Torus obstacle method as a wrapping approach of the deltoid muscle group for humeral abduction in musculoskeletal simulation
Musculoskeletal models of the shoulder complex are valuable research aids to investigate tears of the supraspinatus and the resulting mechanical impact during abduction of the humerus. One of the major contributors to this motion is the deltoid muscle group and for this, an accurate modeling of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2020-08, Vol.109, p.109864-109864, Article 109864 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109864 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109864 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Aurbach, M. Špička, J. Süß, F. Vychytil, J. Havelková, L. Ryba, T. Dendorfer, S. |
description | Musculoskeletal models of the shoulder complex are valuable research aids to investigate tears of the supraspinatus and the resulting mechanical impact during abduction of the humerus. One of the major contributors to this motion is the deltoid muscle group and for this, an accurate modeling of the lines of action is indispensable. The aim of this work was to utilize a torus obstacle wrapping approach for the deltoids of an existing shoulder model and assess the feasibility of the approach during humeral abduction. The shoulder model from the AnyBody™ modeling system was used as a platform. The size of the tori is based on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach and several kinematic couplings are implemented to determine the trajectories of the tori during abduction. To assess the model behavior, the moment arms of the virtual muscle elements and the resultant glenohumeral joint reaction force (GHJF) were compared with reference data from the literature during abduction of the humerus in the range 20°–120°. The root mean square error for the anterior, lateral and posterior part between the simulated muscle elements and reference data from the literature was 3.9, 1.7 and 5.8 mm, respectively. The largest deviation occurred on the outer elements of the muscle groups, with 12.6, 10.4 and 20.5 mm, respectively. During abduction, there is no overlapping of the muscle elements and these are in continuous contact with the torus obstacles, thus enabling a continuous force transmission. This results in a rising trend of the resultant GHJF.
The torus obstacle approach as a wrapping method for the deltoid muscles provides a guided muscle pathing by simultaneously approximating the curvature of the deltoid muscle. The results from the comparison of the simulated moment arms and the resultant GHJF are in accordance with those in the literature in the range 20°–120° of abduction.
Although this study shows the strength of the torus obstacle as a wrapping approach, the method of fitting the tori according to MRI data was not suitable. A cadaver study is recommended to better validate and mathematically describe the torus approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109864 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2435185636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929020302876</els_id><sourcerecordid>2434246992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-789f3fa985a673e67b81b5d9bb18983539a66d790bab07918e884622cfc8f1503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQRi0EopfCX6gssWGTix-JHztQxUuqxKasLduZNA5JfLFjEBI_HofbsmDDaiTP-cZjH4SuKDlSQsXr6Ti5EBfw45ERth9qJdpH6ECV5A3jijxGB0IYbTTT5AI9y3kihMhW6qfogjNFJCftAf26jalkHF3erJ8BL7CNscc2Y4t_JHs6hfUO15Ki9SOOA95GwD3MWww9XkreM3cplhMeYsJjWSDZGVvXF7-FuOKw_qHKHPNXmGGrzRyWMtu9-xw9Geyc4cV9vURf3r-7vf7Y3Hz-8On67U3juRZbI5Ue-GC16qyQHIR0irqu185RpRXvuLZC9FITZx2RmipQqhWM-cGrgXaEX6JX57n1Gd8K5M0sIXuYZ7tCLNmwlndUdYKLir78B51iSWvdbqda1gqtWaXEmfIp5pxgMKcUFpt-GkrM7sdM5sGP2f2Ys58avLofX9wC_d_Yg5AKvDkDUP_je4Bksg-weuhDAr-ZPob_3fEb3WulpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434246992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Torus obstacle method as a wrapping approach of the deltoid muscle group for humeral abduction in musculoskeletal simulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Aurbach, M. ; Špička, J. ; Süß, F. ; Vychytil, J. ; Havelková, L. ; Ryba, T. ; Dendorfer, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aurbach, M. ; Špička, J. ; Süß, F. ; Vychytil, J. ; Havelková, L. ; Ryba, T. ; Dendorfer, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Musculoskeletal models of the shoulder complex are valuable research aids to investigate tears of the supraspinatus and the resulting mechanical impact during abduction of the humerus. One of the major contributors to this motion is the deltoid muscle group and for this, an accurate modeling of the lines of action is indispensable. The aim of this work was to utilize a torus obstacle wrapping approach for the deltoids of an existing shoulder model and assess the feasibility of the approach during humeral abduction. The shoulder model from the AnyBody™ modeling system was used as a platform. The size of the tori is based on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach and several kinematic couplings are implemented to determine the trajectories of the tori during abduction. To assess the model behavior, the moment arms of the virtual muscle elements and the resultant glenohumeral joint reaction force (GHJF) were compared with reference data from the literature during abduction of the humerus in the range 20°–120°. The root mean square error for the anterior, lateral and posterior part between the simulated muscle elements and reference data from the literature was 3.9, 1.7 and 5.8 mm, respectively. The largest deviation occurred on the outer elements of the muscle groups, with 12.6, 10.4 and 20.5 mm, respectively. During abduction, there is no overlapping of the muscle elements and these are in continuous contact with the torus obstacles, thus enabling a continuous force transmission. This results in a rising trend of the resultant GHJF.
The torus obstacle approach as a wrapping method for the deltoid muscles provides a guided muscle pathing by simultaneously approximating the curvature of the deltoid muscle. The results from the comparison of the simulated moment arms and the resultant GHJF are in accordance with those in the literature in the range 20°–120° of abduction.
Although this study shows the strength of the torus obstacle as a wrapping approach, the method of fitting the tori according to MRI data was not suitable. A cadaver study is recommended to better validate and mathematically describe the torus approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109864</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32807304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>AnyBody Modeling System ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Computer simulation ; Couplings ; Deltoid Muscle ; Humerus ; Injuries ; Kinematics ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Modelling ; MRI ; Muscle trajectory ; Muscles ; Muscoloskeletal model ; Range of motion ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Rotator Cuff ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Joint ; Shoulder joint complex ; Simulation ; Thorax ; Torus ; Toruses ; Wrapping</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2020-08, Vol.109, p.109864-109864, Article 109864</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 26, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-789f3fa985a673e67b81b5d9bb18983539a66d790bab07918e884622cfc8f1503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-789f3fa985a673e67b81b5d9bb18983539a66d790bab07918e884622cfc8f1503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929020302876$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32807304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aurbach, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Špička, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Süß, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vychytil, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Havelková, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryba, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dendorfer, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Torus obstacle method as a wrapping approach of the deltoid muscle group for humeral abduction in musculoskeletal simulation</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Musculoskeletal models of the shoulder complex are valuable research aids to investigate tears of the supraspinatus and the resulting mechanical impact during abduction of the humerus. One of the major contributors to this motion is the deltoid muscle group and for this, an accurate modeling of the lines of action is indispensable. The aim of this work was to utilize a torus obstacle wrapping approach for the deltoids of an existing shoulder model and assess the feasibility of the approach during humeral abduction. The shoulder model from the AnyBody™ modeling system was used as a platform. The size of the tori is based on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach and several kinematic couplings are implemented to determine the trajectories of the tori during abduction. To assess the model behavior, the moment arms of the virtual muscle elements and the resultant glenohumeral joint reaction force (GHJF) were compared with reference data from the literature during abduction of the humerus in the range 20°–120°. The root mean square error for the anterior, lateral and posterior part between the simulated muscle elements and reference data from the literature was 3.9, 1.7 and 5.8 mm, respectively. The largest deviation occurred on the outer elements of the muscle groups, with 12.6, 10.4 and 20.5 mm, respectively. During abduction, there is no overlapping of the muscle elements and these are in continuous contact with the torus obstacles, thus enabling a continuous force transmission. This results in a rising trend of the resultant GHJF.
The torus obstacle approach as a wrapping method for the deltoid muscles provides a guided muscle pathing by simultaneously approximating the curvature of the deltoid muscle. The results from the comparison of the simulated moment arms and the resultant GHJF are in accordance with those in the literature in the range 20°–120° of abduction.
Although this study shows the strength of the torus obstacle as a wrapping approach, the method of fitting the tori according to MRI data was not suitable. A cadaver study is recommended to better validate and mathematically describe the torus approach.</description><subject>AnyBody Modeling System</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Couplings</subject><subject>Deltoid Muscle</subject><subject>Humerus</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>Muscle trajectory</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Muscoloskeletal model</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint</subject><subject>Shoulder joint complex</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><subject>Torus</subject><subject>Toruses</subject><subject>Wrapping</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQRi0EopfCX6gssWGTix-JHztQxUuqxKasLduZNA5JfLFjEBI_HofbsmDDaiTP-cZjH4SuKDlSQsXr6Ti5EBfw45ERth9qJdpH6ECV5A3jijxGB0IYbTTT5AI9y3kihMhW6qfogjNFJCftAf26jalkHF3erJ8BL7CNscc2Y4t_JHs6hfUO15Ki9SOOA95GwD3MWww9XkreM3cplhMeYsJjWSDZGVvXF7-FuOKw_qHKHPNXmGGrzRyWMtu9-xw9Geyc4cV9vURf3r-7vf7Y3Hz-8On67U3juRZbI5Ue-GC16qyQHIR0irqu185RpRXvuLZC9FITZx2RmipQqhWM-cGrgXaEX6JX57n1Gd8K5M0sIXuYZ7tCLNmwlndUdYKLir78B51iSWvdbqda1gqtWaXEmfIp5pxgMKcUFpt-GkrM7sdM5sGP2f2Ys58avLofX9wC_d_Yg5AKvDkDUP_je4Bksg-weuhDAr-ZPob_3fEb3WulpA</recordid><startdate>20200826</startdate><enddate>20200826</enddate><creator>Aurbach, M.</creator><creator>Špička, J.</creator><creator>Süß, F.</creator><creator>Vychytil, J.</creator><creator>Havelková, L.</creator><creator>Ryba, T.</creator><creator>Dendorfer, S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200826</creationdate><title>Torus obstacle method as a wrapping approach of the deltoid muscle group for humeral abduction in musculoskeletal simulation</title><author>Aurbach, M. ; Špička, J. ; Süß, F. ; Vychytil, J. ; Havelková, L. ; Ryba, T. ; Dendorfer, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-789f3fa985a673e67b81b5d9bb18983539a66d790bab07918e884622cfc8f1503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>AnyBody Modeling System</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Couplings</topic><topic>Deltoid Muscle</topic><topic>Humerus</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>Muscle trajectory</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Muscoloskeletal model</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint</topic><topic>Shoulder joint complex</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><topic>Torus</topic><topic>Toruses</topic><topic>Wrapping</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aurbach, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Špička, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Süß, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vychytil, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Havelková, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryba, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dendorfer, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aurbach, M.</au><au>Špička, J.</au><au>Süß, F.</au><au>Vychytil, J.</au><au>Havelková, L.</au><au>Ryba, T.</au><au>Dendorfer, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Torus obstacle method as a wrapping approach of the deltoid muscle group for humeral abduction in musculoskeletal simulation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2020-08-26</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>109</volume><spage>109864</spage><epage>109864</epage><pages>109864-109864</pages><artnum>109864</artnum><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Musculoskeletal models of the shoulder complex are valuable research aids to investigate tears of the supraspinatus and the resulting mechanical impact during abduction of the humerus. One of the major contributors to this motion is the deltoid muscle group and for this, an accurate modeling of the lines of action is indispensable. The aim of this work was to utilize a torus obstacle wrapping approach for the deltoids of an existing shoulder model and assess the feasibility of the approach during humeral abduction. The shoulder model from the AnyBody™ modeling system was used as a platform. The size of the tori is based on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach and several kinematic couplings are implemented to determine the trajectories of the tori during abduction. To assess the model behavior, the moment arms of the virtual muscle elements and the resultant glenohumeral joint reaction force (GHJF) were compared with reference data from the literature during abduction of the humerus in the range 20°–120°. The root mean square error for the anterior, lateral and posterior part between the simulated muscle elements and reference data from the literature was 3.9, 1.7 and 5.8 mm, respectively. The largest deviation occurred on the outer elements of the muscle groups, with 12.6, 10.4 and 20.5 mm, respectively. During abduction, there is no overlapping of the muscle elements and these are in continuous contact with the torus obstacles, thus enabling a continuous force transmission. This results in a rising trend of the resultant GHJF.
The torus obstacle approach as a wrapping method for the deltoid muscles provides a guided muscle pathing by simultaneously approximating the curvature of the deltoid muscle. The results from the comparison of the simulated moment arms and the resultant GHJF are in accordance with those in the literature in the range 20°–120° of abduction.
Although this study shows the strength of the torus obstacle as a wrapping approach, the method of fitting the tori according to MRI data was not suitable. A cadaver study is recommended to better validate and mathematically describe the torus approach.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32807304</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109864</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2020-08, Vol.109, p.109864-109864, Article 109864 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2435185636 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | AnyBody Modeling System Biomechanical Phenomena Computer simulation Couplings Deltoid Muscle Humerus Injuries Kinematics Magnetic resonance imaging Mathematical models Methods Modelling MRI Muscle trajectory Muscles Muscoloskeletal model Range of motion Range of Motion, Articular Rotator Cuff Shoulder Shoulder Joint Shoulder joint complex Simulation Thorax Torus Toruses Wrapping |
title | Torus obstacle method as a wrapping approach of the deltoid muscle group for humeral abduction in musculoskeletal simulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A33%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Torus%20obstacle%20method%20as%20a%20wrapping%20approach%20of%20the%20deltoid%20muscle%20group%20for%20humeral%20abduction%20in%20musculoskeletal%20simulation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Aurbach,%20M.&rft.date=2020-08-26&rft.volume=109&rft.spage=109864&rft.epage=109864&rft.pages=109864-109864&rft.artnum=109864&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109864&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2434246992%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434246992&rft_id=info:pmid/32807304&rft_els_id=S0021929020302876&rfr_iscdi=true |