Acute offline transcranial direct current stimulation does not change pain or anxiety produced by the cold pressor test
•Primary motor cortex tDCS has been shown to decrease provoked pain.•Experimental pain has been shown to be decreased by online tDCS.•We have found no effect of offline tDCS in experimental pain.•Successful tDCS in chronic pain may depend on functional targeting. Transcranial direct current stimulat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuroscience letters 2020-09, Vol.736, p.135300-135300, Article 135300 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 135300 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 135300 |
container_title | Neuroscience letters |
container_volume | 736 |
creator | Brasil-Neto, Joaquim P. Iannone, Aline Caixeta, Fabio Viegas Cavendish, Beatriz Araújo de Mello Cruz, Antônio Pedro Buratto, Luciano Grüdtner |
description | •Primary motor cortex tDCS has been shown to decrease provoked pain.•Experimental pain has been shown to be decreased by online tDCS.•We have found no effect of offline tDCS in experimental pain.•Successful tDCS in chronic pain may depend on functional targeting.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) has an antalgic effect on acute experimental pain in healthy volunteers. Many published studies have used online stimulation (i.e., tDCS performed during painful stimulation). On the other hand, daily tDCS sessions have been proposed as a therapy for chronic pain (offline tDCS). In such cases, the therapeutic potential depends on the possible aftereffects of each tDCS session. We set out to investigate whether a single tDCS session before application of a classical experimental pain paradigm (the Cold Pressor Test, CPT) would be capable of modulating physiological measures of anxiety as well as pain perception. tDCS was applied to 30 healthy volunteers, 18–28 years old (mean 18.5), with the anode positioned over either the left M1 or the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC), which has been linked to the affective aspects of experienced pain, including anxiety. All volunteers underwent the CPT procedure before and after a tDCS session. Real 2 mA tDCS sessions for 20 min were compared to sham stimulations. No significant difference was found for any variable after real tDCS sessions when compared to the sham stimulations. This result suggests that effective offline tDCS for chronic pain might have different mechanisms of action. Cumulative effects, functional targeting and the unintended simultaneous stimulation of both M1 and the l-DLPFC are likely responsible for the therapeutic effects of tDCS sessions in the clinical setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135300 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2433240694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030439402030570X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2433240694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-123a01a716f612a546fed3e5e0281552c08429d7430f9b53e4d9f198ebd72bbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2qqKTAP6gqH3vZdPyxX5dKCAFFQuICZ8trzzaONnZqe2nz73G60CMXWxo_M-_4IeQLgzUD1nzfrj3OE-Y1B15KohYAH8iKdS2v2r7lH8kKBMhK9BJOyeeUtgBQs1p-IqeCt10ZAivy59LMGWkYx8l5pDlqn0w5nJ6odRFNpmaOEX2mKbvdPOnsgqc2YKI-lMeN9r-Q7rXzNESq_V-H-UD3MdjZoKXDgeYNUhMmW4qYUoEypnxOTkY9Jbx4vc_I083149XP6v7h9u7q8r4youG5YlxoYLplzdgwrmvZjGgF1gi8Y3XNDXSS97aVAsZ-qAVK24-s73CwLR8GI87It2Vu2ej3XILVziWD06Q9hjkpLoXgEppeFlQuqIkhpYij2ke30_GgGKijcrVVi3J1VK4W5aXt62vCPOzQ_m96c1yAHwuA5Z_PDqNKxqEvdv75VTa49xNeAMKRlZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2433240694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acute offline transcranial direct current stimulation does not change pain or anxiety produced by the cold pressor test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Brasil-Neto, Joaquim P. ; Iannone, Aline ; Caixeta, Fabio Viegas ; Cavendish, Beatriz Araújo ; de Mello Cruz, Antônio Pedro ; Buratto, Luciano Grüdtner</creator><creatorcontrib>Brasil-Neto, Joaquim P. ; Iannone, Aline ; Caixeta, Fabio Viegas ; Cavendish, Beatriz Araújo ; de Mello Cruz, Antônio Pedro ; Buratto, Luciano Grüdtner</creatorcontrib><description>•Primary motor cortex tDCS has been shown to decrease provoked pain.•Experimental pain has been shown to be decreased by online tDCS.•We have found no effect of offline tDCS in experimental pain.•Successful tDCS in chronic pain may depend on functional targeting.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) has an antalgic effect on acute experimental pain in healthy volunteers. Many published studies have used online stimulation (i.e., tDCS performed during painful stimulation). On the other hand, daily tDCS sessions have been proposed as a therapy for chronic pain (offline tDCS). In such cases, the therapeutic potential depends on the possible aftereffects of each tDCS session. We set out to investigate whether a single tDCS session before application of a classical experimental pain paradigm (the Cold Pressor Test, CPT) would be capable of modulating physiological measures of anxiety as well as pain perception. tDCS was applied to 30 healthy volunteers, 18–28 years old (mean 18.5), with the anode positioned over either the left M1 or the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC), which has been linked to the affective aspects of experienced pain, including anxiety. All volunteers underwent the CPT procedure before and after a tDCS session. Real 2 mA tDCS sessions for 20 min were compared to sham stimulations. No significant difference was found for any variable after real tDCS sessions when compared to the sham stimulations. This result suggests that effective offline tDCS for chronic pain might have different mechanisms of action. Cumulative effects, functional targeting and the unintended simultaneous stimulation of both M1 and the l-DLPFC are likely responsible for the therapeutic effects of tDCS sessions in the clinical setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3940</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32781010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anxiety - physiopathology ; Anxiety - therapy ; Cold pressor test ; Cold Temperature ; Humans ; Male ; motor cortex ; Motor Cortex - physiology ; Pain ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain Management - methods ; Pain Measurement ; Pain Perception - physiology ; Pain Threshold - physiology ; Prefrontal cortex ; tDCS ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience letters, 2020-09, Vol.736, p.135300-135300, Article 135300</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-123a01a716f612a546fed3e5e0281552c08429d7430f9b53e4d9f198ebd72bbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-123a01a716f612a546fed3e5e0281552c08429d7430f9b53e4d9f198ebd72bbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135300$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32781010$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brasil-Neto, Joaquim P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iannone, Aline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caixeta, Fabio Viegas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavendish, Beatriz Araújo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mello Cruz, Antônio Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buratto, Luciano Grüdtner</creatorcontrib><title>Acute offline transcranial direct current stimulation does not change pain or anxiety produced by the cold pressor test</title><title>Neuroscience letters</title><addtitle>Neurosci Lett</addtitle><description>•Primary motor cortex tDCS has been shown to decrease provoked pain.•Experimental pain has been shown to be decreased by online tDCS.•We have found no effect of offline tDCS in experimental pain.•Successful tDCS in chronic pain may depend on functional targeting.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) has an antalgic effect on acute experimental pain in healthy volunteers. Many published studies have used online stimulation (i.e., tDCS performed during painful stimulation). On the other hand, daily tDCS sessions have been proposed as a therapy for chronic pain (offline tDCS). In such cases, the therapeutic potential depends on the possible aftereffects of each tDCS session. We set out to investigate whether a single tDCS session before application of a classical experimental pain paradigm (the Cold Pressor Test, CPT) would be capable of modulating physiological measures of anxiety as well as pain perception. tDCS was applied to 30 healthy volunteers, 18–28 years old (mean 18.5), with the anode positioned over either the left M1 or the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC), which has been linked to the affective aspects of experienced pain, including anxiety. All volunteers underwent the CPT procedure before and after a tDCS session. Real 2 mA tDCS sessions for 20 min were compared to sham stimulations. No significant difference was found for any variable after real tDCS sessions when compared to the sham stimulations. This result suggests that effective offline tDCS for chronic pain might have different mechanisms of action. Cumulative effects, functional targeting and the unintended simultaneous stimulation of both M1 and the l-DLPFC are likely responsible for the therapeutic effects of tDCS sessions in the clinical setting.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety - physiopathology</subject><subject>Anxiety - therapy</subject><subject>Cold pressor test</subject><subject>Cold Temperature</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>motor cortex</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Pain Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>tDCS</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0304-3940</issn><issn>1872-7972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2qqKTAP6gqH3vZdPyxX5dKCAFFQuICZ8trzzaONnZqe2nz73G60CMXWxo_M-_4IeQLgzUD1nzfrj3OE-Y1B15KohYAH8iKdS2v2r7lH8kKBMhK9BJOyeeUtgBQs1p-IqeCt10ZAivy59LMGWkYx8l5pDlqn0w5nJ6odRFNpmaOEX2mKbvdPOnsgqc2YKI-lMeN9r-Q7rXzNESq_V-H-UD3MdjZoKXDgeYNUhMmW4qYUoEypnxOTkY9Jbx4vc_I083149XP6v7h9u7q8r4youG5YlxoYLplzdgwrmvZjGgF1gi8Y3XNDXSS97aVAsZ-qAVK24-s73CwLR8GI87It2Vu2ej3XILVziWD06Q9hjkpLoXgEppeFlQuqIkhpYij2ke30_GgGKijcrVVi3J1VK4W5aXt62vCPOzQ_m96c1yAHwuA5Z_PDqNKxqEvdv75VTa49xNeAMKRlZg</recordid><startdate>20200925</startdate><enddate>20200925</enddate><creator>Brasil-Neto, Joaquim P.</creator><creator>Iannone, Aline</creator><creator>Caixeta, Fabio Viegas</creator><creator>Cavendish, Beatriz Araújo</creator><creator>de Mello Cruz, Antônio Pedro</creator><creator>Buratto, Luciano Grüdtner</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200925</creationdate><title>Acute offline transcranial direct current stimulation does not change pain or anxiety produced by the cold pressor test</title><author>Brasil-Neto, Joaquim P. ; Iannone, Aline ; Caixeta, Fabio Viegas ; Cavendish, Beatriz Araújo ; de Mello Cruz, Antônio Pedro ; Buratto, Luciano Grüdtner</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-123a01a716f612a546fed3e5e0281552c08429d7430f9b53e4d9f198ebd72bbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety - physiopathology</topic><topic>Anxiety - therapy</topic><topic>Cold pressor test</topic><topic>Cold Temperature</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>motor cortex</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Pain Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>tDCS</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brasil-Neto, Joaquim P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iannone, Aline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caixeta, Fabio Viegas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavendish, Beatriz Araújo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mello Cruz, Antônio Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buratto, Luciano Grüdtner</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brasil-Neto, Joaquim P.</au><au>Iannone, Aline</au><au>Caixeta, Fabio Viegas</au><au>Cavendish, Beatriz Araújo</au><au>de Mello Cruz, Antônio Pedro</au><au>Buratto, Luciano Grüdtner</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acute offline transcranial direct current stimulation does not change pain or anxiety produced by the cold pressor test</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience letters</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosci Lett</addtitle><date>2020-09-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>736</volume><spage>135300</spage><epage>135300</epage><pages>135300-135300</pages><artnum>135300</artnum><issn>0304-3940</issn><eissn>1872-7972</eissn><abstract>•Primary motor cortex tDCS has been shown to decrease provoked pain.•Experimental pain has been shown to be decreased by online tDCS.•We have found no effect of offline tDCS in experimental pain.•Successful tDCS in chronic pain may depend on functional targeting.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex (M1) has an antalgic effect on acute experimental pain in healthy volunteers. Many published studies have used online stimulation (i.e., tDCS performed during painful stimulation). On the other hand, daily tDCS sessions have been proposed as a therapy for chronic pain (offline tDCS). In such cases, the therapeutic potential depends on the possible aftereffects of each tDCS session. We set out to investigate whether a single tDCS session before application of a classical experimental pain paradigm (the Cold Pressor Test, CPT) would be capable of modulating physiological measures of anxiety as well as pain perception. tDCS was applied to 30 healthy volunteers, 18–28 years old (mean 18.5), with the anode positioned over either the left M1 or the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC), which has been linked to the affective aspects of experienced pain, including anxiety. All volunteers underwent the CPT procedure before and after a tDCS session. Real 2 mA tDCS sessions for 20 min were compared to sham stimulations. No significant difference was found for any variable after real tDCS sessions when compared to the sham stimulations. This result suggests that effective offline tDCS for chronic pain might have different mechanisms of action. Cumulative effects, functional targeting and the unintended simultaneous stimulation of both M1 and the l-DLPFC are likely responsible for the therapeutic effects of tDCS sessions in the clinical setting.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32781010</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135300</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-3940 |
ispartof | Neuroscience letters, 2020-09, Vol.736, p.135300-135300, Article 135300 |
issn | 0304-3940 1872-7972 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2433240694 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Anxiety - physiopathology Anxiety - therapy Cold pressor test Cold Temperature Humans Male motor cortex Motor Cortex - physiology Pain Pain - physiopathology Pain Management - methods Pain Measurement Pain Perception - physiology Pain Threshold - physiology Prefrontal cortex tDCS Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Young Adult |
title | Acute offline transcranial direct current stimulation does not change pain or anxiety produced by the cold pressor test |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A05%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acute%20offline%20transcranial%20direct%20current%20stimulation%20does%20not%20change%20pain%20or%20anxiety%20produced%20by%20the%20cold%20pressor%20test&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience%20letters&rft.au=Brasil-Neto,%20Joaquim%20P.&rft.date=2020-09-25&rft.volume=736&rft.spage=135300&rft.epage=135300&rft.pages=135300-135300&rft.artnum=135300&rft.issn=0304-3940&rft.eissn=1872-7972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135300&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2433240694%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2433240694&rft_id=info:pmid/32781010&rft_els_id=S030439402030570X&rfr_iscdi=true |