A new ranking scale for assessing leaching potential pollution from abandoned mining wastes based on the Mexican official leaching test

Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) present in abandoned mining wastes (AMW) are of great concern because of potential risks to human health and ecosystems. Indices of contamination (IC) applied to mining wastes are calculated using the total concentration of PTEs and comparing them with regional geoc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2020-11, Vol.273, p.111139-111139, Article 111139
Hauptverfasser: Guzmán-Martínez, Fredy, Arranz-González, Julio César, Ortega, Marcelo F., García-Martínez, María Jesús, Rodríguez-Gómez, Virginia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111139
container_issue
container_start_page 111139
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 273
creator Guzmán-Martínez, Fredy
Arranz-González, Julio César
Ortega, Marcelo F.
García-Martínez, María Jesús
Rodríguez-Gómez, Virginia
description Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) present in abandoned mining wastes (AMW) are of great concern because of potential risks to human health and ecosystems. Indices of contamination (IC) applied to mining wastes are calculated using the total concentration of PTEs and comparing them with regional geochemical backgrounds. However, determining the total content of heavy metals is insufficient to assess the hazard of mining wastes. Therefore, in addition to total concentration, the potential risk is also evaluated through water mobility of elements. Accordingly, leaching procedures are useful tools for the geochemical characterization of soluble constituents that are mobilized. In this study, the solubility of PTEs from different types of mining wastes is comparatively assessed using three standard leaching methods (European; U.S. Geological Survey and; Mexican). The Hazard Average Quotient (HAQ) was calculated to assess the potential Toxicity Factor (TF). TF is an indicator of the relative potential toxicity of wastes and is the basis for the classification of AMW. A comparative assessment provides evidence that there are no statistically significant differences in PTEs solubility by the three leaching methods and it was also found that the pH of the eluates was dictated by the type of waste. Results suggest that the IC gives an indicator of the potential contamination of soils and sediments by erosive processes, or a long-term measure, whereas TF assesses the possibility of contaminating water in the short term. The most significant finding is the new ranking scale of TF, as a function of HAQ, applied to the Mexican standard leaching test. This factor, together with other considerations relating to risk-generating processes, might then be applied in places having large amounts of recorded AMW, such as the Iberian Peninsula and Latin America, where effective management is required to rank sites, based on preliminary environmental and human risk assessment. [Display omitted] •Leaching tests assessed do not show significant differences in trace metals solubility.•The type of mining wastes dictates the pH of the eluates.•Toxicity Factor is an indicator of the relative potential toxicity of wastes.•Toxicity Factor assesses the possibility of contaminating water in the short term.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2431826780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479720310653</els_id><sourcerecordid>2431826780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-26786bc9678a79f051b9ce993e431436a22eee558c60fb603752d2e95497cd1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhesknxIy-vUFXxkorYwNpynAl1SOxipy18Ab-NoyC2zGZGV2fuaC5Cl5QsKKH5dbtowe57ZReMsKjF4uIIzSgRWVLmnByjGeGEJmkhilN0FkJLCOGMFjP0vcQWDtgr-27sGw5adYAb57EKAUIYtQ6U3ozD1g1gB6O6OHXdbjDO4sa7HqtK2dpZqHFv7EgeVBgg4EqFqEVq2AB-gk-jlcWuaYweTf58Izqco5NGdQEufvscvd7dvqwekvXz_eNquU40T9mQsLwo80qL2FQhGpLRSmgQgkPKacpzxRgAZFmpc9JUOeFFxmoGIktFoWuq-RxdTb5b7z528bDsTdDQdcqC2wXJok85XiERzSZUexeCh0ZuvemV_5KUyDF42crf4OUYvJyCj3s30x7EP_YGvAzagNVQGw96kLUz_zj8AF1tkKE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2431826780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new ranking scale for assessing leaching potential pollution from abandoned mining wastes based on the Mexican official leaching test</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Guzmán-Martínez, Fredy ; Arranz-González, Julio César ; Ortega, Marcelo F. ; García-Martínez, María Jesús ; Rodríguez-Gómez, Virginia</creator><creatorcontrib>Guzmán-Martínez, Fredy ; Arranz-González, Julio César ; Ortega, Marcelo F. ; García-Martínez, María Jesús ; Rodríguez-Gómez, Virginia</creatorcontrib><description>Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) present in abandoned mining wastes (AMW) are of great concern because of potential risks to human health and ecosystems. Indices of contamination (IC) applied to mining wastes are calculated using the total concentration of PTEs and comparing them with regional geochemical backgrounds. However, determining the total content of heavy metals is insufficient to assess the hazard of mining wastes. Therefore, in addition to total concentration, the potential risk is also evaluated through water mobility of elements. Accordingly, leaching procedures are useful tools for the geochemical characterization of soluble constituents that are mobilized. In this study, the solubility of PTEs from different types of mining wastes is comparatively assessed using three standard leaching methods (European; U.S. Geological Survey and; Mexican). The Hazard Average Quotient (HAQ) was calculated to assess the potential Toxicity Factor (TF). TF is an indicator of the relative potential toxicity of wastes and is the basis for the classification of AMW. A comparative assessment provides evidence that there are no statistically significant differences in PTEs solubility by the three leaching methods and it was also found that the pH of the eluates was dictated by the type of waste. Results suggest that the IC gives an indicator of the potential contamination of soils and sediments by erosive processes, or a long-term measure, whereas TF assesses the possibility of contaminating water in the short term. The most significant finding is the new ranking scale of TF, as a function of HAQ, applied to the Mexican standard leaching test. This factor, together with other considerations relating to risk-generating processes, might then be applied in places having large amounts of recorded AMW, such as the Iberian Peninsula and Latin America, where effective management is required to rank sites, based on preliminary environmental and human risk assessment. [Display omitted] •Leaching tests assessed do not show significant differences in trace metals solubility.•The type of mining wastes dictates the pH of the eluates.•Toxicity Factor is an indicator of the relative potential toxicity of wastes.•Toxicity Factor assesses the possibility of contaminating water in the short term.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Hazard average quotient ; Index of contamination ; Lixiviation ; Mining wastes ; Potentially toxic elements</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2020-11, Vol.273, p.111139-111139, Article 111139</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-26786bc9678a79f051b9ce993e431436a22eee558c60fb603752d2e95497cd1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-26786bc9678a79f051b9ce993e431436a22eee558c60fb603752d2e95497cd1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111139$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guzmán-Martínez, Fredy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arranz-González, Julio César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega, Marcelo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Martínez, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Gómez, Virginia</creatorcontrib><title>A new ranking scale for assessing leaching potential pollution from abandoned mining wastes based on the Mexican official leaching test</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><description>Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) present in abandoned mining wastes (AMW) are of great concern because of potential risks to human health and ecosystems. Indices of contamination (IC) applied to mining wastes are calculated using the total concentration of PTEs and comparing them with regional geochemical backgrounds. However, determining the total content of heavy metals is insufficient to assess the hazard of mining wastes. Therefore, in addition to total concentration, the potential risk is also evaluated through water mobility of elements. Accordingly, leaching procedures are useful tools for the geochemical characterization of soluble constituents that are mobilized. In this study, the solubility of PTEs from different types of mining wastes is comparatively assessed using three standard leaching methods (European; U.S. Geological Survey and; Mexican). The Hazard Average Quotient (HAQ) was calculated to assess the potential Toxicity Factor (TF). TF is an indicator of the relative potential toxicity of wastes and is the basis for the classification of AMW. A comparative assessment provides evidence that there are no statistically significant differences in PTEs solubility by the three leaching methods and it was also found that the pH of the eluates was dictated by the type of waste. Results suggest that the IC gives an indicator of the potential contamination of soils and sediments by erosive processes, or a long-term measure, whereas TF assesses the possibility of contaminating water in the short term. The most significant finding is the new ranking scale of TF, as a function of HAQ, applied to the Mexican standard leaching test. This factor, together with other considerations relating to risk-generating processes, might then be applied in places having large amounts of recorded AMW, such as the Iberian Peninsula and Latin America, where effective management is required to rank sites, based on preliminary environmental and human risk assessment. [Display omitted] •Leaching tests assessed do not show significant differences in trace metals solubility.•The type of mining wastes dictates the pH of the eluates.•Toxicity Factor is an indicator of the relative potential toxicity of wastes.•Toxicity Factor assesses the possibility of contaminating water in the short term.</description><subject>Hazard average quotient</subject><subject>Index of contamination</subject><subject>Lixiviation</subject><subject>Mining wastes</subject><subject>Potentially toxic elements</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUhesknxIy-vUFXxkorYwNpynAl1SOxipy18Ab-NoyC2zGZGV2fuaC5Cl5QsKKH5dbtowe57ZReMsKjF4uIIzSgRWVLmnByjGeGEJmkhilN0FkJLCOGMFjP0vcQWDtgr-27sGw5adYAb57EKAUIYtQ6U3ozD1g1gB6O6OHXdbjDO4sa7HqtK2dpZqHFv7EgeVBgg4EqFqEVq2AB-gk-jlcWuaYweTf58Izqco5NGdQEufvscvd7dvqwekvXz_eNquU40T9mQsLwo80qL2FQhGpLRSmgQgkPKacpzxRgAZFmpc9JUOeFFxmoGIktFoWuq-RxdTb5b7z528bDsTdDQdcqC2wXJok85XiERzSZUexeCh0ZuvemV_5KUyDF42crf4OUYvJyCj3s30x7EP_YGvAzagNVQGw96kLUz_zj8AF1tkKE</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Guzmán-Martínez, Fredy</creator><creator>Arranz-González, Julio César</creator><creator>Ortega, Marcelo F.</creator><creator>García-Martínez, María Jesús</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Gómez, Virginia</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>A new ranking scale for assessing leaching potential pollution from abandoned mining wastes based on the Mexican official leaching test</title><author>Guzmán-Martínez, Fredy ; Arranz-González, Julio César ; Ortega, Marcelo F. ; García-Martínez, María Jesús ; Rodríguez-Gómez, Virginia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-26786bc9678a79f051b9ce993e431436a22eee558c60fb603752d2e95497cd1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Hazard average quotient</topic><topic>Index of contamination</topic><topic>Lixiviation</topic><topic>Mining wastes</topic><topic>Potentially toxic elements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guzmán-Martínez, Fredy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arranz-González, Julio César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega, Marcelo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Martínez, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Gómez, Virginia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guzmán-Martínez, Fredy</au><au>Arranz-González, Julio César</au><au>Ortega, Marcelo F.</au><au>García-Martínez, María Jesús</au><au>Rodríguez-Gómez, Virginia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new ranking scale for assessing leaching potential pollution from abandoned mining wastes based on the Mexican official leaching test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>273</volume><spage>111139</spage><epage>111139</epage><pages>111139-111139</pages><artnum>111139</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) present in abandoned mining wastes (AMW) are of great concern because of potential risks to human health and ecosystems. Indices of contamination (IC) applied to mining wastes are calculated using the total concentration of PTEs and comparing them with regional geochemical backgrounds. However, determining the total content of heavy metals is insufficient to assess the hazard of mining wastes. Therefore, in addition to total concentration, the potential risk is also evaluated through water mobility of elements. Accordingly, leaching procedures are useful tools for the geochemical characterization of soluble constituents that are mobilized. In this study, the solubility of PTEs from different types of mining wastes is comparatively assessed using three standard leaching methods (European; U.S. Geological Survey and; Mexican). The Hazard Average Quotient (HAQ) was calculated to assess the potential Toxicity Factor (TF). TF is an indicator of the relative potential toxicity of wastes and is the basis for the classification of AMW. A comparative assessment provides evidence that there are no statistically significant differences in PTEs solubility by the three leaching methods and it was also found that the pH of the eluates was dictated by the type of waste. Results suggest that the IC gives an indicator of the potential contamination of soils and sediments by erosive processes, or a long-term measure, whereas TF assesses the possibility of contaminating water in the short term. The most significant finding is the new ranking scale of TF, as a function of HAQ, applied to the Mexican standard leaching test. This factor, together with other considerations relating to risk-generating processes, might then be applied in places having large amounts of recorded AMW, such as the Iberian Peninsula and Latin America, where effective management is required to rank sites, based on preliminary environmental and human risk assessment. [Display omitted] •Leaching tests assessed do not show significant differences in trace metals solubility.•The type of mining wastes dictates the pH of the eluates.•Toxicity Factor is an indicator of the relative potential toxicity of wastes.•Toxicity Factor assesses the possibility of contaminating water in the short term.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111139</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2020-11, Vol.273, p.111139-111139, Article 111139
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2431826780
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Hazard average quotient
Index of contamination
Lixiviation
Mining wastes
Potentially toxic elements
title A new ranking scale for assessing leaching potential pollution from abandoned mining wastes based on the Mexican official leaching test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A34%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20ranking%20scale%20for%20assessing%20leaching%20potential%20pollution%20from%20abandoned%20mining%20wastes%20based%20on%20the%20Mexican%20official%20leaching%20test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Guzm%C3%A1n-Mart%C3%ADnez,%20Fredy&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=273&rft.spage=111139&rft.epage=111139&rft.pages=111139-111139&rft.artnum=111139&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2431826780%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2431826780&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301479720310653&rfr_iscdi=true