ec5a83fdd901f8b557777c3a4a77087480c7f5423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4939-6048 ; 0000-0002-2999-3451</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1136%2Fvr.105766$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1136%2Fvr.105766$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32826345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torres-Blas, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mentaberre, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo-Contreras, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Aguilar, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conejero, Carles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valldeperes, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Crespo, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colom-Cadena, Andreu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavín, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing methods to live-capture wild boars (Sus scrofa) in urban and peri-urban environments</title><title>Veterinary record</title><addtitle>Vet Rec</addtitle><description>BackgroundWild boar (Sus scrofa) populations are increasing worldwide and invading urban areas. Live-capture can improve the management of this challenge, maximising efficiency, allowing scientific studies and potentially improving animal welfare. This study assesses teleanaesthesia, drop-net, corral trap and cage trap to live-capture wild boar in urban and peri-urban areas, evaluating efficiency and animal stress through haematology and serum biochemistry.MethodsFrom 2012 to 2018, 655 wild boars were captured in 279 operations (drop-net=17, teleanaesthesia=186, cage trap=66 and corral trap=10) in the urban and peri-urban areas of Barcelona (Spain). Haematological and serum biochemical variables were determined in 145 wild boars (42 drop-netted, 41 teleanaesthetised, 38 cage-trapped and 24 corral-trapped).ResultsPerformance (wild boars captured per operation) was highest for drop-net, followed by corral and cage traps, and finally teleanaesthesia. The three physical capture methods were more stressful than teleanaesthesia, causing a more intense physiological reaction, muscular damage, renal function impairment and homeostasis adaption. Stress response was predominantly adrenergic for drop-net and cortisol-induced for cage and corral traps.ConclusionTeleanaesthesia is the choice in reactive urban situations thanks to its adaptability; drop-net effectively targets wild boars in peri-urban environments; cage and corral traps are useful as long-term methods in specific areas.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Anticoagulants</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>haematochemistry</subject><subject>haematology</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>stress</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Traffic accidents & safety</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><subject>Veterinary services</subject><subject>wild boar</subject><subject>wildlife</subject><issn>0042-4900</issn><issn>2042-7670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLxTAQhYMoen0s_AMS0IUuqmkeTbq8ii8QBF9LS9pOtZc2vWbaK_57c6m6EDSbZOA7Z2ZOCNmN2XEci-Rk4Y9jpnSSrJAJZ5JHOtFslUzY8i1TxjbIJuKMMZ4qwdfJhuCGJ0KqCXmeIgJi7V5oC_1rVyLtO9rUC4gKO-8HD_S9bkqad9YjPbwfkGLhu8oe0drRwefWUetKOgdfR2MJblH7zrXgetwma5VtEHa-7i3yeHH-cHYV3dxeXp9Nb6JcGKUiCdLaFKxSyoCQIq5SI5JcQKGsEVVZpiyuTK6UDqcQVlqtmdHSsEJXSnKxRQ5H37nv3gbAPmtrLKBprINuwIxLkYiUS60Duv8LnXWDd2G6QCWMx6k2IlBHIxWWRfRQZXNft9Z_ZDHLlqFnC5-NoQd278txyFsof8jvlAPARyBECR9_O2VP5w93pxcifNtSdDCK8nb2T_NP-AaWCA</recordid><startdate>20201114</startdate><enddate>20201114</enddate><creator>Torres-Blas, Irene</creator><creator>Mentaberre, Gregorio</creator><creator>Castillo-Contreras, Raquel</creator><creator>Fernández-Aguilar, Xavier</creator><creator>Conejero, Carles</creator><creator>Valldeperes, Marta</creator><creator>González-Crespo, Carlos</creator><creator>Colom-Cadena, Andreu</creator><creator>Lavín, Santiago</creator><creator>López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Limited</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-6048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2999-3451</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201114</creationdate><title>Assessing methods to live-capture wild boars (Sus scrofa) in urban and peri-urban environments</title><author>Torres-Blas, Irene ; Mentaberre, Gregorio ; Castillo-Contreras, Raquel ; Fernández-Aguilar, Xavier ; Conejero, Carles ; Valldeperes, Marta ; González-Crespo, Carlos ; Colom-Cadena, Andreu ; Lavín, Santiago ; López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3855-4e4aa9ea5558e3431f9836b3ec5a83fdd901f8b557777c3a4a77087480c7f5423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Anticoagulants</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>haematochemistry</topic><topic>haematology</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>stress</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Traffic accidents & safety</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><topic>Veterinary services</topic><topic>wild boar</topic><topic>wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres-Blas, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mentaberre, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo-Contreras, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Aguilar, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conejero, Carles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valldeperes, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Crespo, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colom-Cadena, Andreu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavín, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres-Blas, Irene</au><au>Mentaberre, Gregorio</au><au>Castillo-Contreras, Raquel</au><au>Fernández-Aguilar, Xavier</au><au>Conejero, Carles</au><au>Valldeperes, Marta</au><au>González-Crespo, Carlos</au><au>Colom-Cadena, Andreu</au><au>Lavín, Santiago</au><au>López-Olvera, Jorge Ramón</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing methods to live-capture wild boars (Sus scrofa) in urban and peri-urban environments</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary record</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Rec</addtitle><date>2020-11-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>187</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e85</spage><epage>e85</epage><pages>e85-e85</pages><issn>0042-4900</issn><eissn>2042-7670</eissn><abstract>BackgroundWild boar (Sus scrofa) populations are increasing worldwide and invading urban areas. Live-capture can improve the management of this challenge, maximising efficiency, allowing scientific studies and potentially improving animal welfare. This study assesses teleanaesthesia, drop-net, corral trap and cage trap to live-capture wild boar in urban and peri-urban areas, evaluating efficiency and animal stress through haematology and serum biochemistry.MethodsFrom 2012 to 2018, 655 wild boars were captured in 279 operations (drop-net=17, teleanaesthesia=186, cage trap=66 and corral trap=10) in the urban and peri-urban areas of Barcelona (Spain). Haematological and serum biochemical variables were determined in 145 wild boars (42 drop-netted, 41 teleanaesthetised, 38 cage-trapped and 24 corral-trapped).ResultsPerformance (wild boars captured per operation) was highest for drop-net, followed by corral and cage traps, and finally teleanaesthesia. The three physical capture methods were more stressful than teleanaesthesia, causing a more intense physiological reaction, muscular damage, renal function impairment and homeostasis adaption. Stress response was predominantly adrenergic for drop-net and cortisol-induced for cage and corral traps.ConclusionTeleanaesthesia is the choice in reactive urban situations thanks to its adaptability; drop-net effectively targets wild boars in peri-urban environments; cage and corral traps are useful as long-term methods in specific areas.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Limited</pub><pmid>32826345</pmid><doi>10.1136/vr.105766</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4939-6048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2999-3451</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0042-4900 |
| ispartof | Veterinary record, 2020-11, Vol.187 (10), p.e85-e85 |
| issn | 0042-4900 2042-7670 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2436392477 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Age Animal Husbandry Animal welfare Animals Animals, Wild Anticoagulants Cities Environmental impact haematochemistry haematology Hematology Hemoglobin Hogs Laboratories Methods Spain stress Swine Traffic accidents & safety Urban areas Veterinary medicine Veterinary services wild boar wildlife |
| title | Assessing methods to live-capture wild boars (Sus scrofa) in urban and peri-urban environments |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T07%3A55%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20methods%20to%20live-capture%20wild%20boars%20(Sus%20scrofa)%20in%20urban%20and%20peri-urban%20environments&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20record&rft.au=Torres-Blas,%20Irene&rft.date=2020-11-14&rft.volume=187&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e85&rft.epage=e85&rft.pages=e85-e85&rft.issn=0042-4900&rft.eissn=2042-7670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/vr.105766&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2460219783%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2460219783&rft_id=info:pmid/32826345&rfr_iscdi=true |