A Psychometric Evaluation of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) in Nonclinical and Clinical German Samples
The Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) is a 9-item self-report screening instrument and was developed to assess personality disorder (PD) severity according to the initial proposal of ICD-11. Our aim was to investigate the psychometric properties of the German versio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological assessment 2020-10, Vol.32 (10), p.984-990 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 990 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 984 |
| container_title | Psychological assessment |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Rek, Katharina Thielmann, Isabel Henkel, Miriam Crawford, Mike Piccirilli, Luigi Graff, Andreas Mestel, Robert Zimmermann, Johannes |
| description | The Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) is a 9-item self-report screening instrument and was developed to assess personality disorder (PD) severity according to the initial proposal of ICD-11. Our aim was to investigate the psychometric properties of the German version of the SASPD in nonclinical and clinical samples. A total of 1,991 participants (N = 888 from nonclinical and N = 1,103 from clinical samples) provided ratings on the SASPD as well as other measures of psychopathology and personality. We examined the SASPD regarding its factor structure, internal consistency, and construct validity. A unidimensional structure of the SASPD provided inadequate model fit, whereas a 3-factor solution provided good fit in both the nonclinical and clinical samples. Internal consistency of the SASPD total score was acceptable in the clinical and nonclinical samples based on this multifactorial model. In terms of convergent validity, SASPD scores correlated fairly with other measures of PD severity across samples. Discriminant validity with measures of general symptom distress and measures of (normal) personality traits was mixed. In addition, the SASPD scores predicted levels of PD severity above and beyond a measure of symptom distress. The SASPD captures some theoretically expected features of PD severity. However, the multidimensional structure and limited convergent and discriminant validity may hamper future usage of the SASPD as a short screening tool of PD severity according to ICD-11.
Public Significance Statement
Personality disorders (PD) are prevalent, underdiagnosed, and affect clinical trajectories of psychiatric patients. The SASPD has been developed as a screening tool for PD severity according to the dimensional model of the initial ICD-11 proposal. We show that the SASPD total score might be useful as an indicator for a heterogeneous mixture of PD features, but less as a unidimensional measure of PD severity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/pas0000926 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2429773298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2429773298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-98f50db148173e95ae9aaead0edd94239c95793cc8e465df16b4475fd62cbadf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90V1r1TAYB_AiDjenN34ACXgzh9W8NW0uD2evMPRAFbwrz0mesoy26ZJ2cPwSfmVTzjbBC3OTPOTHH5J_lr1j9DOjovwyQqRpaa5eZEdMC50zIX--TGcqaS4KTQ-z1zHeUcqkqIpX2aHgpaC0lEfZ7xXZxJ259T1OwRly_gDdDJPzA_EtmW6R1BMMFoJ1v9CSVYwYY4_DtFzX-IDBTbvlvMEQ_QDdMp656IPFQE7qVb05-0jcQL76wXRucAY6kgLJ-mm4xNDDQGroxw7jm-yghS7i28f9OPtxcf59fZXffLu8Xq9ucpBMTbmu2oLaLZMVKwXqAlADIFiK1mrJhTa6KLUwpkKpCtsytZWyLFqruNmCbcVxdrLPHYO_nzFOTe-iwa6DAf0cGy65LkvBdZXoh3_onZ9DeuqiCsFFIRT_v-KVokoxldTpXpngYwzYNmNwPYRdw2izlNn8LTPh94-R87ZH-0yf2kvg0x7ACM2YaoQwOZN-0cwhpI6WsKSXbF1J8QfMXKot</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2428606616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Psychometric Evaluation of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) in Nonclinical and Clinical German Samples</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Rek, Katharina ; Thielmann, Isabel ; Henkel, Miriam ; Crawford, Mike ; Piccirilli, Luigi ; Graff, Andreas ; Mestel, Robert ; Zimmermann, Johannes</creator><contributor>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rek, Katharina ; Thielmann, Isabel ; Henkel, Miriam ; Crawford, Mike ; Piccirilli, Luigi ; Graff, Andreas ; Mestel, Robert ; Zimmermann, Johannes ; Ben-Porath, Yossef S</creatorcontrib><description>The Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) is a 9-item self-report screening instrument and was developed to assess personality disorder (PD) severity according to the initial proposal of ICD-11. Our aim was to investigate the psychometric properties of the German version of the SASPD in nonclinical and clinical samples. A total of 1,991 participants (N = 888 from nonclinical and N = 1,103 from clinical samples) provided ratings on the SASPD as well as other measures of psychopathology and personality. We examined the SASPD regarding its factor structure, internal consistency, and construct validity. A unidimensional structure of the SASPD provided inadequate model fit, whereas a 3-factor solution provided good fit in both the nonclinical and clinical samples. Internal consistency of the SASPD total score was acceptable in the clinical and nonclinical samples based on this multifactorial model. In terms of convergent validity, SASPD scores correlated fairly with other measures of PD severity across samples. Discriminant validity with measures of general symptom distress and measures of (normal) personality traits was mixed. In addition, the SASPD scores predicted levels of PD severity above and beyond a measure of symptom distress. The SASPD captures some theoretically expected features of PD severity. However, the multidimensional structure and limited convergent and discriminant validity may hamper future usage of the SASPD as a short screening tool of PD severity according to ICD-11.
Public Significance Statement
Personality disorders (PD) are prevalent, underdiagnosed, and affect clinical trajectories of psychiatric patients. The SASPD has been developed as a screening tool for PD severity according to the dimensional model of the initial ICD-11 proposal. We show that the SASPD total score might be useful as an indicator for a heterogeneous mixture of PD features, but less as a unidimensional measure of PD severity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pas0000926</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32730074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Discriminant analysis ; Female ; Germany ; Human ; Humans ; Internal Consistency ; International Classification of Diseases ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Personality Disorders ; Personality Disorders - diagnosis ; Personality Inventory - standards ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards ; Psychometrics ; Psychometrics - standards ; Psychopathology ; Quantitative psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Screening Tests ; Self Report ; Severity (Disorders) ; Test Validity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 2020-10, Vol.32 (10), p.984-990</ispartof><rights>2020 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2020, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-98f50db148173e95ae9aaead0edd94239c95793cc8e465df16b4475fd62cbadf3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-6975-2356 ; 0000-0002-6723-8529</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32730074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rek, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thielmann, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henkel, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccirilli, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graff, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mestel, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>A Psychometric Evaluation of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) in Nonclinical and Clinical German Samples</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><description>The Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) is a 9-item self-report screening instrument and was developed to assess personality disorder (PD) severity according to the initial proposal of ICD-11. Our aim was to investigate the psychometric properties of the German version of the SASPD in nonclinical and clinical samples. A total of 1,991 participants (N = 888 from nonclinical and N = 1,103 from clinical samples) provided ratings on the SASPD as well as other measures of psychopathology and personality. We examined the SASPD regarding its factor structure, internal consistency, and construct validity. A unidimensional structure of the SASPD provided inadequate model fit, whereas a 3-factor solution provided good fit in both the nonclinical and clinical samples. Internal consistency of the SASPD total score was acceptable in the clinical and nonclinical samples based on this multifactorial model. In terms of convergent validity, SASPD scores correlated fairly with other measures of PD severity across samples. Discriminant validity with measures of general symptom distress and measures of (normal) personality traits was mixed. In addition, the SASPD scores predicted levels of PD severity above and beyond a measure of symptom distress. The SASPD captures some theoretically expected features of PD severity. However, the multidimensional structure and limited convergent and discriminant validity may hamper future usage of the SASPD as a short screening tool of PD severity according to ICD-11.
Public Significance Statement
Personality disorders (PD) are prevalent, underdiagnosed, and affect clinical trajectories of psychiatric patients. The SASPD has been developed as a screening tool for PD severity according to the dimensional model of the initial ICD-11 proposal. We show that the SASPD total score might be useful as an indicator for a heterogeneous mixture of PD features, but less as a unidimensional measure of PD severity.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Consistency</subject><subject>International Classification of Diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Personality Disorders</subject><subject>Personality Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Personality Inventory - standards</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Severity (Disorders)</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90V1r1TAYB_AiDjenN34ACXgzh9W8NW0uD2evMPRAFbwrz0mesoy26ZJ2cPwSfmVTzjbBC3OTPOTHH5J_lr1j9DOjovwyQqRpaa5eZEdMC50zIX--TGcqaS4KTQ-z1zHeUcqkqIpX2aHgpaC0lEfZ7xXZxJ259T1OwRly_gDdDJPzA_EtmW6R1BMMFoJ1v9CSVYwYY4_DtFzX-IDBTbvlvMEQ_QDdMp656IPFQE7qVb05-0jcQL76wXRucAY6kgLJ-mm4xNDDQGroxw7jm-yghS7i28f9OPtxcf59fZXffLu8Xq9ucpBMTbmu2oLaLZMVKwXqAlADIFiK1mrJhTa6KLUwpkKpCtsytZWyLFqruNmCbcVxdrLPHYO_nzFOTe-iwa6DAf0cGy65LkvBdZXoh3_onZ9DeuqiCsFFIRT_v-KVokoxldTpXpngYwzYNmNwPYRdw2izlNn8LTPh94-R87ZH-0yf2kvg0x7ACM2YaoQwOZN-0cwhpI6WsKSXbF1J8QfMXKot</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Rek, Katharina</creator><creator>Thielmann, Isabel</creator><creator>Henkel, Miriam</creator><creator>Crawford, Mike</creator><creator>Piccirilli, Luigi</creator><creator>Graff, Andreas</creator><creator>Mestel, Robert</creator><creator>Zimmermann, Johannes</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-2356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6723-8529</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>A Psychometric Evaluation of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) in Nonclinical and Clinical German Samples</title><author>Rek, Katharina ; Thielmann, Isabel ; Henkel, Miriam ; Crawford, Mike ; Piccirilli, Luigi ; Graff, Andreas ; Mestel, Robert ; Zimmermann, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a416t-98f50db148173e95ae9aaead0edd94239c95793cc8e465df16b4475fd62cbadf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Consistency</topic><topic>International Classification of Diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Personality Disorders</topic><topic>Personality Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Personality Inventory - standards</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Severity (Disorders)</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rek, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thielmann, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henkel, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccirilli, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graff, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mestel, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rek, Katharina</au><au>Thielmann, Isabel</au><au>Henkel, Miriam</au><au>Crawford, Mike</au><au>Piccirilli, Luigi</au><au>Graff, Andreas</au><au>Mestel, Robert</au><au>Zimmermann, Johannes</au><au>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Psychometric Evaluation of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) in Nonclinical and Clinical German Samples</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>984</spage><epage>990</epage><pages>984-990</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>The Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) is a 9-item self-report screening instrument and was developed to assess personality disorder (PD) severity according to the initial proposal of ICD-11. Our aim was to investigate the psychometric properties of the German version of the SASPD in nonclinical and clinical samples. A total of 1,991 participants (N = 888 from nonclinical and N = 1,103 from clinical samples) provided ratings on the SASPD as well as other measures of psychopathology and personality. We examined the SASPD regarding its factor structure, internal consistency, and construct validity. A unidimensional structure of the SASPD provided inadequate model fit, whereas a 3-factor solution provided good fit in both the nonclinical and clinical samples. Internal consistency of the SASPD total score was acceptable in the clinical and nonclinical samples based on this multifactorial model. In terms of convergent validity, SASPD scores correlated fairly with other measures of PD severity across samples. Discriminant validity with measures of general symptom distress and measures of (normal) personality traits was mixed. In addition, the SASPD scores predicted levels of PD severity above and beyond a measure of symptom distress. The SASPD captures some theoretically expected features of PD severity. However, the multidimensional structure and limited convergent and discriminant validity may hamper future usage of the SASPD as a short screening tool of PD severity according to ICD-11.
Public Significance Statement
Personality disorders (PD) are prevalent, underdiagnosed, and affect clinical trajectories of psychiatric patients. The SASPD has been developed as a screening tool for PD severity according to the dimensional model of the initial ICD-11 proposal. We show that the SASPD total score might be useful as an indicator for a heterogeneous mixture of PD features, but less as a unidimensional measure of PD severity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>32730074</pmid><doi>10.1037/pas0000926</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-2356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6723-8529</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1040-3590 |
| ispartof | Psychological assessment, 2020-10, Vol.32 (10), p.984-990 |
| issn | 1040-3590 1939-134X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2429773298 |
| source | MEDLINE; APA PsycARTICLES |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Discriminant analysis Female Germany Human Humans Internal Consistency International Classification of Diseases Male Middle Aged Personality Disorders Personality Disorders - diagnosis Personality Inventory - standards Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards Psychometrics Psychometrics - standards Psychopathology Quantitative psychology Reproducibility of Results Screening Tests Self Report Severity (Disorders) Test Validity Young Adult |
| title | A Psychometric Evaluation of the Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder (SASPD) in Nonclinical and Clinical German Samples |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T18%3A07%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Psychometric%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20Standardized%20Assessment%20of%20Severity%20of%20Personality%20Disorder%20(SASPD)%20in%20Nonclinical%20and%20Clinical%20German%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Rek,%20Katharina&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=984&rft.epage=990&rft.pages=984-990&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pas0000926&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429773298%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2428606616&rft_id=info:pmid/32730074&rfr_iscdi=true |