Response to Commentaries

Response to Commentaries

After expressing our gratitude to the commentators for their valuable analyses and assessments of Principles of Biomedical Ethics, we respond to several particular critiques raised by the commentators under the following rubrics: the compatibility of different sets of principles and rules; challenge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of medicine and philosophy 2020-07, Vol.45 (4-5), p.560-579
Hauptverfasser: Beauchamp, Tom L, Childress, James F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Bioethics
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 579
container_issue 4-5
container_start_page 560
container_title The Journal of medicine and philosophy
container_volume 45
creator Beauchamp, Tom L
Childress, James F
description After expressing our gratitude to the commentators for their valuable analyses and assessments of Principles of Biomedical Ethics, we respond to several particular critiques raised by the commentators under the following rubrics: the compatibility of different sets of principles and rules; challenges to the principle of respect for autonomy; connecting principles to cases and resolving their conflicts; the value of and compatibility of virtues and principles; common morality theory; and moral status. We point to areas where we see common agreement with our commentators and respond to their critical evaluations.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jmp/jhaa011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2429055860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2429055860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c181t-578d0a15c3826706f9d89ebe412241ffff3a5b308d4f8bc71c6201b9afc0058d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj89LwzAYhoMoWKcnLx53FKTu-_KjTY5SnAqDwdBzSNMEW9qmJt3B_97K9l7ey8MDDyH3CM8Iim26Ydp038YA4gXJsOQ8F4DqkmTACsgFQ7gmNyl1AMA5iow8HFyawpjceg7rKgyDG2cTW5duyZU3fXJ351-Rr-3rZ_We7_ZvH9XLLrcocc5FKRswKCyTtCih8KqRytWOI6Uc_TJmRM1ANtzL2pZoCwpYK-MtgJANW5HHk3eK4efo0qyHNlnX92Z04Zg05VSBELKABX06oTaGlKLzeortYOKvRtD__Xrp1-d-9gccp01g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429055860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response to Commentaries</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Beauchamp, Tom L ; Childress, James F</creator><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, Tom L ; Childress, James F</creatorcontrib><description>After expressing our gratitude to the commentators for their valuable analyses and assessments of Principles of Biomedical Ethics, we respond to several particular critiques raised by the commentators under the following rubrics: the compatibility of different sets of principles and rules; challenges to the principle of respect for autonomy; connecting principles to cases and resolving their conflicts; the value of and compatibility of virtues and principles; common morality theory; and moral status. We point to areas where we see common agreement with our commentators and respond to their critical evaluations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5019</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhaa011</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Bioethics</subject><ispartof>The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 2020-07, Vol.45 (4-5), p.560-579</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c181t-578d0a15c3826706f9d89ebe412241ffff3a5b308d4f8bc71c6201b9afc0058d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c181t-578d0a15c3826706f9d89ebe412241ffff3a5b308d4f8bc71c6201b9afc0058d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, Tom L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Childress, James F</creatorcontrib><title>Response to Commentaries</title><title>The Journal of medicine and philosophy</title><description>After expressing our gratitude to the commentators for their valuable analyses and assessments of Principles of Biomedical Ethics, we respond to several particular critiques raised by the commentators under the following rubrics: the compatibility of different sets of principles and rules; challenges to the principle of respect for autonomy; connecting principles to cases and resolving their conflicts; the value of and compatibility of virtues and principles; common morality theory; and moral status. We point to areas where we see common agreement with our commentators and respond to their critical evaluations.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><issn>0360-5310</issn><issn>1744-5019</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj89LwzAYhoMoWKcnLx53FKTu-_KjTY5SnAqDwdBzSNMEW9qmJt3B_97K9l7ey8MDDyH3CM8Iim26Ydp038YA4gXJsOQ8F4DqkmTACsgFQ7gmNyl1AMA5iow8HFyawpjceg7rKgyDG2cTW5duyZU3fXJ351-Rr-3rZ_We7_ZvH9XLLrcocc5FKRswKCyTtCih8KqRytWOI6Uc_TJmRM1ANtzL2pZoCwpYK-MtgJANW5HHk3eK4efo0qyHNlnX92Z04Zg05VSBELKABX06oTaGlKLzeortYOKvRtD__Xrp1-d-9gccp01g</recordid><startdate>20200729</startdate><enddate>20200729</enddate><creator>Beauchamp, Tom L</creator><creator>Childress, James F</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200729</creationdate><title>Response to Commentaries</title><author>Beauchamp, Tom L ; Childress, James F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c181t-578d0a15c3826706f9d89ebe412241ffff3a5b308d4f8bc71c6201b9afc0058d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, Tom L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Childress, James F</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of medicine and philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beauchamp, Tom L</au><au>Childress, James F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response to Commentaries</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of medicine and philosophy</jtitle><date>2020-07-29</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4-5</issue><spage>560</spage><epage>579</epage><pages>560-579</pages><issn>0360-5310</issn><eissn>1744-5019</eissn><abstract>After expressing our gratitude to the commentators for their valuable analyses and assessments of Principles of Biomedical Ethics, we respond to several particular critiques raised by the commentators under the following rubrics: the compatibility of different sets of principles and rules; challenges to the principle of respect for autonomy; connecting principles to cases and resolving their conflicts; the value of and compatibility of virtues and principles; common morality theory; and moral status. We point to areas where we see common agreement with our commentators and respond to their critical evaluations.</abstract><doi>10.1093/jmp/jhaa011</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-5310
ispartof The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 2020-07, Vol.45 (4-5), p.560-579
issn 0360-5310
1744-5019
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2429055860
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bioethics
title Response to Commentaries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T12%3A14%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20to%20Commentaries&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20medicine%20and%20philosophy&rft.au=Beauchamp,%20Tom%20L&rft.date=2020-07-29&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4-5&rft.spage=560&rft.epage=579&rft.pages=560-579&rft.issn=0360-5310&rft.eissn=1744-5019&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jmp/jhaa011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429055860%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429055860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true