Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis
Purpose There are currently no reports on the application of three-dimensional (3D) vision to single-incision laparoscopic surgery. This study compared 3D vision to the previous two-dimensional (2D) system in single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SIDG). Methods Medical charts of 179 gastr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Langenbeck's archives of surgery 2021-03, Vol.406 (2), p.473-478 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 478 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 473 |
| container_title | Langenbeck's archives of surgery |
| container_volume | 406 |
| creator | Kang, So Hyun Won, Yongjoon Lee, Kanghaeng Youn, Sang Il Min, Sa-Hong Park, Young Suk Ahn, Sang-Hoon Kim, Hyung-Ho |
| description | Purpose
There are currently no reports on the application of three-dimensional (3D) vision to single-incision laparoscopic surgery. This study compared 3D vision to the previous two-dimensional (2D) system in single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SIDG).
Methods
Medical charts of 179 gastric cancer patients who underwent SIDG from February 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into either a 2D group or 3D group depending on the type of camera that was used. All operations were performed using a flexible camera (Olympus, Japan). Operative data and postoperative outcome were analyzed.
Results
There were 90 patients in the 2D group and 89 patients in the 3D group. No differences were found in terms of the age, body mass index, staging, and other demographics of the patients. Operative time was significantly faster in the 3D group (115.6 ± 34.0 vs. 129.4 ± 38.5 min,
p
= 0.012), and estimated blood loss (EBL) was less in the 3D group (20.7 ± 30.0 vs. 35.1 ± 56.0 ml,
p
= 0.034). Patients in the 3D group were able to start a small fluid diet earlier (2.5, range 1–6 vs. 3.0, range 2–8 postoperative days,
p
= 0.006) and were discharged faster (5.4, range 3–12 vs. 6.2, range 4–24 postoperative days,
p
= 0.024). There was no statistical difference between early and late complications.
Conclusion
The use of the 3D camera shortened operative time with possible clinical benefits for patients undergoing SIDG. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00423-020-01952-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2430368797</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2430368797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1e88cdc769ea8e0de0e6bfe96589f0aba00c9c72b30a3d6250e93a6d1fac3c663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURiMEoqXwAiyQl2VhemM7TsIOlRaQKnXTri3HuZlxlcTB1ykaHosnxMOUSgipK1v29x3_nKJ4W8KHEqA-IwAlJAcBHMq2Elw_K45LJSsuVFU-f5wreVS8IroDAF236mVxJEWtGlDquPh1s42IvPcTzuTDbEd2Kj-_Z_eeVjv6nzblRbbEcO97JNZhShhZWJMLE7K0tTNLP8K_ffFf38-M_LwZkS8hJjbaxcZALizesd5Tyq2NpRTRpTDtPjK7P3HZE9OOTza5LfbMZviOPL0uXgx2JHzzMJ4Ut5cXN-df-dX1l2_nn664k6pOvMSmcb2rdYu2QegRUHcDtrpq2gFsZwFc62rRSbCy16ICbKXVfTlYJ53W8qQ4PXDzXb6vSMlMnhyOo50xrGSEkiB1U7d1jopD1OVnUcTBLNFPNu5MCWbvyhxcmezK_HFl9vx3D_y1m7B_rPyVkwPyEKC8NW8wmruwxvwL9BT2N9kxpMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430368797</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kang, So Hyun ; Won, Yongjoon ; Lee, Kanghaeng ; Youn, Sang Il ; Min, Sa-Hong ; Park, Young Suk ; Ahn, Sang-Hoon ; Kim, Hyung-Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Kang, So Hyun ; Won, Yongjoon ; Lee, Kanghaeng ; Youn, Sang Il ; Min, Sa-Hong ; Park, Young Suk ; Ahn, Sang-Hoon ; Kim, Hyung-Ho</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
There are currently no reports on the application of three-dimensional (3D) vision to single-incision laparoscopic surgery. This study compared 3D vision to the previous two-dimensional (2D) system in single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SIDG).
Methods
Medical charts of 179 gastric cancer patients who underwent SIDG from February 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into either a 2D group or 3D group depending on the type of camera that was used. All operations were performed using a flexible camera (Olympus, Japan). Operative data and postoperative outcome were analyzed.
Results
There were 90 patients in the 2D group and 89 patients in the 3D group. No differences were found in terms of the age, body mass index, staging, and other demographics of the patients. Operative time was significantly faster in the 3D group (115.6 ± 34.0 vs. 129.4 ± 38.5 min,
p
= 0.012), and estimated blood loss (EBL) was less in the 3D group (20.7 ± 30.0 vs. 35.1 ± 56.0 ml,
p
= 0.034). Patients in the 3D group were able to start a small fluid diet earlier (2.5, range 1–6 vs. 3.0, range 2–8 postoperative days,
p
= 0.006) and were discharged faster (5.4, range 3–12 vs. 6.2, range 4–24 postoperative days,
p
= 0.024). There was no statistical difference between early and late complications.
Conclusion
The use of the 3D camera shortened operative time with possible clinical benefits for patients undergoing SIDG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-2443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-2451</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01952-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32748044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Cardiac Surgery ; General Surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Thoracic Surgery ; Traumatic Surgery ; Vascular Surgery</subject><ispartof>Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021-03, Vol.406 (2), p.473-478</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1e88cdc769ea8e0de0e6bfe96589f0aba00c9c72b30a3d6250e93a6d1fac3c663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1e88cdc769ea8e0de0e6bfe96589f0aba00c9c72b30a3d6250e93a6d1fac3c663</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0241-2781 ; 0000-0002-4029-8572 ; 0000-0002-6352-9759 ; 0000-0002-6150-7935 ; 0000-0002-8916-0048 ; 0000-0002-8248-9043 ; 0000-0001-8827-3625 ; 0000-0001-9222-288X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00423-020-01952-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00423-020-01952-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32748044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kang, So Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Yongjoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kanghaeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youn, Sang Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Sa-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Young Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Sang-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyung-Ho</creatorcontrib><title>Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis</title><title>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</title><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose
There are currently no reports on the application of three-dimensional (3D) vision to single-incision laparoscopic surgery. This study compared 3D vision to the previous two-dimensional (2D) system in single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SIDG).
Methods
Medical charts of 179 gastric cancer patients who underwent SIDG from February 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into either a 2D group or 3D group depending on the type of camera that was used. All operations were performed using a flexible camera (Olympus, Japan). Operative data and postoperative outcome were analyzed.
Results
There were 90 patients in the 2D group and 89 patients in the 3D group. No differences were found in terms of the age, body mass index, staging, and other demographics of the patients. Operative time was significantly faster in the 3D group (115.6 ± 34.0 vs. 129.4 ± 38.5 min,
p
= 0.012), and estimated blood loss (EBL) was less in the 3D group (20.7 ± 30.0 vs. 35.1 ± 56.0 ml,
p
= 0.034). Patients in the 3D group were able to start a small fluid diet earlier (2.5, range 1–6 vs. 3.0, range 2–8 postoperative days,
p
= 0.006) and were discharged faster (5.4, range 3–12 vs. 6.2, range 4–24 postoperative days,
p
= 0.024). There was no statistical difference between early and late complications.
Conclusion
The use of the 3D camera shortened operative time with possible clinical benefits for patients undergoing SIDG.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Vascular Surgery</subject><issn>1435-2443</issn><issn>1435-2451</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURiMEoqXwAiyQl2VhemM7TsIOlRaQKnXTri3HuZlxlcTB1ykaHosnxMOUSgipK1v29x3_nKJ4W8KHEqA-IwAlJAcBHMq2Elw_K45LJSsuVFU-f5wreVS8IroDAF236mVxJEWtGlDquPh1s42IvPcTzuTDbEd2Kj-_Z_eeVjv6nzblRbbEcO97JNZhShhZWJMLE7K0tTNLP8K_ffFf38-M_LwZkS8hJjbaxcZALizesd5Tyq2NpRTRpTDtPjK7P3HZE9OOTza5LfbMZviOPL0uXgx2JHzzMJ4Ut5cXN-df-dX1l2_nn664k6pOvMSmcb2rdYu2QegRUHcDtrpq2gFsZwFc62rRSbCy16ICbKXVfTlYJ53W8qQ4PXDzXb6vSMlMnhyOo50xrGSEkiB1U7d1jopD1OVnUcTBLNFPNu5MCWbvyhxcmezK_HFl9vx3D_y1m7B_rPyVkwPyEKC8NW8wmruwxvwL9BT2N9kxpMk</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Kang, So Hyun</creator><creator>Won, Yongjoon</creator><creator>Lee, Kanghaeng</creator><creator>Youn, Sang Il</creator><creator>Min, Sa-Hong</creator><creator>Park, Young Suk</creator><creator>Ahn, Sang-Hoon</creator><creator>Kim, Hyung-Ho</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-2781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4029-8572</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-9759</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6150-7935</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-0048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-9043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-3625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-288X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis</title><author>Kang, So Hyun ; Won, Yongjoon ; Lee, Kanghaeng ; Youn, Sang Il ; Min, Sa-Hong ; Park, Young Suk ; Ahn, Sang-Hoon ; Kim, Hyung-Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-1e88cdc769ea8e0de0e6bfe96589f0aba00c9c72b30a3d6250e93a6d1fac3c663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Vascular Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kang, So Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Won, Yongjoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kanghaeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youn, Sang Il</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Sa-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Young Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Sang-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyung-Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kang, So Hyun</au><au>Won, Yongjoon</au><au>Lee, Kanghaeng</au><au>Youn, Sang Il</au><au>Min, Sa-Hong</au><au>Park, Young Suk</au><au>Ahn, Sang-Hoon</au><au>Kim, Hyung-Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis</atitle><jtitle>Langenbeck's archives of surgery</jtitle><stitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</stitle><addtitle>Langenbecks Arch Surg</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>406</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>478</epage><pages>473-478</pages><issn>1435-2443</issn><eissn>1435-2451</eissn><abstract>Purpose
There are currently no reports on the application of three-dimensional (3D) vision to single-incision laparoscopic surgery. This study compared 3D vision to the previous two-dimensional (2D) system in single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SIDG).
Methods
Medical charts of 179 gastric cancer patients who underwent SIDG from February 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into either a 2D group or 3D group depending on the type of camera that was used. All operations were performed using a flexible camera (Olympus, Japan). Operative data and postoperative outcome were analyzed.
Results
There were 90 patients in the 2D group and 89 patients in the 3D group. No differences were found in terms of the age, body mass index, staging, and other demographics of the patients. Operative time was significantly faster in the 3D group (115.6 ± 34.0 vs. 129.4 ± 38.5 min,
p
= 0.012), and estimated blood loss (EBL) was less in the 3D group (20.7 ± 30.0 vs. 35.1 ± 56.0 ml,
p
= 0.034). Patients in the 3D group were able to start a small fluid diet earlier (2.5, range 1–6 vs. 3.0, range 2–8 postoperative days,
p
= 0.006) and were discharged faster (5.4, range 3–12 vs. 6.2, range 4–24 postoperative days,
p
= 0.024). There was no statistical difference between early and late complications.
Conclusion
The use of the 3D camera shortened operative time with possible clinical benefits for patients undergoing SIDG.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32748044</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00423-020-01952-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-2781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4029-8572</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-9759</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6150-7935</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-0048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-9043</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-3625</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-288X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1435-2443 |
| ispartof | Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021-03, Vol.406 (2), p.473-478 |
| issn | 1435-2443 1435-2451 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2430368797 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Abdominal Surgery Cardiac Surgery General Surgery Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Thoracic Surgery Traumatic Surgery Vascular Surgery |
| title | Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A56%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three-dimensional%20(3D)%20visualization%20provides%20better%20outcome%20than%20two-dimensional%20(2D)%20visualization%20in%20single-port%20laparoscopic%20distal%20gastrectomy:%20a%20propensity-matched%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Langenbeck's%20archives%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Kang,%20So%20Hyun&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=406&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=478&rft.pages=473-478&rft.issn=1435-2443&rft.eissn=1435-2451&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00423-020-01952-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2430368797%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430368797&rft_id=info:pmid/32748044&rfr_iscdi=true |