The utility of post-biopsy ultrasonography in detecting complications after percutaneous liver biopsy in children
Background Surveillance post image-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in children is variable. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the value of 4–6-h post-procedure ultrasonography (US) in detecting post-liver-biopsy hemorrhage. Materials and methods This prospective study included pediatric...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric radiology 2020-11, Vol.50 (12), p.1717-1723 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Surveillance post image-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in children is variable.
Objective
The aim of this study was to assess the value of 4–6-h post-procedure ultrasonography (US) in detecting post-liver-biopsy hemorrhage.
Materials and methods
This prospective study included pediatric patients who underwent US-guided percutaneous liver biopsies. All children had a US study obtained
pre-procedure
and one obtained 4–6 h
post-procedure
; US examinations were deemed positive if abnormalities were present. We also reviewed any subsequent imaging that was performed within 7 days (
late imaging)
at the discretion of the referring team. Changes in US findings (ΔUS) were graded by two radiologists using a descriptive non-validated scale (none, minimal, marked). Hemoglobin (Hb) levels were assessed pre-procedure and 4 h post-procedure. The diagnostic accuracy of US changes for detecting post-procedural hemorrhage was calculated based on a drop in Hb >1.5 g/dL or Hb >15% from baseline (ΔHb). We used a Kruskal–Wallis test to correlate the ΔHb with ΔUS. Association between
late-imaging
and
post-procedure
US findings was tested using a chi-square test. We included 224 biopsies.
Results
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of post-procedure US in detecting post-procedure hemorrhage ranged 26.3–42.1%, 72.4–93.3%, 0.22–0.42, and 0.87–0.88, respectively. No significant association was seen between the ΔHb and sonographic findings (
P
=0.068). No significant difference was seen in the need for late imaging between children who did and those who did not have positive US findings (
P
=0.814).
Conclusion
The sensitivity and PPV of post-procedure US in detecting post-procedural hemorrhage are low. Our findings do not support routine post-procedure surveillance US. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-0449 1432-1998 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00247-020-04783-1 |