Efficacy of drug‐coated balloon angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy for coronary bifurcation lesions (DCA/DCB registry)
Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) for coronary bifurcation lesions. Background The optimal therapy for bifurcation lesions has not been established, even in the drug‐eluting stent era. DCA p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2021-04, Vol.97 (5), p.E614-E623 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E623 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | E614 |
container_title | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Kitani, Shunsuke Igarashi, Yasumi Tsuchikane, Etsuo Nakamura, Shigeru Seino, Yoshitane Habara, Maoto Takeda, Yoshihiro Shimoji, Kenichiro Yasaka, Yoshinori Kijima, Mikihiro |
description | Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) for coronary bifurcation lesions.
Background
The optimal therapy for bifurcation lesions has not been established, even in the drug‐eluting stent era. DCA possibly prevents plaque and carina shift in bifurcation lesions by plaque debulking; however, the efficacy of combined DCA and DCB (DCA/DCB) for bifurcation lesions remains unclear.
Methods
This multicenter registry retrospectively recruited patients with bifurcation lesions who underwent DCA/DCB and follow‐up angiogram at 6–15 months. The primary endpoint was the 12‐month target vessel failure (TVF) rate. The secondary endpoints were procedure‐related major complications, major cardiovascular events at 12 months, restenosis at 12 months, target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months.
Results
We enrolled 129 patients from 16 Japanese centers. One hundred and four lesions (80.6%) were located around the left main trunk bifurcations. No side branch compromise was found intraoperatively. Restenosis was observed in three patients (2.3%) at 12 months. TLR occurred in four patients (3.1%): 3 (2.3%) in the main vessel and 1 (0.8%) in the ostium of the side branch at 12 months. TVF incidence at 12 months was slightly higher in 14 patients (10.9%), and only two patients (1.6%) had symptomatic TVR. One patient (0.8%) had non‐target vessel‐related myocardial infarction.
Conclusions
Our data suggested that DCA/DCB provided good clinical outcomes and minimal side branch damage and could be an optimal non‐stent percutaneous coronary intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ccd.29185 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432860385</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2432860385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4195-38348f4c1291dab809d252849d2720bdd6fdb87f35451d580c43f88830de880f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKAzEYhYMo3he-gATc1EVtLpOZzFKn3kBwo-BuyORSI2lTkxlkdi5d-ow-iamtCoKr8_OfjwOHA8ABRicYITKSUp2QEnO2BrYxI2RYkPxhfXXjMsu3wE6MTwihMiflJtiipCjynJfb4O3cGCuF7KE3UIVu8vH6Lr1otYKNcM77GRSzifVzJ2LbQ2FaHaCyQcvW-plwUPqQNCSrfdSLt5_20PjwazTWdEGKBQ-djkkiHIyr09G4OoNBT2xsQ3-8BzaMcFHvr3QX3F-c31VXw5vby-vq9GYoM1yyIeU04yaTOPVVouGoVIQRniUpCGqUyo1qeGEoyxhWjCOZUcM5p0hpzpGhu2CwzJ0H_9zp2NZTG6V2Tsy072JNMkp4jihnCT36gz75LqTSiWKYkAIhuqCOl5QMPsagTT0PdpqK1xjVi3nqNE_9NU9iD1eJXTPV6of83iMBoyXwYp3u_0-qq2q8jPwEU9Ca8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2512270035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of drug‐coated balloon angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy for coronary bifurcation lesions (DCA/DCB registry)</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kitani, Shunsuke ; Igarashi, Yasumi ; Tsuchikane, Etsuo ; Nakamura, Shigeru ; Seino, Yoshitane ; Habara, Maoto ; Takeda, Yoshihiro ; Shimoji, Kenichiro ; Yasaka, Yoshinori ; Kijima, Mikihiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Kitani, Shunsuke ; Igarashi, Yasumi ; Tsuchikane, Etsuo ; Nakamura, Shigeru ; Seino, Yoshitane ; Habara, Maoto ; Takeda, Yoshihiro ; Shimoji, Kenichiro ; Yasaka, Yoshinori ; Kijima, Mikihiro</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) for coronary bifurcation lesions.
Background
The optimal therapy for bifurcation lesions has not been established, even in the drug‐eluting stent era. DCA possibly prevents plaque and carina shift in bifurcation lesions by plaque debulking; however, the efficacy of combined DCA and DCB (DCA/DCB) for bifurcation lesions remains unclear.
Methods
This multicenter registry retrospectively recruited patients with bifurcation lesions who underwent DCA/DCB and follow‐up angiogram at 6–15 months. The primary endpoint was the 12‐month target vessel failure (TVF) rate. The secondary endpoints were procedure‐related major complications, major cardiovascular events at 12 months, restenosis at 12 months, target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months.
Results
We enrolled 129 patients from 16 Japanese centers. One hundred and four lesions (80.6%) were located around the left main trunk bifurcations. No side branch compromise was found intraoperatively. Restenosis was observed in three patients (2.3%) at 12 months. TLR occurred in four patients (3.1%): 3 (2.3%) in the main vessel and 1 (0.8%) in the ostium of the side branch at 12 months. TVF incidence at 12 months was slightly higher in 14 patients (10.9%), and only two patients (1.6%) had symptomatic TVR. One patient (0.8%) had non‐target vessel‐related myocardial infarction.
Conclusions
Our data suggested that DCA/DCB provided good clinical outcomes and minimal side branch damage and could be an optimal non‐stent percutaneous coronary intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29185</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32776689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Angioplasty ; Balloon treatment ; drug‐eluting stents ; Implants ; intervention device ; Lesions ; Myocardial infarction ; percutaneous coronary intervention ; Restenosis ; Stents</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2021-04, Vol.97 (5), p.E614-E623</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4195-38348f4c1291dab809d252849d2720bdd6fdb87f35451d580c43f88830de880f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4195-38348f4c1291dab809d252849d2720bdd6fdb87f35451d580c43f88830de880f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7075-325X ; 0000-0002-5905-9715 ; 0000-0002-8600-1295</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.29185$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.29185$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32776689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kitani, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igarashi, Yasumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuchikane, Etsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seino, Yoshitane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habara, Maoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeda, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimoji, Kenichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasaka, Yoshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kijima, Mikihiro</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of drug‐coated balloon angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy for coronary bifurcation lesions (DCA/DCB registry)</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) for coronary bifurcation lesions.
Background
The optimal therapy for bifurcation lesions has not been established, even in the drug‐eluting stent era. DCA possibly prevents plaque and carina shift in bifurcation lesions by plaque debulking; however, the efficacy of combined DCA and DCB (DCA/DCB) for bifurcation lesions remains unclear.
Methods
This multicenter registry retrospectively recruited patients with bifurcation lesions who underwent DCA/DCB and follow‐up angiogram at 6–15 months. The primary endpoint was the 12‐month target vessel failure (TVF) rate. The secondary endpoints were procedure‐related major complications, major cardiovascular events at 12 months, restenosis at 12 months, target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months.
Results
We enrolled 129 patients from 16 Japanese centers. One hundred and four lesions (80.6%) were located around the left main trunk bifurcations. No side branch compromise was found intraoperatively. Restenosis was observed in three patients (2.3%) at 12 months. TLR occurred in four patients (3.1%): 3 (2.3%) in the main vessel and 1 (0.8%) in the ostium of the side branch at 12 months. TVF incidence at 12 months was slightly higher in 14 patients (10.9%), and only two patients (1.6%) had symptomatic TVR. One patient (0.8%) had non‐target vessel‐related myocardial infarction.
Conclusions
Our data suggested that DCA/DCB provided good clinical outcomes and minimal side branch damage and could be an optimal non‐stent percutaneous coronary intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions.</description><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Balloon treatment</subject><subject>drug‐eluting stents</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>intervention device</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>percutaneous coronary intervention</subject><subject>Restenosis</subject><subject>Stents</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctKAzEYhYMo3he-gATc1EVtLpOZzFKn3kBwo-BuyORSI2lTkxlkdi5d-ow-iamtCoKr8_OfjwOHA8ABRicYITKSUp2QEnO2BrYxI2RYkPxhfXXjMsu3wE6MTwihMiflJtiipCjynJfb4O3cGCuF7KE3UIVu8vH6Lr1otYKNcM77GRSzifVzJ2LbQ2FaHaCyQcvW-plwUPqQNCSrfdSLt5_20PjwazTWdEGKBQ-djkkiHIyr09G4OoNBT2xsQ3-8BzaMcFHvr3QX3F-c31VXw5vby-vq9GYoM1yyIeU04yaTOPVVouGoVIQRniUpCGqUyo1qeGEoyxhWjCOZUcM5p0hpzpGhu2CwzJ0H_9zp2NZTG6V2Tsy072JNMkp4jihnCT36gz75LqTSiWKYkAIhuqCOl5QMPsagTT0PdpqK1xjVi3nqNE_9NU9iD1eJXTPV6of83iMBoyXwYp3u_0-qq2q8jPwEU9Ca8g</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Kitani, Shunsuke</creator><creator>Igarashi, Yasumi</creator><creator>Tsuchikane, Etsuo</creator><creator>Nakamura, Shigeru</creator><creator>Seino, Yoshitane</creator><creator>Habara, Maoto</creator><creator>Takeda, Yoshihiro</creator><creator>Shimoji, Kenichiro</creator><creator>Yasaka, Yoshinori</creator><creator>Kijima, Mikihiro</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7075-325X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5905-9715</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8600-1295</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Efficacy of drug‐coated balloon angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy for coronary bifurcation lesions (DCA/DCB registry)</title><author>Kitani, Shunsuke ; Igarashi, Yasumi ; Tsuchikane, Etsuo ; Nakamura, Shigeru ; Seino, Yoshitane ; Habara, Maoto ; Takeda, Yoshihiro ; Shimoji, Kenichiro ; Yasaka, Yoshinori ; Kijima, Mikihiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4195-38348f4c1291dab809d252849d2720bdd6fdb87f35451d580c43f88830de880f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Balloon treatment</topic><topic>drug‐eluting stents</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>intervention device</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>percutaneous coronary intervention</topic><topic>Restenosis</topic><topic>Stents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kitani, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Igarashi, Yasumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuchikane, Etsuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seino, Yoshitane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habara, Maoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeda, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimoji, Kenichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasaka, Yoshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kijima, Mikihiro</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kitani, Shunsuke</au><au>Igarashi, Yasumi</au><au>Tsuchikane, Etsuo</au><au>Nakamura, Shigeru</au><au>Seino, Yoshitane</au><au>Habara, Maoto</au><au>Takeda, Yoshihiro</au><au>Shimoji, Kenichiro</au><au>Yasaka, Yoshinori</au><au>Kijima, Mikihiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of drug‐coated balloon angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy for coronary bifurcation lesions (DCA/DCB registry)</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>E614</spage><epage>E623</epage><pages>E614-E623</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional drug‐coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) for coronary bifurcation lesions.
Background
The optimal therapy for bifurcation lesions has not been established, even in the drug‐eluting stent era. DCA possibly prevents plaque and carina shift in bifurcation lesions by plaque debulking; however, the efficacy of combined DCA and DCB (DCA/DCB) for bifurcation lesions remains unclear.
Methods
This multicenter registry retrospectively recruited patients with bifurcation lesions who underwent DCA/DCB and follow‐up angiogram at 6–15 months. The primary endpoint was the 12‐month target vessel failure (TVF) rate. The secondary endpoints were procedure‐related major complications, major cardiovascular events at 12 months, restenosis at 12 months, target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months.
Results
We enrolled 129 patients from 16 Japanese centers. One hundred and four lesions (80.6%) were located around the left main trunk bifurcations. No side branch compromise was found intraoperatively. Restenosis was observed in three patients (2.3%) at 12 months. TLR occurred in four patients (3.1%): 3 (2.3%) in the main vessel and 1 (0.8%) in the ostium of the side branch at 12 months. TVF incidence at 12 months was slightly higher in 14 patients (10.9%), and only two patients (1.6%) had symptomatic TVR. One patient (0.8%) had non‐target vessel‐related myocardial infarction.
Conclusions
Our data suggested that DCA/DCB provided good clinical outcomes and minimal side branch damage and could be an optimal non‐stent percutaneous coronary intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32776689</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.29185</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7075-325X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5905-9715</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8600-1295</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-1946 |
ispartof | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2021-04, Vol.97 (5), p.E614-E623 |
issn | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432860385 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Angioplasty Balloon treatment drug‐eluting stents Implants intervention device Lesions Myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention Restenosis Stents |
title | Efficacy of drug‐coated balloon angioplasty after directional coronary atherectomy for coronary bifurcation lesions (DCA/DCB registry) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A20%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20drug%E2%80%90coated%20balloon%20angioplasty%20after%20directional%20coronary%20atherectomy%20for%20coronary%20bifurcation%20lesions%20(DCA/DCB%20registry)&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Kitani,%20Shunsuke&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=E614&rft.epage=E623&rft.pages=E614-E623&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.29185&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432860385%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2512270035&rft_id=info:pmid/32776689&rfr_iscdi=true |