Comparison of handrail reaction forces between two different handrails during sit-to-stand movement in the elderly
The handrail is an effective means of assisting sit-to-stand movements. As some elderly people need force to support their body during sit-to-stand movements because of instability and weakness; however, few handrails are specifically shaped to generate more force and support the body. This study ai...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2020-12, Vol.80, p.105130-105130, Article 105130 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 105130 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 105130 |
| container_title | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) |
| container_volume | 80 |
| creator | Kato, Tomohisa Sekiguchi, Yusuke Honda, Keita Izumi, Shin-Ichi Kanetaka, Hiroyasu |
| description | The handrail is an effective means of assisting sit-to-stand movements. As some elderly people need force to support their body during sit-to-stand movements because of instability and weakness; however, few handrails are specifically shaped to generate more force and support the body. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a newly designed curved-angled handrail on the reaction force during sit-to-stand movements in the elderly.
Twenty-one elderly subjects (age range, 72–84 years) participated in the study. They performed sit-to-stand movements using a conventional vertical handrail and then the curved-angled handrail five times each. For each subject, body coordinate data were acquired and the handrail reaction force was measured using motion analysis and load sensors on the handrail.
The reaction forces generated in the anterior–posterior and upward–downward directions during sit-to-stand movements using the curved-angled handrail were significantly greater than those generated using the conventional vertical handrail (p conventional vertical handrail•Subjective evaluation is also better with curved-angled handrail.•Center of mass variations are equal between these two types of handrails. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105130 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2430374822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0268003320302497</els_id><sourcerecordid>2430374822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-3987fcf4857f2e81328d0740f33ee8230bcb1a30a482e0098680ff7cdb1360373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2L3CAYgKW0dGe3_QvF3gol01dNRudYQr9goZf2LMa8dhySOFWzw_77GjId9rgnRZ9H8ZGQ9wy2DNju03FrBz91PoxoD1sOfFlvmIAXZMOU3FeMS_aSbIDvVAUgxA25TekIADVv5GtyI7isGwn1hsQ2jCcTfQoTDY4ezNRH4wca0djsy6IL0WKiHeYz4kTzOdDeO4cRp3zFE-3n6Kc_NPlc5VClXDboGB5wXDBfvANSHHqMw-Mb8sqZIeHby3hHfn_98qv9Xt3__Paj_Xxf2boWuRJ7JZ11tWqk46iY4KoHWYMTAlFxAZ3tmBFgasURYK92CpyTtu-Y2IGQ4o58WM89xfB3xpT16JPFYTAThjlpXouCFZsXdL-iNoaUIjp9in408VEz0EtyfdRPkusluV6TF_fd5Zq5G7G_mv8bF0CtwBm74JL1OFm8YuVTdsCFaFiZMWh9Nkv3NsxTLurH56uFblcaS9UHj1FfjN5HtFn3wT_jPf8ARFC5vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430374822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of handrail reaction forces between two different handrails during sit-to-stand movement in the elderly</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><creator>Kato, Tomohisa ; Sekiguchi, Yusuke ; Honda, Keita ; Izumi, Shin-Ichi ; Kanetaka, Hiroyasu</creator><creatorcontrib>Kato, Tomohisa ; Sekiguchi, Yusuke ; Honda, Keita ; Izumi, Shin-Ichi ; Kanetaka, Hiroyasu</creatorcontrib><description>The handrail is an effective means of assisting sit-to-stand movements. As some elderly people need force to support their body during sit-to-stand movements because of instability and weakness; however, few handrails are specifically shaped to generate more force and support the body. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a newly designed curved-angled handrail on the reaction force during sit-to-stand movements in the elderly.
Twenty-one elderly subjects (age range, 72–84 years) participated in the study. They performed sit-to-stand movements using a conventional vertical handrail and then the curved-angled handrail five times each. For each subject, body coordinate data were acquired and the handrail reaction force was measured using motion analysis and load sensors on the handrail.
The reaction forces generated in the anterior–posterior and upward–downward directions during sit-to-stand movements using the curved-angled handrail were significantly greater than those generated using the conventional vertical handrail (p < .001).
Compared with using the conventional vertical handrail, using the curved-angled handrail enhances the generated force during sit-to-stand movements.
•Reaction force generated: curved-angled handrail > conventional vertical handrail•Subjective evaluation is also better with curved-angled handrail.•Center of mass variations are equal between these two types of handrails.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0033</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105130</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32745704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>OXFORD: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Elderly people ; Engineering ; Engineering, Biomedical ; Female ; Handrail ; Humans ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Male ; Mechanical Phenomena ; Movement ; Orthopedics ; Reaction force ; Science & Technology ; Self-Help Devices ; Sit-to-stand ; Sitting Position ; Sport Sciences ; Standing Position ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2020-12, Vol.80, p.105130-105130, Article 105130</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>9</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000602335100010</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-3987fcf4857f2e81328d0740f33ee8230bcb1a30a482e0098680ff7cdb1360373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-3987fcf4857f2e81328d0740f33ee8230bcb1a30a482e0098680ff7cdb1360373</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5881-3619 ; 0000-0002-9404-8659</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,28252,28253,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32745704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kato, Tomohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honda, Keita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanetaka, Hiroyasu</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of handrail reaction forces between two different handrails during sit-to-stand movement in the elderly</title><title>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</title><addtitle>CLIN BIOMECH</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><description>The handrail is an effective means of assisting sit-to-stand movements. As some elderly people need force to support their body during sit-to-stand movements because of instability and weakness; however, few handrails are specifically shaped to generate more force and support the body. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a newly designed curved-angled handrail on the reaction force during sit-to-stand movements in the elderly.
Twenty-one elderly subjects (age range, 72–84 years) participated in the study. They performed sit-to-stand movements using a conventional vertical handrail and then the curved-angled handrail five times each. For each subject, body coordinate data were acquired and the handrail reaction force was measured using motion analysis and load sensors on the handrail.
The reaction forces generated in the anterior–posterior and upward–downward directions during sit-to-stand movements using the curved-angled handrail were significantly greater than those generated using the conventional vertical handrail (p < .001).
Compared with using the conventional vertical handrail, using the curved-angled handrail enhances the generated force during sit-to-stand movements.
•Reaction force generated: curved-angled handrail > conventional vertical handrail•Subjective evaluation is also better with curved-angled handrail.•Center of mass variations are equal between these two types of handrails.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Elderly people</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering, Biomedical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Handrail</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Reaction force</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Self-Help Devices</subject><subject>Sit-to-stand</subject><subject>Sitting Position</subject><subject>Sport Sciences</subject><subject>Standing Position</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2L3CAYgKW0dGe3_QvF3gol01dNRudYQr9goZf2LMa8dhySOFWzw_77GjId9rgnRZ9H8ZGQ9wy2DNju03FrBz91PoxoD1sOfFlvmIAXZMOU3FeMS_aSbIDvVAUgxA25TekIADVv5GtyI7isGwn1hsQ2jCcTfQoTDY4ezNRH4wca0djsy6IL0WKiHeYz4kTzOdDeO4cRp3zFE-3n6Kc_NPlc5VClXDboGB5wXDBfvANSHHqMw-Mb8sqZIeHby3hHfn_98qv9Xt3__Paj_Xxf2boWuRJ7JZ11tWqk46iY4KoHWYMTAlFxAZ3tmBFgasURYK92CpyTtu-Y2IGQ4o58WM89xfB3xpT16JPFYTAThjlpXouCFZsXdL-iNoaUIjp9in408VEz0EtyfdRPkusluV6TF_fd5Zq5G7G_mv8bF0CtwBm74JL1OFm8YuVTdsCFaFiZMWh9Nkv3NsxTLurH56uFblcaS9UHj1FfjN5HtFn3wT_jPf8ARFC5vg</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Kato, Tomohisa</creator><creator>Sekiguchi, Yusuke</creator><creator>Honda, Keita</creator><creator>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creator><creator>Kanetaka, Hiroyasu</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5881-3619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9404-8659</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Comparison of handrail reaction forces between two different handrails during sit-to-stand movement in the elderly</title><author>Kato, Tomohisa ; Sekiguchi, Yusuke ; Honda, Keita ; Izumi, Shin-Ichi ; Kanetaka, Hiroyasu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-3987fcf4857f2e81328d0740f33ee8230bcb1a30a482e0098680ff7cdb1360373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Elderly people</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering, Biomedical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Handrail</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Reaction force</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Self-Help Devices</topic><topic>Sit-to-stand</topic><topic>Sitting Position</topic><topic>Sport Sciences</topic><topic>Standing Position</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kato, Tomohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiguchi, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honda, Keita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanetaka, Hiroyasu</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kato, Tomohisa</au><au>Sekiguchi, Yusuke</au><au>Honda, Keita</au><au>Izumi, Shin-Ichi</au><au>Kanetaka, Hiroyasu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of handrail reaction forces between two different handrails during sit-to-stand movement in the elderly</atitle><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle><stitle>CLIN BIOMECH</stitle><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>80</volume><spage>105130</spage><epage>105130</epage><pages>105130-105130</pages><artnum>105130</artnum><issn>0268-0033</issn><eissn>1879-1271</eissn><abstract>The handrail is an effective means of assisting sit-to-stand movements. As some elderly people need force to support their body during sit-to-stand movements because of instability and weakness; however, few handrails are specifically shaped to generate more force and support the body. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a newly designed curved-angled handrail on the reaction force during sit-to-stand movements in the elderly.
Twenty-one elderly subjects (age range, 72–84 years) participated in the study. They performed sit-to-stand movements using a conventional vertical handrail and then the curved-angled handrail five times each. For each subject, body coordinate data were acquired and the handrail reaction force was measured using motion analysis and load sensors on the handrail.
The reaction forces generated in the anterior–posterior and upward–downward directions during sit-to-stand movements using the curved-angled handrail were significantly greater than those generated using the conventional vertical handrail (p < .001).
Compared with using the conventional vertical handrail, using the curved-angled handrail enhances the generated force during sit-to-stand movements.
•Reaction force generated: curved-angled handrail > conventional vertical handrail•Subjective evaluation is also better with curved-angled handrail.•Center of mass variations are equal between these two types of handrails.</abstract><cop>OXFORD</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32745704</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105130</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5881-3619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9404-8659</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0268-0033 |
| ispartof | Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2020-12, Vol.80, p.105130-105130, Article 105130 |
| issn | 0268-0033 1879-1271 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2430374822 |
| source | MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /> |
| subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Biomechanical Phenomena Elderly people Engineering Engineering, Biomedical Female Handrail Humans Life Sciences & Biomedicine Male Mechanical Phenomena Movement Orthopedics Reaction force Science & Technology Self-Help Devices Sit-to-stand Sitting Position Sport Sciences Standing Position Technology |
| title | Comparison of handrail reaction forces between two different handrails during sit-to-stand movement in the elderly |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T13%3A37%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20handrail%20reaction%20forces%20between%20two%20different%20handrails%20during%20sit-to-stand%20movement%20in%20the%20elderly&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20biomechanics%20(Bristol)&rft.au=Kato,%20Tomohisa&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=80&rft.spage=105130&rft.epage=105130&rft.pages=105130-105130&rft.artnum=105130&rft.issn=0268-0033&rft.eissn=1879-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105130&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2430374822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430374822&rft_id=info:pmid/32745704&rft_els_id=S0268003320302497&rfr_iscdi=true |