Comparison of outcomes in non-head injured trauma patients using pre-injury warfarin or direct oral anticoagulant therapy
•Warfarin users receive more anticoagulation reversal than DOAC users.•DOAC use is not associated with higher mortality despite higher average ISS.•DOAC use is not associated with more transfusion despite higher average ISS. Patients on prehospital anticoagulation with warfarin or direct oral antico...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2020-11, Vol.51 (11), p.2546-2552 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Warfarin users receive more anticoagulation reversal than DOAC users.•DOAC use is not associated with higher mortality despite higher average ISS.•DOAC use is not associated with more transfusion despite higher average ISS.
Patients on prehospital anticoagulation with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent a vulnerable subset of the trauma population. While protocolized warfarin reversal is widely available and easily implemented, prehospital anticoagulation with DOAC is cost prohibitive with only a few reversal options. This study aims to compare hospital outcomes of non-head injured trauma patients taking pre-injury DOAC versus warfarin.
A retrospective cohort study at a level 1 trauma center was performed. All adult trauma patients with pre-injury anticoagulation admitted between January 2015 and December 2018, were stratified into DOAC-using and warfarin-using groups. Patients were excluded if they had traumatic brain injury (TBI). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. Outcomes measures included in-hospital mortality, blood transfusion requirements, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS and discharge disposition.
374 non-TBI trauma patients on anticoagulation were identified, of which 134 were on DOACs and 240 on warfarin. Patients on DOACs had a higher ISS (9 [IQR, 9–10] vs. 9 [IQR, 5–9]; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.063 |