Identifying Counterfeit Cigarettes Using Environmental Pollen Analysis: An Improved Procedure

Traditional pollen preparation techniques provide clear residues for pollen identification; however, such methods are time‐consuming, requiring repeated centrifugation, heating, and digestion with high‐concentration hazardous chemicals. Tobacco leaves can effectively trap environmental pollen due to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forensic sciences 2020-11, Vol.65 (6), p.2138-2145
Hauptverfasser: Chan, Tiffany, Robinson, Guy, Liu, Jonathan, Kurti, Marin, He, Yi, Lampe, Klaus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2145
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2138
container_title Journal of forensic sciences
container_volume 65
creator Chan, Tiffany
Robinson, Guy
Liu, Jonathan
Kurti, Marin
He, Yi
Lampe, Klaus
description Traditional pollen preparation techniques provide clear residues for pollen identification; however, such methods are time‐consuming, requiring repeated centrifugation, heating, and digestion with high‐concentration hazardous chemicals. Tobacco leaves can effectively trap environmental pollen due to hairy surface and terpene‐rich exudates. A new tobacco sample processing method was developed by using different extraction chemistry with surfactant. Marlboro Gold cigarettes were employed as model samples for method development. Parameters critical for pollen extraction, which include number of cigarette sticks used, extraction solution, and extraction temperature, were optimized. By using 1% dishwashing detergent to treat three cigarettes at room temperature, the improved method was able to recover sufficient pollen for microscopic analysis in three repeated centrifuge‐washing steps and omit hazardous chemicals involved in traditional methods. We focused on the pollen of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), a plant native to North America, as an indicator to differentiate genuine and counterfeit U.S. brand cigarettes. Results from analyzing randomly purchased genuine (authenticated by forensic examination) and known counterfeit Marlboro Gold provided by law enforcement revealed that a significant amount (39%) of Ambrosia were consistently present in all genuine samples, while counterfeit contained none or only trace count. Similar results were found in other counterfeit U.S. brand cigarettes (all seized in the U.S.) involved in this study as well. Lack of Ambrosia in cigarette strongly indicates the product was not originated in the United States.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1556-4029.14540
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2434755840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2457269583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3710-e93445e3d5e4e89d47c1f6db37c5f5a8b26a8bf718fcfa4bcb5a14f3bf4b22763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EoqUws6FILCyhfubBVlUtFCHBQEdkOcl15SqPYidF_fc4tHRgwcO1dX3uJ_sgdE3wPfFrTISIQo5pek-44PgEDY-dUzTEmNKQkDQZoAvn1hjjiETkHA0YTTDnlA7Rx6KAujV6Z-pVMG26ugWrwbTB1KyUhbYFFyxdfzmrt8Y2deVxVQZvTVlCHUxqVe6ccQ_-FCyqjW22UARvtsmh6CxcojOtSgdXh32ElvPZ-_QpfHl9XEwnL2HOYoJDSBnnAlghgEOSFjzOiY6KjMW50EIlGY180TFJdK4Vz_JMKMI1yzTPKI0jNkJ3-1z_gM8OXCsr43IoS1VD0zlJOeOxEAnHHr39g66bzvpv9JSIaZSKhHlqvKdy2zhnQcuNNZWyO0mw7M3L3rPsPcsf837i5pDbZRUUR_5XtQfEHvgyJez-y5PP89d98DdBpI2r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2457269583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying Counterfeit Cigarettes Using Environmental Pollen Analysis: An Improved Procedure</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Chan, Tiffany ; Robinson, Guy ; Liu, Jonathan ; Kurti, Marin ; He, Yi ; Lampe, Klaus</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Tiffany ; Robinson, Guy ; Liu, Jonathan ; Kurti, Marin ; He, Yi ; Lampe, Klaus</creatorcontrib><description>Traditional pollen preparation techniques provide clear residues for pollen identification; however, such methods are time‐consuming, requiring repeated centrifugation, heating, and digestion with high‐concentration hazardous chemicals. Tobacco leaves can effectively trap environmental pollen due to hairy surface and terpene‐rich exudates. A new tobacco sample processing method was developed by using different extraction chemistry with surfactant. Marlboro Gold cigarettes were employed as model samples for method development. Parameters critical for pollen extraction, which include number of cigarette sticks used, extraction solution, and extraction temperature, were optimized. By using 1% dishwashing detergent to treat three cigarettes at room temperature, the improved method was able to recover sufficient pollen for microscopic analysis in three repeated centrifuge‐washing steps and omit hazardous chemicals involved in traditional methods. We focused on the pollen of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), a plant native to North America, as an indicator to differentiate genuine and counterfeit U.S. brand cigarettes. Results from analyzing randomly purchased genuine (authenticated by forensic examination) and known counterfeit Marlboro Gold provided by law enforcement revealed that a significant amount (39%) of Ambrosia were consistently present in all genuine samples, while counterfeit contained none or only trace count. Similar results were found in other counterfeit U.S. brand cigarettes (all seized in the U.S.) involved in this study as well. Lack of Ambrosia in cigarette strongly indicates the product was not originated in the United States.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14540</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32804422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ambrosia ; cigarette ; Cigarettes ; Counterfeit ; Counterfeiting ; Exudation ; Forensic chemistry ; forensic palynology ; Forensic sciences ; Gold ; Pollen ; Room temperature ; Tobacco</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 2020-11, Vol.65 (6), p.2138-2145</ispartof><rights>2020 American Academy of Forensic Sciences</rights><rights>2020 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3710-e93445e3d5e4e89d47c1f6db37c5f5a8b26a8bf718fcfa4bcb5a14f3bf4b22763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3710-e93445e3d5e4e89d47c1f6db37c5f5a8b26a8bf718fcfa4bcb5a14f3bf4b22763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1556-4029.14540$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1556-4029.14540$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804422$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurti, Marin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampe, Klaus</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying Counterfeit Cigarettes Using Environmental Pollen Analysis: An Improved Procedure</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>Traditional pollen preparation techniques provide clear residues for pollen identification; however, such methods are time‐consuming, requiring repeated centrifugation, heating, and digestion with high‐concentration hazardous chemicals. Tobacco leaves can effectively trap environmental pollen due to hairy surface and terpene‐rich exudates. A new tobacco sample processing method was developed by using different extraction chemistry with surfactant. Marlboro Gold cigarettes were employed as model samples for method development. Parameters critical for pollen extraction, which include number of cigarette sticks used, extraction solution, and extraction temperature, were optimized. By using 1% dishwashing detergent to treat three cigarettes at room temperature, the improved method was able to recover sufficient pollen for microscopic analysis in three repeated centrifuge‐washing steps and omit hazardous chemicals involved in traditional methods. We focused on the pollen of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), a plant native to North America, as an indicator to differentiate genuine and counterfeit U.S. brand cigarettes. Results from analyzing randomly purchased genuine (authenticated by forensic examination) and known counterfeit Marlboro Gold provided by law enforcement revealed that a significant amount (39%) of Ambrosia were consistently present in all genuine samples, while counterfeit contained none or only trace count. Similar results were found in other counterfeit U.S. brand cigarettes (all seized in the U.S.) involved in this study as well. Lack of Ambrosia in cigarette strongly indicates the product was not originated in the United States.</description><subject>Ambrosia</subject><subject>cigarette</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Counterfeit</subject><subject>Counterfeiting</subject><subject>Exudation</subject><subject>Forensic chemistry</subject><subject>forensic palynology</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Room temperature</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0EoqUws6FILCyhfubBVlUtFCHBQEdkOcl15SqPYidF_fc4tHRgwcO1dX3uJ_sgdE3wPfFrTISIQo5pek-44PgEDY-dUzTEmNKQkDQZoAvn1hjjiETkHA0YTTDnlA7Rx6KAujV6Z-pVMG26ugWrwbTB1KyUhbYFFyxdfzmrt8Y2deVxVQZvTVlCHUxqVe6ccQ_-FCyqjW22UARvtsmh6CxcojOtSgdXh32ElvPZ-_QpfHl9XEwnL2HOYoJDSBnnAlghgEOSFjzOiY6KjMW50EIlGY180TFJdK4Vz_JMKMI1yzTPKI0jNkJ3-1z_gM8OXCsr43IoS1VD0zlJOeOxEAnHHr39g66bzvpv9JSIaZSKhHlqvKdy2zhnQcuNNZWyO0mw7M3L3rPsPcsf837i5pDbZRUUR_5XtQfEHvgyJez-y5PP89d98DdBpI2r</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Chan, Tiffany</creator><creator>Robinson, Guy</creator><creator>Liu, Jonathan</creator><creator>Kurti, Marin</creator><creator>He, Yi</creator><creator>Lampe, Klaus</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Identifying Counterfeit Cigarettes Using Environmental Pollen Analysis: An Improved Procedure</title><author>Chan, Tiffany ; Robinson, Guy ; Liu, Jonathan ; Kurti, Marin ; He, Yi ; Lampe, Klaus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3710-e93445e3d5e4e89d47c1f6db37c5f5a8b26a8bf718fcfa4bcb5a14f3bf4b22763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ambrosia</topic><topic>cigarette</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Counterfeit</topic><topic>Counterfeiting</topic><topic>Exudation</topic><topic>Forensic chemistry</topic><topic>forensic palynology</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Room temperature</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurti, Marin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampe, Klaus</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Tiffany</au><au>Robinson, Guy</au><au>Liu, Jonathan</au><au>Kurti, Marin</au><au>He, Yi</au><au>Lampe, Klaus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying Counterfeit Cigarettes Using Environmental Pollen Analysis: An Improved Procedure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2138</spage><epage>2145</epage><pages>2138-2145</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><abstract>Traditional pollen preparation techniques provide clear residues for pollen identification; however, such methods are time‐consuming, requiring repeated centrifugation, heating, and digestion with high‐concentration hazardous chemicals. Tobacco leaves can effectively trap environmental pollen due to hairy surface and terpene‐rich exudates. A new tobacco sample processing method was developed by using different extraction chemistry with surfactant. Marlboro Gold cigarettes were employed as model samples for method development. Parameters critical for pollen extraction, which include number of cigarette sticks used, extraction solution, and extraction temperature, were optimized. By using 1% dishwashing detergent to treat three cigarettes at room temperature, the improved method was able to recover sufficient pollen for microscopic analysis in three repeated centrifuge‐washing steps and omit hazardous chemicals involved in traditional methods. We focused on the pollen of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), a plant native to North America, as an indicator to differentiate genuine and counterfeit U.S. brand cigarettes. Results from analyzing randomly purchased genuine (authenticated by forensic examination) and known counterfeit Marlboro Gold provided by law enforcement revealed that a significant amount (39%) of Ambrosia were consistently present in all genuine samples, while counterfeit contained none or only trace count. Similar results were found in other counterfeit U.S. brand cigarettes (all seized in the U.S.) involved in this study as well. Lack of Ambrosia in cigarette strongly indicates the product was not originated in the United States.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>32804422</pmid><doi>10.1111/1556-4029.14540</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1198
ispartof Journal of forensic sciences, 2020-11, Vol.65 (6), p.2138-2145
issn 0022-1198
1556-4029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2434755840
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Ambrosia
cigarette
Cigarettes
Counterfeit
Counterfeiting
Exudation
Forensic chemistry
forensic palynology
Forensic sciences
Gold
Pollen
Room temperature
Tobacco
title Identifying Counterfeit Cigarettes Using Environmental Pollen Analysis: An Improved Procedure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T05%3A53%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20Counterfeit%20Cigarettes%20Using%20Environmental%20Pollen%20Analysis:%20An%20Improved%20Procedure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Chan,%20Tiffany&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2138&rft.epage=2145&rft.pages=2138-2145&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1556-4029.14540&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2457269583%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2457269583&rft_id=info:pmid/32804422&rfr_iscdi=true