Inside the shell: body composition of free-ranging tortoises (Testudo hermanni)

•The quantification of the relative mass of the main organs is usually unfeasible in wild animals.•Thus, the specific contribution of fat stores to body condition index (BCI) remains unknown.•In the Hermann tortoise, the contribution of fat bodies was negligible (0.0% to 0.5% of total mass).•Somatic organs, shell, and digestive tract content were the main contributors of BCI.•This challenges classical shortcuts in ecological studies where BCI is assumed to tightly reflect fat reserves. Body condition indices (BCI – mass scaled by size) are widely used in ecological studies. They presumably reflect variations of endogenous fat reserves in free-ranging animals. In the field, however, accurately quantifying internal body reserves is a difficult task. This is especially true in armoured animals where convenient clues that may guide BCI assessment (e.g. visible subcutaneous fat deposits) remain inaccessible. Alternatively, inclusive dissections may provide anatomical abacuses to estimate body reserves in living individuals. Sacrificing animals for this purpose is not acceptable. We opportunistically tested the ability of BCI to estimate body reserves in 13 free-ranging Hermann's tortoises (Gmelin, 1789) dissected soon after they died from natural causes. On average, BCI values were lower in dissected tortoises relative to living individuals (N > 10,000 measurements), but they remained within the range of variation of the studied populations. Shell mass relative to body mass was high and showed considerable inter-individual variation (33.5% to 52.3%). Stomach and digestive tract content represented another important and variable part of total body mass (4.4% to 14.5%). The contribution of fat bodies was negligible (0.0% to 0.5%). Overall, in the studied tortoises, variations of body condition are weakly determined by variations of fat stores. Other endogenous (e.g. muscles, visceral tissues, liver) and “exogenous” (e.g. digestive tract content, clutch) elements should be considered to better understand age and sex specific life-history trade-offs faced by chelonians.