Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe
Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged Rhipicephalus ( B...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tropical animal health and production 2020-11, Vol.52 (6), p.3323-3330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3330 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 3323 |
container_title | Tropical animal health and production |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Makuvadze, Francis Taenda Hove, Thokozani Makaya, Pious Waniwa, Emily Nemaungwe, Tinotenda |
description | Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged
Rhipicephalus
(
Boophilus
)
decoloratus
,
Rhipicephalus appendiculatus
and
Amblyomma hebraeum
females were randomly collected from cattle presented for dipping at the 5 diptanks and were allowed to oviposit separately at
T
: 28 °C and RH: 85–95%. Larvae obtained were tested for resistance against various amitraz concentrations (1–0.0078125%) using the Larval Packet Test (LPT) and were compared with susceptible reference strains of
R.
(
B.
)
decoloratus
(Makuti strain, 2017),
R. appendiculatus
(Lake Chivero strain, 2015) and
A
.
hebraeum
(Lake Mutirikwi strain, 2017). The most abundant tick species were
R.
(
B.
)
decoloratus
(27.2%),
Hyalomma rufipes
(20.0%),
H. truncatum
(16.0%),
R. appendiculatus
(12.0%) and
R. evertsi evertsi
(11.9%).
Amblyomma hebraeum
(8.6%) and
A
.
variegatum
(1.8%) were the least common in the collection; this suggests that they were not well established in Domboshawa. Low amitraz resistance (RL = I) was detected only in
R
. (
B
.)
decoloratus
at 2 of the 5 diptanks. In the future, decentralised tick control due to inadequate and inconsistent supply of acaricides could introduce a number of factors which could contribute towards resistance development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432858233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2432858233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a2ea2416078bccb55acd7dee1d864b33173aef5bcc164980bb366bfe484a5813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEYRYMotlb_gAsJuHEzmnfSpRRfUBBEN25CksnI1HnUJKXorzd1qoILCSGL79z7hQPAMUbnGCF5ETEmHBWIbC4VrFjvgDHmkhaSUbULxgixacEkkyNwEOMCoRxTYh-MKJEKEYHGgD34WMdkOudhX8FUu9cI-w46k1LjYeqhaesUzAesO_hct9bYtT8Ee5Vpoj_avhPwdH31OLst5vc3d7PLeeGo5KkghnhDGBZIKuuc5dy4Upbe41IJZinFkhpf8TzDgk0VspYKYSvPFDNcYToBZ0PvMvRvKx-TbuvofNOYzverqAmjRHFFKM3o6R900a9Cl3-XKYmloCSfCSAD5UIfY_CVXoa6NeFdY6Q3TvXgVGen-supXufQybZ6ZVtf_kS-JWaADkDMo-7Fh9_d_9R-AuOygGc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471763232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda ; Hove, Thokozani ; Makaya, Pious ; Waniwa, Emily ; Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</creator><creatorcontrib>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda ; Hove, Thokozani ; Makaya, Pious ; Waniwa, Emily ; Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</creatorcontrib><description>Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged
Rhipicephalus
(
Boophilus
)
decoloratus
,
Rhipicephalus appendiculatus
and
Amblyomma hebraeum
females were randomly collected from cattle presented for dipping at the 5 diptanks and were allowed to oviposit separately at
T
: 28 °C and RH: 85–95%. Larvae obtained were tested for resistance against various amitraz concentrations (1–0.0078125%) using the Larval Packet Test (LPT) and were compared with susceptible reference strains of
R.
(
B.
)
decoloratus
(Makuti strain, 2017),
R. appendiculatus
(Lake Chivero strain, 2015) and
A
.
hebraeum
(Lake Mutirikwi strain, 2017). The most abundant tick species were
R.
(
B.
)
decoloratus
(27.2%),
Hyalomma rufipes
(20.0%),
H. truncatum
(16.0%),
R. appendiculatus
(12.0%) and
R. evertsi evertsi
(11.9%).
Amblyomma hebraeum
(8.6%) and
A
.
variegatum
(1.8%) were the least common in the collection; this suggests that they were not well established in Domboshawa. Low amitraz resistance (RL = I) was detected only in
R
. (
B
.)
decoloratus
at 2 of the 5 diptanks. In the future, decentralised tick control due to inadequate and inconsistent supply of acaricides could introduce a number of factors which could contribute towards resistance development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32780260</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acaricides ; Amblyomma hebraeum ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Decoloring ; Lakes ; Larvae ; Life Sciences ; Regular Articles ; Ticks ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 2020-11, Vol.52 (6), p.3323-3330</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a2ea2416078bccb55acd7dee1d864b33173aef5bcc164980bb366bfe484a5813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a2ea2416078bccb55acd7dee1d864b33173aef5bcc164980bb366bfe484a5813</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8758-1335</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32780260$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hove, Thokozani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makaya, Pious</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waniwa, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</creatorcontrib><title>Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged
Rhipicephalus
(
Boophilus
)
decoloratus
,
Rhipicephalus appendiculatus
and
Amblyomma hebraeum
females were randomly collected from cattle presented for dipping at the 5 diptanks and were allowed to oviposit separately at
T
: 28 °C and RH: 85–95%. Larvae obtained were tested for resistance against various amitraz concentrations (1–0.0078125%) using the Larval Packet Test (LPT) and were compared with susceptible reference strains of
R.
(
B.
)
decoloratus
(Makuti strain, 2017),
R. appendiculatus
(Lake Chivero strain, 2015) and
A
.
hebraeum
(Lake Mutirikwi strain, 2017). The most abundant tick species were
R.
(
B.
)
decoloratus
(27.2%),
Hyalomma rufipes
(20.0%),
H. truncatum
(16.0%),
R. appendiculatus
(12.0%) and
R. evertsi evertsi
(11.9%).
Amblyomma hebraeum
(8.6%) and
A
.
variegatum
(1.8%) were the least common in the collection; this suggests that they were not well established in Domboshawa. Low amitraz resistance (RL = I) was detected only in
R
. (
B
.)
decoloratus
at 2 of the 5 diptanks. In the future, decentralised tick control due to inadequate and inconsistent supply of acaricides could introduce a number of factors which could contribute towards resistance development.</description><subject>Acaricides</subject><subject>Amblyomma hebraeum</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Decoloring</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Regular Articles</subject><subject>Ticks</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEYRYMotlb_gAsJuHEzmnfSpRRfUBBEN25CksnI1HnUJKXorzd1qoILCSGL79z7hQPAMUbnGCF5ETEmHBWIbC4VrFjvgDHmkhaSUbULxgixacEkkyNwEOMCoRxTYh-MKJEKEYHGgD34WMdkOudhX8FUu9cI-w46k1LjYeqhaesUzAesO_hct9bYtT8Ee5Vpoj_avhPwdH31OLst5vc3d7PLeeGo5KkghnhDGBZIKuuc5dy4Upbe41IJZinFkhpf8TzDgk0VspYKYSvPFDNcYToBZ0PvMvRvKx-TbuvofNOYzverqAmjRHFFKM3o6R900a9Cl3-XKYmloCSfCSAD5UIfY_CVXoa6NeFdY6Q3TvXgVGen-supXufQybZ6ZVtf_kS-JWaADkDMo-7Fh9_d_9R-AuOygGc</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda</creator><creator>Hove, Thokozani</creator><creator>Makaya, Pious</creator><creator>Waniwa, Emily</creator><creator>Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-1335</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe</title><author>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda ; Hove, Thokozani ; Makaya, Pious ; Waniwa, Emily ; Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a2ea2416078bccb55acd7dee1d864b33173aef5bcc164980bb366bfe484a5813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acaricides</topic><topic>Amblyomma hebraeum</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Decoloring</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Regular Articles</topic><topic>Ticks</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hove, Thokozani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makaya, Pious</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waniwa, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda</au><au>Hove, Thokozani</au><au>Makaya, Pious</au><au>Waniwa, Emily</au><au>Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><stitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</stitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3323</spage><epage>3330</epage><pages>3323-3330</pages><issn>0049-4747</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged
Rhipicephalus
(
Boophilus
)
decoloratus
,
Rhipicephalus appendiculatus
and
Amblyomma hebraeum
females were randomly collected from cattle presented for dipping at the 5 diptanks and were allowed to oviposit separately at
T
: 28 °C and RH: 85–95%. Larvae obtained were tested for resistance against various amitraz concentrations (1–0.0078125%) using the Larval Packet Test (LPT) and were compared with susceptible reference strains of
R.
(
B.
)
decoloratus
(Makuti strain, 2017),
R. appendiculatus
(Lake Chivero strain, 2015) and
A
.
hebraeum
(Lake Mutirikwi strain, 2017). The most abundant tick species were
R.
(
B.
)
decoloratus
(27.2%),
Hyalomma rufipes
(20.0%),
H. truncatum
(16.0%),
R. appendiculatus
(12.0%) and
R. evertsi evertsi
(11.9%).
Amblyomma hebraeum
(8.6%) and
A
.
variegatum
(1.8%) were the least common in the collection; this suggests that they were not well established in Domboshawa. Low amitraz resistance (RL = I) was detected only in
R
. (
B
.)
decoloratus
at 2 of the 5 diptanks. In the future, decentralised tick control due to inadequate and inconsistent supply of acaricides could introduce a number of factors which could contribute towards resistance development.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>32780260</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-1335</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-4747 |
ispartof | Tropical animal health and production, 2020-11, Vol.52 (6), p.3323-3330 |
issn | 0049-4747 1573-7438 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432858233 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Acaricides Amblyomma hebraeum Biomedical and Life Sciences Cattle Decoloring Lakes Larvae Life Sciences Regular Articles Ticks Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science Zoology |
title | Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A21%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resistance%20of%20ticks%20on%20cattle%20to%20amitraz%20in%20Zimbabwe&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Makuvadze,%20Francis%20Taenda&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3323&rft.epage=3330&rft.pages=3323-3330&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432858233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471763232&rft_id=info:pmid/32780260&rfr_iscdi=true |