Comparison of blur and magnification effects on stereopsis: overall and meridional, monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced

Purpose To determine whether monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced spherical and meridional blur and aniseikonia had similar effects on stereopsis thresholds. Methods Twelve participants with normal binocular vision viewed McGill modified random dot stereograms to determine stereoacuities in a four‐a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmic & physiological optics 2020-09, Vol.40 (5), p.660-668
Hauptverfasser: Atchison, David A, Schmid, Katrina L, Haley, Emma C, Liggett, Elisabeth M, Lee, Sally J, Lu, Jianing, Moon, Ho Jung, Baldwin, Alex S, Hess, Robert F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 668
container_issue 5
container_start_page 660
container_title Ophthalmic & physiological optics
container_volume 40
creator Atchison, David A
Schmid, Katrina L
Haley, Emma C
Liggett, Elisabeth M
Lee, Sally J
Lu, Jianing
Moon, Ho Jung
Baldwin, Alex S
Hess, Robert F
description Purpose To determine whether monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced spherical and meridional blur and aniseikonia had similar effects on stereopsis thresholds. Methods Twelve participants with normal binocular vision viewed McGill modified random dot stereograms to determine stereoacuities in a four‐alternative forced‐choice procedure. Astigmatism was induced by placing trial lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty‐three conditions were used, consisting of zero (no lens), +1 D and +2 D spheres and cylinders at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye, and the following binocular combinations of both lens powers: R × 180/L × 180, R × 45/L × 45, R × 90/L × 90, R sphere/L sphere, R × 180/L × 90, R × 45/L × 135, R × 90/L × 180. Aniseikonia was induced by placing magnifying lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty‐three conditions were used, consisting of zero, 6% and 12% overall magnification and both magnifications at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye only, and the following binocular combinations using 3% and 6% lenses: R × 90/L × 90, R × 45/L × 45, R × 180/L × 180, R overall/L overall, R × 90/L × 180, R × 45/L × 135, and R × 180/L × 90. Results Stereopsis losses for binocular blur effects with parallel axes (non‐anisometropic) were the same as for monocular blur effects of the same axes, and these were strongly dependent on axis (spherical blur and ×90 had the greatest effects). Binocular blur effects with orthogonal axes had greater effects than with parallel axes, with the axis combination of the former having no effect (e.g. R × 90/L × 180 was similar to R × 45/L × 135). For induced aniseikonia, splitting the magnifications between the eyes improved stereopsis slightly, and the effects were not dependent on axis. Conclusion Binocular blur affects stereopsis similarly to monocular meridional blur if axes in the two eyes are parallel, whereas the effect is greater if the axes are orthogonal. In meridional aniseikonia, splitting magnification between the right and left lenses produces a small improvement in stereopsis that is independent of axis direction and right/left combination.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/opo.12724
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432859720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2432859720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3304-aa3a0ca00cd111b408b79df91118401500a678711d281349f10858653120ea1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1KxDAQx4MouK4efIOCFwW7O0naTetNFr9gYT3oucymqWRJm5q0yoIHH8Fn9EmMWw8iOJf5-s3Anz8hxxQmNMTUtnZCmWDJDhnRRKQx5ZTvkhGwUKcJZPvkwPs1AAghshF5m9u6Rae9bSJbRSvTuwibMqrxqdGVltjpsFFVpWTno1D6TjllW6_9RWRflENjhgPldBlYNOdRbRsre4PObD7fP7brlf490k3ZS1Uekr0KjVdHP3lMHq-vHua38WJ5cze_XMSSc0hiRI4gEUCWQeIqiFiJvKzy0GQJ0BQAZyITlJYsozzJKwpZms1SThkopMjH5HT42zr73CvfFbX2UhmDjbK9L1jCWZbmgkFAT_6ga9u7oGpL5bngDESgzgZKOuu9U1XROl2j2xQUim8fiuBDsfUhsNOBfdVGbf4Hi-X9crj4AnM-i8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2439973207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of blur and magnification effects on stereopsis: overall and meridional, monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Atchison, David A ; Schmid, Katrina L ; Haley, Emma C ; Liggett, Elisabeth M ; Lee, Sally J ; Lu, Jianing ; Moon, Ho Jung ; Baldwin, Alex S ; Hess, Robert F</creator><creatorcontrib>Atchison, David A ; Schmid, Katrina L ; Haley, Emma C ; Liggett, Elisabeth M ; Lee, Sally J ; Lu, Jianing ; Moon, Ho Jung ; Baldwin, Alex S ; Hess, Robert F</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To determine whether monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced spherical and meridional blur and aniseikonia had similar effects on stereopsis thresholds. Methods Twelve participants with normal binocular vision viewed McGill modified random dot stereograms to determine stereoacuities in a four‐alternative forced‐choice procedure. Astigmatism was induced by placing trial lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty‐three conditions were used, consisting of zero (no lens), +1 D and +2 D spheres and cylinders at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye, and the following binocular combinations of both lens powers: R × 180/L × 180, R × 45/L × 45, R × 90/L × 90, R sphere/L sphere, R × 180/L × 90, R × 45/L × 135, R × 90/L × 180. Aniseikonia was induced by placing magnifying lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty‐three conditions were used, consisting of zero, 6% and 12% overall magnification and both magnifications at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye only, and the following binocular combinations using 3% and 6% lenses: R × 90/L × 90, R × 45/L × 45, R × 180/L × 180, R overall/L overall, R × 90/L × 180, R × 45/L × 135, and R × 180/L × 90. Results Stereopsis losses for binocular blur effects with parallel axes (non‐anisometropic) were the same as for monocular blur effects of the same axes, and these were strongly dependent on axis (spherical blur and ×90 had the greatest effects). Binocular blur effects with orthogonal axes had greater effects than with parallel axes, with the axis combination of the former having no effect (e.g. R × 90/L × 180 was similar to R × 45/L × 135). For induced aniseikonia, splitting the magnifications between the eyes improved stereopsis slightly, and the effects were not dependent on axis. Conclusion Binocular blur affects stereopsis similarly to monocular meridional blur if axes in the two eyes are parallel, whereas the effect is greater if the axes are orthogonal. In meridional aniseikonia, splitting magnification between the right and left lenses produces a small improvement in stereopsis that is independent of axis direction and right/left combination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5408</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-1313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/opo.12724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>aniseikonia ; anisometropia ; Binocular vision ; meridional ; Splitting ; stereoacuity ; stereopsis</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics, 2020-09, Vol.40 (5), p.660-668</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors Ophthalmic &amp; Physiological Optics © 2020 The College of Optometrists Ophthalmic &amp; Physiological Optics</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The College of Optometrists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3304-aa3a0ca00cd111b408b79df91118401500a678711d281349f10858653120ea1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3304-aa3a0ca00cd111b408b79df91118401500a678711d281349f10858653120ea1a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3099-6545 ; 0000-0003-2660-4497</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fopo.12724$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fopo.12724$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atchison, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Katrina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haley, Emma C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liggett, Elisabeth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sally J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jianing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Ho Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Alex S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Robert F</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of blur and magnification effects on stereopsis: overall and meridional, monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced</title><title>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics</title><description>Purpose To determine whether monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced spherical and meridional blur and aniseikonia had similar effects on stereopsis thresholds. Methods Twelve participants with normal binocular vision viewed McGill modified random dot stereograms to determine stereoacuities in a four‐alternative forced‐choice procedure. Astigmatism was induced by placing trial lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty‐three conditions were used, consisting of zero (no lens), +1 D and +2 D spheres and cylinders at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye, and the following binocular combinations of both lens powers: R × 180/L × 180, R × 45/L × 45, R × 90/L × 90, R sphere/L sphere, R × 180/L × 90, R × 45/L × 135, R × 90/L × 180. Aniseikonia was induced by placing magnifying lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty‐three conditions were used, consisting of zero, 6% and 12% overall magnification and both magnifications at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye only, and the following binocular combinations using 3% and 6% lenses: R × 90/L × 90, R × 45/L × 45, R × 180/L × 180, R overall/L overall, R × 90/L × 180, R × 45/L × 135, and R × 180/L × 90. Results Stereopsis losses for binocular blur effects with parallel axes (non‐anisometropic) were the same as for monocular blur effects of the same axes, and these were strongly dependent on axis (spherical blur and ×90 had the greatest effects). Binocular blur effects with orthogonal axes had greater effects than with parallel axes, with the axis combination of the former having no effect (e.g. R × 90/L × 180 was similar to R × 45/L × 135). For induced aniseikonia, splitting the magnifications between the eyes improved stereopsis slightly, and the effects were not dependent on axis. Conclusion Binocular blur affects stereopsis similarly to monocular meridional blur if axes in the two eyes are parallel, whereas the effect is greater if the axes are orthogonal. In meridional aniseikonia, splitting magnification between the right and left lenses produces a small improvement in stereopsis that is independent of axis direction and right/left combination.</description><subject>aniseikonia</subject><subject>anisometropia</subject><subject>Binocular vision</subject><subject>meridional</subject><subject>Splitting</subject><subject>stereoacuity</subject><subject>stereopsis</subject><issn>0275-5408</issn><issn>1475-1313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1KxDAQx4MouK4efIOCFwW7O0naTetNFr9gYT3oucymqWRJm5q0yoIHH8Fn9EmMWw8iOJf5-s3Anz8hxxQmNMTUtnZCmWDJDhnRRKQx5ZTvkhGwUKcJZPvkwPs1AAghshF5m9u6Rae9bSJbRSvTuwibMqrxqdGVltjpsFFVpWTno1D6TjllW6_9RWRflENjhgPldBlYNOdRbRsre4PObD7fP7brlf490k3ZS1Uekr0KjVdHP3lMHq-vHua38WJ5cze_XMSSc0hiRI4gEUCWQeIqiFiJvKzy0GQJ0BQAZyITlJYsozzJKwpZms1SThkopMjH5HT42zr73CvfFbX2UhmDjbK9L1jCWZbmgkFAT_6ga9u7oGpL5bngDESgzgZKOuu9U1XROl2j2xQUim8fiuBDsfUhsNOBfdVGbf4Hi-X9crj4AnM-i8Q</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Atchison, David A</creator><creator>Schmid, Katrina L</creator><creator>Haley, Emma C</creator><creator>Liggett, Elisabeth M</creator><creator>Lee, Sally J</creator><creator>Lu, Jianing</creator><creator>Moon, Ho Jung</creator><creator>Baldwin, Alex S</creator><creator>Hess, Robert F</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-6545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2660-4497</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Comparison of blur and magnification effects on stereopsis: overall and meridional, monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced</title><author>Atchison, David A ; Schmid, Katrina L ; Haley, Emma C ; Liggett, Elisabeth M ; Lee, Sally J ; Lu, Jianing ; Moon, Ho Jung ; Baldwin, Alex S ; Hess, Robert F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3304-aa3a0ca00cd111b408b79df91118401500a678711d281349f10858653120ea1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>aniseikonia</topic><topic>anisometropia</topic><topic>Binocular vision</topic><topic>meridional</topic><topic>Splitting</topic><topic>stereoacuity</topic><topic>stereopsis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atchison, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Katrina L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haley, Emma C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liggett, Elisabeth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sally J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jianing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Ho Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Alex S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Robert F</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atchison, David A</au><au>Schmid, Katrina L</au><au>Haley, Emma C</au><au>Liggett, Elisabeth M</au><au>Lee, Sally J</au><au>Lu, Jianing</au><au>Moon, Ho Jung</au><au>Baldwin, Alex S</au><au>Hess, Robert F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of blur and magnification effects on stereopsis: overall and meridional, monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>660</spage><epage>668</epage><pages>660-668</pages><issn>0275-5408</issn><eissn>1475-1313</eissn><abstract>Purpose To determine whether monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced spherical and meridional blur and aniseikonia had similar effects on stereopsis thresholds. Methods Twelve participants with normal binocular vision viewed McGill modified random dot stereograms to determine stereoacuities in a four‐alternative forced‐choice procedure. Astigmatism was induced by placing trial lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty‐three conditions were used, consisting of zero (no lens), +1 D and +2 D spheres and cylinders at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye, and the following binocular combinations of both lens powers: R × 180/L × 180, R × 45/L × 45, R × 90/L × 90, R sphere/L sphere, R × 180/L × 90, R × 45/L × 135, R × 90/L × 180. Aniseikonia was induced by placing magnifying lenses in front of the eyes. Twenty‐three conditions were used, consisting of zero, 6% and 12% overall magnification and both magnifications at axes 180, 45 and 90 in front of the right eye only, and the following binocular combinations using 3% and 6% lenses: R × 90/L × 90, R × 45/L × 45, R × 180/L × 180, R overall/L overall, R × 90/L × 180, R × 45/L × 135, and R × 180/L × 90. Results Stereopsis losses for binocular blur effects with parallel axes (non‐anisometropic) were the same as for monocular blur effects of the same axes, and these were strongly dependent on axis (spherical blur and ×90 had the greatest effects). Binocular blur effects with orthogonal axes had greater effects than with parallel axes, with the axis combination of the former having no effect (e.g. R × 90/L × 180 was similar to R × 45/L × 135). For induced aniseikonia, splitting the magnifications between the eyes improved stereopsis slightly, and the effects were not dependent on axis. Conclusion Binocular blur affects stereopsis similarly to monocular meridional blur if axes in the two eyes are parallel, whereas the effect is greater if the axes are orthogonal. In meridional aniseikonia, splitting magnification between the right and left lenses produces a small improvement in stereopsis that is independent of axis direction and right/left combination.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/opo.12724</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3099-6545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2660-4497</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-5408
ispartof Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 2020-09, Vol.40 (5), p.660-668
issn 0275-5408
1475-1313
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432859720
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects aniseikonia
anisometropia
Binocular vision
meridional
Splitting
stereoacuity
stereopsis
title Comparison of blur and magnification effects on stereopsis: overall and meridional, monocularly‐ and binocularly‐induced
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T18%3A12%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20blur%20and%20magnification%20effects%20on%20stereopsis:%20overall%20and%20meridional,%20monocularly%E2%80%90%20and%20binocularly%E2%80%90induced&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmic%20&%20physiological%20optics&rft.au=Atchison,%20David%20A&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=660&rft.epage=668&rft.pages=660-668&rft.issn=0275-5408&rft.eissn=1475-1313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/opo.12724&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432859720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2439973207&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true