Direct oral anticoagulant versus low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Cancer associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been standard of care for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, however direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging as alternative treatment options. To compare th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thrombosis research 2020-10, Vol.194, p.57-65
Hauptverfasser: Haykal, Tarek, Zayed, Yazan, Deliwala, Smit, Kerbage, Josiane, Ponnapalli, Anoosha, Malladi, Srikanth, Goranta, Sowmya, Samji, Varun, Adam, Soheir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue
container_start_page 57
container_title Thrombosis research
container_volume 194
creator Haykal, Tarek
Zayed, Yazan
Deliwala, Smit
Kerbage, Josiane
Ponnapalli, Anoosha
Malladi, Srikanth
Goranta, Sowmya
Samji, Varun
Adam, Soheir
description Cancer associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been standard of care for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, however direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging as alternative treatment options. To compare the benefits and harms of DOACs versus LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing DOACs with LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer patients. Four good-quality RCTs, met inclusion criteria. Compared with LMWH, DOACs were associated with lower rates of VTE recurrence (RR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44–0.87; P = 0.006), and DVT recurrence (RR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.4–0.94; P = 0.02) but not PE recurrence (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51–1.04; P = 0.08), in cancer patients. However, the risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) (RR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11–2.24; P = 0.01), and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer (RR 2.55; 95% CI 1.24–5.27, P = 0.01), were higher with DOACs. The risk of overall major bleeding (RR 1.33; 95% CI: 0.84–2.1; P = 0.22), all-cause mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.84–1.17; P = 0.92), VTE-related mortality (RR: 1; 95% CI: 0.29–3.44; P = 1) and bleeding-related mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.17–2.91; P = 0.63), were similar in both treatment groups. Among cancer patients with VTE, treatment with DOACs is associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT recurrence, compared to LMWH. These benefits were offset by an increased risk of CRNMB, and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer. •Among cancer patients with VTE, DOACs are associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT recurrence, compared to LMWH.•The risk of major bleeding is similar in both treatment groups.•In gastrointestinal cancer, the risk of major bleeding is significantly higher with DOACs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2434054422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004938482030267X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2434054422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-414bf0c329f7d5a31c8ce8ae772a7bfd7395a685973364938cd7b70872d3d6233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhi0EoofCK1ResknwLbHDiqpcpUpsYG059qTHR04cbKdVeSyeEJ-eli0La0b298945kfogpKWEtq_O7Rln-KcILeMMNKSviWse4Z2VMmhYUKy52hHiBgaroQ6Q69yPhBCJR26l-iMM6kUZWyH_nz0CWzBMZmAzVK8jeZmCzXDt5DylnGId80cA9h6m5o78Df7gvewmuQXPMWESwJTZqiKOFXREqvo4XNjhHqCzzOuqDWLhYRXU3xl83t8ueBtdaaAwzMU05jFhPvs87FMMouLs_9d32xcSooh1LQkb0J-jV5MNcCbx3iOfn7-9OPqa3P9_cu3q8vrxvJelUZQMU7EcjZM0nWGU6ssKANSMiPHyUk-dKZX3SA578XAlXVylERJ5rjrGefn6O2p7prirw1y0bPPFkJdDtQZNRNckE4Ixiran1CbYs4JJr0mP5t0rynRR7_0QT_5pY9-adLr6lcVXjz22MYZ3D_Zk0EV-HACoE566yHpbOv-LLgH37SL_n89_gIFH6_i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434054422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct oral anticoagulant versus low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Haykal, Tarek ; Zayed, Yazan ; Deliwala, Smit ; Kerbage, Josiane ; Ponnapalli, Anoosha ; Malladi, Srikanth ; Goranta, Sowmya ; Samji, Varun ; Adam, Soheir</creator><creatorcontrib>Haykal, Tarek ; Zayed, Yazan ; Deliwala, Smit ; Kerbage, Josiane ; Ponnapalli, Anoosha ; Malladi, Srikanth ; Goranta, Sowmya ; Samji, Varun ; Adam, Soheir</creatorcontrib><description>Cancer associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been standard of care for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, however direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging as alternative treatment options. To compare the benefits and harms of DOACs versus LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing DOACs with LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer patients. Four good-quality RCTs, met inclusion criteria. Compared with LMWH, DOACs were associated with lower rates of VTE recurrence (RR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44–0.87; P = 0.006), and DVT recurrence (RR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.4–0.94; P = 0.02) but not PE recurrence (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51–1.04; P = 0.08), in cancer patients. However, the risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) (RR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11–2.24; P = 0.01), and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer (RR 2.55; 95% CI 1.24–5.27, P = 0.01), were higher with DOACs. The risk of overall major bleeding (RR 1.33; 95% CI: 0.84–2.1; P = 0.22), all-cause mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.84–1.17; P = 0.92), VTE-related mortality (RR: 1; 95% CI: 0.29–3.44; P = 1) and bleeding-related mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.17–2.91; P = 0.63), were similar in both treatment groups. Among cancer patients with VTE, treatment with DOACs is associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT recurrence, compared to LMWH. These benefits were offset by an increased risk of CRNMB, and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer. •Among cancer patients with VTE, DOACs are associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT recurrence, compared to LMWH.•The risk of major bleeding is similar in both treatment groups.•In gastrointestinal cancer, the risk of major bleeding is significantly higher with DOACs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-3848</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2472</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32788122</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Direct acting oral anticoagulants ; Heparin ; Low-molecular-weight ; Venous thromboembolism</subject><ispartof>Thrombosis research, 2020-10, Vol.194, p.57-65</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-414bf0c329f7d5a31c8ce8ae772a7bfd7395a685973364938cd7b70872d3d6233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-414bf0c329f7d5a31c8ce8ae772a7bfd7395a685973364938cd7b70872d3d6233</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0076-4572 ; 0000-0002-8637-7292 ; 0000-0001-5239-9533</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.025$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788122$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haykal, Tarek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zayed, Yazan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deliwala, Smit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerbage, Josiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponnapalli, Anoosha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malladi, Srikanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goranta, Sowmya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samji, Varun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adam, Soheir</creatorcontrib><title>Direct oral anticoagulant versus low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><title>Thrombosis research</title><addtitle>Thromb Res</addtitle><description>Cancer associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been standard of care for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, however direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging as alternative treatment options. To compare the benefits and harms of DOACs versus LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing DOACs with LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer patients. Four good-quality RCTs, met inclusion criteria. Compared with LMWH, DOACs were associated with lower rates of VTE recurrence (RR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44–0.87; P = 0.006), and DVT recurrence (RR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.4–0.94; P = 0.02) but not PE recurrence (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51–1.04; P = 0.08), in cancer patients. However, the risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) (RR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11–2.24; P = 0.01), and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer (RR 2.55; 95% CI 1.24–5.27, P = 0.01), were higher with DOACs. The risk of overall major bleeding (RR 1.33; 95% CI: 0.84–2.1; P = 0.22), all-cause mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.84–1.17; P = 0.92), VTE-related mortality (RR: 1; 95% CI: 0.29–3.44; P = 1) and bleeding-related mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.17–2.91; P = 0.63), were similar in both treatment groups. Among cancer patients with VTE, treatment with DOACs is associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT recurrence, compared to LMWH. These benefits were offset by an increased risk of CRNMB, and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer. •Among cancer patients with VTE, DOACs are associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT recurrence, compared to LMWH.•The risk of major bleeding is similar in both treatment groups.•In gastrointestinal cancer, the risk of major bleeding is significantly higher with DOACs.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Direct acting oral anticoagulants</subject><subject>Heparin</subject><subject>Low-molecular-weight</subject><subject>Venous thromboembolism</subject><issn>0049-3848</issn><issn>1879-2472</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctu1TAQhi0EoofCK1ResknwLbHDiqpcpUpsYG059qTHR04cbKdVeSyeEJ-eli0La0b298945kfogpKWEtq_O7Rln-KcILeMMNKSviWse4Z2VMmhYUKy52hHiBgaroQ6Q69yPhBCJR26l-iMM6kUZWyH_nz0CWzBMZmAzVK8jeZmCzXDt5DylnGId80cA9h6m5o78Df7gvewmuQXPMWESwJTZqiKOFXREqvo4XNjhHqCzzOuqDWLhYRXU3xl83t8ueBtdaaAwzMU05jFhPvs87FMMouLs_9d32xcSooh1LQkb0J-jV5MNcCbx3iOfn7-9OPqa3P9_cu3q8vrxvJelUZQMU7EcjZM0nWGU6ssKANSMiPHyUk-dKZX3SA578XAlXVylERJ5rjrGefn6O2p7prirw1y0bPPFkJdDtQZNRNckE4Ixiran1CbYs4JJr0mP5t0rynRR7_0QT_5pY9-adLr6lcVXjz22MYZ3D_Zk0EV-HACoE566yHpbOv-LLgH37SL_n89_gIFH6_i</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Haykal, Tarek</creator><creator>Zayed, Yazan</creator><creator>Deliwala, Smit</creator><creator>Kerbage, Josiane</creator><creator>Ponnapalli, Anoosha</creator><creator>Malladi, Srikanth</creator><creator>Goranta, Sowmya</creator><creator>Samji, Varun</creator><creator>Adam, Soheir</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-4572</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8637-7292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5239-9533</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Direct oral anticoagulant versus low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><author>Haykal, Tarek ; Zayed, Yazan ; Deliwala, Smit ; Kerbage, Josiane ; Ponnapalli, Anoosha ; Malladi, Srikanth ; Goranta, Sowmya ; Samji, Varun ; Adam, Soheir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-414bf0c329f7d5a31c8ce8ae772a7bfd7395a685973364938cd7b70872d3d6233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Direct acting oral anticoagulants</topic><topic>Heparin</topic><topic>Low-molecular-weight</topic><topic>Venous thromboembolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haykal, Tarek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zayed, Yazan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deliwala, Smit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerbage, Josiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponnapalli, Anoosha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malladi, Srikanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goranta, Sowmya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samji, Varun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adam, Soheir</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Thrombosis research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haykal, Tarek</au><au>Zayed, Yazan</au><au>Deliwala, Smit</au><au>Kerbage, Josiane</au><au>Ponnapalli, Anoosha</au><au>Malladi, Srikanth</au><au>Goranta, Sowmya</au><au>Samji, Varun</au><au>Adam, Soheir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct oral anticoagulant versus low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Thrombosis research</jtitle><addtitle>Thromb Res</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>194</volume><spage>57</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>57-65</pages><issn>0049-3848</issn><eissn>1879-2472</eissn><abstract>Cancer associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) results in significant morbidity and mortality. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been standard of care for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, however direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are emerging as alternative treatment options. To compare the benefits and harms of DOACs versus LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to April 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing DOACs with LMWH for treatment of VTE in cancer patients. Four good-quality RCTs, met inclusion criteria. Compared with LMWH, DOACs were associated with lower rates of VTE recurrence (RR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44–0.87; P = 0.006), and DVT recurrence (RR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.4–0.94; P = 0.02) but not PE recurrence (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51–1.04; P = 0.08), in cancer patients. However, the risk of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) (RR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11–2.24; P = 0.01), and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer (RR 2.55; 95% CI 1.24–5.27, P = 0.01), were higher with DOACs. The risk of overall major bleeding (RR 1.33; 95% CI: 0.84–2.1; P = 0.22), all-cause mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.84–1.17; P = 0.92), VTE-related mortality (RR: 1; 95% CI: 0.29–3.44; P = 1) and bleeding-related mortality (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.17–2.91; P = 0.63), were similar in both treatment groups. Among cancer patients with VTE, treatment with DOACs is associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT recurrence, compared to LMWH. These benefits were offset by an increased risk of CRNMB, and major bleeding in gastrointestinal cancer. •Among cancer patients with VTE, DOACs are associated with a significant reduction of VTE and DVT recurrence, compared to LMWH.•The risk of major bleeding is similar in both treatment groups.•In gastrointestinal cancer, the risk of major bleeding is significantly higher with DOACs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32788122</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.025</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-4572</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8637-7292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5239-9533</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-3848
ispartof Thrombosis research, 2020-10, Vol.194, p.57-65
issn 0049-3848
1879-2472
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2434054422
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Cancer
Direct acting oral anticoagulants
Heparin
Low-molecular-weight
Venous thromboembolism
title Direct oral anticoagulant versus low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T21%3A23%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20oral%20anticoagulant%20versus%20low-molecular-weight%20heparin%20for%20treatment%20of%20venous%20thromboembolism%20in%20cancer%20patients:%20An%20updated%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Thrombosis%20research&rft.au=Haykal,%20Tarek&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=194&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=57-65&rft.issn=0049-3848&rft.eissn=1879-2472&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2434054422%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434054422&rft_id=info:pmid/32788122&rft_els_id=S004938482030267X&rfr_iscdi=true