Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe

Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged Rhipicephalus ( B...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tropical animal health and production 2020-11, Vol.52 (6), p.3323-3330
Hauptverfasser: Makuvadze, Francis Taenda, Hove, Thokozani, Makaya, Pious, Waniwa, Emily, Nemaungwe, Tinotenda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3330
container_issue 6
container_start_page 3323
container_title Tropical animal health and production
container_volume 52
creator Makuvadze, Francis Taenda
Hove, Thokozani
Makaya, Pious
Waniwa, Emily
Nemaungwe, Tinotenda
description Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus ) decoloratus , Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and Amblyomma hebraeum females were randomly collected from cattle presented for dipping at the 5 diptanks and were allowed to oviposit separately at T : 28 °C and RH: 85–95%. Larvae obtained were tested for resistance against various amitraz concentrations (1–0.0078125%) using the Larval Packet Test (LPT) and were compared with susceptible reference strains of R. ( B. ) decoloratus (Makuti strain, 2017), R. appendiculatus (Lake Chivero strain, 2015) and A . hebraeum (Lake Mutirikwi strain, 2017). The most abundant tick species were R. ( B. ) decoloratus (27.2%), Hyalomma rufipes (20.0%), H. truncatum (16.0%), R. appendiculatus (12.0%) and R. evertsi evertsi (11.9%). Amblyomma hebraeum (8.6%) and A . variegatum (1.8%) were the least common in the collection; this suggests that they were not well established in Domboshawa. Low amitraz resistance (RL = I) was detected only in R . ( B .) decoloratus at 2 of the 5 diptanks. In the future, decentralised tick control due to inadequate and inconsistent supply of acaricides could introduce a number of factors which could contribute towards resistance development.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432858233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2432858233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a2ea2416078bccb55acd7dee1d864b33173aef5bcc164980bb366bfe484a5813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEYRYMotlb_gAsJuHEzmnfSpRRfUBBEN25CksnI1HnUJKXorzd1qoILCSGL79z7hQPAMUbnGCF5ETEmHBWIbC4VrFjvgDHmkhaSUbULxgixacEkkyNwEOMCoRxTYh-MKJEKEYHGgD34WMdkOudhX8FUu9cI-w46k1LjYeqhaesUzAesO_hct9bYtT8Ee5Vpoj_avhPwdH31OLst5vc3d7PLeeGo5KkghnhDGBZIKuuc5dy4Upbe41IJZinFkhpf8TzDgk0VspYKYSvPFDNcYToBZ0PvMvRvKx-TbuvofNOYzverqAmjRHFFKM3o6R900a9Cl3-XKYmloCSfCSAD5UIfY_CVXoa6NeFdY6Q3TvXgVGen-supXufQybZ6ZVtf_kS-JWaADkDMo-7Fh9_d_9R-AuOygGc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471763232</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda ; Hove, Thokozani ; Makaya, Pious ; Waniwa, Emily ; Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</creator><creatorcontrib>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda ; Hove, Thokozani ; Makaya, Pious ; Waniwa, Emily ; Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</creatorcontrib><description>Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus ) decoloratus , Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and Amblyomma hebraeum females were randomly collected from cattle presented for dipping at the 5 diptanks and were allowed to oviposit separately at T : 28 °C and RH: 85–95%. Larvae obtained were tested for resistance against various amitraz concentrations (1–0.0078125%) using the Larval Packet Test (LPT) and were compared with susceptible reference strains of R. ( B. ) decoloratus (Makuti strain, 2017), R. appendiculatus (Lake Chivero strain, 2015) and A . hebraeum (Lake Mutirikwi strain, 2017). The most abundant tick species were R. ( B. ) decoloratus (27.2%), Hyalomma rufipes (20.0%), H. truncatum (16.0%), R. appendiculatus (12.0%) and R. evertsi evertsi (11.9%). Amblyomma hebraeum (8.6%) and A . variegatum (1.8%) were the least common in the collection; this suggests that they were not well established in Domboshawa. Low amitraz resistance (RL = I) was detected only in R . ( B .) decoloratus at 2 of the 5 diptanks. In the future, decentralised tick control due to inadequate and inconsistent supply of acaricides could introduce a number of factors which could contribute towards resistance development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32780260</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acaricides ; Amblyomma hebraeum ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Decoloring ; Lakes ; Larvae ; Life Sciences ; Regular Articles ; Ticks ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 2020-11, Vol.52 (6), p.3323-3330</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a2ea2416078bccb55acd7dee1d864b33173aef5bcc164980bb366bfe484a5813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a2ea2416078bccb55acd7dee1d864b33173aef5bcc164980bb366bfe484a5813</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8758-1335</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32780260$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hove, Thokozani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makaya, Pious</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waniwa, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</creatorcontrib><title>Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus ) decoloratus , Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and Amblyomma hebraeum females were randomly collected from cattle presented for dipping at the 5 diptanks and were allowed to oviposit separately at T : 28 °C and RH: 85–95%. Larvae obtained were tested for resistance against various amitraz concentrations (1–0.0078125%) using the Larval Packet Test (LPT) and were compared with susceptible reference strains of R. ( B. ) decoloratus (Makuti strain, 2017), R. appendiculatus (Lake Chivero strain, 2015) and A . hebraeum (Lake Mutirikwi strain, 2017). The most abundant tick species were R. ( B. ) decoloratus (27.2%), Hyalomma rufipes (20.0%), H. truncatum (16.0%), R. appendiculatus (12.0%) and R. evertsi evertsi (11.9%). Amblyomma hebraeum (8.6%) and A . variegatum (1.8%) were the least common in the collection; this suggests that they were not well established in Domboshawa. Low amitraz resistance (RL = I) was detected only in R . ( B .) decoloratus at 2 of the 5 diptanks. In the future, decentralised tick control due to inadequate and inconsistent supply of acaricides could introduce a number of factors which could contribute towards resistance development.</description><subject>Acaricides</subject><subject>Amblyomma hebraeum</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Decoloring</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Regular Articles</subject><subject>Ticks</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEYRYMotlb_gAsJuHEzmnfSpRRfUBBEN25CksnI1HnUJKXorzd1qoILCSGL79z7hQPAMUbnGCF5ETEmHBWIbC4VrFjvgDHmkhaSUbULxgixacEkkyNwEOMCoRxTYh-MKJEKEYHGgD34WMdkOudhX8FUu9cI-w46k1LjYeqhaesUzAesO_hct9bYtT8Ee5Vpoj_avhPwdH31OLst5vc3d7PLeeGo5KkghnhDGBZIKuuc5dy4Upbe41IJZinFkhpf8TzDgk0VspYKYSvPFDNcYToBZ0PvMvRvKx-TbuvofNOYzverqAmjRHFFKM3o6R900a9Cl3-XKYmloCSfCSAD5UIfY_CVXoa6NeFdY6Q3TvXgVGen-supXufQybZ6ZVtf_kS-JWaADkDMo-7Fh9_d_9R-AuOygGc</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda</creator><creator>Hove, Thokozani</creator><creator>Makaya, Pious</creator><creator>Waniwa, Emily</creator><creator>Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-1335</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe</title><author>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda ; Hove, Thokozani ; Makaya, Pious ; Waniwa, Emily ; Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2a2ea2416078bccb55acd7dee1d864b33173aef5bcc164980bb366bfe484a5813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acaricides</topic><topic>Amblyomma hebraeum</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Decoloring</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Regular Articles</topic><topic>Ticks</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hove, Thokozani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makaya, Pious</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waniwa, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Makuvadze, Francis Taenda</au><au>Hove, Thokozani</au><au>Makaya, Pious</au><au>Waniwa, Emily</au><au>Nemaungwe, Tinotenda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><stitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</stitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3323</spage><epage>3330</epage><pages>3323-3330</pages><issn>0049-4747</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus ) decoloratus , Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and Amblyomma hebraeum females were randomly collected from cattle presented for dipping at the 5 diptanks and were allowed to oviposit separately at T : 28 °C and RH: 85–95%. Larvae obtained were tested for resistance against various amitraz concentrations (1–0.0078125%) using the Larval Packet Test (LPT) and were compared with susceptible reference strains of R. ( B. ) decoloratus (Makuti strain, 2017), R. appendiculatus (Lake Chivero strain, 2015) and A . hebraeum (Lake Mutirikwi strain, 2017). The most abundant tick species were R. ( B. ) decoloratus (27.2%), Hyalomma rufipes (20.0%), H. truncatum (16.0%), R. appendiculatus (12.0%) and R. evertsi evertsi (11.9%). Amblyomma hebraeum (8.6%) and A . variegatum (1.8%) were the least common in the collection; this suggests that they were not well established in Domboshawa. Low amitraz resistance (RL = I) was detected only in R . ( B .) decoloratus at 2 of the 5 diptanks. In the future, decentralised tick control due to inadequate and inconsistent supply of acaricides could introduce a number of factors which could contribute towards resistance development.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>32780260</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-1335</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-4747
ispartof Tropical animal health and production, 2020-11, Vol.52 (6), p.3323-3330
issn 0049-4747
1573-7438
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2432858233
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acaricides
Amblyomma hebraeum
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cattle
Decoloring
Lakes
Larvae
Life Sciences
Regular Articles
Ticks
Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science
Zoology
title Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A21%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resistance%20of%20ticks%20on%20cattle%20to%20amitraz%20in%20Zimbabwe&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Makuvadze,%20Francis%20Taenda&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3323&rft.epage=3330&rft.pages=3323-3330&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11250-020-02364-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432858233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471763232&rft_id=info:pmid/32780260&rfr_iscdi=true