Ineffective esophageal motility is not a contraindication to total fundoplication

Introduction Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a physiologic diagnosis and is a component of the Chicago Classification. It has a strong association with gastroesophageal reflux and may be found during work-up for anti-reflux surgery. IEM implies a higher risk of post-op dysphagia if a total...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.4811-4816
Hauptverfasser: Laliberte, Anne-Sophie, Louie, Brian E., Wilshire, Candice L., Farivar, Alexander S., Bograd, Adam J., Aye, Ralph W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4816
container_issue 8
container_start_page 4811
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 35
creator Laliberte, Anne-Sophie
Louie, Brian E.
Wilshire, Candice L.
Farivar, Alexander S.
Bograd, Adam J.
Aye, Ralph W.
description Introduction Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a physiologic diagnosis and is a component of the Chicago Classification. It has a strong association with gastroesophageal reflux and may be found during work-up for anti-reflux surgery. IEM implies a higher risk of post-op dysphagia if a total fundoplication is done. We hypothesized that IEM is not predictive of dysphagia following fundoplication and that it is safe to perform total fundoplication in appropriately selected patients. Methods Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent total fundoplication between September 2012 and December 2018 in a single foregut surgery center and who had IEM on preoperative manometry. We excluded patients who had partial fundoplication, previous foregut surgery, other causes of dysphagia or an esophageal lengthening procedure. Dysphagia was assessed using standardized Dakkak score ≤ 40 and GERD-HRQL question 7 ≥ 3. Results Two hundred patients were diagnosed with IEM and 31 met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up: 706 days (IQR 278–1348 days). No preoperative factors, including subjective dysphagia, transit on barium swallow, or individual components of manometry showed statistical correlation with postoperative dysphagia. Of 9 patients with preoperative dysphagia, 2 (22%) had persistent postoperative dysphagia and 7 had resolution. Of 22 patients without preoperative dysphagia, 3 (14%) developed postoperative dysphagia; for a combined rate of 16%. No patient needed re-intervention beyond early recovery or required reoperation for dysphagia during the follow-up period. Conclusion In appropriately selected patients, when total fundoplication is performed in the presence of preoperative IEM, the rate of long-term postoperative dysphagia is similar to the reported rate of dysphagia without IEM. With appropriate patient selection, total fundoplication may be performed in patients with IEM without a disproportionate increase in postoperative dysphagia. The presence of preoperative IEM should not be rigidly applied as a contraindication to a total fundoplication.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-020-07883-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2434484247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2434484247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-8294fcbec94571e02994211296c24f207374b583c663ae1ea069b7a40ce0ea0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wNOCFy_RycduNkcpfhQKIug5pGm2pmyTdZMV2l9vdAuCB2FgmOF5h-FB6JLADQEQtxGAVxwDBQyirhneH6EJ4YxiSkl9jCYgGWAqJD9FZzFuIPOSlBP0Mve2aaxJ7tMWNobuXa-tbottSK51aVe4WPiQCl2Y4FOvnV85o5MLvkghV8psM_hV6NrD_hydNLqN9uLQp-jt4f519oQXz4_z2d0CG1bShGsqeWOW1kheCmKBSskpIVRWhvKGgmCCL8uamapi2hKroZJLoTkYC3lo2BRdj3e7PnwMNia1ddHYttXehiEqyhnnNadcZPTqD7oJQ-_zd4qW2QPUXEKm6EiZPsTY20Z1vdvqfqcIqG_LarSssmX1Y1ntc4iNoZhhv7b97-l_Ul9aloAa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549108490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ineffective esophageal motility is not a contraindication to total fundoplication</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Laliberte, Anne-Sophie ; Louie, Brian E. ; Wilshire, Candice L. ; Farivar, Alexander S. ; Bograd, Adam J. ; Aye, Ralph W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Laliberte, Anne-Sophie ; Louie, Brian E. ; Wilshire, Candice L. ; Farivar, Alexander S. ; Bograd, Adam J. ; Aye, Ralph W.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a physiologic diagnosis and is a component of the Chicago Classification. It has a strong association with gastroesophageal reflux and may be found during work-up for anti-reflux surgery. IEM implies a higher risk of post-op dysphagia if a total fundoplication is done. We hypothesized that IEM is not predictive of dysphagia following fundoplication and that it is safe to perform total fundoplication in appropriately selected patients. Methods Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent total fundoplication between September 2012 and December 2018 in a single foregut surgery center and who had IEM on preoperative manometry. We excluded patients who had partial fundoplication, previous foregut surgery, other causes of dysphagia or an esophageal lengthening procedure. Dysphagia was assessed using standardized Dakkak score ≤ 40 and GERD-HRQL question 7 ≥ 3. Results Two hundred patients were diagnosed with IEM and 31 met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up: 706 days (IQR 278–1348 days). No preoperative factors, including subjective dysphagia, transit on barium swallow, or individual components of manometry showed statistical correlation with postoperative dysphagia. Of 9 patients with preoperative dysphagia, 2 (22%) had persistent postoperative dysphagia and 7 had resolution. Of 22 patients without preoperative dysphagia, 3 (14%) developed postoperative dysphagia; for a combined rate of 16%. No patient needed re-intervention beyond early recovery or required reoperation for dysphagia during the follow-up period. Conclusion In appropriately selected patients, when total fundoplication is performed in the presence of preoperative IEM, the rate of long-term postoperative dysphagia is similar to the reported rate of dysphagia without IEM. With appropriate patient selection, total fundoplication may be performed in patients with IEM without a disproportionate increase in postoperative dysphagia. The presence of preoperative IEM should not be rigidly applied as a contraindication to a total fundoplication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07883-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>2020 SAGES Poster ; Abdominal Surgery ; Contraindications ; Dysphagia ; Esophagus ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Motility ; Patients ; Proctology ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.4811-4816</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-8294fcbec94571e02994211296c24f207374b583c663ae1ea069b7a40ce0ea0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-8294fcbec94571e02994211296c24f207374b583c663ae1ea069b7a40ce0ea0f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3726-6673</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-020-07883-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-020-07883-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laliberte, Anne-Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louie, Brian E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilshire, Candice L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farivar, Alexander S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bograd, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aye, Ralph W.</creatorcontrib><title>Ineffective esophageal motility is not a contraindication to total fundoplication</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Introduction Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a physiologic diagnosis and is a component of the Chicago Classification. It has a strong association with gastroesophageal reflux and may be found during work-up for anti-reflux surgery. IEM implies a higher risk of post-op dysphagia if a total fundoplication is done. We hypothesized that IEM is not predictive of dysphagia following fundoplication and that it is safe to perform total fundoplication in appropriately selected patients. Methods Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent total fundoplication between September 2012 and December 2018 in a single foregut surgery center and who had IEM on preoperative manometry. We excluded patients who had partial fundoplication, previous foregut surgery, other causes of dysphagia or an esophageal lengthening procedure. Dysphagia was assessed using standardized Dakkak score ≤ 40 and GERD-HRQL question 7 ≥ 3. Results Two hundred patients were diagnosed with IEM and 31 met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up: 706 days (IQR 278–1348 days). No preoperative factors, including subjective dysphagia, transit on barium swallow, or individual components of manometry showed statistical correlation with postoperative dysphagia. Of 9 patients with preoperative dysphagia, 2 (22%) had persistent postoperative dysphagia and 7 had resolution. Of 22 patients without preoperative dysphagia, 3 (14%) developed postoperative dysphagia; for a combined rate of 16%. No patient needed re-intervention beyond early recovery or required reoperation for dysphagia during the follow-up period. Conclusion In appropriately selected patients, when total fundoplication is performed in the presence of preoperative IEM, the rate of long-term postoperative dysphagia is similar to the reported rate of dysphagia without IEM. With appropriate patient selection, total fundoplication may be performed in patients with IEM without a disproportionate increase in postoperative dysphagia. The presence of preoperative IEM should not be rigidly applied as a contraindication to a total fundoplication.</description><subject>2020 SAGES Poster</subject><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Contraindications</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Motility</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wNOCFy_RycduNkcpfhQKIug5pGm2pmyTdZMV2l9vdAuCB2FgmOF5h-FB6JLADQEQtxGAVxwDBQyirhneH6EJ4YxiSkl9jCYgGWAqJD9FZzFuIPOSlBP0Mve2aaxJ7tMWNobuXa-tbottSK51aVe4WPiQCl2Y4FOvnV85o5MLvkghV8psM_hV6NrD_hydNLqN9uLQp-jt4f519oQXz4_z2d0CG1bShGsqeWOW1kheCmKBSskpIVRWhvKGgmCCL8uamapi2hKroZJLoTkYC3lo2BRdj3e7PnwMNia1ddHYttXehiEqyhnnNadcZPTqD7oJQ-_zd4qW2QPUXEKm6EiZPsTY20Z1vdvqfqcIqG_LarSssmX1Y1ntc4iNoZhhv7b97-l_Ul9aloAa</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Laliberte, Anne-Sophie</creator><creator>Louie, Brian E.</creator><creator>Wilshire, Candice L.</creator><creator>Farivar, Alexander S.</creator><creator>Bograd, Adam J.</creator><creator>Aye, Ralph W.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-6673</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Ineffective esophageal motility is not a contraindication to total fundoplication</title><author>Laliberte, Anne-Sophie ; Louie, Brian E. ; Wilshire, Candice L. ; Farivar, Alexander S. ; Bograd, Adam J. ; Aye, Ralph W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-8294fcbec94571e02994211296c24f207374b583c663ae1ea069b7a40ce0ea0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>2020 SAGES Poster</topic><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Contraindications</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Motility</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laliberte, Anne-Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louie, Brian E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilshire, Candice L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farivar, Alexander S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bograd, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aye, Ralph W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laliberte, Anne-Sophie</au><au>Louie, Brian E.</au><au>Wilshire, Candice L.</au><au>Farivar, Alexander S.</au><au>Bograd, Adam J.</au><au>Aye, Ralph W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ineffective esophageal motility is not a contraindication to total fundoplication</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4811</spage><epage>4816</epage><pages>4811-4816</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Introduction Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a physiologic diagnosis and is a component of the Chicago Classification. It has a strong association with gastroesophageal reflux and may be found during work-up for anti-reflux surgery. IEM implies a higher risk of post-op dysphagia if a total fundoplication is done. We hypothesized that IEM is not predictive of dysphagia following fundoplication and that it is safe to perform total fundoplication in appropriately selected patients. Methods Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent total fundoplication between September 2012 and December 2018 in a single foregut surgery center and who had IEM on preoperative manometry. We excluded patients who had partial fundoplication, previous foregut surgery, other causes of dysphagia or an esophageal lengthening procedure. Dysphagia was assessed using standardized Dakkak score ≤ 40 and GERD-HRQL question 7 ≥ 3. Results Two hundred patients were diagnosed with IEM and 31 met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up: 706 days (IQR 278–1348 days). No preoperative factors, including subjective dysphagia, transit on barium swallow, or individual components of manometry showed statistical correlation with postoperative dysphagia. Of 9 patients with preoperative dysphagia, 2 (22%) had persistent postoperative dysphagia and 7 had resolution. Of 22 patients without preoperative dysphagia, 3 (14%) developed postoperative dysphagia; for a combined rate of 16%. No patient needed re-intervention beyond early recovery or required reoperation for dysphagia during the follow-up period. Conclusion In appropriately selected patients, when total fundoplication is performed in the presence of preoperative IEM, the rate of long-term postoperative dysphagia is similar to the reported rate of dysphagia without IEM. With appropriate patient selection, total fundoplication may be performed in patients with IEM without a disproportionate increase in postoperative dysphagia. The presence of preoperative IEM should not be rigidly applied as a contraindication to a total fundoplication.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s00464-020-07883-z</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-6673</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2021-08, Vol.35 (8), p.4811-4816
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2434484247
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects 2020 SAGES Poster
Abdominal Surgery
Contraindications
Dysphagia
Esophagus
Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux
Gynecology
Hepatology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Motility
Patients
Proctology
Surgery
title Ineffective esophageal motility is not a contraindication to total fundoplication
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T18%3A34%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ineffective%20esophageal%20motility%20is%20not%20a%20contraindication%20to%20total%20fundoplication&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Laliberte,%20Anne-Sophie&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4811&rft.epage=4816&rft.pages=4811-4816&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-020-07883-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2434484247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549108490&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true