Rectal cancer lateral pelvic sidewall lymph nodes: a review of controversies and management

Abstract Background The management of lateral pelvic lymphadenopathy in low rectal cancer poses an oncological and technical challenge. Interpretation of the literature is confounded by different approaches to management in the East and West, and a lack of randomized data from which to draw accurate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of surgery 2020-11, Vol.107 (12), p.1562-1569
Hauptverfasser: Williamson, J S, Quyn, A J, Sagar, P M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1569
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1562
container_title British journal of surgery
container_volume 107
creator Williamson, J S
Quyn, A J
Sagar, P M
description Abstract Background The management of lateral pelvic lymphadenopathy in low rectal cancer poses an oncological and technical challenge. Interpretation of the literature is confounded by different approaches to management in the East and West, and a lack of randomized data from which to draw accurate conclusions regarding the optimal approach. Recent collaboration between Eastern and Western centres has increased the standardization of care. Despite this, significant differences in international guidelines remain. The aim of this review was to appraise the available literature and propose a management algorithm. Methods A literature review of all relevant studies was performed to summarize the historical evidence, as well as establish the significance of clinically positive lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, and the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and lateral pelvic node dissection. A management algorithm was developed based on this review of the literature. Results The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is non-standardized, with geographical differences. The mechanism of lateral lymphatic spread is well defined; the risk increases with lower tumour height and advanced T category. Existing data indicate that acceptable disease-free and overall survival can be achieved by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with selective lateral pelvic node dissection. Conclusion Suspicious lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, particularly in the internal iliac chain, should be considered as resectable locoregional disease, and surgery offered for enlarged nodes that do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Graphical Abstract The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is controversial and non-standardized, with significant geographical differences. Residual pelvic sidewall node involvement following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and total mesorectal excision is associated with worse oncological outcomes. Highly selective lateral pelvic node dissection after NCRT can reduce rates of local recurrence, particularly in the pelvic sidewall. Graphical Abstract Selective resection appropriate
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bjs.11925
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2431807499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1002/bjs.11925</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2431807499</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3485-e2c5f5b73efab6a146bff60ff3abcb452285050c4ea2ed623892be603f0cd8e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kclOxDAMhiMEgmE58AIoEhy4dHCSpu1wgxGrRkJiOXGo0tSBjtKFpJ3RvD2dBQ5InGzL32_Z_gk5ZjBkAPwim_ohYyMut8iAiUgGnEXJNhkAQBwwwcUe2fd-CsAESL5L9gSPY4hDPiDvz6hbZalWlUZHrWrR9WWDdlZo6osc58paahdl80mrOkd_SRV1OCtwTmtDdV21rp6h8wV6qqqclqpSH1hi1R6SHaOsx6NNPCBvtzev4_tg8nT3ML6aBFqEiQyQa2lkFgs0KosUC6PMmAiMESrTWSg5TyRI0CEqjnnERTLiGUYgDOg8wZE4IOfruY2rvzr0bVoWXqO1qsK68ykPBUv6c0dL9PQPOq07V_Xb9ZSEmMmIxT11sqG6rMQ8bVxRKrdIf97WAxdrYF5YXPz2GaRLP9Lej3TlR3r9-LJKesXZWlF3zf-8-AZX2Yh-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2450715617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rectal cancer lateral pelvic sidewall lymph nodes: a review of controversies and management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Williamson, J S ; Quyn, A J ; Sagar, P M</creator><creatorcontrib>Williamson, J S ; Quyn, A J ; Sagar, P M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The management of lateral pelvic lymphadenopathy in low rectal cancer poses an oncological and technical challenge. Interpretation of the literature is confounded by different approaches to management in the East and West, and a lack of randomized data from which to draw accurate conclusions regarding the optimal approach. Recent collaboration between Eastern and Western centres has increased the standardization of care. Despite this, significant differences in international guidelines remain. The aim of this review was to appraise the available literature and propose a management algorithm. Methods A literature review of all relevant studies was performed to summarize the historical evidence, as well as establish the significance of clinically positive lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, and the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and lateral pelvic node dissection. A management algorithm was developed based on this review of the literature. Results The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is non-standardized, with geographical differences. The mechanism of lateral lymphatic spread is well defined; the risk increases with lower tumour height and advanced T category. Existing data indicate that acceptable disease-free and overall survival can be achieved by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with selective lateral pelvic node dissection. Conclusion Suspicious lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, particularly in the internal iliac chain, should be considered as resectable locoregional disease, and surgery offered for enlarged nodes that do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Graphical Abstract The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is controversial and non-standardized, with significant geographical differences. Residual pelvic sidewall node involvement following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and total mesorectal excision is associated with worse oncological outcomes. Highly selective lateral pelvic node dissection after NCRT can reduce rates of local recurrence, particularly in the pelvic sidewall. Graphical Abstract Selective resection appropriate</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11925</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32770742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Colorectal cancer ; Dissection ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymph Nodes - surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Lymphatic system ; Pelvis ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>British journal of surgery, 2020-11, Vol.107 (12), p.1562-1569</ispartof><rights>2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd 2020</rights><rights>2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3485-e2c5f5b73efab6a146bff60ff3abcb452285050c4ea2ed623892be603f0cd8e93</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-6961-4639</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbjs.11925$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbjs.11925$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770742$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williamson, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quyn, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagar, P M</creatorcontrib><title>Rectal cancer lateral pelvic sidewall lymph nodes: a review of controversies and management</title><title>British journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The management of lateral pelvic lymphadenopathy in low rectal cancer poses an oncological and technical challenge. Interpretation of the literature is confounded by different approaches to management in the East and West, and a lack of randomized data from which to draw accurate conclusions regarding the optimal approach. Recent collaboration between Eastern and Western centres has increased the standardization of care. Despite this, significant differences in international guidelines remain. The aim of this review was to appraise the available literature and propose a management algorithm. Methods A literature review of all relevant studies was performed to summarize the historical evidence, as well as establish the significance of clinically positive lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, and the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and lateral pelvic node dissection. A management algorithm was developed based on this review of the literature. Results The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is non-standardized, with geographical differences. The mechanism of lateral lymphatic spread is well defined; the risk increases with lower tumour height and advanced T category. Existing data indicate that acceptable disease-free and overall survival can be achieved by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with selective lateral pelvic node dissection. Conclusion Suspicious lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, particularly in the internal iliac chain, should be considered as resectable locoregional disease, and surgery offered for enlarged nodes that do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Graphical Abstract The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is controversial and non-standardized, with significant geographical differences. Residual pelvic sidewall node involvement following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and total mesorectal excision is associated with worse oncological outcomes. Highly selective lateral pelvic node dissection after NCRT can reduce rates of local recurrence, particularly in the pelvic sidewall. Graphical Abstract Selective resection appropriate</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - surgery</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>0007-1323</issn><issn>1365-2168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kclOxDAMhiMEgmE58AIoEhy4dHCSpu1wgxGrRkJiOXGo0tSBjtKFpJ3RvD2dBQ5InGzL32_Z_gk5ZjBkAPwim_ohYyMut8iAiUgGnEXJNhkAQBwwwcUe2fd-CsAESL5L9gSPY4hDPiDvz6hbZalWlUZHrWrR9WWDdlZo6osc58paahdl80mrOkd_SRV1OCtwTmtDdV21rp6h8wV6qqqclqpSH1hi1R6SHaOsx6NNPCBvtzev4_tg8nT3ML6aBFqEiQyQa2lkFgs0KosUC6PMmAiMESrTWSg5TyRI0CEqjnnERTLiGUYgDOg8wZE4IOfruY2rvzr0bVoWXqO1qsK68ykPBUv6c0dL9PQPOq07V_Xb9ZSEmMmIxT11sqG6rMQ8bVxRKrdIf97WAxdrYF5YXPz2GaRLP9Lej3TlR3r9-LJKesXZWlF3zf-8-AZX2Yh-</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Williamson, J S</creator><creator>Quyn, A J</creator><creator>Sagar, P M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-4639</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Rectal cancer lateral pelvic sidewall lymph nodes: a review of controversies and management</title><author>Williamson, J S ; Quyn, A J ; Sagar, P M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3485-e2c5f5b73efab6a146bff60ff3abcb452285050c4ea2ed623892be603f0cd8e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - surgery</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williamson, J S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quyn, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagar, P M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williamson, J S</au><au>Quyn, A J</au><au>Sagar, P M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rectal cancer lateral pelvic sidewall lymph nodes: a review of controversies and management</atitle><jtitle>British journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Surg</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1562</spage><epage>1569</epage><pages>1562-1569</pages><issn>0007-1323</issn><eissn>1365-2168</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The management of lateral pelvic lymphadenopathy in low rectal cancer poses an oncological and technical challenge. Interpretation of the literature is confounded by different approaches to management in the East and West, and a lack of randomized data from which to draw accurate conclusions regarding the optimal approach. Recent collaboration between Eastern and Western centres has increased the standardization of care. Despite this, significant differences in international guidelines remain. The aim of this review was to appraise the available literature and propose a management algorithm. Methods A literature review of all relevant studies was performed to summarize the historical evidence, as well as establish the significance of clinically positive lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, and the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and lateral pelvic node dissection. A management algorithm was developed based on this review of the literature. Results The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is non-standardized, with geographical differences. The mechanism of lateral lymphatic spread is well defined; the risk increases with lower tumour height and advanced T category. Existing data indicate that acceptable disease-free and overall survival can be achieved by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with selective lateral pelvic node dissection. Conclusion Suspicious lateral pelvic sidewall nodes, particularly in the internal iliac chain, should be considered as resectable locoregional disease, and surgery offered for enlarged nodes that do not respond to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Graphical Abstract The management of pelvic sidewall lymphadenopathy in rectal cancer is controversial and non-standardized, with significant geographical differences. Residual pelvic sidewall node involvement following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and total mesorectal excision is associated with worse oncological outcomes. Highly selective lateral pelvic node dissection after NCRT can reduce rates of local recurrence, particularly in the pelvic sidewall. Graphical Abstract Selective resection appropriate</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32770742</pmid><doi>10.1002/bjs.11925</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6961-4639</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1323
ispartof British journal of surgery, 2020-11, Vol.107 (12), p.1562-1569
issn 0007-1323
1365-2168
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2431807499
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Algorithms
Colorectal cancer
Dissection
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymph Nodes - surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Lymphatic system
Pelvis
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
title Rectal cancer lateral pelvic sidewall lymph nodes: a review of controversies and management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T19%3A54%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rectal%20cancer%20lateral%20pelvic%20sidewall%20lymph%20nodes:%20a%20review%20of%20controversies%20and%20management&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Williamson,%20J%20S&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1562&rft.epage=1569&rft.pages=1562-1569&rft.issn=0007-1323&rft.eissn=1365-2168&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bjs.11925&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2431807499%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2450715617&rft_id=info:pmid/32770742&rft_oup_id=10.1002/bjs.11925&rfr_iscdi=true