Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry
In four experiments pupillary responses were used to examine attention allocation and encoding dynamics in free recall. In Experiment 1 , pupillary responses increased (and then decreased) across serial position suggesting that attention was increasingly allocated to items during learning until work...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Memory & cognition 2021-01, Vol.49 (1), p.90-111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 111 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | Memory & cognition |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Unsworth, Nash Miller, Ashley L. |
description | In four experiments pupillary responses were used to examine attention allocation and encoding dynamics in free recall. In Experiment
1
, pupillary responses increased (and then decreased) across serial position suggesting that attention was increasingly allocated to items during learning until working memory was overloaded. In Experiment
2
, manipulating presentation duration resulted in larger and more sustained pupillary responses with increased presentation duration, suggesting that participants were likely engaging in more elaborative and attention-demanding processes. In Experiment
3a
, manipulating list-length resulted in decreased pupillary responses across serial position suggesting that participants were prioritizing early list items and less attention was allocated to later items. In Experiment
3b
, when list-length was known, pupillary responses in the long-list length condition tended to decrease across serial position whereas pupillary responses in the short list-length condition tended to increase and decrease across serial positon. These results suggest that participants flexibly allocate attention to items during encoding depending on the nature of the task and the types of processes that are engaged in. These results further suggest the potential of utilizing pupillary responses to track attention allocation during learning. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13421-020-01077-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2431815811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2490280474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-91c49688f5b5b3b0bdba2db990b09b0255092fd741d0b834160702dabc6796073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoabZJ_0AOxdBLLm5m9GFZvZWwaQKBQEkgNyHJ8sbBlreSTbL_PtrspoUectIw8-id4SHkBOE7k6I-S8g4xRIolIAgZSkPyAIFo6VQvPpAFgAKSgH0_pB8TukRAIRQ1SdyyKiskCEuyO9lcGPThVXRbIIZOpeKLhRt9L6I3pm-_1Esn3M_bBEzTT5M3RiKPBideS2fuumhWM_rLrcGP8XNMfnYmj75L_v3iNxdLG_PL8vrm19X5z-vS8dRTaVCx1VV162wwjILtrGGNlYpsKAsUCFA0baRHBuwNeNYgQTaGOsqqXLNjsjpLncdxz-zT5MeuuR835vgxzlpyhnWKGrEjH77D30c5xjydZlSQGvgkmeK7igXx5Sib_U6doOJG42gt8b1zrjOxvWrcb294us-eraDb_5-eVOcAbYDUh6FlY__dr8T-wKujor8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490280474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Unsworth, Nash ; Miller, Ashley L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Unsworth, Nash ; Miller, Ashley L.</creatorcontrib><description>In four experiments pupillary responses were used to examine attention allocation and encoding dynamics in free recall. In Experiment
1
, pupillary responses increased (and then decreased) across serial position suggesting that attention was increasingly allocated to items during learning until working memory was overloaded. In Experiment
2
, manipulating presentation duration resulted in larger and more sustained pupillary responses with increased presentation duration, suggesting that participants were likely engaging in more elaborative and attention-demanding processes. In Experiment
3a
, manipulating list-length resulted in decreased pupillary responses across serial position suggesting that participants were prioritizing early list items and less attention was allocated to later items. In Experiment
3b
, when list-length was known, pupillary responses in the long-list length condition tended to decrease across serial position whereas pupillary responses in the short list-length condition tended to increase and decrease across serial positon. These results suggest that participants flexibly allocate attention to items during encoding depending on the nature of the task and the types of processes that are engaged in. These results further suggest the potential of utilizing pupillary responses to track attention allocation during learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01077-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32761311</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Experiments ; Hypotheses ; Learning ; Memory ; Psychology ; Short term memory</subject><ispartof>Memory & cognition, 2021-01, Vol.49 (1), p.90-111</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2020</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jan 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-91c49688f5b5b3b0bdba2db990b09b0255092fd741d0b834160702dabc6796073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-91c49688f5b5b3b0bdba2db990b09b0255092fd741d0b834160702dabc6796073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13421-020-01077-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13421-020-01077-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32761311$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Unsworth, Nash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Ashley L.</creatorcontrib><title>Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry</title><title>Memory & cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>In four experiments pupillary responses were used to examine attention allocation and encoding dynamics in free recall. In Experiment
1
, pupillary responses increased (and then decreased) across serial position suggesting that attention was increasingly allocated to items during learning until working memory was overloaded. In Experiment
2
, manipulating presentation duration resulted in larger and more sustained pupillary responses with increased presentation duration, suggesting that participants were likely engaging in more elaborative and attention-demanding processes. In Experiment
3a
, manipulating list-length resulted in decreased pupillary responses across serial position suggesting that participants were prioritizing early list items and less attention was allocated to later items. In Experiment
3b
, when list-length was known, pupillary responses in the long-list length condition tended to decrease across serial position whereas pupillary responses in the short list-length condition tended to increase and decrease across serial positon. These results suggest that participants flexibly allocate attention to items during encoding depending on the nature of the task and the types of processes that are engaged in. These results further suggest the potential of utilizing pupillary responses to track attention allocation during learning.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoabZJ_0AOxdBLLm5m9GFZvZWwaQKBQEkgNyHJ8sbBlreSTbL_PtrspoUectIw8-id4SHkBOE7k6I-S8g4xRIolIAgZSkPyAIFo6VQvPpAFgAKSgH0_pB8TukRAIRQ1SdyyKiskCEuyO9lcGPThVXRbIIZOpeKLhRt9L6I3pm-_1Esn3M_bBEzTT5M3RiKPBideS2fuumhWM_rLrcGP8XNMfnYmj75L_v3iNxdLG_PL8vrm19X5z-vS8dRTaVCx1VV162wwjILtrGGNlYpsKAsUCFA0baRHBuwNeNYgQTaGOsqqXLNjsjpLncdxz-zT5MeuuR835vgxzlpyhnWKGrEjH77D30c5xjydZlSQGvgkmeK7igXx5Sib_U6doOJG42gt8b1zrjOxvWrcb294us-eraDb_5-eVOcAbYDUh6FlY__dr8T-wKujor8</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Unsworth, Nash</creator><creator>Miller, Ashley L.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry</title><author>Unsworth, Nash ; Miller, Ashley L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-91c49688f5b5b3b0bdba2db990b09b0255092fd741d0b834160702dabc6796073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Unsworth, Nash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Ashley L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Unsworth, Nash</au><au>Miller, Ashley L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry</atitle><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle><stitle>Mem Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>90-111</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><abstract>In four experiments pupillary responses were used to examine attention allocation and encoding dynamics in free recall. In Experiment
1
, pupillary responses increased (and then decreased) across serial position suggesting that attention was increasingly allocated to items during learning until working memory was overloaded. In Experiment
2
, manipulating presentation duration resulted in larger and more sustained pupillary responses with increased presentation duration, suggesting that participants were likely engaging in more elaborative and attention-demanding processes. In Experiment
3a
, manipulating list-length resulted in decreased pupillary responses across serial position suggesting that participants were prioritizing early list items and less attention was allocated to later items. In Experiment
3b
, when list-length was known, pupillary responses in the long-list length condition tended to decrease across serial position whereas pupillary responses in the short list-length condition tended to increase and decrease across serial positon. These results suggest that participants flexibly allocate attention to items during encoding depending on the nature of the task and the types of processes that are engaged in. These results further suggest the potential of utilizing pupillary responses to track attention allocation during learning.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32761311</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13421-020-01077-7</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-502X |
ispartof | Memory & cognition, 2021-01, Vol.49 (1), p.90-111 |
issn | 0090-502X 1532-5946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2431815811 |
source | Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Experiments Hypotheses Learning Memory Psychology Short term memory |
title | Encoding dynamics in free recall: Examining attention allocation with pupillometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Encoding%20dynamics%20in%20free%20recall:%20Examining%20attention%20allocation%20with%20pupillometry&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=Unsworth,%20Nash&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=90-111&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13421-020-01077-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2490280474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490280474&rft_id=info:pmid/32761311&rfr_iscdi=true |