The frequency and clinical characteristics of in-stent restenosis due to calcified nodule development after coronary stent implantation

The purpose of this study was to evaluated the clinical characteristics of calcified nodule-like in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in vivo. A total of 124 ISR lesions that were treated with a repeat coronary intervention under OCT guidance were included in th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2021-01, Vol.37 (1), p.15-23
Hauptverfasser: Isodono, Koji, Fujii, Kenichi, Fujimoto, Tomotaka, Kasahara, Takeru, Ariyoshi, Makoto, Irie, Daisuke, Tsubakimoto, Yoshinori, Sakatani, Tomohiko, Matsuo, Akiko, Inoue, Keiji, Fujita, Hiroshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
container_volume 37
creator Isodono, Koji
Fujii, Kenichi
Fujimoto, Tomotaka
Kasahara, Takeru
Ariyoshi, Makoto
Irie, Daisuke
Tsubakimoto, Yoshinori
Sakatani, Tomohiko
Matsuo, Akiko
Inoue, Keiji
Fujita, Hiroshi
description The purpose of this study was to evaluated the clinical characteristics of calcified nodule-like in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in vivo. A total of 124 ISR lesions that were treated with a repeat coronary intervention under OCT guidance were included in this analysis. ISR neointimal morphology was classified as “calcified nodule-like ISR”, that appeared as a high-backscattering protruding mass with an irregular surface covered by signal-rich bands, or “non-calcified nodule-like ISR”. The maximum arc and thickness of calcium behind the stent struts was also measured. Of the 124 ISR lesions, calcified nodule-like ISR was observed in 11 lesions (9%). OCT analysis data showed that the maximum arc of calcium and the maximum calcium thickness behind the stent were significantly larger in the calcified nodule-like ISR lesions than in the non-calcified nodule-like ISR lesions (269 ± 51 vs. 179 ± 92°, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10554-020-01952-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2429773499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2488351639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d91a2e38a0bcda180bdf279d25c0dd0e9cba652f525a9d9e988e744bc4b391083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1jAQhS0Eohd4gS6QJTZsDL7-iZdVBbRSJTZlbTn2hLpK7L-2U6l9AV4bh7RU6oLVjOTvHM_MQeiE0c-M0u5LYVQpSSinhDKtOHl4hQ6Z6gShnRSv136nieq0PEBHpdxQ2lAu3qIDwTshpVaH6PfVNeAxw-0C0d1jGz12U4jB2Qm7a5utq5BDqcEVnEYcIikVYsUZ1ppKKNgvgGvCTeHCGMDjmPwyAfZwB1Pazytux2aDXcop2nyPN48w7ycbq60hxXfozWinAu8f6zH6-e3r1dk5ufzx_eLs9JI4KVklXjPLQfSWDs5b1tPBj7zTnitHvaeg3WB3io-KK6u9Bt330Ek5ODkIzWgvjtGnzXefU9u5VDOH4mBqg0BaiuGS664dR-uGfnyB3qQlxzZdo_peKLYTK8U3yuVUSobR7HOY25KGUbPGZLaYTLu9-RuTeWiiD4_WyzCD_yd5yqUBYgNKe4q_ID___R_bP-BCoV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2488351639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The frequency and clinical characteristics of in-stent restenosis due to calcified nodule development after coronary stent implantation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Isodono, Koji ; Fujii, Kenichi ; Fujimoto, Tomotaka ; Kasahara, Takeru ; Ariyoshi, Makoto ; Irie, Daisuke ; Tsubakimoto, Yoshinori ; Sakatani, Tomohiko ; Matsuo, Akiko ; Inoue, Keiji ; Fujita, Hiroshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Isodono, Koji ; Fujii, Kenichi ; Fujimoto, Tomotaka ; Kasahara, Takeru ; Ariyoshi, Makoto ; Irie, Daisuke ; Tsubakimoto, Yoshinori ; Sakatani, Tomohiko ; Matsuo, Akiko ; Inoue, Keiji ; Fujita, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluated the clinical characteristics of calcified nodule-like in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in vivo. A total of 124 ISR lesions that were treated with a repeat coronary intervention under OCT guidance were included in this analysis. ISR neointimal morphology was classified as “calcified nodule-like ISR”, that appeared as a high-backscattering protruding mass with an irregular surface covered by signal-rich bands, or “non-calcified nodule-like ISR”. The maximum arc and thickness of calcium behind the stent struts was also measured. Of the 124 ISR lesions, calcified nodule-like ISR was observed in 11 lesions (9%). OCT analysis data showed that the maximum arc of calcium and the maximum calcium thickness behind the stent were significantly larger in the calcified nodule-like ISR lesions than in the non-calcified nodule-like ISR lesions (269 ± 51 vs. 179 ± 92°, p &lt; 0.01 and 989 ± 174 vs. 684 ± 241 μm, p &lt; 0.01, respectively). The enlargement of the stent area was significantly larger in the calcified nodule-like ISR lesions than in the non-calcified nodule-like ISR lesions (1.6 ± 2.3 vs. 0.7 ± 1.3 mm 2 , p = 0.02). As a result, the enlargement of the lumen area tended to be larger in the calcified group (2.8 ± 1.7 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3 mm 2 , p = 0.3). Calcified nodule-like neointima within the stent could develop in approximately 10% of all ISR lesions, especially within stents deployed in severely calcified lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-5794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-8312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01952-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32734495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Backscattering ; Calcification ; Calcium ; Cardiac Imaging ; Cardiology ; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Artery Disease - therapy ; Coronary Restenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Restenosis - etiology ; Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging ; Enlargement ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Implants ; Lesions ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Morphology ; Neointima ; Optical Coherence Tomography ; Original Paper ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiology ; Restenosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Struts ; Surgical implants ; Thickness ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging ; Vascular Calcification - etiology</subject><ispartof>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2021-01, Vol.37 (1), p.15-23</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d91a2e38a0bcda180bdf279d25c0dd0e9cba652f525a9d9e988e744bc4b391083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d91a2e38a0bcda180bdf279d25c0dd0e9cba652f525a9d9e988e744bc4b391083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10554-020-01952-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10554-020-01952-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32734495$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Isodono, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, Tomotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Takeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariyoshi, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, Daisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsubakimoto, Yoshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakatani, Tomohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><title>The frequency and clinical characteristics of in-stent restenosis due to calcified nodule development after coronary stent implantation</title><title>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluated the clinical characteristics of calcified nodule-like in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in vivo. A total of 124 ISR lesions that were treated with a repeat coronary intervention under OCT guidance were included in this analysis. ISR neointimal morphology was classified as “calcified nodule-like ISR”, that appeared as a high-backscattering protruding mass with an irregular surface covered by signal-rich bands, or “non-calcified nodule-like ISR”. The maximum arc and thickness of calcium behind the stent struts was also measured. Of the 124 ISR lesions, calcified nodule-like ISR was observed in 11 lesions (9%). OCT analysis data showed that the maximum arc of calcium and the maximum calcium thickness behind the stent were significantly larger in the calcified nodule-like ISR lesions than in the non-calcified nodule-like ISR lesions (269 ± 51 vs. 179 ± 92°, p &lt; 0.01 and 989 ± 174 vs. 684 ± 241 μm, p &lt; 0.01, respectively). The enlargement of the stent area was significantly larger in the calcified nodule-like ISR lesions than in the non-calcified nodule-like ISR lesions (1.6 ± 2.3 vs. 0.7 ± 1.3 mm 2 , p = 0.02). As a result, the enlargement of the lumen area tended to be larger in the calcified group (2.8 ± 1.7 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3 mm 2 , p = 0.3). Calcified nodule-like neointima within the stent could develop in approximately 10% of all ISR lesions, especially within stents deployed in severely calcified lesions.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Backscattering</subject><subject>Calcification</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Cardiac Imaging</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Coronary Restenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Restenosis - etiology</subject><subject>Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Enlargement</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Neointima</subject><subject>Optical Coherence Tomography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Restenosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Struts</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Vascular Calcification - etiology</subject><issn>1569-5794</issn><issn>1573-0743</issn><issn>1875-8312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1jAQhS0Eohd4gS6QJTZsDL7-iZdVBbRSJTZlbTn2hLpK7L-2U6l9AV4bh7RU6oLVjOTvHM_MQeiE0c-M0u5LYVQpSSinhDKtOHl4hQ6Z6gShnRSv136nieq0PEBHpdxQ2lAu3qIDwTshpVaH6PfVNeAxw-0C0d1jGz12U4jB2Qm7a5utq5BDqcEVnEYcIikVYsUZ1ppKKNgvgGvCTeHCGMDjmPwyAfZwB1Pazytux2aDXcop2nyPN48w7ycbq60hxXfozWinAu8f6zH6-e3r1dk5ufzx_eLs9JI4KVklXjPLQfSWDs5b1tPBj7zTnitHvaeg3WB3io-KK6u9Bt330Ek5ODkIzWgvjtGnzXefU9u5VDOH4mBqg0BaiuGS664dR-uGfnyB3qQlxzZdo_peKLYTK8U3yuVUSobR7HOY25KGUbPGZLaYTLu9-RuTeWiiD4_WyzCD_yd5yqUBYgNKe4q_ID___R_bP-BCoV8</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Isodono, Koji</creator><creator>Fujii, Kenichi</creator><creator>Fujimoto, Tomotaka</creator><creator>Kasahara, Takeru</creator><creator>Ariyoshi, Makoto</creator><creator>Irie, Daisuke</creator><creator>Tsubakimoto, Yoshinori</creator><creator>Sakatani, Tomohiko</creator><creator>Matsuo, Akiko</creator><creator>Inoue, Keiji</creator><creator>Fujita, Hiroshi</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>The frequency and clinical characteristics of in-stent restenosis due to calcified nodule development after coronary stent implantation</title><author>Isodono, Koji ; Fujii, Kenichi ; Fujimoto, Tomotaka ; Kasahara, Takeru ; Ariyoshi, Makoto ; Irie, Daisuke ; Tsubakimoto, Yoshinori ; Sakatani, Tomohiko ; Matsuo, Akiko ; Inoue, Keiji ; Fujita, Hiroshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-d91a2e38a0bcda180bdf279d25c0dd0e9cba652f525a9d9e988e744bc4b391083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Backscattering</topic><topic>Calcification</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Cardiac Imaging</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Coronary Restenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Restenosis - etiology</topic><topic>Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Enlargement</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Neointima</topic><topic>Optical Coherence Tomography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Restenosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Struts</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Vascular Calcification - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Isodono, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, Tomotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasahara, Takeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariyoshi, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, Daisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsubakimoto, Yoshinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakatani, Tomohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Keiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Isodono, Koji</au><au>Fujii, Kenichi</au><au>Fujimoto, Tomotaka</au><au>Kasahara, Takeru</au><au>Ariyoshi, Makoto</au><au>Irie, Daisuke</au><au>Tsubakimoto, Yoshinori</au><au>Sakatani, Tomohiko</au><au>Matsuo, Akiko</au><au>Inoue, Keiji</au><au>Fujita, Hiroshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The frequency and clinical characteristics of in-stent restenosis due to calcified nodule development after coronary stent implantation</atitle><jtitle>The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</jtitle><stitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</stitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>15-23</pages><issn>1569-5794</issn><eissn>1573-0743</eissn><eissn>1875-8312</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluated the clinical characteristics of calcified nodule-like in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in vivo. A total of 124 ISR lesions that were treated with a repeat coronary intervention under OCT guidance were included in this analysis. ISR neointimal morphology was classified as “calcified nodule-like ISR”, that appeared as a high-backscattering protruding mass with an irregular surface covered by signal-rich bands, or “non-calcified nodule-like ISR”. The maximum arc and thickness of calcium behind the stent struts was also measured. Of the 124 ISR lesions, calcified nodule-like ISR was observed in 11 lesions (9%). OCT analysis data showed that the maximum arc of calcium and the maximum calcium thickness behind the stent were significantly larger in the calcified nodule-like ISR lesions than in the non-calcified nodule-like ISR lesions (269 ± 51 vs. 179 ± 92°, p &lt; 0.01 and 989 ± 174 vs. 684 ± 241 μm, p &lt; 0.01, respectively). The enlargement of the stent area was significantly larger in the calcified nodule-like ISR lesions than in the non-calcified nodule-like ISR lesions (1.6 ± 2.3 vs. 0.7 ± 1.3 mm 2 , p = 0.02). As a result, the enlargement of the lumen area tended to be larger in the calcified group (2.8 ± 1.7 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3 mm 2 , p = 0.3). Calcified nodule-like neointima within the stent could develop in approximately 10% of all ISR lesions, especially within stents deployed in severely calcified lesions.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>32734495</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10554-020-01952-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1569-5794
ispartof The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2021-01, Vol.37 (1), p.15-23
issn 1569-5794
1573-0743
1875-8312
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2429773499
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Backscattering
Calcification
Calcium
Cardiac Imaging
Cardiology
Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Artery Disease - therapy
Coronary Restenosis - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Restenosis - etiology
Coronary Vessels - diagnostic imaging
Enlargement
Female
Humans
Imaging
Implants
Lesions
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Morphology
Neointima
Optical Coherence Tomography
Original Paper
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - instrumentation
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiology
Restenosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stents
Struts
Surgical implants
Thickness
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging
Vascular Calcification - etiology
title The frequency and clinical characteristics of in-stent restenosis due to calcified nodule development after coronary stent implantation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A21%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20frequency%20and%20clinical%20characteristics%20of%20in-stent%20restenosis%20due%20to%20calcified%20nodule%20development%20after%20coronary%20stent%20implantation&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20Journal%20of%20Cardiovascular%20Imaging&rft.au=Isodono,%20Koji&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=15-23&rft.issn=1569-5794&rft.eissn=1573-0743&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10554-020-01952-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2488351639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2488351639&rft_id=info:pmid/32734495&rfr_iscdi=true