The Predictive Value of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Patient Selection in Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Study

Objective Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) is an effective alternative treatment for patients with chronic low back pain. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is frequently used in pain therapy. Aim of this prospective study was to examine the predictive value of TENS for late...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.) Mass.), 2021-08, Vol.24 (6), p.1051-1058
Hauptverfasser: Schwarm, Frank Patrick, Ott, Marc, Nagl, Jasmin, Bender, Michael, Stein, Marco, Uhl, Eberhard, Maxeiner, Hagen, Kolodziej, Malgorzata A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1058
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1051
container_title Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.)
container_volume 24
creator Schwarm, Frank Patrick
Ott, Marc
Nagl, Jasmin
Bender, Michael
Stein, Marco
Uhl, Eberhard
Maxeiner, Hagen
Kolodziej, Malgorzata A.
description Objective Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) is an effective alternative treatment for patients with chronic low back pain. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is frequently used in pain therapy. Aim of this prospective study was to examine the predictive value of TENS for later PNFS treatment. Materials and Methods Between 2014 and 2019, a prospective cohort study of 41 patients with chronic lumbar pain was conducted. Pain intensity (NRS) was assessed before and after TENS use, preoperatively/postoperatively and in the follow‐up after three and six months, SF12v2 questionnaires with physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire at baseline as well as three and six months after PNFS implantation. Implantation of the PNFS‐system with two percutaneous leads was performed after four to seven days of positive testing. Statistical analysis was performed using depending t‐test, ANOVA, and Spearman correlation. Results The cohort consisted of 41 patients (19 females, 22 males) with a median age of 60.5 years (IQR25‐75 52–67). Two patients were lost to follow‐up. After positive PNFS testing a pulse generator (IPG) was implanted in 15 patients with positive TENS effect and 15 patients without TENS effect. Leads were explanted in nine patients after negative PNFS trial phase. TENS positive patients showed significant correlation to a positive effect in the PNFS trial phase in NRS reduction (p = 0.042) indicating that TENS responders will also respond to PNFS (94% patients). After three and six months follow‐up median NRS and SF12v2 (PCS) improved significantly in both cohorts, SF12v2 (MCS) and ODI only in the TENS positive cohort, respectively. Conclusion TENS can be predictive for patient selection in PNFS, as TENS positive patients showed significant correlation with a positive PNFS trial period. Therefore, TENS positive patients might be justifiable to be directly implanted with leads and IPG. TENS positive patients further tend to show a better improvement in the follow‐up.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ner.13244
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2430978457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2430978457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-4d4344db5977ce080b830ec812107539bc8769cd066e15b665785974d075340d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1uEzEUhS0EoqWw4AWQJTawmNa_4xl2JUoBKSoRCWytGftGcXHs1J6hykvxjDhM6QKEN77y_e7R8T0IvaTknJZzESCdU86EeIROqWSyooLwx6UmragUle0JepbzDSFUtUw9RSecKamYVKfo53oLeJnAOjO4H4C_dX4EHDd4nbqQzTh0AeKY8dyDGZIzncfXkAq4Gtxu9N3gYsCbmPCylBAGvIIjeXx1AS8huf0W0sPUlQNv_5mdbVMMzuBFvMPvO_O9iLnwDl8WYzHvYXK2GkZ7eI6ebDqf4cX9fYa-Xs3Xs4_V4vOHT7PLRWW45KISVnAhbC9bpQyQhvQNJ2AayihRkre9aVTdGkvqGqjs61qqprDCHruCWH6G3ky6-xRvR8iD3rlswPtpHZoJTlrVCKkK-vov9CaOKRR3mslaCkEYawr1dqJM-VJOsNH75HZdOmhK9DFEXULUv0Ms7Kt7xbHfgX0g_6RWgIsJuHMeDv9X0tfzL5PkLxJ_pmo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565440228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Predictive Value of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Patient Selection in Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schwarm, Frank Patrick ; Ott, Marc ; Nagl, Jasmin ; Bender, Michael ; Stein, Marco ; Uhl, Eberhard ; Maxeiner, Hagen ; Kolodziej, Malgorzata A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwarm, Frank Patrick ; Ott, Marc ; Nagl, Jasmin ; Bender, Michael ; Stein, Marco ; Uhl, Eberhard ; Maxeiner, Hagen ; Kolodziej, Malgorzata A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) is an effective alternative treatment for patients with chronic low back pain. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is frequently used in pain therapy. Aim of this prospective study was to examine the predictive value of TENS for later PNFS treatment. Materials and Methods Between 2014 and 2019, a prospective cohort study of 41 patients with chronic lumbar pain was conducted. Pain intensity (NRS) was assessed before and after TENS use, preoperatively/postoperatively and in the follow‐up after three and six months, SF12v2 questionnaires with physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire at baseline as well as three and six months after PNFS implantation. Implantation of the PNFS‐system with two percutaneous leads was performed after four to seven days of positive testing. Statistical analysis was performed using depending t‐test, ANOVA, and Spearman correlation. Results The cohort consisted of 41 patients (19 females, 22 males) with a median age of 60.5 years (IQR25‐75 52–67). Two patients were lost to follow‐up. After positive PNFS testing a pulse generator (IPG) was implanted in 15 patients with positive TENS effect and 15 patients without TENS effect. Leads were explanted in nine patients after negative PNFS trial phase. TENS positive patients showed significant correlation to a positive effect in the PNFS trial phase in NRS reduction (p = 0.042) indicating that TENS responders will also respond to PNFS (94% patients). After three and six months follow‐up median NRS and SF12v2 (PCS) improved significantly in both cohorts, SF12v2 (MCS) and ODI only in the TENS positive cohort, respectively. Conclusion TENS can be predictive for patient selection in PNFS, as TENS positive patients showed significant correlation with a positive PNFS trial period. Therefore, TENS positive patients might be justifiable to be directly implanted with leads and IPG. TENS positive patients further tend to show a better improvement in the follow‐up.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-7159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ner.13244</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32757257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Back pain ; Chronic low back pain ; Female ; Humans ; Low back pain ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; multimodal therapy ; Patient Selection ; Patients ; Peripheral Nerves ; PNFS ; predictive value ; Prospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; TENS ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation ; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS ; Treatment Outcome ; trial phase</subject><ispartof>Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.), 2021-08, Vol.24 (6), p.1051-1058</ispartof><rights>2020 International Neuromodulation Society.</rights><rights>2021 International Neuromodulation Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-4d4344db5977ce080b830ec812107539bc8769cd066e15b665785974d075340d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-4d4344db5977ce080b830ec812107539bc8769cd066e15b665785974d075340d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5030-1870 ; 0000-0001-6026-767X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32757257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwarm, Frank Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ott, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagl, Jasmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Eberhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxeiner, Hagen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolodziej, Malgorzata A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Predictive Value of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Patient Selection in Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Study</title><title>Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Neuromodulation</addtitle><description>Objective Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) is an effective alternative treatment for patients with chronic low back pain. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is frequently used in pain therapy. Aim of this prospective study was to examine the predictive value of TENS for later PNFS treatment. Materials and Methods Between 2014 and 2019, a prospective cohort study of 41 patients with chronic lumbar pain was conducted. Pain intensity (NRS) was assessed before and after TENS use, preoperatively/postoperatively and in the follow‐up after three and six months, SF12v2 questionnaires with physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire at baseline as well as three and six months after PNFS implantation. Implantation of the PNFS‐system with two percutaneous leads was performed after four to seven days of positive testing. Statistical analysis was performed using depending t‐test, ANOVA, and Spearman correlation. Results The cohort consisted of 41 patients (19 females, 22 males) with a median age of 60.5 years (IQR25‐75 52–67). Two patients were lost to follow‐up. After positive PNFS testing a pulse generator (IPG) was implanted in 15 patients with positive TENS effect and 15 patients without TENS effect. Leads were explanted in nine patients after negative PNFS trial phase. TENS positive patients showed significant correlation to a positive effect in the PNFS trial phase in NRS reduction (p = 0.042) indicating that TENS responders will also respond to PNFS (94% patients). After three and six months follow‐up median NRS and SF12v2 (PCS) improved significantly in both cohorts, SF12v2 (MCS) and ODI only in the TENS positive cohort, respectively. Conclusion TENS can be predictive for patient selection in PNFS, as TENS positive patients showed significant correlation with a positive PNFS trial period. Therefore, TENS positive patients might be justifiable to be directly implanted with leads and IPG. TENS positive patients further tend to show a better improvement in the follow‐up.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Chronic low back pain</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multimodal therapy</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Peripheral Nerves</subject><subject>PNFS</subject><subject>predictive value</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>TENS</subject><subject>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation</subject><subject>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>trial phase</subject><issn>1094-7159</issn><issn>1525-1403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1uEzEUhS0EoqWw4AWQJTawmNa_4xl2JUoBKSoRCWytGftGcXHs1J6hykvxjDhM6QKEN77y_e7R8T0IvaTknJZzESCdU86EeIROqWSyooLwx6UmragUle0JepbzDSFUtUw9RSecKamYVKfo53oLeJnAOjO4H4C_dX4EHDd4nbqQzTh0AeKY8dyDGZIzncfXkAq4Gtxu9N3gYsCbmPCylBAGvIIjeXx1AS8huf0W0sPUlQNv_5mdbVMMzuBFvMPvO_O9iLnwDl8WYzHvYXK2GkZ7eI6ebDqf4cX9fYa-Xs3Xs4_V4vOHT7PLRWW45KISVnAhbC9bpQyQhvQNJ2AayihRkre9aVTdGkvqGqjs61qqprDCHruCWH6G3ky6-xRvR8iD3rlswPtpHZoJTlrVCKkK-vov9CaOKRR3mslaCkEYawr1dqJM-VJOsNH75HZdOmhK9DFEXULUv0Ms7Kt7xbHfgX0g_6RWgIsJuHMeDv9X0tfzL5PkLxJ_pmo</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Schwarm, Frank Patrick</creator><creator>Ott, Marc</creator><creator>Nagl, Jasmin</creator><creator>Bender, Michael</creator><creator>Stein, Marco</creator><creator>Uhl, Eberhard</creator><creator>Maxeiner, Hagen</creator><creator>Kolodziej, Malgorzata A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5030-1870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-767X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>The Predictive Value of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Patient Selection in Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Study</title><author>Schwarm, Frank Patrick ; Ott, Marc ; Nagl, Jasmin ; Bender, Michael ; Stein, Marco ; Uhl, Eberhard ; Maxeiner, Hagen ; Kolodziej, Malgorzata A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-4d4344db5977ce080b830ec812107539bc8769cd066e15b665785974d075340d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Chronic low back pain</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multimodal therapy</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Peripheral Nerves</topic><topic>PNFS</topic><topic>predictive value</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>TENS</topic><topic>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation</topic><topic>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>trial phase</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwarm, Frank Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ott, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagl, Jasmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stein, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Eberhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxeiner, Hagen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolodziej, Malgorzata A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwarm, Frank Patrick</au><au>Ott, Marc</au><au>Nagl, Jasmin</au><au>Bender, Michael</au><au>Stein, Marco</au><au>Uhl, Eberhard</au><au>Maxeiner, Hagen</au><au>Kolodziej, Malgorzata A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Predictive Value of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Patient Selection in Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuromodulation</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1051</spage><epage>1058</epage><pages>1051-1058</pages><issn>1094-7159</issn><eissn>1525-1403</eissn><abstract>Objective Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNFS) is an effective alternative treatment for patients with chronic low back pain. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is frequently used in pain therapy. Aim of this prospective study was to examine the predictive value of TENS for later PNFS treatment. Materials and Methods Between 2014 and 2019, a prospective cohort study of 41 patients with chronic lumbar pain was conducted. Pain intensity (NRS) was assessed before and after TENS use, preoperatively/postoperatively and in the follow‐up after three and six months, SF12v2 questionnaires with physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire at baseline as well as three and six months after PNFS implantation. Implantation of the PNFS‐system with two percutaneous leads was performed after four to seven days of positive testing. Statistical analysis was performed using depending t‐test, ANOVA, and Spearman correlation. Results The cohort consisted of 41 patients (19 females, 22 males) with a median age of 60.5 years (IQR25‐75 52–67). Two patients were lost to follow‐up. After positive PNFS testing a pulse generator (IPG) was implanted in 15 patients with positive TENS effect and 15 patients without TENS effect. Leads were explanted in nine patients after negative PNFS trial phase. TENS positive patients showed significant correlation to a positive effect in the PNFS trial phase in NRS reduction (p = 0.042) indicating that TENS responders will also respond to PNFS (94% patients). After three and six months follow‐up median NRS and SF12v2 (PCS) improved significantly in both cohorts, SF12v2 (MCS) and ODI only in the TENS positive cohort, respectively. Conclusion TENS can be predictive for patient selection in PNFS, as TENS positive patients showed significant correlation with a positive PNFS trial period. Therefore, TENS positive patients might be justifiable to be directly implanted with leads and IPG. TENS positive patients further tend to show a better improvement in the follow‐up.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32757257</pmid><doi>10.1111/ner.13244</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5030-1870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-767X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1094-7159
ispartof Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.), 2021-08, Vol.24 (6), p.1051-1058
issn 1094-7159
1525-1403
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2430978457
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Back pain
Chronic low back pain
Female
Humans
Low back pain
Low Back Pain - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
multimodal therapy
Patient Selection
Patients
Peripheral Nerves
PNFS
predictive value
Prospective Studies
Statistical analysis
TENS
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS
Treatment Outcome
trial phase
title The Predictive Value of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Patient Selection in Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A02%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Predictive%20Value%20of%20Transcutaneous%20Electrical%20Nerve%20Stimulation%20for%20Patient%20Selection%20in%20Peripheral%20Nerve%20Field%20Stimulation%20for%20Chronic%20Low%20Back%20Pain:%20A%20Prospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Neuromodulation%20(Malden,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Schwarm,%20Frank%20Patrick&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1051&rft.epage=1058&rft.pages=1051-1058&rft.issn=1094-7159&rft.eissn=1525-1403&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ner.13244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2430978457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565440228&rft_id=info:pmid/32757257&rfr_iscdi=true